Introduction |
|
ix | |
|
Background to the Implementation of Case Management Models for Chronic Long-Term Conditions within the National Health Service |
|
|
1 | (17) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Primary care management of long-term conditions |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
How management approaches have been developed |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
Developing and delivering care |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
The impact and cost of chronic disease |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
Identifying patients who require case management |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
National guidelines and evidence-based practice |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
Embedding evidence in practice |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
Making progress in the management of chronic conditions |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
Modernising care in the National Health Service |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
Developing case management and care delivery |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
Case management in the National Health Service |
|
|
11 | (2) |
|
Promotion of self-management and self-care |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
Partnerships and expectations |
|
|
13 | (2) |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
|
15 | (3) |
|
Case Management Models: Nationally and Internationally |
|
|
18 | (25) |
|
|
18 | (2) |
|
The context for case management in the NHS |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
Impact of managed care models |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
International models of care reviewed |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
The Alaskan Medical Service |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
Kaiser Permanente (North California) |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
Group Health Cooperative (Seattle, Washington) |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
Health Partners (Minnesota) |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
Touchpoint Health Plan (Wisconsin) |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield (Connecticut) |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
United Health Europe Evercare |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
Amsterdam HealthCare System (the Netherlands) |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
Outcome intervention model (New Zealand) |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
National model of chronic disease prevention and control (Australia) |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
Guided Care (United States) |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
Veterans Affairs (Unites States) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
Improving Chronic Iliness Care (Seattle) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
Expanded Chronic Care Model (Canada) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
Green Ribbon Health: Medicare in health support (Florida) |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
What do these models provide? |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
Care management in social care |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
Case management models in the NHS |
|
|
32 | (4) |
|
Joint NHS and social care |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
|
36 | (2) |
|
|
38 | (2) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
Competencies for Managing Long-Term Conditions |
|
|
43 | (23) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
Development of the competency framework |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
What the competencies are expected to deliver |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
The competencies: what are they? |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
Advanced clinical nursing practice |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
Leading complex care co-ordination |
|
|
49 | (3) |
|
Proactively manage complex long-term conditions |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
Managing cognitive impairment and mental well-being |
|
|
52 | (3) |
|
Supporting self-care, self-management and enabling independence |
|
|
55 | (2) |
|
Professional practice and leadership |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
Identifying high-risk people, promoting health and preventing ill health |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
Interagency and partnership working |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
What the competencies aim to do |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
Developing educational models to develop competencies |
|
|
62 | (2) |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
|
64 | (2) |
|
Outcomes for Patients-Managing Complex Care |
|
|
66 | (19) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
The areas of competence and deliverables for patients: Leading complex care co-ordination |
|
|
66 | (8) |
|
Identifying high-risk patients, promoting health and preventing ill health |
|
|
74 | (3) |
|
Interagency and partnership working |
|
|
77 | (5) |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
|
82 | (3) |
|
Outcomes for Patients-Advanced Nursing Practice |
|
|
85 | (20) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
Advanced clinical nursing practice |
|
|
85 | (6) |
|
Proactively manage complex long-term conditions |
|
|
91 | (3) |
|
Professional practice and leadership |
|
|
94 | (3) |
|
Managing care at the end of life |
|
|
97 | (4) |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
|
102 | (3) |
|
Outcomes of Case Management for Social Care and Older People |
|
|
105 | (18) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
Policy drivers for the care of older people |
|
|
105 | (3) |
|
Health and social care integration |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
Cost of care for older people |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
What do people expect in old age and how will these services be commissioned? |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
What does case management offer to older people? |
|
|
112 | (2) |
|
Integrated models of care |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
Impact of case management on older people |
|
|
114 | (4) |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
Outcomes for older people |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
|
120 | (3) |
|
Outcomes for Patients-Cancer Care and End-of-Life Care |
|
|
123 | (21) |
|
|
123 | (2) |
|
Gold Standards Framework for Palliative Care |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
Integrated Cancer Care Programme |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
Preparing for the pilot programmes |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
Case management competencies-what can/should patients expect? |
|
|
132 | (5) |
|
The real need for competencies |
|
|
137 | (2) |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
Preferred place of care and delivering choice programmes |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
|
140 | (2) |
|
|
142 | (2) |
|
Leadership and Advancing Practice |
|
|
144 | (20) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
What does leadership provide? |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
Leadership framework in the NHS |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
Political understanding and functioning |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
Setting targets and delivering outcomes |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
Empowerment and influencing |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
Other leadership frameworks |
|
|
150 | (3) |
|
What does good leadership do? |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
Leadership in case management |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
Leadership is in every role |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
Advanced practice in long-term conditions |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
|
161 | (3) |
|
Self-Care and Patient Outcomes |
|
|
164 | (21) |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
|
164 | (3) |
|
Self-care and practitioners |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
Effectiveness of self-care programmes |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
Promoting self-care: staff role |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
|
171 | (2) |
|
Self-care: the evidence base |
|
|
173 | (2) |
|
Using information and technology for self-care |
|
|
175 | (4) |
|
How do we engage patients in self-care? |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
|
180 | (3) |
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
What does this Mean for Patients? |
|
|
185 | (22) |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
What do patients want from care? |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
Reported outcomes from management of long-term conditions |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
Modernisation to enable outcomes for users of services |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
Do patients really see improvement? |
|
|
188 | (2) |
|
Understanding the patient experience, how we find out? |
|
|
190 | (2) |
|
Public Service Agreement targets |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
Other assessments of user/patient experiences |
|
|
192 | (3) |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
Allowing patients to tell their tale |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
Outcomes of care and patient experience |
|
|
195 | (2) |
|
Experience in case management |
|
|
197 | (2) |
|
Partnerships with patients: impact on experience |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
Impact of the provision of information on patients' views and outcomes |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
|
201 | (2) |
|
|
203 | (4) |
Index |
|
207 | |