Preface and Acknowledgements |
|
x | |
List of Figures |
|
xii | |
List of Maps |
|
xiii | |
List of Tables |
|
xiv | |
Conventions |
|
xv | |
1 Introduction |
|
1 | (37) |
|
1.1 Basics of co-compounds |
|
|
1 | (16) |
|
1.1.1 The form of co-compounds |
|
|
2 | (3) |
|
1.1.2 The meaning of co-compounds |
|
|
5 | (3) |
|
1.1.3 The use of co-compounds |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
1.1.4 Differences and similarities with phrase-like tight coordination |
|
|
10 | (5) |
|
1.1.5 Are co-compounds a form of parallelism? |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
1.2 Co-compounds in the linguistic literature |
|
|
17 | (5) |
|
1.3 Theoretical background, method, and material |
|
|
22 | (13) |
|
1.3.1 Why this is not a classical typological study? |
|
|
22 | (4) |
|
(i) Universal 'semantic' domains and 'language-specific' classes |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
(ii) Discrete and continuous typological variables |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
(iii) The problem of sampling for features that are highly biased areally |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
(iv) Explanations in typology |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
1.3.2 Meaning in language |
|
|
26 | (7) |
|
(i) Meaning in natural languages is not systematically taxonomic |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
(ii) Partial cover meanings |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
(iii) The form-related-ergo-meaning-related approach and its limits |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
(iv) Semantic relativity and the level of cross-linguistic semantic comparison (morpheme vs. utterance) |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
(v) Contextual semantic sharpening |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
1.3.3 The linguistic material considered in this study |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
1.4 Organization of the following chapters |
|
|
35 | (3) |
2 The Marking Patterns of Natural Coordination |
|
38 | (29) |
|
2.1 Different kinds of markedness |
|
|
38 | (7) |
|
2.2 Relational marking in natural coordination |
|
|
45 | (3) |
|
2.3 Non-relational marking in natural coordination |
|
|
48 | (9) |
|
2.3.1 Distinctive non-relational single marking |
|
|
49 | (2) |
|
2.3.2 Distinctive non-relational double marking |
|
|
51 | (3) |
|
2.3.3 Distinctive non-relational zero marking |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
2.3.4 Iconicity of the distinctive non-relational marking strategies |
|
|
55 | (2) |
|
2.4 The syntax of single non-relational marking in coordination |
|
|
57 | (7) |
|
|
58 | (2) |
|
2.4.2 Is coordination with single non-relational marking syntactically asymmetric? |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
2.4.3 Phonological-syntactic non-isomorphism |
|
|
60 | (4) |
|
|
64 | (3) |
3 Tight Coordination |
|
67 | (23) |
|
3.1 The first dimension: the length of the coordination |
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
3.2 The second dimension: the marking patterns of coordination |
|
|
69 | (5) |
|
3.3 The third dimension: the semantic correlates of tight coordination |
|
|
74 | (13) |
|
3.3.1 Group vs. separate coordination |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
3.3.2 Intersective vs. non-intersective coordination |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
3.3.3 Overlapping vs. non-overlapping coordination |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
|
78 | (3) |
|
3.3.5 Non-exhaustive vs. exhaustive listing coordination |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
|
81 | (2) |
|
3.3.7 Explicative disjunction |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
3.3.8 Repair and pseudo-repair |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
3.3.10 Pseudo-coordination |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
87 | (3) |
4 Co-compounds as a Lexical Class Type |
|
90 | (45) |
|
4.1 The traditional morphological (and indirectly syntactic) approach to compounding |
|
|
90 | (2) |
|
4.2 Are (co-)compounds really words? |
|
|
92 | (13) |
|
4.2.1 What is word? Laying out the problem |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
4.2.2 Deconstructing the notion of word |
|
|
93 | (4) |
|
4.2.3 Criteria for the 'wordhood' of compounds (with special reference to co-compounds) |
|
|
97 | (8) |
|
(i) Semantic criteria for compounds |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
(ii) Conventionalized prosodic patterns |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
(iii) Compounding forms and clippings |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
|
101 | (2) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
4.3 An alternative approach to co-compounds: lexical classes |
|
|
105 | (16) |
|
4.3.1 The middle as a typical example for a lexical class type |
|
|
107 | (6) |
|
4.3.2 More examples of lexical class types no |
|
|
|
4.3.3 Co-compounds as a lexical class type |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
4.3.4 Reconsidering lexicalization and the lexicon |
|
|
114 | (3) |
|
4.3.5 Differences and similarities of lexical and grammatical classes |
|
|
117 | (4) |
|
4.4 The form of co-compounds and the problem of formal non-distinctiveness |
|
|
121 | (9) |
|
4.4.1 Distinguishing co-compounds and sub-compounds |
|
|
122 | (2) |
|
4.4.2 Distinguishing co-compounds and serial verbs |
|
|
124 | (2) |
|
4.4.3 Distinguishing co-compounds and coordination |
|
|
126 | (4) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
|
131 | (4) |
5 A Semantic Classification of Co-compounds |
|
135 | (51) |
|
5.1 The basis of the semantic classification |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
5.2 The various semantic types of co-compounds |
|
|
137 | (21) |
|
5.2.1 Additive co-compounds |
|
|
137 | (2) |
|
5.2.2 Generalizing co-compounds |
|
|
139 | (2) |
|
5.2.3 Collective co-compounds |
|
|
141 | (2) |
|
5.2.4 Synonymic co-compounds |
|
|
143 | (3) |
|
5.2.5 Ornamental co-compounds |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
5.2.6 Imitative co-compounds |
|
|
147 | (2) |
|
5.2.7 Figurative co-compounds |
|
|
149 | (2) |
|
5.2.8 Alternative and approximate co-compounds |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
5.2.9 Scalar co-compounds |
|
|
152 | (2) |
|
5.2.10 Basic and non-basic co-compounds |
|
|
154 | (4) |
|
5.3 Contextual semantic sharpening in co-compounds |
|
|
158 | (3) |
|
5.4 Compounds that are closely related to co-compounds |
|
|
161 | (10) |
|
5.4.1 Appositional compounds |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
5.4.2 Intermediate-denoting compounds |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
5.4.3 Comparative (or figurative-appositional) compounds |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
5.4.4 Ideophones and ideophone compounds |
|
|
164 | (2) |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
|
167 | (3) |
|
5.4.7 Affirmative-negative compounds |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
5.5 Contextual motivation of co-compounds |
|
|
171 | (12) |
|
5.5.1 Additive contextual co-compounds |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
5.5.3 Generalizing context |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
5.5.4 Contrast (in adversative sequences) |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
5.5.5 Non-referential contexts and restricted evidence |
|
|
176 | (4) |
|
|
176 | (2) |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
(iii) Irrealis, potentialis, conditional, and future |
|
|
178 | (2) |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
|
183 | (3) |
6 The Areal Distribution of Co-compounds in the Languages of Eurasia |
|
186 | (57) |
|
6.1 Patterns of areal coherence |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
6.2 Consideration of parallel texts |
|
|
187 | (11) |
|
6.3 More evidence for a continuous diminishment of co-compounds from east to west throughout Eurasia |
|
|
198 | (20) |
|
6.3.1 Turkic, Mongolian, and Tungus |
|
|
198 | (3) |
|
6.3.2 The languages of the Caucasus |
|
|
201 | (2) |
|
|
203 | (3) |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
|
208 | (2) |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
|
212 | (2) |
|
|
214 | (4) |
|
6.4 Language internal diversity: the example of Mordvin |
|
|
218 | (7) |
|
6.5 Diversity in co-compounding in Eurasia |
|
|
225 | (4) |
|
6.6 The independence of co-compounds from other typological features |
|
|
229 | (7) |
|
6.6.1 Head and dependent marking |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
6.6.2 Isolating morphological type and monosyllabic words |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
6.6.4 The type of ordinary coordination |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
6.6.5 Dyad constructions and family group classifiers |
|
|
232 | (3) |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
6.A Appendix: Beyond Eurasia |
|
|
237 | (6) |
7 Some Considerations about the Diachronic Evolution of Co-compounds |
|
243 | (31) |
|
7.1 The evolution of markers, patterns, and constructions vs. the evolution of classes |
|
|
243 | (2) |
|
7.2 The diachronic relationship between co-compounds and coordination |
|
|
245 | (7) |
|
7.2.1 The condensation hypothesis |
|
|
245 | (5) |
|
7.2.2 The introduction of new 'heavy forms' |
|
|
250 | (1) |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
7.3 Co-compounds as a lexical class evolve gradually |
|
|
252 | (5) |
|
7.4 The role of textual markedness for the acceptability of co-compounds |
|
|
257 | (7) |
|
7.5 Co-compounds in folk poetry and desemantization |
|
|
264 | (6) |
|
|
270 | (4) |
8 Conclusions |
|
274 | (7) |
Appendix A: Languages and their Linguistic Affiliation |
|
281 | (5) |
Appendix B: Map of Languages |
|
286 | (2) |
References |
|
288 | (23) |
Index of Persons |
|
311 | (6) |
Index of Languages |
|
317 | (6) |
Index of Subjects |
|
323 | |