Foreword |
|
xi | |
Introduction |
|
xiii | |
|
1 Brain, environment, and development: A synthesis and a conceptual model |
|
|
1 | (20) |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
Changes from earlier theoretic orientations |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
4 | (4) |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
Critical and sensitive periods |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
Application to developmental assessment |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
Components of epigenetics |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
Components of the environment |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
Extrapolation to other theories and developmental assessment |
|
|
10 | (3) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (3) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
Translating to developmental assessment |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
|
16 | (5) |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
Disruption/insult summary |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
Relationship to assessment |
|
|
18 | (3) |
|
|
21 | (14) |
|
|
21 | (4) |
|
Maintain the basic qualities of the Bayley scales |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
Develop a polytomous scoring approach |
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
Include caregivers in the evaluation process |
|
|
25 | (3) |
|
Reduction of testing duration time/simplifying administration |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
Improve age and content coverage |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
Improve the clinical utility of the Bayley |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
Use digital administration |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
|
35 | (8) |
|
|
35 | (2) |
|
Underlying skills that are assessed |
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
Scoring and interpretation |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
|
43 | (10) |
|
|
44 | (3) |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
Underlying skills assessed |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
47 | (3) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
Underlying skills assessed |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
Scoring and interpretation |
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
|
50 | (3) |
|
|
50 | (3) |
|
|
53 | (8) |
|
|
53 | (3) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
Underlying skills that are assessed |
|
|
54 | (2) |
|
|
56 | (3) |
|
Scoring and interpretation |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
6 Adaptive Behavior Scale |
|
|
61 | (8) |
|
|
61 | (2) |
|
Impairment, handicap, and disability |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
Why emphasize functional skills? |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
Underlying skills assessed |
|
|
64 | (3) |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
Scoring and interpretation |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
|
69 | (8) |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
Underlying areas assessed |
|
|
70 | (2) |
|
Scoring and interpretation |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
Scoring and interpretation |
|
|
74 | (3) |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
|
74 | (3) |
|
8 The Autism Spectrum Disorder Checklist |
|
|
77 | (6) |
|
9 Bayley-4 accommodations and modifications |
|
|
83 | (10) |
|
Accommodations versus modifications |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
Accommodations for Bayley-4 cognitive, language, and motor scales |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
The child with visual impairment |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
The child with hearing impairment |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
The child with motor impairment |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
|
89 | (4) |
|
10 Indicators of abnormality (red flags) |
|
|
93 | (10) |
|
Delay, dissociation, and deviance |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
Vision/motor/tone indicators |
|
|
94 | (5) |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
97 | (2) |
|
Social interaction and communication |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
Attention/executive function |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
A unique approach: Optimality |
|
|
101 | (2) |
|
11 Clinical group studies |
|
|
103 | (10) |
|
Children with down syndrome |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
Children with motor impairment |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
Developmental coordination disorders |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
Children with language delay or specific language impairment |
|
|
107 | (2) |
|
Children with developmental delay |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
Children with prenatal drug/alcohol exposure |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
|
110 | (3) |
|
12 The Bayley-4 on Q-global |
|
|
113 | (24) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
Objectives of the Bayley-4 on Q-global |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
Reduce the complexity of administration and scoring |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
Linear versus nonlinear administration |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
The Bayley-4 on Q-global navigation |
|
|
115 | (5) |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
The Bayley-4 on Q-global administration rules |
|
|
120 | (4) |
|
|
120 | (2) |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
The Bayley-4 on Q-global item interface |
|
|
124 | (4) |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
The Bayley-4 on Q-global item types |
|
|
128 | (7) |
|
Item with multiple trials |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
|
129 | (3) |
|
Items with caregiver questions |
|
|
132 | (3) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
135 | (2) |
|
|
137 | (10) |
|
|
137 | (3) |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
Level III (Synthesis and discussion) |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
|
140 | (2) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
Level III (Synthesis and discussion) |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
|
142 | (2) |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
Level III (Synthesis and discussion) |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
|
144 | (3) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
Level III (Synthesis and discussion) |
|
|
145 | (2) |
|
|
147 | (12) |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
Tools to facilitate feedback |
|
|
149 | (2) |
|
Age equivalents/percent delay |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
Determining if the message got through |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
Correction for prematurity |
|
|
155 | (4) |
|
15 The Bayley-4 Screening Test |
|
|
159 | (6) |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
|
159 | (3) |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
|
162 | (3) |
References |
|
165 | (12) |
Index |
|
177 | |