This collection of essays investigates the way in which modern private law apportions responsibility between multiple parties who are (or may be) responsible for the same legal event. It examines both doctrines and principles that share responsibility between plaintiffs and defendants, on the one hand, and between multiple defendants, on the other.
The doctrines examined include those 'originating' doctrines which operate to create shared liabilities in the first place (such as vicarious and accessorial liability); and, more centrally, those doctrines that operate to distribute the liabilities and responsibilities so created. These include the doctrine of contributory (comparative) negligence, joint and several (solidary) liability, contribution, reimbursement, and 'proportionate' liability, as well as defences and principles of equitable 'allowance' that permit both losses and gains to be shared between parties to civil proceedings. The work also considers the principles which apportion liability between multiple defendants and insurers in cases in which the cause, or timing, of a particular loss is hard to determine.
The contributions to this volume offer important perspectives on the law in the UK, USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, as well as a number of civilian jurisdictions. They explicate the main rules and trends and offer critical insights on the growth and distribution of shared responsibilities from a number of different perspectives historical, comparative, empirical, doctrinal and philosophical.
Papildus informācija
An original collection of essays exploring how the law apportions liability flowing from events for which more than one party is responsible, a scenario which might apply in a small claim or the most complex international litigation. In so doing it examines the UK, USA, Canada and Australia, and offers historical, comparative, doctrinal and theoretical analysis of the law.
Preface |
|
v | |
Acknowledgements |
|
vii | |
|
|
xi | |
|
|
xxix | |
|
|
xxxiii | |
|
PART I FRAMEWORKS, ETHICS AND POLITICS |
|
|
|
1 Apportionment in Private Law: Nothing All, or Something in Between? |
|
|
3 | (32) |
|
|
2 Allocating Liability Among Multiple Responsible Causes: Principles, Rhetoric and Power |
|
|
35 | (28) |
|
|
3 Full, No, or Partial Liability? That is the Question - Some Answers from a Civilian Perspective |
|
|
63 | (26) |
|
|
PART II ORIGINATING DOCTRINES |
|
|
|
4 Vicarious Liability: A Pailful of Slops and Other Hazards |
|
|
89 | (22) |
|
|
5 Accessories, Joint or Independent Liability and Apportionment |
|
|
111 | (30) |
|
|
PART III PLAINTIFF-DEFENDANT APPORTIONMENT |
|
|
|
6 Contributory Negligence and Apportionment in Canadian Tort Law |
|
|
141 | (20) |
|
|
7 Contributory Negligence and Professional Negligence: An Empirical Perspective |
|
|
161 | (36) |
|
|
|
8 Allocating the Costs of Making Restitution: Change of Position |
|
|
197 | (24) |
|
|
9 Certainty in Calculating Monetary Remedies for Breach of Fiduciary Duty |
|
|
221 | (22) |
|
|
PART IV APPORTIONMENT BETWEEN DEFENDANTS |
|
|
|
10 Contribution Among Wrongdoers: Reducing the Risk of Contribution Recovery Shortfall and Other Issues |
|
|
243 | (24) |
|
|
11 Reforming a Reform: Why Has It Been So Hard to Reform Proportionate Liability Reforms? |
|
|
267 | (26) |
|
|
12 Causation and Proportional Recovery |
|
|
293 | (28) |
|
|
|
13 Justice Between Defendants: A New Zealand Note on (non) Law Reform |
|
|
321 | (22) |
|
Index |
|
343 | |
Kit Barker is Professor of Law and Ross Grantham is Professor of Commercial Law, both at the TC Beirne School of Law, University of Queensland, Australia.