Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Anti-Methodism and Theological Controversy in Eighteenth-Century England: The Struggle for True Religion

(Visiting Research Fellow, Trinity College Dublin)
  • Formāts - EPUB+DRM
  • Cena: 62,05 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

John Wesley and George Whitefield are remembered as founders of Methodism, one of the most influential movements in the history of modern Christianity. Characterized by open-air and itinerant preaching, eighteenth-century Methodism was a divisive phenomenon, which attracted a torrent of printed opposition, especially from Anglican clergymen. Yet, most of these opponents have been virtually forgotten. Anti-Methodism and Theological Controversy in Eighteenth-Century England is the first large-scale examination of the theological ideas of early anti-Methodist authors. By illuminating a very different perspective on Methodism, Simon Lewis provides a fundamental reappraisal of the eighteenth-century Church of England and its doctrinal priorities. For anti-Methodist authors, attacking Wesley and Whitefield was part of a wider defence of 'true religion', which demonstrates the theological vitality of the much-derided Georgian Church. This book, therefore, places Methodism firmly in its
contemporary theological context, as part of the Church of England's continuing struggle to define itself theologically.

Recenzijas

Thanks to [ Lewis'] excellent monograph, and to the contributions of earlier scholars, we have a sound understanding of the pattern and extent of anti-Methodism during the lifetimes of Wesley and Whitefield. * Clive D. Field, University of Birmingham, Proceedings of the Wesley Historical Society * This is a work of exceptionally fine scholarship, rooted in extensive research in the literature and theology of the eighteenth century. Lewis's work is meticulous and he has left no stone unturned in his examination of the attacks on Methodism. As a result, this is a superb book that advances a groundbreaking and original view of the eighteenth century, and one which will need to be read by all scholars of religion in the future. * William Gibson, OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY, Journal of Ecclesiastical History * Thanks to [ Lewis'] excellent monograph, and to the contributions of earlier scholars, we have a sound understanding of the pattern and extent of anti-Methodism during the lifetimes of Wesley and Whitefield. * Clive D. Field, University of Birmingham, Proceedings of the Wesley Historical Society * Lewis...improves our understanding of the historical context of Anti-Methodism and Theological Controversy in Eighteenth-Century England. * Samuel J. Richards, Anglican and Episcopal History * Lewis presents his findings in a compact way. The chapters are quite dense in construction, but the shortness of the subsections and the provision of sub-headings enhance the smooth progression of the argument and enable the reader to appreciate the coherence with which the chapters are integrated into the structure of the book as a whole. * G. M. Ditchfield, Wesley and Methodist Studies *

List of Figures
ix
List of Abbreviations
xi
Introduction 1(9)
1 A `Torrent' of Opposition
10(26)
The Rise of Methodism
12(3)
Controversial Practices
15(8)
The Lavington Affair
23(3)
Print Culture
26(4)
Transatlantic Networks
30(4)
Conclusions
34(2)
2 Justification and Assurance
36(24)
Post-Restoration Soteriology
37(4)
A `System of Moral Ethicks'
41(4)
Competing Authorities: Pro- and Anti-Methodist Sources
45(7)
Assurance
52(6)
Conclusions
58(2)
3 Perfectionism and Self-Denial
60(19)
Wesley's `Holy Living' Asceticism
61(6)
Whitefield's Self-Denial
67(3)
`Righteous Over-Much'?
70(3)
The Perceived Dangers of Evangelical Self-Denial
73(4)
Conclusions
77(2)
4 Histories of `Enthusiasm', Schism, and Popery
79(27)
Pagano-Papism
82(4)
Christian Antiquity
86(7)
The Medieval Church
93(4)
Histories of Protestant Schism and `Enthusiasm'
97(7)
Conclusions
104(2)
5 Deism and Melancholia
106(19)
Defining `Deism'
108(2)
Melancholia and Suicide
110(3)
The `Immediate Inspiration of God'
113(6)
`Spiritual' and `Sensual' Enthusiasts
119(2)
`Seek and you shall find'
121(2)
Conclusions
123(2)
6 Miracles and Demons
125(19)
Methodism and Miracles
128(4)
A `Preternatural Agent'?
132(4)
The Middleton Debate
136(3)
`Old Latitudinarian Excesses'
139(3)
Conclusions
142(2)
7 Anti-Dogmatism and `Orthodoxy'
144(22)
Doctrines of Original Sin
146(4)
A `Diversity of Passions and Humours'
150(6)
Heaven and Hell
156(5)
`Orthodoxy' and Infallibility
161(3)
Conclusions
164(2)
Epilogue and Conclusion 166(5)
Bibliography 171(32)
Index 203
Simon Lewis is a Visiting Research Fellow at Trinity College Dublin, Republic of Ireland. He was previously a Junior Research Fellow at the Institute of Historical Research, University of London and undertook a two-year Irish Research Council Postdoctoral Fellowship at Trinity College Dublin.