| Foreword |
|
xi | |
|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|
xiii | |
| Introduction: A Christian Theology of Science |
|
1 | (10) |
|
The Difference between And and Of Naming the Uneasy History of Science and Christian Theology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Failed Strategies of War and Peace between Science and Religion The Challenge of Making a New Start |
|
|
|
1 Starting Definitions of Christian Theology and of Science |
|
|
11 | (7) |
|
1.1 What Is Christian Theology? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 Prescriptive Theology and Descriptive Science |
|
|
|
1.4 Christian Theology and Science? |
|
|
|
2 Viewing Christian Theology through the Truth Lens of Science |
|
|
18 | (8) |
|
2.1 Empiricism and Christian Theology |
|
|
|
2.2 Rationalism and Christian Theology |
|
|
|
2.3 Physical Reductionism and Christian Theology |
|
|
|
2.4 Are Modern Science and Christian Theology Incompatible? |
|
|
|
3 Christian Theology as a First Truth Discourse |
|
|
26 | (14) |
|
3.1 Secularization and Interpretation |
|
|
|
3.2 The Primary Interpretive Commitments of Christian Theology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2.2 God as the Source of All Created Essence and Existence |
|
|
|
3.3 Theocentric Foundations versus Egocentric Foundations |
|
|
|
4 Viewing Science through the Truth Lens of Christian Theology |
|
|
40 | (34) |
|
4.1 Christian Theology and Empiricism |
|
|
|
4.2 Christian Theology and Rationalism |
|
|
|
4.3 Christian Theology and Physical Reductionism |
|
|
|
4.3.1 Nominalism and Physical Reductionism |
|
|
|
4.3.2 Voluntarism and Physical Reductionism |
|
|
|
4.3.3 Pure Matter and Physical Reductionism |
|
|
|
4.4 Physical Reductionism Is a Useful and Dangerous Abstraction |
|
|
|
5 The Remarkable Reversal--Revisiting History |
|
|
74 | (17) |
|
5.1 Modern Scientific Historiography and Christian Theology |
|
|
|
5.2 The Social Sciences and Christian Theology |
|
|
|
5.3 "Science and Religion" and Christian Theology after the 1870s |
|
|
|
5.3.1 Functional Demarcation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 The Unremarkable Remarkable Reversal |
|
|
|
6 Thinking "After" Science but Nor "After" Christian Theology |
|
|
91 | (8) |
|
|
|
|
6.2 Not "After" Christian Theology |
|
|
|
7 Rediscovering Christian Theological Epistemology |
|
|
99 | (32) |
|
7.1 The Fall, the Foundations of Science, and Two Theological Anthropology Trajectories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.3 Can Fallen Humanity Know Nature? |
|
|
|
7.4 Complexity Issues regarding Natural Light and Divine Light |
|
|
|
7.5 Distinguishing and Integrating Natural Light and Divine Light |
|
|
|
7.6 An Integrative Zone for "Science and Religion" Today? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.8 Christian Theological Epistemology and Post-Victorian Science |
|
|
|
8 Myth and History--the Fall and Science |
|
|
131 | (26) |
|
8.1 Myth and History in Christian Theology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.4 The Myth of Secular Progress Falters |
|
|
|
8.5 Ricoeur on the Four Basic Mythic Archetypes |
|
|
|
8.5.1 The Mythos of Original Violence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5.4 The Mythos of Exile |
|
|
|
8.6 Ricceur on Myth, Time, and Power |
|
|
|
8.7 What Stands and Falls with the Edenic Fall? |
|
|
|
8.8 On Finding What You Are Looking for--the "Myth" of Epistemic Neutrality |
|
|
|
8.9 Eden and the Shibboleth Dynamic |
|
|
|
8.10 Myth and History--Adam and the Fall |
|
|
|
8.11 Myth and Christian Theological Epistemology |
|
|
|
9 Recovering an Integrative Zone |
|
|
157 | (20) |
|
9.1 The "Myth" of the Autonomy of Science from Theology |
|
|
|
9.2 Obstacles to Recovering the Integration of Knowledge and Understanding |
|
|
|
9.3 Christian Theology's Need for an Integrative Zone for Knowledge and Understanding |
|
|
|
9.4 Rejecting the Sublimation of Understanding into Knowledge |
|
|
|
9.5 Obstacles to Integrating Christian Theological Understanding with Scientific Knowledge |
|
|
|
9.6 What a Working Integrative Zone for Christian Theology and Modern Science Might Look Like |
|
|
|
9.7 A Confident and Uncomfortable Stance |
|
|
| Epilogue: The Future? |
|
177 | (6) |
| Glossary |
|
183 | (12) |
| Bibliography |
|
195 | (10) |
| Index |
|
205 | |
Biežāk uzdotie jautājumi par e-grāmatām