Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Acquisition of Syntactic Structure: Animacy and Thematic Alignment

(University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill)
  • Formāts: EPUB+DRM
  • Sērija : Cambridge Studies in Linguistics
  • Izdošanas datums: 03-Apr-2014
  • Izdevniecība: Cambridge University Press
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781139904193
  • Formāts - EPUB+DRM
  • Cena: 36,87 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.
  • Formāts: EPUB+DRM
  • Sērija : Cambridge Studies in Linguistics
  • Izdošanas datums: 03-Apr-2014
  • Izdevniecība: Cambridge University Press
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781139904193

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

This book explains a well-known puzzle that helped catalyze the establishment of generative syntax: how children tease apart the different syntactic structures associated with sentences like John is easy/eager to please. The answer lies in animacy: taking the premise that subjects are animate, the book argues that children can exploit the occurrence of an inanimate subject as a cue to a non-canonical structure, in which that subject is displaced (the book is easy/*eager to read). The author uses evidence from a range of linguistic subfields, including syntactic theory, typology, language processing, conceptual development, language acquisition, and computational modeling, exposing readers to these different kinds of data in an accessible way. The theoretical claims of the book expand the well-known hypotheses of syntactic and semantic bootstrapping, resulting in greater coverage of the core principles of language acquisition. This is a must-read for researchers in language acquisition, syntax, psycholinguistics and computational linguistics.

This book explains how children's early ability to distinguish between animate and inanimate nouns helps them acquire complex sentence structure. The theoretical claims of the book expand the well-known hypotheses of syntactic and semantic bootstrapping, resulting in greater coverage of the core principles of language acquisition.

Recenzijas

'This book is a major milestone for acquisition research in the 'strict' sense: what exactly does the adult know, and how do children acquire that knowledge? Becker is conversant with an unusually broad range of disciplines, including generative grammar, developmental psychology, and computational modeling. This enables her to support the book's central thesis - that children use animacy cues for detecting syntactic displacement - with strong, converging evidence from cross-linguistic comparisons, adult psycholinguistics, Bayesian models, transcripts of child-directed speech, and laboratory experiments with children.' William Snyder, University of Connecticut

Papildus informācija

This book explains how children's early ability to distinguish between animate and inanimate nouns helps them acquire complex sentence structure.
List of figures
x
List of tables
xi
Acknowledgements xiii
1 Introduction
1(13)
2 The syntax of displacing and non-displacing predicates
14(47)
2.1 Raising-to-subject and subject control: seem vs. claim
16(14)
2.1.1 The structure of raising
19(6)
2.1.2 The structure of control
25(3)
2.1.3 Raising-to-object and object control: expect vs. persuade
28(2)
2.2 Tough-constructions: easy vs. eager
30(9)
2.2.1 Structure of tough-constructions
32(4)
2.2.2 Related constructions
36(3)
2.2.3 Structure of control adjective constructions
39(1)
2.3 Unaccusatives and unergatives: arrive vs. dance
39(6)
2.3.1 A semantically-driven syntactic distinction
40(2)
2.3.2 Formal representations of unaccusativity
42(3)
2.4 Passive
45(7)
2.4.1 Structure of passive
46(3)
2.4.2 A different displacing predicate
49(3)
2.5 The learning problem
52(9)
3 Argument hierarchies
61(65)
3.1 The Animacy Hierarchy "
63(12)
3.1.1 Linguistic effects of animacy: morphosyntax and argument structure
64(5)
3.1.2 Animacy, agency, degree of control, and teleological capability
69(6)
3.2 The Thematic Hierarchy
75(9)
3.2.1 A brief history of thematic roles
76(3)
3.2.2 Formal accounts of thematic role assignment
79(5)
3.3 Animacy and thematic roles in opaque constructions
84(25)
3.3.1 Raising constructions across languages
86(17)
3.3.2 Tough-constructions across languages
103(6)
3.4 Properties of derived subjects
109(10)
3.4.1 Argument structure universals, and the "problem" of ergativity
114(5)
3.5 A learning procedure
119(5)
3.6 Summary
124(2)
4 Animacy and adult sentence processing
126(30)
4.1 Relative clauses
129(10)
4.1.1 Reduced relative clauses
129(7)
4.1.2 Subject vs. object relative clauses
136(3)
4.2 Processing of raising and control
139(14)
4.2.1 Sentence completion
140(7)
4.2.2 Novel verb learning
147(6)
4.3 Psycholinguistic effects of animacy on production of the passive
153(2)
4.4 Summary
155(1)
5 Animacy and children's language
156(89)
5.1 Development of the animacy concept
157(17)
5.1.1 Featural properties of animates
158(1)
5.1.2 Behavioral properties of animates
159(7)
5.1.3 Intentional properties of animates
166(3)
5.1.4 Further conceptual change
169(3)
5.1.5 Agency
172(1)
5.1.6 Summary
173(1)
5.2 Children's use of animacy in learning argument structure
174(16)
5.2.1 The power and limitations of Semantic Bootstrapping
179(7)
5.2.2 The power and limitations of Syntactic Bootstrapping
186(4)
5.3 Children's acquisition of displacing predicates
190(52)
5.3.1 Acquisition of raising and control
192(16)
5.3.2 Acquisition of tough-constructions
208(19)
5.3.3 Acquisition of unaccusatives
227(8)
5.3.4 Animacy and the acquisition of the passive
235(7)
5.4 Summary
242(3)
6 Modeling the acquisition of displacing predicates
245(38)
6.1 Displacing predicates in the input to children
250(6)
6.2 Computational modeling of language acquisition
256(9)
6.2.1 Learning as generalization
258(3)
6.2.2 Restricting the hypothesis space
261(4)
6.3 Hierarchical Bayesian Models
265(16)
6.3.1 A model of learning raising and control
267(9)
6.3.2 A model of learning tough-constructions
276(3)
6.3.3 A model of learning unaccusatives and unergatives
279(2)
6.4 Summary of modeling results
281(2)
7 Conclusions and origins
283(15)
7.1 Origins of knowledge of the animacy distinction
286(3)
7.2 Origins of knowledge of linguistic animacy and displacing predicates
289(7)
7.3 Further questions
296(2)
Appendix 298(2)
Bibliography 300(22)
Index 322
Misha Becker is an Associate Professor in the linguistics department at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, where she has taught courses in linguistic theory and child language acquisition since 2002.