Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Adaptive Governance of Disaster: Drought and Flood in Rural Areas 1st ed. 2018 [Hardback]

  • Formāts: Hardback, 247 pages, height x width: 235x155 mm, weight: 5751 g, 8 Illustrations, color; 22 Illustrations, black and white; XVIII, 247 p. 30 illus., 8 illus. in color., 1 Hardback
  • Sērija : Water Governance - Concepts, Methods, and Practice
  • Izdošanas datums: 24-Aug-2017
  • Izdevniecība: Springer International Publishing AG
  • ISBN-10: 3319578006
  • ISBN-13: 9783319578002
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 109,38 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Standarta cena: 128,69 €
  • Ietaupiet 15%
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
Adaptive Governance of Disaster: Drought and Flood in Rural Areas 1st ed. 2018Palielināt
  • Formāts: Hardback, 247 pages, height x width: 235x155 mm, weight: 5751 g, 8 Illustrations, color; 22 Illustrations, black and white; XVIII, 247 p. 30 illus., 8 illus. in color., 1 Hardback
  • Sērija : Water Governance - Concepts, Methods, and Practice
  • Izdošanas datums: 24-Aug-2017
  • Izdevniecība: Springer International Publishing AG
  • ISBN-10: 3319578006
  • ISBN-13: 9783319578002
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
Permanent link: https://www.kriso.lv/db/9783319578002.html
Keywords:

This book provides a comparative analysis of policy instruments designed to respond to climate change, drought and floods in connection with agricultural producers and their communities in four case study areas: Alberta and Saskatchewan, Canada; Coquimbo, Chile; and Mendoza, Argentina. Assessed from the standpoint of effectiveness and adaptive governance, instruments for improving the livelihood capitals of agricultural producers are identified and recommendations to improve the suite of policy instruments are put forward.

1 Introduction
1(20)
1.1 Purpose
1(1)
1.2 Impacts of Climate Change on Agriculture and Society
2(1)
1.3 The Problem Definition
3(4)
1.3.1 Nature of the Problem
3(1)
1.3.2 Why Adaptive Governance is the Best Solution for the Problem
4(1)
1.3.3 What We Know and Don't Know
5(2)
1.4 Filling the Gaps
7(2)
1.5 The Literature Review
9(1)
1.6 The Case Studies
9(3)
1.7 Focus
12(1)
1.8 A Critical Realist Approach
13(1)
1.9 Structure of This Book
14(7)
References
15(6)
2 Adaptive Governance (Management, Co-management and Anticipatory)
21(28)
2.1 Introduction
21(1)
2.2 Why Adaptive Governance?
22(1)
2.3 Defining Adaptive Governance
23(8)
2.3.1 Introduction
23(1)
2.3.2 Evolution of Adaptive Governance
23(2)
2.3.3 Comparing Components of Adaptive Governance
25(5)
2.3.4 Shortcomings of Adaptive Governance
30(1)
2.4 Enhancement of Adaptive Governance
31(8)
2.4.1 Risk
31(1)
2.4.2 Model of Adaptive Governance and Problem Structuring
32(4)
2.4.3 Adaptive Governance and the Split Ladder of Participation (Inclusive Development)
36(3)
2.5 Goals of Adaptive Governance
39(2)
2.5.1 Adaptive Governance Aims to (a) Reduce the Risk of d&f
39(1)
2.5.2 Adaptive Governance Aims to (b) Increase Livelihood Capitals of Agricultural Producers
40(1)
2.5.3 Adaptive Governance Aims to (c) Enhance the Adaptive Capacity of Institutions
40(1)
2.6 Implications of Adaptive Governance for Climate Related D&F Research
41(8)
References
42(7)
3 Methodology: Institutional Analysis and Adaptive Governance
49(20)
3.1 Introduction
49(1)
3.2 Evolution of the Method
49(2)
3.3 Conceptual Framework and Operationalization
51(12)
3.3.1 Overview and Conceptual Model
51(1)
3.3.2 Formal Institutions and Organizations
52(1)
3.3.3 Instruments
53(5)
3.3.4 Drivers
58(1)
3.3.5 Policy Effects on Actors
58(1)
3.3.6 Social Learning
58(2)
3.3.7 Policy Effects on Society: Livelihoods
60(1)
3.3.8 Instrument Redesign
61(2)
3.4 Methods
63(1)
3.4.1 Content Analysis
63(1)
3.4.2 Interviews
63(1)
3.5 Limits
64(1)
3.6 Inferences
64(5)
References
65(4)
4 International Level
69(24)
4.1 Introduction
69(1)
4.2 Drivers
70(2)
4.3 International Institutions
72(4)
4.3.1 Four Distinct Institutional Clusters and Their Evolution
72(1)
4.3.2 Institutions
73(2)
4.3.3 Organizational Linkages and Interactions
75(1)
4.4 Instruments
76(6)
4.4.1 Regulatory Instruments
76(1)
4.4.2 Economic Instruments
77(1)
4.4.3 Suasive Instruments
78(4)
4.4.4 Managerial Instruments
82(1)
4.5 Adaptive Governance and Problem Structuring
82(3)
4.6 Learning at the International Level
85(1)
4.7 Re-designing Instruments
86(7)
References
87(6)
5 Case Study Saskatchewan, Canada
93(26)
5.1 Introduction
93(1)
5.2 The Case Study Area
94(1)
5.3 Main Drivers Impacting Rural Agricultural Producers
95(2)
5.4 Institutions (Organizations) That Build Capacity for Climate Change, d&f
97(1)
5.5 Instruments Responding to Climate Change, d&f
98(4)
5.5.1 Regulatory Instruments
98(2)
5.5.2 Economic Instruments
100(1)
5.5.3 Suasive Instruments
101(1)
5.5.4 Managerial Instruments
101(1)
5.6 Adaptive Governance and Problem Structuring
102(1)
5.7 Impacts of Instruments on Actors Measured by Mandate Effectiveness
103(2)
5.7.1 Regulatory Instruments
103(1)
5.7.2 Economic Instruments
104(1)
5.7.3 Suasive Instruments
104(1)
5.7.4 Managerial Instruments
104(1)
5.8 Assessment of Learning
105(1)
5.9 Instrument Impacts on Livelihood Capitals
106(3)
5.9.1 Human Capital
106(1)
5.9.2 Social Capital
106(2)
5.9.3 Economic Capital
108(1)
5.9.4 Technological Capital
108(1)
5.9.5 Natural Capital
109(1)
5.10 Re-designing Instruments with the ACW
109(10)
References
113(6)
6 Case Study Alberta, Canada
119(24)
6.1 Introduction
119(1)
6.2 The Case Study Area
120(1)
6.3 Main Drivers Impacting Rural Agricultural Producers
121(2)
6.4 Institutions (Organizations) That Build Capacity for Climate Change, d&f
123(1)
6.5 Instruments Responding to Climate Change, d&f
123(3)
6.5.1 Regulatory Instruments
124(1)
6.5.2 Economic Instruments
125(1)
6.5.3 Suasive Instruments
125(1)
6.5.4 Managerial Instruments
126(1)
6.6 Adaptive Governance and Problem Structuring
126(2)
6.7 Impact of Instruments on Actors Measureby Mandate Effectiveness
128(2)
6.7.1 Regulatory Instruments
128(1)
6.7.2 Economic Instruments
128(1)
6.7.3 Suasive Instruments
129(1)
6.7.4 Managerial Instruments
129(1)
6.8 Assessment of Learning
130(1)
6.9 Instrument Impacts on Livelihood Capitals
131(4)
6.9.1 Human Capital
131(1)
6.9.2 Social Capital
131(2)
6.9.3 Economic Capital
133(1)
6.9.4 Technological Capital
134(1)
6.9.5 Natural Capital
134(1)
6.10 Re-designing Instruments with the ACW
135(8)
References
138(5)
7 Case Study Coquimbo, Chile
143(26)
7.1 Introduction
143(1)
7.2 The Case Study Area
144(1)
7.3 Main Drivers Impacting Rural Agricultural Producers
145(2)
7.4 Institutions (Organizations) That Build Capacity for Climate Change, d&f
147(1)
7.5 Instruments Responding to Climate Change, d&f
148(3)
7.5.1 Regulatory Instruments
148(2)
7.5.2 Economic Instruments
150(1)
7.5.3 Suasive Instruments
151(1)
7.5.4 Managerial Instruments
151(1)
7.6 Adaptive Governance and Problem Structuring
151(2)
7.7 Impact of Instruments on Actors Measured by Mandate Effectiveness
153(2)
7.7.1 Regulatory Instruments
153(1)
7.7.2 Economic Instruments
154(1)
7.7.3 Suasive Instruments
154(1)
7.7.4 Managerial Instruments
154(1)
7.8 Assessment of Learning
155(1)
7.9 Instrument Impacts on Livelihood Capitals
156(5)
7.9.1 Human Capital
158(1)
7.9.2 Social Capital
158(1)
7.9.3 Economic Capital
159(1)
7.9.4 Technological Capital
159(1)
7.9.5 Natural Capital
160(1)
7.10 Re-designing Instruments with the ACW
161(8)
References
164(5)
8 Case Study Mendoza, Argentina
169(22)
8.1 Introduction
169(1)
8.2 The Case Study Area
170(1)
8.3 Main Drivers Impacting Rural Agricultural Producers
171(1)
8.4 Institutions (Organizations) That Build Capacity for Climate Change, d&f
172(1)
8.5 Instruments Responding to Climate Change, d&f
173(3)
8.5.1 Regulatory Instruments
173(2)
8.5.2 Economic Instruments
175(1)
8.5.3 Suasive Instruments
176(1)
8.5.4 Managerial Instruments
176(1)
8.6 Adaptive Governance and Problem Structuring
176(2)
8.7 Impacts of Instruments on Actors Measured by Mandate Effectiveness
178(2)
8.7.1 Regulatory Instruments
178(1)
8.7.2 Economic Instruments
179(1)
8.7.3 Suasive Instruments
179(1)
8.7.4 Managerial Instruments
179(1)
8.8 Assessment of Learning
180(1)
8.9 Instrument Impacts on Livelihood Capitals
181(4)
8.9.1 Human Capital
181(1)
8.9.2 Social Capital
181(2)
8.9.3 Economic Capital
183(1)
8.9.4 Technological Capital
184(1)
8.9.5 Natural Capital
184(1)
8.10 Re-designing Instruments with the ACW
185(6)
References
188(3)
9 Comparative Analysis
191(26)
9.1 Introduction
191(1)
9.2 Main Drivers Affecting Producer Livelihoods
192(4)
9.3 Main Formal Institutions Responding to Climate Change, d&f
196(3)
9.4 Main Instruments Responding to Climate Change, d&f
199(5)
9.5 Impact on Actors - Effectiveness at Achieving Mandate
204(4)
9.6 Impact of Instruments on Livelihood Capitals
208(3)
9.6.1 Human Capital
208(1)
9.6.2 Social Capital
209(1)
9.6.3 Economic Capital
210(1)
9.6.4 Technological Capital
210(1)
9.6.5 Natural Capital
211(1)
9.7 Comparing Adaptive Governance and Policy Structuring
211(2)
9.8 Inferences
213(4)
References
215(2)
10 Conclusion
217(24)
10.1 Recalling the Research Question
217(1)
10.2 Designing a Policy Framework to Build Rural Agricultural Producer Capacity
218(12)
10.2.1 Comprehensive Institutional Assessment -- ACWs
219(6)
10.2.2 Participatory, Inclusive Decision Making
225(3)
10.2.3 Focus on Learning
228(2)
10.3 Contribution to Science
230(3)
10.3.1 Uncertainty and Risk
230(1)
10.3.2 Systemic Nature of the Problem
231(1)
10.3.3 Complexity (Contested Values and Science)
231(1)
10.3.4 A Better Theoretical Framework to Address Poor Governance
232(1)
10.4 Contribution to Methodology
233(4)
10.4.1 Methodological Strengths
233(1)
10.4.2 Methodological Challenges
233(1)
10.4.3 Recommendations for the Future
234(3)
10.5 The Need for Inclusive Development
237(4)
References
238(3)
Appendices
241
Appendix I Interviews
241(1)
Appendix II Field Guide for Governance Assessment
241
A Purpose and Scope
241(1)
B Set-Up and General Background Preparation
242(1)
C Pre-interview
242(1)
D The Research Interview and Themes
242
Margot Hurlbert holds a B.Admin. (Great Distinction) from the University of Regina, an LL.B. (Osgoode), and an LL.M. (Osgoode) in Constitutional Law with a focus on Aboriginal and environmental issues. Her PhD is from the University of Amsterdam and was entitled Adaptive Governance of Disaster: Drought and Flood in Rural Areas.

She is the author of numerous journal articles, book chapters and scholarly papers on a broad range of topics but more recently on the subjects of energy, Aboriginal justice, water and climate change adaptation. In 1992 she co-authored a book entitled School Law and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms (second edition)(1992), in 2010 edited a book, Pursuing Justice, An introduction to the Study of Justice of which the second edition is currently prepared, and co-edited Vulnerability and Adaptation to Drought: The Canadian Prairies and South America, in 2016.

Her current research focuses on governance and climate change. She inter

rogates laws, policies, and practices that will address both the problem of climate change and adaptation to the changing climate. She has participated and led research projects focusing on aspects of governance including water, agricultural producer livelihoods, drought, flood, and energy. The geographical focus of her study is western Canada and South America.

Hurlbert has a long history of volunteerism in the community include volunteering at the YMCA since 1990, holding various executive positions with the Canadian Bar Association since 1987 (acting as their designate on the board of the Public Legal Education Association), filling various executive positions with SCEP Center, a non-profit organization in Regina since 1997, and being President of the Regina Womens Network (1996-97).