Preface |
|
xxiii | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xxv | |
|
Chapter 1 An Overview of Procedure |
|
|
1 | (48) |
|
A The Idea and the Practice of Procedure |
|
|
1 | (3) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
2 Clients, Lawyers, Procedure, and Strategy |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
B Where Can the Suit Be Brought? |
|
|
4 | (7) |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
2 Subject Matter Jurisdiction |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
Hawkins v. Masters Farms, Inc. |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
11 | (6) |
|
1 The Lawyer's Responsibility |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
Bridges v. Diesel Service, Inc. |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
Note: Reading the Rules --- Process and Politics in State and Federal Courts |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
Bell v. Novick Transfer Co. |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
3 The Response---Motions and Answer |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
|
18 | (3) |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
|
21 | (3) |
|
Fisher v. Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp. |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
E Factual Development---Discovery |
|
|
24 | (5) |
|
Gorson v. T.G.R. Logistics, Inc. |
|
|
26 | (3) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
F Pretrial Disposition --- Summary Judgment |
|
|
29 | (4) |
|
Houchens v. American Home Assurance Co. |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (5) |
|
Norton v. Snapper Power Equipment |
|
|
34 | (2) |
|
|
36 | (2) |
|
|
38 | (2) |
|
|
38 | (2) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (5) |
|
Reise v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
Note on Appellate Structure and Jurisdiction |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
Note: Civil Procedure in Your Substantive Courses |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
Assessment Questions --- And a Word About Using These Questions |
|
|
45 | (4) |
|
Analysis of Assessment Questions |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
PART I THE CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR U.S. LITIGATION |
|
|
49 | (154) |
|
A Approaching Civil Procedure |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
B Constitutional Limits in Litigation |
|
|
49 | (4) |
|
1 The Idea of Jurisdiction |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
2 Jurisdiction and the Constitution |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
3 The Constitution and Choice of Law |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
Chapter 2 Personal Jurisdiction and Notice |
|
|
53 | (88) |
|
|
53 | (6) |
|
|
53 | (4) |
|
|
57 | (2) |
|
B The Modern Constitutional Formulation of Power |
|
|
59 | (15) |
|
1 Redefining Constitutional Power |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
International Shoe Co. v. Washington |
|
|
60 | (4) |
|
|
64 | (2) |
|
McGee v. International life Insurance Co. |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
2 Absorbing In Rem Jurisdiction |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
3 Specific Jurisdiction: The Modern Cases |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson |
|
|
69 | (5) |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro |
|
|
74 | (27) |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
4 General Jurisdiction and Refinements to Specific Jurisdiction |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court |
|
|
82 | (3) |
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist. Court |
|
|
87 | (5) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
Note on Personal Jurisdiction and the Internet |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
Burnham v. Superior Court |
|
|
94 | (4) |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
Note on the Mechanics of Jurisdiction: Challenge and Waiver |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
C Consent as a Substitute for Power |
|
|
101 | (4) |
|
Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute |
|
|
102 | (2) |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
|
105 | (13) |
|
1 The Constitutional Requirements |
|
|
105 | (2) |
|
Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. |
|
|
107 | (2) |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
|
111 | (3) |
|
2 Beyond the Constitutional Requirements: The Mechanics of Notice and Service |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
|
115 | (3) |
|
E Self-Imposed Restraints on Jurisdictional Power: Long-Arm Statutes, Venue, Discretionary Refusal of Jurisdiction, and Multidistrict Litigation |
|
|
118 | (19) |
|
1 Long-Arm Statutes as a Restraint on Jurisdiction |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
2 Venue as a Further Localizing Principle |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
Thompson v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. |
|
|
123 | (2) |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
3 Declining Jurisdiction: Transfer and Forum Non Conveniens |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
|
127 | (4) |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
Atlantic Marine Construction Co. v. United States District Court |
|
|
132 | (3) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
4 Borrowing Jurisdiction: Multidistrict Litigation |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
|
137 | (4) |
|
Analysis of Assessment Questions |
|
|
138 | (3) |
|
Chapter 3 Subject Matter Jurisdiction of the Federal Courts |
|
|
141 | (36) |
|
A The Idea and the Structure of Subject Matter Jurisdiction |
|
|
141 | (3) |
|
B Federal Question Jurisdiction |
|
|
144 | (6) |
|
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mottley |
|
|
145 | (2) |
|
|
147 | (3) |
|
|
150 | (9) |
|
1 Diversity of Citizenship |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
|
152 | (3) |
|
|
155 | (2) |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
D Supplemental Jurisdiction |
|
|
159 | (7) |
|
|
160 | (2) |
|
In re Ameriquest Mortgage Co. Mortgage Lending Practices Litigation |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
Szendrey-Ramos v. First Bancorp |
|
|
163 | (2) |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
E Multidistrict Litigation |
|
|
166 | (2) |
|
|
168 | (5) |
|
|
168 | (3) |
|
Keller Logistics Group, Inc. v. Navistar, Inc. |
|
|
171 | (2) |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
|
173 | (4) |
|
Analysis of Assessment Questions |
|
|
175 | (2) |
|
Chapter 4 State Law in Federal Courts: Erie and Choice of Law |
|
|
177 | (26) |
|
A State Courts as Lawmakers in a Federal System: Erie |
|
|
178 | (7) |
|
1 The Issue in Historical Context |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
2 Constitutionalizing the Issue |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
Erie Railroad v. Tompkins |
|
|
180 | (3) |
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
B The Limits of State Power in Federal Courts |
|
|
185 | (12) |
|
1 Interpreting the Constitutional Command of Erie |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
Guaranty Trust Co. v. York |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
2 De-constitutionalizing Erie |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
|
190 | (3) |
|
|
193 | (3) |
|
3 Determining Whether State and Federal Law Conflict |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
C The Interpretation of State Law in Federal Courts |
|
|
197 | (4) |
|
1 Deciding Which State's Laws to Apply |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
2 Deferring to a State's Interpretation of Its Laws |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
Analysis of Assessment Questions |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
PART II THE PROCESS OF LITIGATION |
|
|
203 | (378) |
|
A Approaching Civil Procedure |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
C A Roadmap for Exploring Choices |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
Chapter 5 Incentives to Litigate |
|
|
205 | (54) |
|
A Litigation in the United States at the Start of the Twenty-First Century |
|
|
205 | (5) |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
B Reasons to Litigate: Dollars, Orders, and Declarations |
|
|
210 | (4) |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
Troupe v. C & S Wholesale Grocers, Inc. |
|
|
211 | (2) |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
a Damage Amounts: Ceilings and Floors |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
|
215 | (9) |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
Lucy Webb Hayes Natl. Training School v. Geoghegan |
|
|
218 | (2) |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
|
220 | (2) |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
|
223 | (1) |
|
a Preliminary Injunctions and Temporary Restraining Orders: The Basic Problem |
|
|
224 | (4) |
|
Detroit Will Breathe v. City of Detroit |
|
|
224 | (3) |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
b Provisional Remedies and Due Process |
|
|
228 | (6) |
|
|
229 | (4) |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
|
234 | (4) |
|
1 The "American" and "English" Rules About Attorneys' Fees |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
2 Insurance, the Contingent Fee, and Alternative Litigation Finance |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
|
239 | (3) |
|
|
242 | (1) |
|
c Alternative Litigation Finance |
|
|
242 | (6) |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
3 Public Subsidies and Professional Charity |
|
|
245 | (3) |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
4 From Fee Spreading to Fee Shifting |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
|
249 | (1) |
|
|
249 | (1) |
|
|
249 | (7) |
|
|
250 | (1) |
|
|
251 | (2) |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources |
|
|
253 | (2) |
|
|
255 | (1) |
|
|
256 | (1) |
|
Analysis of Assessment Questions |
|
|
257 | (2) |
|
|
259 | (72) |
|
|
259 | (15) |
|
1 Of Stories and Jurisdiction |
|
|
259 | (1) |
|
|
260 | (1) |
|
2 Plaintiff's Story, Defendant's Story |
|
|
261 | (1) |
|
3 One Function of Pleading: Establishing the Law |
|
|
262 | (3) |
|
|
265 | (2) |
|
Haddle v. Garrison (S.D. Ga. 1996) |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
|
268 | (1) |
|
Haddle v. Garrison (11th Cir. 1997) |
|
|
269 | (1) |
|
|
269 | (1) |
|
Haddle v. Garrison (525 U.S. 121 (1998)) |
|
|
270 | (2) |
|
|
272 | (1) |
|
4 Another Function of Pleading: Sorting Strong from Weak Cases? |
|
|
273 | (1) |
|
a The "Ordinary" Case: How Much Detail in a Complaint? |
|
|
274 | (15) |
|
|
275 | (2) |
|
|
277 | (9) |
|
|
286 | (1) |
|
McCleary-Evans v. Maryland Department of Transportation, State Highway Administration |
|
|
287 | (2) |
|
|
289 | (1) |
|
b Special Cases: Requiring and Forbidding Specificity in Pleading |
|
|
289 | (9) |
|
Stradford v. Zurich Insurance Co. |
|
|
290 | (2) |
|
|
292 | (1) |
|
5 Allocating the Elements of a Claim |
|
|
293 | (1) |
|
|
294 | (1) |
|
|
295 | (3) |
|
B Ethical Limitations in Pleading---and in Litigation Generally |
|
|
298 | (7) |
|
|
299 | (1) |
|
Christian v. Mattel, Inc. |
|
|
300 | (3) |
|
|
303 | (2) |
|
C Responding to the Complaint |
|
|
305 | (4) |
|
|
305 | (1) |
|
|
305 | (1) |
|
3 The Pre-Answer Motion (and a Close Post-Answer Relative) |
|
|
306 | (1) |
|
|
306 | (1) |
|
|
307 | (2) |
|
|
309 | (1) |
|
|
309 | (1) |
|
|
309 | (5) |
|
Zielinski v. Philadelphia Piers, Inc. |
|
|
310 | (2) |
|
|
312 | (2) |
|
|
314 | (2) |
|
|
314 | (1) |
|
|
315 | (1) |
|
|
315 | (1) |
|
|
316 | (11) |
|
|
316 | (1) |
|
1 The Basic Problem: Prejudice |
|
|
316 | (1) |
|
Beeck v. Aquaslide `N' Dive Corp. |
|
|
316 | (4) |
|
|
320 | (1) |
|
2 Statutes of Limitations and Relation Back |
|
|
321 | (1) |
|
|
322 | (1) |
|
Bonerb v. Richard J. Caron Foundation |
|
|
323 | (2) |
|
|
325 | (2) |
|
|
327 | (1) |
|
Analysis of Assessment Questions |
|
|
328 | (3) |
|
|
331 | (54) |
|
|
331 | (5) |
|
1 Discovery Before Discovery: Obligations and Spoliation |
|
|
332 | (1) |
|
Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLP |
|
|
332 | (2) |
|
|
334 | (1) |
|
2 Getting the Story Straight: Crafting a Discovery Plan |
|
|
335 | (1) |
|
|
336 | (11) |
|
1 Required Disclosures --- First Round |
|
|
338 | (1) |
|
|
338 | (1) |
|
2 Documents, Things, Land, and Bytes: Requests for Production (Rules 34 and 45) |
|
|
339 | (1) |
|
|
340 | (1) |
|
3 Asking Questions in Writing, Seeking Admissions: Interrogatories and Admissions (Rules 33 and 36) |
|
|
341 | (1) |
|
|
342 | (1) |
|
4 Asking Questions in Person: Depositions (Rule 30) and Physical and Mental Evaluations (Rule 35) |
|
|
342 | (2) |
|
|
344 | (3) |
|
5 Pretrial Witness Lists and the Final Pretrial Order |
|
|
347 | (1) |
|
|
347 | (19) |
|
|
347 | (1) |
|
Favale v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Bridgeport |
|
|
348 | (2) |
|
|
350 | (1) |
|
2 Proportionality, Burden, and Privacy |
|
|
351 | (1) |
|
Cerrato v. Nutribullet, LLC |
|
|
351 | (1) |
|
Wagoner v. Lewis Gale Medical Center, LLC |
|
|
352 | (3) |
|
Rengifo v. Erevos Enterprises, Inc. |
|
|
355 | (2) |
|
|
357 | (2) |
|
|
359 | (1) |
|
|
360 | (1) |
|
4 Trial Preparation Material |
|
|
361 | (1) |
|
|
361 | (4) |
|
|
365 | (1) |
|
|
366 | (5) |
|
|
367 | (1) |
|
Thompson v. The Haskell Co. |
|
|
368 | (1) |
|
Chiquita International Ltd. v. M/V Bolero Reefer |
|
|
369 | (1) |
|
|
370 | (1) |
|
E Ensuring Compliance and Controlling Abuse of Discovery |
|
|
371 | (9) |
|
1 Types of Discovery Disputes |
|
|
371 | (1) |
|
|
372 | (1) |
|
|
372 | (2) |
|
3 Remedies: Management and Sanctions |
|
|
374 | (1) |
|
|
374 | (3) |
|
|
377 | (1) |
|
Security National Bank of Sioux City v. Abbott Laboratories |
|
|
378 | (1) |
|
|
379 | (1) |
|
|
380 | (2) |
|
Analysis of Assessment Questions |
|
|
382 | (3) |
|
Chapter 8 Resolution Without Trial |
|
|
385 | (52) |
|
A The Pressure to Choose Adjudication or an Alternative |
|
|
386 | (5) |
|
1 Default and Default Judgments |
|
|
386 | (1) |
|
Peralta v. Heights Medical Center |
|
|
386 | (2) |
|
|
388 | (1) |
|
2 Scheduling Orders and Failure to Prosecute: Involuntary Dismissal |
|
|
389 | (1) |
|
|
390 | (1) |
|
|
390 | (1) |
|
|
391 | (2) |
|
1 Negotiation and Settlement: Why Settle? And How? |
|
|
391 | (2) |
|
|
393 | (4) |
|
|
393 | (4) |
|
b Third-Party Participation in Settlement: Facilitation, Encouragement, and Coercion |
|
|
397 | (1) |
|
|
397 | (1) |
|
c Contracting for Confidentiality |
|
|
398 | (5) |
|
|
398 | (2) |
|
|
400 | (2) |
|
|
402 | (1) |
|
2 Contracting for Private Adjudication: Arbitration and Its Variants |
|
|
403 | (1) |
|
a The Idea and Practice of Arbitration |
|
|
403 | (1) |
|
b Federalism and Arbitration: Herein of Preemption |
|
|
404 | (12) |
|
Ferguson v. Countrywide Credit Industries, Inc. |
|
|
405 | (3) |
|
|
408 | (1) |
|
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Conception |
|
|
409 | (6) |
|
|
415 | (1) |
|
C Adjudication Without Trial: Summary Judgment |
|
|
416 | (18) |
|
|
416 | (2) |
|
1 Summary Judgment in Action: The Burdens on the Moving and Nonmoving Parties |
|
|
418 | (2) |
|
|
420 | (2) |
|
|
422 | (2) |
|
2 Summary Judgment in Action: How Courts Should Assess the Evidence |
|
|
424 | (1) |
|
|
424 | (4) |
|
|
428 | (1) |
|
|
429 | (4) |
|
|
433 | (1) |
|
|
434 | (1) |
|
Analysis of Assessment Questions |
|
|
435 | (2) |
|
Chapter 9 The Trier and the Trial |
|
|
437 | (54) |
|
A Choosing and Challenging Judges |
|
|
438 | (9) |
|
|
439 | (1) |
|
Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co. |
|
|
440 | (6) |
|
|
446 | (1) |
|
B Sharing Power with a Jury |
|
|
447 | (11) |
|
1 When May a Jury Decide? |
|
|
448 | (3) |
|
|
451 | (2) |
|
|
453 | (1) |
|
|
454 | (2) |
|
|
456 | (2) |
|
C What Will Trial Be About? The Final Pretrial Conference and Order |
|
|
458 | (3) |
|
|
458 | (2) |
|
|
460 | (1) |
|
|
461 | (3) |
|
1 Instruction and Comment |
|
|
462 | (1) |
|
2 Excluding Improper Influences |
|
|
462 | (1) |
|
3 Size and Decision Rules |
|
|
463 | (1) |
|
E Judges Controlling Juries: Judgment as a Matter of Law |
|
|
464 | (12) |
|
|
464 | (2) |
|
1 Judgment as a Matter of Law in Action: How Courts Should Assess the Evidence |
|
|
466 | (1) |
|
|
466 | (3) |
|
|
469 | (2) |
|
2 Judgment as Matter of Law in Action: Judgments and Renewed Judgments |
|
|
471 | (1) |
|
|
471 | (1) |
|
Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc. |
|
|
472 | (3) |
|
|
475 | (1) |
|
F Judges Undoing Verdicts: The New Trial |
|
|
476 | (1) |
|
1 The Justifications for New Trials |
|
|
476 | (1) |
|
|
476 | (1) |
|
|
476 | (5) |
|
Lind v. Schenley Industries |
|
|
477 | (3) |
|
|
480 | (1) |
|
|
481 | (1) |
|
a New Trial Limited to Damages |
|
|
481 | (1) |
|
|
481 | (1) |
|
G The Limits of Judicial Power: The Reexamination Clause and the Jury as a Black Box |
|
|
482 | (6) |
|
|
482 | (3) |
|
|
485 | (3) |
|
|
488 | (1) |
|
Analysis of Assessment Questions |
|
|
489 | (2) |
|
|
491 | (32) |
|
A Whether a Decision May Be Reviewed: Obstacles to Appeal |
|
|
491 | (6) |
|
1 The Adversity Requirement |
|
|
492 | (1) |
|
|
492 | (1) |
|
2 The Preservation Requirement |
|
|
493 | (1) |
|
|
494 | (1) |
|
3 Financial Burdens and Other Forms of Discouragement |
|
|
495 | (2) |
|
B When a Decision May Be Reviewed: "Finality" |
|
|
497 | (1) |
|
1 The Final Judgment Rule |
|
|
497 | (1) |
|
a Appellate Jurisdiction and the Final Judgment Rule |
|
|
498 | (5) |
|
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wetzel |
|
|
498 | (3) |
|
|
501 | (2) |
|
b Defining the Moment of Judgment |
|
|
503 | (2) |
|
|
504 | (1) |
|
2 Exceptions to the Final Judgment Rule |
|
|
505 | (1) |
|
|
505 | (5) |
|
Lauro Lines s.r.l. v. Chasser |
|
|
505 | (3) |
|
|
508 | (2) |
|
|
510 | (1) |
|
|
510 | (1) |
|
|
511 | (1) |
|
|
511 | (2) |
|
|
512 | (1) |
|
C How a Decision May Be Reviewed: Scope of Review |
|
|
513 | (7) |
|
|
513 | (1) |
|
Anderson v. Bessemer City |
|
|
513 | (4) |
|
|
517 | (1) |
|
|
517 | (1) |
|
|
518 | (1) |
|
|
519 | (1) |
|
|
520 | (1) |
|
Analysis of Assessment Questions |
|
|
521 | (2) |
|
Chapter 11 Respect for Judgments |
|
|
523 | (58) |
|
|
523 | (1) |
|
1 Precluding the "Same" Claim |
|
|
524 | (1) |
|
|
524 | (11) |
|
Frier v. City of Vandalia |
|
|
524 | (4) |
|
|
528 | (3) |
|
Semtek Intl. Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp. |
|
|
531 | (3) |
|
|
534 | (1) |
|
b Consistency---The Logical Implications of the Former Judgment |
|
|
535 | (14) |
|
|
536 | (1) |
|
2 Between the "Same" Parties |
|
|
537 | (1) |
|
|
537 | (5) |
|
|
542 | (2) |
|
|
544 | (1) |
|
4 After a Judgment "On the Merits" |
|
|
545 | (1) |
|
|
545 | (1) |
|
Gargallo v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith |
|
|
546 | (3) |
|
|
549 | (1) |
|
|
549 | (16) |
|
1 An Issue of Fact or Law |
|
|
550 | (1) |
|
|
550 | (1) |
|
2 An Issue "Actually Litigated and Determined" |
|
|
551 | (1) |
|
Illinois Central Gulf Railroad v. Parks |
|
|
551 | (2) |
|
|
553 | (1) |
|
3 By a Valid and Final Judgment |
|
|
553 | (1) |
|
4 The Determination of the Issue Is "Essential to the Judgment" |
|
|
554 | (1) |
|
|
555 | (1) |
|
5 Against a Party to the First Case, Who Had Adequate Incentive and Opportunity to Litigate the Issue |
|
|
556 | (1) |
|
Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore |
|
|
557 | (4) |
|
|
561 | (4) |
|
C The Boundaries of Preclusion |
|
|
565 | (2) |
|
|
565 | (1) |
|
|
566 | (1) |
|
D Repose: Collateral Attack and Reopened Judgments |
|
|
567 | (10) |
|
1 Full Faith and Credit as a Bar to Collateral Attack |
|
|
567 | (1) |
|
|
568 | (3) |
|
|
571 | (3) |
|
2 The Reopened Judgment as an Alternative to Collateral Attack |
|
|
574 | (1) |
|
United States v. Beggerly |
|
|
574 | (2) |
|
|
576 | (1) |
|
|
577 | (2) |
|
Analysis of Assessment Questions |
|
|
579 | (2) |
|
PART III PROBING THE BOUNDARIES: ADDITIONAL CLAIMS AND PARTIES |
|
|
581 | (86) |
|
|
583 | (84) |
|
|
583 | (1) |
|
1 In a Plaintiff's Complaint |
|
|
583 | (1) |
|
|
583 | (1) |
|
|
584 | (1) |
|
c Joinder and Jurisdiction |
|
|
584 | (7) |
|
|
585 | (1) |
|
2 In Defendant's Answer: Counterclaims and Crossclaims |
|
|
586 | (1) |
|
|
587 | (2) |
|
|
589 | (2) |
|
|
591 | (19) |
|
1 By Plaintiffs: Permissive Joinder |
|
|
591 | (1) |
|
Mosley v. General Motors Corp. |
|
|
591 | (3) |
|
|
594 | (2) |
|
2 By Defendants: Third-Party Claims |
|
|
596 | (1) |
|
|
596 | (2) |
|
|
598 | (3) |
|
3 By Court Order: Compulsory Joinder |
|
|
601 | (1) |
|
|
602 | (1) |
|
|
603 | (1) |
|
Marvel Characters, Inc. v. Kirby |
|
|
604 | (3) |
|
|
607 | (3) |
|
|
610 | (11) |
|
United States v. City of Los Angeles |
|
|
611 | (3) |
|
|
614 | (2) |
|
|
616 | (4) |
|
|
620 | (1) |
|
|
621 | (1) |
|
1 The Class Action and the Constitution |
|
|
621 | (1) |
|
a Representative Adequacy |
|
|
621 | (6) |
|
|
622 | (4) |
|
|
626 | (1) |
|
|
627 | (25) |
|
Phillips Petroleum v. Shutts |
|
|
627 | (3) |
|
|
630 | (1) |
|
2 The Class Action and Federalism |
|
|
631 | (2) |
|
Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Knowles |
|
|
633 | (3) |
|
|
636 | (1) |
|
|
637 | (3) |
|
|
640 | (2) |
|
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes |
|
|
642 | (7) |
|
|
649 | (2) |
|
4 Counsel Appointment and Fees |
|
|
651 | (1) |
|
|
651 | (1) |
|
a Settlement Notice and Approval |
|
|
652 | (2) |
|
|
653 | (1) |
|
|
654 | (9) |
|
Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor |
|
|
654 | (5) |
|
|
659 | (4) |
|
|
663 | (1) |
|
Analysis of Assessment Questions |
|
|
664 | (3) |
Table of Cases |
|
667 | (6) |
Table of Citations to the Judicial Code (28 U.S. C.) |
|
673 | (2) |
Table of Citations to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure |
|
675 | (2) |
Table of Authorities |
|
677 | (2) |
Index |
|
679 | |