Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Benchmarking in Institutional Research: New Directions for Institutional Research, Number 156 [Mīkstie vāki]

Edited by , Edited by
  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 136 pages, height x width x depth: 229x149x7 mm, weight: 186 g
  • Sērija : J-B IR Single Issue Institutional Research
  • Izdošanas datums: 27-Feb-2013
  • Izdevniecība: Jossey-Bass Inc.,U.S.
  • ISBN-10: 1118608836
  • ISBN-13: 9781118608838
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Mīkstie vāki
  • Cena: 40,08 €*
  • * Šī grāmata vairs netiek publicēta. Jums tiks paziņota lietotas grāmatas cena
  • Šī grāmata vairs netiek publicēta. Jums tiks paziņota lietotas grāmatas cena.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 136 pages, height x width x depth: 229x149x7 mm, weight: 186 g
  • Sērija : J-B IR Single Issue Institutional Research
  • Izdošanas datums: 27-Feb-2013
  • Izdevniecība: Jossey-Bass Inc.,U.S.
  • ISBN-10: 1118608836
  • ISBN-13: 9781118608838
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
While the term benchmarking is commonplace nowadays in institutional research and higher education, less common, is a solid understanding of what it really means and how it has been, and can be, used effectively.

This volume begins by defining benchmarking as a strategic and structured approach whereby an organization compares aspects of its processes and/or outcomes to those of another organization or set of organizations to identify opportunities for improvement.

Building on this definition, the chapters provide a brief history of the evolution and emergence of benchmarking in general and in higher education in particular. The authors apply benchmarking to:





Enrollment management and student success Institutional effectiveness The potential economic impact of higher education institutions on their host communities.

They look at the use of national external survey data in institutional benchmarking and selection of peer institutions, introduce multivariate statistical methodologies for guiding that selection, and consider a novel application of baseball sabermetric methods. The volume offers a solid starting point for those new to benchmarking in higher education and provides examples of current best practices and prospective new directions.

This is the 156th volume of this Jossey-Bass series. Always timely and comprehensive, New Directions for Institutional Research provides planners and administrators in all types of academic institutions with guidelines in such areas as resource coordination, information analysis, program evaluation, and institutional management.
Editors' Notes 1(4)
Gary D. Levy
Nicolas A. Valcik
1 How Benchmarking and Higher Education Came Together
5(10)
Gary D. Levy
Sharron L. Ronco
2 Internal Benchmarking for Institutional Effectiveness
15(10)
Sharron L. Ronco
3 Benchmarking and Enrollment Management
25(12)
Robert L. Duniway
4 Using Institutional Survey Data to Jump-Start Your Benchmarking Process
37(10)
Timothy K. C. Chow
5 Learning How to Play Ball: Applying Sabermetric Thinking to Benchmarking in Higher Education
47(14)
Gary D. Levy
6 Selecting Peer Institutions with IPEDS and Other Nationally Available Data
61(8)
Sarah D. Carrigan
7 Benchmarking Tier-One Universities: "Keeping Up with the Joneses"
69(24)
Nicolas A. Valcik
Kimberly E. Scruton
Stuart B. Murchison
Ted J. Benavides
Todd Jordan
Andrea D. Stigdon
Angela M. Olszewski
8 Taming Multivariate Data: Conceptual and Methodological Issues
93(16)
Lawrence J. Redlinger
John J. Wiorkowski
Anna I. Moses
9 Conclusions and Future Directions
109(10)
Fred Lillibridge
Index 119
Gary D. Levy is the editor of Benchmarking in Institutional Research: New Directions for Institutional Research, Number 156, published by Wiley. Nicolas Valcik is an author and a higher education administrator. He is the current Executive Director of Institutional Effectiveness at Central Washington University. Valcik has authored a series of notable case study books on strategic planning and analysis.