About the author |
|
xv | |
Preface and acknowledgments |
|
xvi | |
|
|
xix | |
|
|
xxiii | |
|
1 Introduction to Anti-Money Laundering Regulation and Compliance |
|
|
1 | (13) |
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
|
3 | (3) |
|
1 Book's scope, structure, and intended readership |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
2 Chapter-by-chapter overview |
|
|
4 | (2) |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
|
6 | (5) |
|
1 The risk-based regulatory hierarchy |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
2 The law enforcement objective |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
3 `Compliance paradox': factors undermining BSA/sanctions compliance |
|
|
8 | (3) |
|
D Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 and FinCEN comment request |
|
|
11 | (2) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
2 Introductory overview of money laundering and terrorist financing risks and their regulation |
|
|
14 | (32) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
B Foundational concepts and mechanics of ML and FT |
|
|
15 | (5) |
|
1 ML and FT definitions and key differences |
|
|
15 | (4) |
|
2 ML's and FT's differing compliance and risk management implications |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
3 ML's profit incentive informs law enforcement strategy and tools |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
C Evolution of AML/CFT regulatory framework |
|
|
20 | (4) |
|
1 Evolution from a rules - to a risk-based approach |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
2 Increasing number of regulated sectors and illicit financings |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
D Global framework of standard-setting and national regulation |
|
|
24 | (9) |
|
1 FATF's standard-setting framework and other harmonizing factors |
|
|
24 | (4) |
|
2 Other initiatives contributing to global standardization |
|
|
28 | (2) |
|
3 US's implementation of FATF standards |
|
|
30 | (3) |
|
4 Regulatory paradox of AML/CFT regulation |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
E FATF's country risk assessment methodology and application to US |
|
|
33 | (11) |
|
1 FATF's country risk assessment methodology |
|
|
34 | (2) |
|
2 Application of FATF risk assessment methodology to US |
|
|
36 | (8) |
|
3 Role of typologies in assessing US ML and FT vulnerabilities |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
3 AML/CFT and OFAC regulatory, supervisory, and enforcement framework |
|
|
46 | (31) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
B Objectives of AML/CFT and OFAC regulation |
|
|
47 | (6) |
|
1 Primacy of law enforcement objective |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
2 Reasons for law enforcement focus and intensity of regulation |
|
|
49 | (2) |
|
3 BSA's continuous enhancement of law enforcement tools |
|
|
51 | (2) |
|
C AML/CFT regulatory and supervisory framework for all covered sectors |
|
|
53 | (10) |
|
1 FinCEN's coordinating role vis-a-vis sectors' primary regulators |
|
|
54 | (2) |
|
2 Three tiers of decreasing AML/CFT compliance obligations |
|
|
56 | (6) |
|
3 Enforcement actions by sector, 2002--2015 |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
D Impact on BSA compliance of US's fragmented institutional supervision |
|
|
63 | (2) |
|
1 US's fragmented supervisory structure |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
2 Institutionally based supervisory structure |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
3 Criticism of institutionally based supervision |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
E Office of Foreign Assets Control |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
2 Broad scope of sanctions liability |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
F Agency investigative, prosecutorial, and sanctioning powers |
|
|
67 | (5) |
|
1 Overview of investigative and prosecutorial authority |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
2 Civil sanctioning powers and penalties for AML/CFT and sanctions violations |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
3 Criminal investigations and prosecutions of AML/CFT and sanctions violations |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
4 Criminal liability for AML/CFT and sanctions violations |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
5 Terrorist financing criminal liability, investigation, and prosecution |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
6 OF AC's enforcement authority |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
G Conveyance of regulatory expectations for AML/CFT and sanctions compliance |
|
|
72 | (3) |
|
1 Wide array of means for conveying regulatory expectations |
|
|
72 | (2) |
|
2 Pyramid of regulatory expectations |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
|
75 | (2) |
|
4 AML/CFT and OFAC reporting, recordkeeping, and information sharing requirements |
|
|
77 | (15) |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
B Reporting and recordkeeping requirements |
|
|
79 | (8) |
|
1 Currency transaction reports |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
2 Form 8300: currency received in a trade or business |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
3 Reports of transportation of currency or monetary instruments |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
4 Reports of foreign bank and financial accounts |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
5 SAR reporting and recordkeeping requirements |
|
|
83 | (3) |
|
6 Filing and recordkeeping requirements for OFAC reports |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
C Nonreporting recordkeeping and transactional requirements |
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
1 Loans, transfers of monetary instruments, securities, and credits |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
2 Transmittal of funds involving nonbank FIs of $3,000 or more |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
3 Items required to be included in transmittal of funds of $3,000 or more |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
4 Sale of monetary instruments amounting to $3,000 or more and less than $10,000 |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
|
89 | (2) |
|
1 Information sharing between FIs and LEAs |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
2 Voluntary information sharing |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
5 Regulatory expectations for AML/CFT and sanctions compliance programs |
|
|
92 | (45) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
B The five BSA compliance pillars |
|
|
93 | (9) |
|
1 Internal policies, procedures, and controls |
|
|
94 | (2) |
|
2 Designation of AML/CTL compliance officer |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
97 | (2) |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
5 Customer due diligence (CDD) |
|
|
99 | (3) |
|
C Know your customer (KYC) compliance obligations |
|
|
102 | (14) |
|
1 Customer identification program (CIP) |
|
|
103 | (5) |
|
2 Beneficial ownership rule |
|
|
108 | (8) |
|
D Special due diligence for foreign correspondent and private banking accounts |
|
|
116 | (12) |
|
1 General due diligence program for FFI correspondent accounts |
|
|
116 | (5) |
|
2 EDD procedures for foreign banks with specified licenses |
|
|
121 | (4) |
|
3 Due diligence program for foreign private banking accounts |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
4 Prohibition of correspondent accounts for foreign shell banks |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
E OFAC's regulatory expectations for compliance and risk management |
|
|
128 | (8) |
|
1 Issues in combining OFAC and AML/CFT compliance and risk management programs |
|
|
128 | (2) |
|
2 Compliance requirements relating to blocked and rejected transactions |
|
|
130 | (2) |
|
3 OFAC's framework for a sanctions compliance and risk management program |
|
|
132 | (4) |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
6 The role of corporate governance in mitigating AML/CFT and sanctions compliance risk |
|
|
137 | (38) |
|
|
137 | (2) |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
B Primer on corporate governance and board of directors' risk-return decision-making |
|
|
139 | (9) |
|
1 Evolution of BSA compliance expectations |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
2 Overview of a corporate governance system |
|
|
140 | (4) |
|
3 Role of board and senior management |
|
|
144 | (2) |
|
4 Board's risk-return optimization in pursuit of shareholder value |
|
|
146 | (2) |
|
C AML/CFT `compliance paradox' that skews firms' risk-return tradeoff |
|
|
148 | (11) |
|
1 Factors that create the compliance paradox |
|
|
149 | (3) |
|
2 Evidence of skewed revenue-compliance cost calculus |
|
|
152 | (7) |
|
D Role of BSA and sanctions compliance |
|
|
159 | (5) |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
2 Attributes of the modern compliance function |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
3 Factors underlying rise of modern BSA and sanctions compliance |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
4 Relationship between compliance and the other control functions |
|
|
162 | (2) |
|
E Prosecutorial, regulatory, and state law guidance on effective BSA and sanctions compliance programs |
|
|
164 | (10) |
|
1 Incentives for establishing effective compliance programs |
|
|
164 | (4) |
|
2 General guidance on substantive elements of effective compliance programs |
|
|
168 | (5) |
|
3 Limited guidance provided by settlement agreements |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
7 The role of risk management in meeting AML/CFT and OFAC regulatory expectations |
|
|
175 | (64) |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
B Role of risk management in AML/CFT and sanctions compliance |
|
|
176 | (6) |
|
1 FRB guidance on the risk management function |
|
|
177 | (2) |
|
2 Risk appetite framework and risk appetite statement |
|
|
179 | (2) |
|
3 BSA/sanctions issues in financial conglomerates' risk management |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
C ML/FT and sanctions risk assessments |
|
|
182 | (9) |
|
1 Central role played by ML/FT and sanctions risk assessments |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
2 ML/FT risk assessments and their application |
|
|
183 | (3) |
|
3 ML/FT risk assessment methodology |
|
|
186 | (4) |
|
4 Risk assessments by financial conglomerates |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
5 Sanctions risk assessments |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
D The 3LOD model and role of the control functions |
|
|
191 | (4) |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
2 The first line: the operating businesses |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
3 The second lines: compliance, risk management, and controller |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
4 The third line: internal audit |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
8 The risk-based approach to suspicious transaction monitoring and sanctions screening |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
|
196 | (2) |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
B Transaction monitoring and sanctions screening |
|
|
198 | (23) |
|
1 Role of machine learning in AML/CFT and sanctions compliance |
|
|
199 | (4) |
|
2 Customer account and transaction data-gathering and analysis |
|
|
203 | (4) |
|
3 Customer risk profiles and risk scoring |
|
|
207 | (4) |
|
4 TM alert systems and decision-making on SAR filing |
|
|
211 | (5) |
|
5 Sanctions screening alert systems |
|
|
216 | (5) |
|
C Rule 504's risk management and compliance requirements |
|
|
221 | (5) |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
2 General requirements common to TM and sanctions screening |
|
|
222 | (2) |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
4 Rule 504 sanctions filtering |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
D Model risk and model risk management |
|
|
226 | (12) |
|
1 Overview of model risk and MRM in AML/CFT and sanctions compliance |
|
|
226 | (4) |
|
2 Federal Reserve Board's SR 11-7 guidance |
|
|
230 | (8) |
|
|
238 | (1) |
Appendix |
|
239 | (10) |
References |
|
249 | (4) |
Index |
|
253 | |