|
1 Introduction and key data points |
|
|
11 | (22) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
|
11 | (16) |
|
1.3 Composition of this volume |
|
|
27 | (6) |
|
2 A-Binding as LF-relevant Upward Agree and PF-relevant Head Movement |
|
|
33 | (38) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
2.2 Components of the analysis |
|
|
33 | (36) |
|
2.2.1 Index Raising (Nikolaeva 2014) |
|
|
35 | (6) |
|
2.2.2 Modifying the theoretical framework |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
2.2.2.1 A-binding as Agree |
|
|
41 | (3) |
|
2.2.2.2 D-bound/index rising as clitic climbing |
|
|
44 | (25) |
|
|
69 | (2) |
|
|
71 | (36) |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
|
71 | (10) |
|
3.3 Index Raising as a diagnostic for case positions of datives |
|
|
81 | (17) |
|
3.3.1 The VP-internal dative antecedents |
|
|
81 | (5) |
|
3.3.2 The medial domain: Dative OEs in [ spec.vP] |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
3.3.2.1 OEs with non-verbal psychological predicates |
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
3.3.2.2 Verbal psychological predicates and the idiosyncrasy of podobac sie appeal to' |
|
|
89 | (6) |
|
3.3.2.3 Dative antecedents in the high domain and more Long-Distance Binding |
|
|
95 | (3) |
|
3.4 Extension to the Anaphor Agreement Effect |
|
|
98 | (8) |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
4 Extensions: Accusative Object Experiencers as antecedents and binding in nominal domains |
|
|
107 | (44) |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
4.2 The position of accusative-marked arguments and binding |
|
|
107 | (3) |
|
4.3 Accusative OEs in the medial domain |
|
|
110 | (9) |
|
4.4 Remarks on word order in constructions with type II psych predicates |
|
|
119 | (14) |
|
4.5 Binding within nominal domains |
|
|
133 | (12) |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
4.7 Appendix: Lexicalisation of the D-bound/Index and unambiguous c-command |
|
|
146 | (5) |
|
5 Binding by objects and dative experiencers -experimental studies |
|
|
151 | (34) |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
5.2 Expl. Binding by objects (Gogloza et al. forthcoming-a) |
|
|
151 | (13) |
|
5.2.1 Literature discussion |
|
|
152 | (5) |
|
5.2.2 Expl: Aims and predictions |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
|
158 | (3) |
|
5.2.4 Expl: Results and discussion |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
5.2.4.1 Expla: Reflexive/personal pronoun bindees |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
5.2.4.2 Exp lb: Reflexive/pronominal possessive bindees |
|
|
162 | (2) |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
5.3 Exp2: Binding by ExpDAT in podobac sie `to please' (Gogloza and Leska 2018) |
|
|
164 | (10) |
|
5.3.1 Literature discussion |
|
|
166 | (2) |
|
5.3.2 Exp2: Aims and predictions |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
|
169 | (2) |
|
5.3.4 Exp2: Results and discussion |
|
|
171 | (2) |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
5.4 Exp3. Binding by ExpDAT into TnN0M vs. TbnonNOM: Testing the AAE (Gogloza et al. forthcoming-b) |
|
|
174 | (10) |
|
5.4.1 Literature discussion |
|
|
175 | (2) |
|
5.4.2 Exp3: Aims and predictions |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
|
178 | (2) |
|
5.4.4 Exp3: Results and discussion |
|
|
180 | (2) |
|
5.4.5 Explb, Exp2 and Exp3: The effect of embedding |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
6 Theoretical inspirations and reflections |
|
|
185 | (62) |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
|
185 | (6) |
|
|
191 | (29) |
|
|
220 | (10) |
|
6.5 Competition-based accounts |
|
|
230 | (17) |
|
|
247 | (8) |
References |
|
255 | (16) |
Index of Authors |
|
271 | (4) |
Subject Index |
|
275 | |