Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Comparing Law: Comparative Law as Reconstruction of Collective Commitments

(University of Toronto)
  • Formāts: PDF+DRM
  • Sērija : ASCL Studies in Comparative Law
  • Izdošanas datums: 25-Oct-2018
  • Izdevniecība: Cambridge University Press
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781108577007
  • Formāts - PDF+DRM
  • Cena: 39,24 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.
  • Formāts: PDF+DRM
  • Sērija : ASCL Studies in Comparative Law
  • Izdošanas datums: 25-Oct-2018
  • Izdevniecība: Cambridge University Press
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781108577007

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

Comparing Law will appeal to all involved in comparative legal research, theorists and practitioners, both seasoned or beginners. This book provides an intellectually and linguistically accessible analytic framework for comparative law, one that serves to both redeem the existing scholarship and offer guidance for future work.

The enterprise of comparative law is familiar, yet its conceptual whereabouts remain somewhat obscure. Comparing Law: Comparative Law as Reconstruction of Collective Commitments reconstructs comparative law scholarship into a systematic account of comparative law as an autonomous academic discipline. The point of that discipline is neither to harmonize world law, nor to emphasize its cultural diversity, but rather to understand each legal system on its own terms. As the proposed reconstruction exercise involves bridging comparative law and contemporary legal theory, it shows how comparative law and legal theory both stand to benefit from being exposed to each other. At a time when many courses are adding a transnational perspective, Valcke offers a more theoretical, broadened, and refreshed view of comparative law.

Recenzijas

'This insightful analysis of the current state of comparative law is sure to be a landmark valuable both as a survey of the field and as a highly original contribution to the debates over comparative method.' William Ewald, University of Pennsylvania 'As comparative law becomes a more pervasive and more important field, the need for theoretical and practical reflection on the actual methods and point of comparison becomes even more pressing. Catherine Valcke's path breaking book not only provides the foundation for comparative law methodology, but also, in seeing comparison as focusing on commonalities as well as differences, offers a novel and provocative theory of the very idea of comparison.' Frederick Schauer, David and Mary Harrison Distinguished Professor of Law, University of Virginia 'Catherine Valcke combines her vast knowledge in both jurisprudence and comparative law into a study that is both rigorously argued and thoroughly original. This fabulous book moves both disciplines forward in extremely needed ways.' Ralf Michaels, Duke University, North Carolina 'One can only thank Catherine Valcke for having contributed so meaningfully to this new, and much-needed, trend.' Luca Siliquini-Cinelli, Edinburgh Law Review

Papildus informācija

Reconstructs existing comparative law scholarship into a coherent analytic framework so as to both fend off current charges of theoretical arbitrariness and guide future work.
Acknowledgements xiii
Prologue: The `Malaise' of Comparative Law 1(12)
Detailed Description of
Chapter Contents
13(5)
1 Law
18(42)
Introduction
18(1)
I `Law as Collective Commitment'
19(25)
i Effectiveness
20(2)
ii Argumentativeness
22(5)
iii Coherence
27(3)
iv Publicness
30(4)
v Formality
34(4)
vi Normativity
38(6)
II An Idealist/Materialist Conception
44(15)
i Natural Law as Idealist Ideal-Type
44(4)
ii Positivism as Materialist Ideal-Type
48(4)
iii Law as Collective Commitment as Natural Law/Positivism Hybrid
52(7)
Conclusion
59(1)
2 Legal Systems
60(30)
Introduction
60(1)
I Comparison Requires Distinctness and Connectedness
61(9)
i `Distinctness'
62(1)
ii `Connectedness'
63(2)
iii From Comparability to Meaningful Comparison
65(1)
iv Meaningful Comparison in Law
66(4)
II Legal Systems Under Natural Law
70(7)
III Legal Systems Under Positivism
77(9)
IV Legal Systems Under Law as Collective Commitment
86(3)
Conclusion
89(1)
3 Engaging with Legal Systems: Epistemology
90(43)
Introduction
90(1)
I Internal and External Perspectives in the Social Sciences
90(5)
II Internal and External Perspectives in Law
95(14)
i An External Perspective Under the Natural Law and Positivist Ideal-Types
96(1)
ii An Internal Perspective Under Law as Collective Commitment
97(2)
iii A Midway Position?
99(2)
iv The Heterogeneity Objection
101(4)
v The Subjectivity Objection
105(4)
III Internal and External Perspectives in Comparative Law
109(23)
i The Outsider's Internal Perspective
110(2)
ii The Outsider's Home Bias
112(9)
iii The Outsider's Internal/External Process
121(5)
iv The Outsider's Comparative Contribution
126(3)
v The Outsider's Many Legal Games
129(3)
Conclusion
132(1)
4 Delineating Legal Systems: Geography
133(56)
Introduction
133(2)
I Internal and External Legal System Delineation
135(9)
i Internal Delineation
135(8)
ii External Delineation
143(1)
II Legal Systems as Bee Swarms
144(15)
i A Well-Defined (Material) Centre of Gravity
144(5)
ii Fluid (Intellectual) Edges
149(10)
III Bee Swarms in Global Law
159(27)
i Monism Versus Pluralism
160(4)
ii `Strong' Versus `Weak' Legal Pluralism
164(7)
iii `Subnational' Versus `Supranational' Weak Legal Pluralism
171(15)
Conclusion
186(3)
5 Comparing Legal Systems: Methodology
189(30)
Introduction
189(1)
I Gathering the Relevant Legal Data
190(15)
i Choosing a Topic and Target Legal Systems
192(2)
ii Identifying Potentially Relevant Legal Data: Functionalism
194(6)
iii Sorting Relevant Legal Data: Expressivism
200(5)
II Reconstructing the Data into Systems
205(6)
III Comparing the Systems
211(5)
Conclusion
216(3)
Epilogue: The Academic Discipline of Comparative Law 219(6)
Index 225
Catherine Valcke is Full Professor, Faculty of Law at the University of Toronto. She has taught, lectured and published on comparative law, comparative law theory and legal theory worldwide, including in such journals as Nomos, The American Journal of Comparative Law, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Yale Journal of International Law, European Review of Private Law, and Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence. Her work on English and French contract law, in particular, was recently cited as 'illuminating' by the English House of Lords. An elected member of the International Academy of Comparative Law, she has acted as National Reporter for Canada to the Congress of the Academy.