Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Categorial Features [Hardback]

(University of Cyprus)
  • Formāts: Hardback, 224 pages, height x width x depth: 235x158x17 mm, weight: 460 g, 19 Tables, black and white; 62 Line drawings, black and white
  • Sērija : Cambridge Studies in Linguistics
  • Izdošanas datums: 04-Dec-2014
  • Izdevniecība: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1107038111
  • ISBN-13: 9781107038110
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 80,72 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Hardback, 224 pages, height x width x depth: 235x158x17 mm, weight: 460 g, 19 Tables, black and white; 62 Line drawings, black and white
  • Sērija : Cambridge Studies in Linguistics
  • Izdošanas datums: 04-Dec-2014
  • Izdevniecība: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1107038111
  • ISBN-13: 9781107038110
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
"Proposing a novel theory of parts of speech, this book discusses categorization from a methodological and theoretical point a view. It draws on discoveries and insights from a number of approaches - typology, cognitive grammar, notional approaches, and generative grammar - and presents a generative, feature-based theory. Building on up-to-date research and the latest findings and ideas in categorization and word-building, Panagiotidis combines the primacy of categorical features with a syntactic categorization approach, addressing the fundamental, but often overlooked, questions in grammatical theory. Designed for graduate students and researchers studying grammar and syntax, this book is richly illustrated with examples from a variety of languages and explains elements and phenomena central to the nature of human language"--

Recenzijas

'A welcome reconsideration of the notion of lexical category from a syntactic-decomposition perspective. Panagiotidis draws together insights from a diverse array of frameworks to formulate his central hypothesis concerning the 'perspective-taking' contribution of (N) and (V) features at LF. His proposal has explanatory power in a number of domains, particularly in providing an intuitive rationale for the long-recognized requirement that lexical roots must be categorized in order to participate in a syntactic derivation. Other outstanding contributions include the idea that the notion of 'functional' reduces to 'bears uninterpretable categorial features', and a substantive characterization of what 'semi-lexical' really means. A very stimulating read.' Heidi Harley, University of Arizona

Papildus informācija

Proposes a novel theory of parts of speech, bringing together the latest research and discoveries.
Preface xiii
1 Theories of grammatical category
1(23)
1.1 Introduction
1(1)
1.2 Preliminaries to a theory: approaching the part-of-speech problem
1(11)
1.2.1 On syntactic categories and word classes: some clarifications
3(1)
1.2.2 Parts of speech: the naive notional approach
4(2)
1.2.3 Parts of speech: morphological criteria
6(1)
1.2.4 Parts of speech: syntactic criteria
7(1)
1.2.5 An interesting correlation
8(1)
1.2.6 Prototype theory
9(2)
1.2.7 Summarizing: necessary ingredients of a theory of category
11(1)
1.3 Categories in the lexicon
12(5)
1.4 Deconstructing categories
17(2)
1.4.1 Distributed Morphology
17(1)
1.4.2 Radical categorylessness
18(1)
1.5 The notional approach revisited: Langacker (1987) and Anderson (1997)
19(2)
1.6 The present approach: LF-interpretable categorial features make categorizers
21(3)
2 Are word class categories universal?
24(29)
2.1 Introduction
24(1)
2.2 Do all languages have nouns and verbs? How can we tell?
25(1)
2.3 Two caveats: when we talk about 'verb' and 'noun'
26(3)
2.3.1 Verbs, not their entourage
26(1)
2.3.2 Misled by morphological criteria: nouns and verbs looking alike
27(1)
2.3.3 What criterion, then?
28(1)
2.4 Identical (?) behaviours
29(3)
2.5 The Nootka debate (is probably pointless)
32(5)
2.6 Verbs can be found everywhere, but not necessarily as a word class
37(3)
2.7 An interim summary: verbs, nouns, roots
40(1)
2.8 What about adjectives (and adverbs)?
41(8)
2.8.1 Adjectives are unlike nouns and verbs
41(1)
2.8.2 Adjectives are not unmarked
42(6)
2.8.3 Adverbs are not a simplex category
48(1)
2.9 The trouble with adpositions
49(2)
2.10 Conclusion
51(2)
3 Syntactic decomposition and categorizers
53(25)
3.1 Introduction
53(1)
3.2 Where are words made?
54(4)
3.3 Fewer idiosyncrasies: argument structure is syntactic structure
58(2)
3.4 There are still idiosyncrasies, however
60(2)
3.5 Conversions
62(3)
3.6 Phases
65(2)
3.7 Roots and phases
67(3)
3.8 On the limited productivity (?) of first phases
70(2)
3.9 Are roots truly acategorial? Dutch restrictions
72(5)
3.10 Conclusion
77(1)
4 Categorial features
78(28)
4.1 Introduction
78(1)
4.2 Answering the old questions
78(4)
4.3 Categorial features: a matter of perspective
82(7)
4.4 The Categorization Assumption and roots
89(9)
4.4.1 The Categorization Assumption
89(4)
4.4.2 The interpretation of free roots
93(2)
4.4.3 The role of categorization
95(2)
4.4.4 nPs and vPs as idioms
97(1)
4.5 Categorizers are not functional
98(2)
4.6 Nouns and verbs
100(6)
4.6.1 Keeping [ N] and [ V] separate?
101(2)
4.6.2 Do Farsi verbs always contain nouns?
103(3)
5 Functional categories
106(28)
5.1 Introduction
106(1)
5.2 The category of functional categories
106(4)
5.3 Functional categories as 'satellites' of lexical ones
110(1)
5.4 Biuniqueness
111(5)
5.5 Too many categorial features
116(1)
5.6 Categorial Deficiency
117(3)
5.7 Categorial Deficiency ≠ c-selection
120(2)
5.8 Categorial Deficiency and roots (and categorizers)
122(2)
5.9 Categorial Deficiency and Agree
124(9)
5.9.1 On Agree
124(2)
5.9.2 Biuniqueness as a product of categorial Agree
126(1)
5.9.3 Why there are no mid-projection lexical heads
127(1)
5.9.4 How projection lines begin
128(2)
5.9.5 Deciding the label: no uninterpretable Goals
130(3)
5.10 Conclusion
133(1)
6 Mixed projections and functional categorizers
134(39)
6.1 Introduction
134(1)
6.2 Mixed projections
134(2)
6.3 Two generalizations on mixed projections
136(4)
6.4 Free-mixing mixed projections?
140(2)
6.5 Switches as functional categorizers
142(6)
6.6 Morphologically overt Switches
148(4)
6.7 Switches and their complements
152(9)
6.7.1 Locating the Switch: the size of its complement
153(6)
6.7.2 Phases and Switches
159(2)
6.8 Are all mixed projections externally nominal?
161(4)
6.8.1 Verbal nouns
162(3)
6.9 The properties of mixed projections
165(5)
6.9.1 Similarities: Nominalized Aspect Phrases in English and Dutch
166(1)
6.9.2 Differences: two types of Dutch 'plain' nominalized infinitives
166(3)
6.9.3 Fine-grained differences: different features in nominalized Tense Phrases
169(1)
6.10 Why functional categorizers?
170(2)
6.11 Conclusion
172(1)
7 A summary and the bigger picture
173(6)
7.1 A summary
173(2)
7.2 Loose ends
175(1)
7.3 Extensions and consequences
176(3)
8 Appendix: notes on Baker (2003)
179(10)
8.1 Introduction
179(1)
8.2 Are nouns referential?
180(1)
8.3 Syntactic predication, semantic predication and specifiers
181(2)
8.4 Are adjectives the unmarked lexical category? Are they roots?
183(1)
8.5 Pred and other functional categories
184(1)
8.6 Two details: co-ordination and syntactic categorization
185(4)
References 189(15)
Index 204
Phoevos Panagiotidis is Associate Professor of Linguistics in the Department of English Studies at the University of Cyprus.