Preface |
|
xiii | |
Introduction |
|
xv | |
1 Introduction |
|
1 | (14) |
|
1.1 The Development of an Electronic Control Fuel Injection System |
|
|
2 | (5) |
|
1.1.1 Position Type Electronic Control Fuel Injection System |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
1.1.2 Time Type Electronic Control Fuel Injection System |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
1.1.3 Pressure-Time Controlled (Common Rail) Type Electronic Control Fuel Injection System |
|
|
4 | (3) |
|
1.1.3.1 Medium-Pressure Common Rail System |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
1.1.3.2 High-Pressure Common Rail System |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
1.2 High-Pressure Common Rail System: Present Situation and Development |
|
|
7 | (8) |
|
1.2.1 For a Common Rail System |
|
|
7 | (4) |
|
1.2.1.1 Germany BOSCH Company of the High-Pressure Common Rail System |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
1.2.1.2 The Delphi DCR System of the Company |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
1.2.1.3 Denso High-Pressure Common Rail Injection System of the Company |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
1.2.2 High-Power Marine Diesel Common Rail System |
|
|
11 | (4) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
1.2.2.2 High-Pressure Oil Pump |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
1.2.2.4 Electronically Controlled Injector |
|
|
13 | (2) |
2 Common Rail System Simulation and Overall Design Technology |
|
15 | (28) |
|
2.1 Common Rail System Basic Model |
|
|
15 | (8) |
|
2.1.1 The Common Rail System Required to Simulate a Typical Module HYDSIM |
|
|
16 | (5) |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
2.1.1.3 Runner Class Module |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
2.1.1.4 Annular Gap Class Module Physical Model Shown in Figure 2.6 |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
2.1.2 The Relevant Parameters During the Simulation Calculations |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
2.1.2.1 Fuel Physical Parameters |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
2.1.2.2 Fuel Flow Resistance |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
2.1.2.3 Partial Loss of Fuel Flow |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
2.1.2.4 Rigid Elastic Volume Expansion and Elastic Compression |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
2.2 Common Rail System Simulation Model |
|
|
23 | (3) |
|
2.2.1 High-Pressure Pump Simulation Model |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
2.2.2 Injector Flow Restrictor Simulation Model |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
2.2.3 Simulation Model Electronic Fuel Injector |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
2.2.4 Overall Model Common Rail System |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
2.3 Influence Analysis of the High-Pressure Common Rail System Parameters |
|
|
26 | (17) |
|
2.3.1 Influence Analysis of the High-Pressure Fuel Pump Structure Parameters |
|
|
26 | (7) |
|
2.3.1.1 Frequency of the Fuel Supply Pump |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
2.3.1.2 Quantity of the Fuel Supply by the High-Pressure Supply Pump |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
2.3.1.3 Diameter of the Oil Outlet Valve Hole of the High-Pressure Pump |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
2.3.1.4 Influence of the Pre-tightening Force of the Oil Outlet Valve |
|
|
31 | (2) |
|
2.3.2 Analysis of the Influence of the High-Pressure Rail Volume |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
2.3.3 Influence of the Injector Structure Parameters |
|
|
34 | (6) |
|
2.3.3.1 Control Orifice Diameter |
|
|
34 | (2) |
|
2.3.3.2 Influence of the Control Chamber Volume |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
2.3.3.3 Influence of the Control Piston Assembly on the Fuel Injector Response Characteristics |
|
|
36 | (2) |
|
2.3.3.4 Influence of the Needle Valve Chamber Volume |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
2.3.3.5 Influence of the Pressure Chamber Volume |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
2.3.3.6 Influence of the Nozzle Orifice Diameter on the Response Characteristics of the Injector |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
2.3.4 Influence of the Flow Limiter |
|
|
40 | (2) |
|
2.3.4.1 Influence of the Plunger Diameter |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
2.3.4.2 Influence of the Flow Limiter Orifice Diameter |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
2.3.5 Common Rail System Design Principle |
|
|
42 | (1) |
3 Electronically Controlled Injector Design Technologies |
|
43 | (84) |
|
3.1 Electric Control Fuel Injector Control Solenoid Valve Design Technology |
|
|
43 | (29) |
|
3.1.1 Solenoid Valve 33 Mathematical Analysis Model |
|
|
43 | (6) |
|
3.1.1.1 Circuit Subsystem |
|
|
43 | (3) |
|
3.1.1.2 Magnetic Circuit Subsystem |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
3.1.1.3 Mechanical Circuit Subsystem |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
3.1.1.4 Hydraulic Subsystem |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
3.1.1.5 Thermodynamic Subsystem |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
3.1.1.6 Dynamic Characteristic Synthetic Mathematical Model of the Solenoid Valve |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
3.1.2 Solenoid Magnetic Field Finite Element Analysis |
|
|
49 | (4) |
|
3.1.2.1 Model Establishment and Mesh Creation |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
51 | (2) |
|
3.1.2.3 Result Display After ANSYS |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
3.1.3 Solenoid Valve Response Characteristic Analysis |
|
|
53 | (18) |
|
3.1.3.1 The Influence of Spring Pre-load on the Dynamic Response Time of the Solenoid Valve |
|
|
57 | (3) |
|
3.1.3.2 The Influence of Spring Stiffness on the Dynamic Response Time of the Solenoid Valve |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
3.1.3.3 The Influence of Driving Voltage on the Dynamic Response Time of the Solenoid Valve |
|
|
60 | (2) |
|
3.1.3.4 Influence of Capacitance on the Dynamic Response Time of the Solenoid Valve |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
3.1.3.5 Influence of Structure of the Iron Core on the Response Characteristics of the Solenoid Valve |
|
|
63 | (4) |
|
3.1.3.6 Influence of Coil Structure Parameters on the Response Characteristics of the Solenoid Valve |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
3.1.3.7 The Influence of Working Air Gap (Electromagnetic Valve Lift) of the Solenoid Valve |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
3.1.3.8 Material Selection of the Electromagnetic Valve |
|
|
69 | (2) |
|
3.1.4 What Should Be of Concern When Designing the Solenoid Valve |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
3.2 Nozzle Design Technology |
|
|
72 | (55) |
|
3.2.1 Mathematical Model and Spray Model Analysis of the Nozzle Internal Flow Field |
|
|
72 | (18) |
|
3.2.1.1 CFD Simulation of the Nozzle Flow Field |
|
|
73 | (5) |
|
3.2.1.1.1 Description of the Computational Model |
|
|
73 | (5) |
|
3.2.1.2 Determination of the Calculation Area and Establishment of the Calculation Model |
|
|
78 | (3) |
|
3.2.1.3 Discrete Computational Model of the Finite Volume Method |
|
|
81 | (3) |
|
3.2.1.3.1 Computational Mesh Generation |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
3.2.1.3.2 Definition of Boundary and Initial Conditions |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
3.2.1.3.3 Numerical Solution |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
3.2.1.4 Spray Model of the Nozzle |
|
|
84 | (6) |
|
3.2.1.4.1 Hole Type Flow Nozzle Model |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
3.2.1.4.4 Primary Breakup Model of Diesel Engine |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
3.2.2 Analysis of the Influence of Injection on the Electronically Controlled Injector |
|
|
90 | (29) |
|
3.2.2.1 The Effect of Injector Orifices |
|
|
91 | (4) |
|
3.2.2.2 The Influence of the Ratio of the Length to the Diameter of the Orifice |
|
|
95 | (6) |
|
3.2.2.3 The Influence of the Round Angle at the Inlet of the Orifice |
|
|
101 | (5) |
|
3.2.2.4 The Influence of the Shape of the Needle Valve Head |
|
|
106 | (4) |
|
3.2.2.5 Effect of the Injection Angle |
|
|
110 | (6) |
|
3.2.2.6 The Influence of the Number of Orifices |
|
|
116 | (3) |
|
3.2.3 Simulation and Experimental Study of Spray |
|
|
119 | (8) |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
3.2.3.2 Simulation Calculation of the Nozzle Flow Field |
|
|
119 | (4) |
|
3.2.3.3 Simulation and Test Verification of Spray |
|
|
123 | (4) |
4 High-Pressure Fuel Pump Design Technology |
|
127 | (84) |
|
4.1 Leakage Control Technique for the Plunger and Barrel Assembly |
|
|
127 | (27) |
|
4.1.1 Finite Element Analysis of the Fluid Physical Field in the Plunger and Barrel Assembly Gap |
|
|
130 | (8) |
|
4.1.1.1 Similarity Principle |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
4.1.1.2 Similarity Criterion |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
4.1.1.3 Dimensional Analysis and the Pion Theorem |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
4.1.1.4 Similarity Model and Finite Element Analysis of the Clearance Flow Field |
|
|
133 | (5) |
|
4.1.2 Finite Element Analysis of the Plunger and Barrel Assembly Structure |
|
|
138 | (2) |
|
4.1.2.1 Three-dimensional Solid Finite Element Model |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
4.1.2.2 Constraint Condition of Structure Field |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
4.1.2.3 Structural Field Solution |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
4.1.3 Structural Optimization of the Plunger and Barrel Assembly |
|
|
140 | (8) |
|
4.1.3.1 Analysis of the Preliminary Simulation Result |
|
|
140 | (4) |
|
4.1.3.2 Deformation Compensation Optimization Strategy |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
4.1.3.3 ANSYS Optimization Analysis |
|
|
144 | (3) |
|
4.1.3.4 Evaluation of the Optimization Result |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
4.1.4 Experimental Study on the Deformation Compensation Performance of the Plunger and Barrel Assembly |
|
|
148 | (6) |
|
4.1.4.1 Test for the Sealing Performance of the Plunger and Barrel Assembly |
|
|
148 | (3) |
|
4.1.4.2 Plunger and Barrel Assembly Deformation Test |
|
|
151 | (3) |
|
4.2 Strength Analysis of the Cam Transmission System for a High-pressure Fuel Pump |
|
|
154 | (22) |
|
4.2.1 Dynamic Simulation of the Cam Mechanism of a High-Pressure Pump |
|
|
155 | (3) |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
4.2.1.2 Rigid-Flexible Hybrid Modeling and Simulation of the Camshaft Mechanism |
|
|
156 | (2) |
|
4.2.2 Stress Analysis of the Cam and Roller Contact Surface |
|
|
158 | (11) |
|
4.2.2.1 Contact Stress Calculation Method |
|
|
159 | (3) |
|
4.2.2.2 Calculation of Contact Stress under the Combined Action of Normal and Tangential Loads |
|
|
162 | (2) |
|
4.2.2.3 Analysis of the Cam Working State |
|
|
164 | (5) |
|
4.2.3 Experimental Study on Stress and Strain of the High-Pressure Fuel Pump |
|
|
169 | (7) |
|
4.2.3.1 Test and Analysis of the Pressure of the Plunger Cavity |
|
|
169 | (5) |
|
4.2.3.2 Stress Test and Analysis of the Camshaft |
|
|
174 | (2) |
|
4.3 Research on Common Rail Pressure Control Technology Based on Pump Flow Control |
|
|
176 | (35) |
|
4.3.1 Design Study of a High-Pressure Pump Flow Control Device |
|
|
177 | (17) |
|
4.3.1.1 Overview of a High-Pressure Pump Flow Control Device |
|
|
177 | (4) |
|
4.3.1.2 Structure and Working Principle of the High-Speed Solenoid Valve |
|
|
181 | (2) |
|
4.3.1.3 Simulation of the Static Characteristic of the Solenoid Valve |
|
|
183 | (5) |
|
4.3.1.4 Simulation of Dynamic Characteristics of the Solenoid Valve |
|
|
188 | (3) |
|
4.3.1.5 Design and Optimization of the One-Way Valve |
|
|
191 | (3) |
|
4.3.2 Conjoint Simulation Analysis of a Flow Control Device and the Common Rail System |
|
|
194 | (2) |
|
4.3.2.1 Simulation of the Flow Control Device |
|
|
194 | (2) |
|
4.3.3 Analysis of Simulation Results |
|
|
196 | (4) |
|
4.3.4 Experimental Study on the Regulation of Common Rail Pressure by the Flow Control Device |
|
|
200 | (11) |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
4.3.4.2 Sealing Performance Test of the One-Way Valve |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
4.3.4.3 Experimental Study on the Dynamic Response Characteristics of the Electromagnet |
|
|
202 | (2) |
|
4.3.4.4 Test of Pressure Control in the Common Rail Chamber |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
|
205 | (3) |
|
4.3.4.6 Experimental Study of the Influence of the Duty Ratio of the Solenoid Valve on the Pressure Fluctuation of the Common Rail |
|
|
208 | (3) |
5 ECU Design Technique |
|
211 | (62) |
|
5.1 An Overview of Diesel Engine Electronically Controlled Technology |
|
|
211 | (6) |
|
5.1.1 The Development of ECU |
|
|
212 | (3) |
|
5.1.1.1 The Application of Control Theory in the Research of an Electronically Controlled Unit |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
5.1.1.1.1 Adaptive Control and Robust Control |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
5.1.1.1.2 Neural Network and Fuzzy Control |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
5.1.1.2 Function Expansion of the Engine Management System |
|
|
213 | (2) |
|
5.1.1.2.1 Fault Diagnosis Function for an Electronically Controlled Engine |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
5.1.1.2.2 Field Bus Technology |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
5.1.1.2.3 Sensor Technology |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
5.1.1.3 Development of Computer Hardware Technology |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
5.1.2 Development of Electronically Controlled System Development Tools and Design Methods |
|
|
215 | (2) |
|
5.1.2.1 Application of Computer Simulation Technology |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
5.1.2.2 Computer-Aided Control System Design Technology |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
5.2 Overall Design of the Controller |
|
|
217 | (11) |
|
5.2.1 Controller Development Process |
|
|
217 | (2) |
|
5.2.2 Hierarchical Function Design and Technical Indicators of the Controller |
|
|
219 | (2) |
|
|
221 | (2) |
|
5.2.3.1 Man-Machine Interactive Interface Input Signal |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
5.2.3.1.1 Switching Signal |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
5.2.3.1.2 Continuous Signal |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
5.2.3.2 Sensor Input Signal |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
5.2.3.2.1 Temperature Input Signal |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
5.2.3.2.2 Pressure Input Signal |
|
|
223 | (1) |
|
5.2.3.2.3 Pulse Input Signal |
|
|
223 | (1) |
|
|
223 | (5) |
|
5.2.4.1 Starting Motor Control Switch Signal |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
5.2.4.2 Drive Signal of the Electronically Controlled Injector |
|
|
225 | (2) |
|
5.2.4.2.1 Time Precision Requirements |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
5.2.4.2.2 Current Waveform Requirements |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
5.2.4.2.3 Power Requirements |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
5.2.4.3 The Driving Signal of the Solenoid Valve Controlled by the Common Rail Chamber Pressure |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
5.3 Design of the Diesel Engine Control Strategy Based on the Finite State Machine |
|
|
228 | (7) |
|
5.3.1 Brief Introduction of the Finite State Machine |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
5.3.1.1 Finite State Machine Definition |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
5.3.1.2 State Transition Diagram |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
5.3.2 Design of the Operation State Conversion Module |
|
|
229 | (3) |
|
5.3.3 Design of the Self-Inspection State Control Strategy |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
5.3.4 Design of the Starting State Control Strategy |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
5.3.5 Design of a State Control Strategy for Acceleration and Deceleration |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
5.3.6 Design of a Stable Speed Control Strategy |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
5.3.7 Principle of the Oil Supply Pulse |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
5.4 Design of the ECU Hardware Circuit |
|
|
235 | (20) |
|
5.4.1 Selection of Core Controller Parts |
|
|
235 | (3) |
|
5.4.1.1 Characteristics of FPGA |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
5.4.1.2 Selection of Core Auxiliary Devices |
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
5.4.2 Control Core Circuit Design |
|
|
238 | (4) |
|
5.4.2.1 FPGA Circuit Design |
|
|
238 | (2) |
|
5.4.2.1.1 Power Supply Design |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
5.4.2.1.2 Configuration Circuit Design |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
5.4.2.1.3 Logic Voltage Matching Circuit |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
5.4.2.2 Circuit Design of SCM |
|
|
240 | (2) |
|
5.4.3 Design of the Sensor Signal Conditioning Circuit |
|
|
242 | (6) |
|
5.4.3.1 Design of the Signal Conditioning Circuit for the Temperature Sensor |
|
|
242 | (2) |
|
5.4.3.2 Design of the Signal Conditioning Circuit for the Pressure Sensor |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
5.4.3.3 Design of the Pulse Signal Conditioning Circuit |
|
|
245 | (3) |
|
5.4.4 Design of the Power Drive Circuit |
|
|
248 | (7) |
|
5.4.4.1 Design of the Power Drive Circuit of the Pressure Controlled Solenoid Overflow Valve in the Common Rail Chamber |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
5.4.4.2 Design of the Power Drive Circuit for the Solenoid Valve of the Injector |
|
|
249 | (6) |
|
5.5 Soft Core Development of the Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) |
|
|
255 | (18) |
|
5.5.1 EDA Technology and VHDL Language |
|
|
256 | (2) |
|
5.5.1.1 Introduction of EDA Technology and VHDL Language |
|
|
256 | (1) |
|
5.5.1.2 Introduction of EDA Tools |
|
|
257 | (1) |
|
5.5.2 Module Division of the FPGA Internal Function |
|
|
258 | (3) |
|
5.5.3 Design of the Rotational Speed Measurement Module |
|
|
261 | (5) |
|
5.5.3.1 Measuring Principle |
|
|
261 | (2) |
|
|
263 | (3) |
|
5.5.4 Design of the Control Pulse Generation Module for the Injector |
|
|
266 | (7) |
|
5.5.4.1 The Function, Input, and Output of the Injector Control Pulse Generation Module |
|
|
266 | (5) |
|
5.5.4.1.1 Shortening Timing Compensation Method |
|
|
268 | (1) |
|
5.5.4.1.2 Increasing the Advance Angle Compensation Method |
|
|
269 | (2) |
|
5.5.4.2 The Realization of the Control Pulse Generation Module of the Injector |
|
|
271 | (2) |
6 Research on Matching Technology |
|
273 | (20) |
|
6.1 Component Matching Technology of the Common Rail System |
|
|
273 | (8) |
|
6.1.1 Matching Design of the High-Pressure Fuel Pump |
|
|
273 | (1) |
|
6.1.2 Matching Design of the Rail Chamber |
|
|
274 | (1) |
|
6.1.3 Matching Design of the Injector |
|
|
274 | (7) |
|
6.1.3.1 Modeling and Verification of Diesel Engine Spray and the Combustion Simulation Model |
|
|
276 | (2) |
|
6.1.3.2 Optimal Parameters and Objective Functions |
|
|
278 | (1) |
|
6.1.3.3 Simulation Experiment Design (DOE) |
|
|
278 | (2) |
|
6.1.3.4 Establishment of an Approximate Model for the Response Surface |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
6.2 Parameter Optimization and Result Analysis of the Injection System |
|
|
281 | (4) |
|
|
281 | (1) |
|
6.2.2 Global Optimization Based on the Approximate Model |
|
|
282 | (1) |
|
6.2.3 Optimization Results Analysis |
|
|
283 | (2) |
|
6.3 Optimization Calibration Technology of the Jet Control MAP |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
6.3.2 Optimal Calibration Method |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
6.3.3 Optimization of Target Analysis |
|
|
286 | (1) |
|
6.4 Off-line Steady-State Optimization Calibration of the Common Rail Diesel Engine |
|
|
286 | (7) |
|
6.4.1 Mathematical Model for Optimization of the Electric Control Parameters |
|
|
287 | (1) |
|
6.4.2 Experimental Design |
|
|
287 | (1) |
|
6.4.3 Establishment of the Performance Prediction Response Model |
|
|
288 | (1) |
|
6.4.4 Optimal Calibration |
|
|
289 | (2) |
|
|
291 | (2) |
7 Development of the Dual Pressure Common Rail System |
|
293 | (50) |
|
7.1 Structure Design and Simulation Modeling of the Dual Pressure Common Rail System |
|
|
295 | (4) |
|
7.1.1 Design of the Dual Pressure Common Rail System Supercharger |
|
|
295 | (4) |
|
7.1.2 Modeling of the Dual Pressure Common Rail System |
|
|
299 | (1) |
|
7.2 Simulation Study of the Dual Pressure Common Rail System |
|
|
299 | (14) |
|
7.2.1 Study of the Dynamic Characteristics of the System |
|
|
299 | (13) |
|
7.2.1.1 Simulation of the Dynamic Characteristics of the System |
|
|
300 | (3) |
|
7.2.1.2 Sensitivity Analysis of the Structural Parameters of the Supercharger |
|
|
303 | (5) |
|
7.2.1.3 Study on Pressure Oscillation Elimination of the Supercharger Chamber in the Dual Pressure Common Rail System |
|
|
308 | (7) |
|
|
309 | (2) |
|
|
311 | (1) |
|
7.2.2 Prototype Trial Production |
|
|
312 | (1) |
|
7.3 Control Strategy and Implementation of the Dual Pressure Common Rail System |
|
|
313 | (12) |
|
7.3.1 Control Strategy of the Dual Pressure Common Rail System |
|
|
314 | (1) |
|
7.3.2 Hardware and Software Design of the Controller Based on the Single Chip Microcomputer |
|
|
315 | (4) |
|
7.3.2.1 The Basic Composition of the Control System |
|
|
315 | (1) |
|
7.3.2.2 Performance of Control Chip and Its Circuit Design |
|
|
316 | (3) |
|
7.3.2.2.1 The Circuit Design of the Minimum System of the Single Chip Microcomputer |
|
|
316 | (1) |
|
7.3.2.2.2 Design of the Serial Communication Circuit |
|
|
316 | (2) |
|
7.3.2.2.3 Pulse Signal Conditioning Circuit |
|
|
318 | (1) |
|
7.3.2.3 Programming of Control System |
|
|
319 | (1) |
|
7.3.3 Drive Circuit Design |
|
|
319 | (6) |
|
7.3.3.1 Design Requirements of the Driving Circuit |
|
|
319 | (2) |
|
7.3.3.2 Design of the Power Drive Circuit |
|
|
321 | (4) |
|
7.3.3.2.1 Power Drive Circuit of the GMM Actuator |
|
|
321 | (2) |
|
7.3.3.2.2 Power Drive Circuit of the Solenoid Valve |
|
|
323 | (2) |
|
7.4 Experimental Study on the Dual Pressure Common Rail System |
|
|
325 | (18) |
|
7.4.1 Test of Pressurization Pressure and Injection Law |
|
|
325 | (11) |
|
7.4.1.1 Test Platform for Pressurization Pressure and Fuel Injection |
|
|
325 | (3) |
|
7.4.1.2 Simulation and Test |
|
|
328 | (1) |
|
7.4.1.3 Effect of the Turbocharging Ratio on Pressure and Fuel Injection Law |
|
|
329 | (5) |
|
7.4.1.4 Effect of the Control Time Series on Pressurization Pressure and Fuel Injection Law |
|
|
334 | (1) |
|
7.4.1.5 Test of System High-Pressure Oil Consumption |
|
|
334 | (2) |
|
7.4.2 Test on Spray Characteristics of the Dual Pressure Common Rail System |
|
|
336 | (4) |
|
7.4.2.1 Spray Photography Test Platform |
|
|
336 | (2) |
|
7.4.2.2 Effect of the Fuel Injection Law on Fuel Injection Quantity |
|
|
338 | (1) |
|
7.4.2.3 Effect of the Injection Rate Shape on Spray Penetration and the Spray Cone Angle |
|
|
338 | (2) |
|
7.4.3 Experimental Research Conclusions |
|
|
340 | (3) |
Index |
|
343 | |