|
|
1 | (8) |
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
1.3 Research Focus and Design |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
6 | (3) |
|
2 Theoretical Foundations |
|
|
9 | (50) |
|
2.1 Definition of Core Concepts |
|
|
9 | (8) |
|
2.1.1 Information, Knowledge, and Team Cognition |
|
|
9 | (3) |
|
2.1.2 Information Systems Development |
|
|
12 | (2) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
2.1.4 Collaborative Quality Assurance Techniques |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
2.2 Prior Work on Collaborative Quality Assurance Techniques |
|
|
17 | (11) |
|
2.2.1 Adoption and Appropriation |
|
|
18 | (4) |
|
2.2.2 Application and Outcome Effects |
|
|
22 | (3) |
|
2.2.3 Transferability to Team Level |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
2.2.4 Substituting Pair Programming with Peer Code Review |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
2.3 Three Perspectives on Team Cognition in ISD |
|
|
28 | (8) |
|
2.3.1 The Team Learning Curve |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
2.3.2 Team Cognition as a Group Activity in ISD |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
2.3.3 Socio-Cognitive Structures |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
2.4 Selection of Theoretical Lenses |
|
|
36 | (19) |
|
2.4.1 Transactive Memory Systems Theory |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
2.4.1.1 A Bipartite System of Structure and Processes |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
2.4.1.2 Transactive Memory System Development and Effects |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
2.4.1.3 General IS Research on Transactive Memory Systems |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
2.4.2 Concept of Functional Affordances |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
2.4.2.2 Contemporary Conceptualization |
|
|
46 | (3) |
|
2.4.2.3 Broad Application in IS Research |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
2.4.2.4 Application in Group Cognition Research |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
2.4.2.5 Application in ISD Research |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
2.4.2.6 Critical Assessment of Extant Work |
|
|
51 | (2) |
|
2.4.3 Adaptation of Functional Affordances to ISD Techniques |
|
|
53 | (2) |
|
2.5 Summary and Preliminary Research Framework |
|
|
55 | (4) |
|
|
59 | (32) |
|
3.1 Ontological and Epistemological Stance: Critical Realism |
|
|
60 | (3) |
|
3.2 Mixed Methods Research Strategy |
|
|
63 | (4) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
68 | (5) |
|
|
69 | (2) |
|
|
71 | (2) |
|
3.5 Critical Realist Case Studies |
|
|
73 | (9) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
|
76 | (6) |
|
3.6 Questionnaire Survey Study |
|
|
82 | (6) |
|
3.6.1 Instrument Development and Pretest |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
3.6.2 Survey Design and Method |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
3.6.3 Data Collection and Sample Characteristics |
|
|
84 | (3) |
|
3.6.4 Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling: PLS |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (3) |
|
|
91 | (82) |
|
4.1 Empirical Exploration of Collaborative Quality Assurance |
|
|
92 | (16) |
|
4.1.1 Application of the Techniques in Nine Teams |
|
|
92 | (2) |
|
4.1.2 Distinct Functional Affordances of Pair Programming and Peer Code Review |
|
|
94 | (5) |
|
4.1.3 Material Properties and Symbolic Expressions of Collaborative Quality Assurance Techniques |
|
|
99 | (7) |
|
4.1.4 Unclear Effect of Transactive Memory on Functional Affordances |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
4.1.5 Summary and Critical Assessment |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
4.2 Critical Realist Case Studies |
|
|
108 | (32) |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
|
110 | (2) |
|
|
112 | (2) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
4.2.2 The Effect of Transactive Memory on Task Level Affordances |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
4.2.2.1 Overview of Findings |
|
|
116 | (2) |
|
4.2.2.2 Detailed Case Analysis and Supporting Evidence |
|
|
118 | (10) |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
4.2.3 Emergent Effects on Teams' Transactive Memory Systems |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
4.2.3.1 Overview: Homogenization and Transparency |
|
|
129 | (2) |
|
4.2.3.2 Detailed Analysis and Supporting Evidence |
|
|
131 | (6) |
|
4.2.3.3 Summary of Emergent Effects |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
4.2.4 Summary and Critical Assessment |
|
|
138 | (2) |
|
|
140 | (33) |
|
4.3.1 Conceptual Foundations and Overview of Research Model |
|
|
141 | (3) |
|
4.3.2 Detailed Conceptualization and Hypothesis Development |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
4.3.2.1 Perceived Effectiveness of Transactive Memory System |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
4.3.2.2 Team Relationship Quality |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
4.3.2.4 Homogenization Through Pair Programming |
|
|
146 | (3) |
|
4.3.2.5 Software Modularity |
|
|
149 | (2) |
|
4.3.2.6 Transparency Through Peer Code Review |
|
|
151 | (2) |
|
4.3.2.7 Control Variables |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
4.3.3 Operationalization and Measurement Model |
|
|
154 | (3) |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
4.3.4.1 Measurement Model Validation |
|
|
157 | (3) |
|
4.3.4.2 Structural Model Evaluation |
|
|
160 | (5) |
|
4.3.4.3 Robustness Check and Post-Hoc Analyses |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
4.3.5 Summary and Critical Assessment |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
4.3.5.1 Transparency Through Peer Code Review |
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
4.3.5.2 Homogenization Through Pair Programming |
|
|
169 | (2) |
|
4.3.5.3 Software Modularity |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
4.3.5.4 Limitations of Survey Study |
|
|
171 | (2) |
|
|
173 | (20) |
|
5.1 Integration and Interpretation of Findings |
|
|
173 | (3) |
|
5.2 Contributions to Theory and Directions for Future Research |
|
|
176 | (10) |
|
5.3 Contributions to Practice |
|
|
186 | (3) |
|
5.3.1 Implications for ISD Managers |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
5.3.2 Implications for ISD Teams |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
5.3.3 Implications for the Development of Peer Code Review Systems |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
5.4 Limitations of Mixed Methods Study |
|
|
189 | (4) |
|
|
193 | (2) |
|
|
195 | (6) |
|
|
201 | (4) |
|
|
201 | (2) |
|
|
203 | (2) |
|
C Observations and Interviews of In-Depth Case Studies |
|
|
205 | (8) |
|
C.1 Background Meeting with Team Leads |
|
|
205 | (4) |
|
C.2 Observation Report Sheets |
|
|
209 | (4) |
|
D Questionnaire-Based Survey |
|
|
213 | (12) |
|
D.1 Survey Items and Measurement Model |
|
|
213 | (11) |
|
D.2 Post-Hoc Survey Analysis |
|
|
224 | (1) |
Bibliography |
|
225 | (18) |
About the Author |
|
243 | |