Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Comparison in Anthropology: The Impossible Method

(University of Cambridge)
  • Formāts: PDF+DRM
  • Sērija : New Departures in Anthropology
  • Izdošanas datums: 15-Nov-2018
  • Izdevniecība: Cambridge University Press
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781108626965
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Formāts - PDF+DRM
  • Cena: 30,92 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.
  • Formāts: PDF+DRM
  • Sērija : New Departures in Anthropology
  • Izdošanas datums: 15-Nov-2018
  • Izdevniecība: Cambridge University Press
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781108626965
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

Why and how do social and cultural anthropologists make comparisons? What problems do they encounter in doing so, and how might these be resolved? What, if anything, makes one comparison better than another? This book answers these questions by exploring the many ways in which, from the nineteenth century to the present day, comparative methods have been conceptualised and re-invented, praised and rejected, multiplied and unified. Anthropologists today use comparisons to describe and to explain, to generalise and to challenge generalisations, to critique and to create new concepts. In this multiplicity of often contradictory aims lie both the key challenge of anthropological comparison, and also its key strength. Matei Candea maps a path through that entangled conversation, providing a ground-up re-assessment of the key conceptual issues at the heart of any form of anthropological comparison, whilst creating a bold charter for reconsidering the value of comparison in anthropology and beyond.

Recenzijas

'This witty, mind-opening and intellectually generous book is a classic in the making. Candea combines a breathtaking sweep of comparative practice and the constantly self-eclipsing waves of anthropological enquiry with a penetrating discernment of the theoretical passions that shape it and how anthropologists distinctively keep them in play. The comparative method will never be the same. It is also a gripping read!' Marilyn Strathern, University of Cambridge 'As Matei Candea shows in this deeply thoughtful volume, anthropology has long been haunted by the sense that comparison is impossible yet indispensable. To a topic that has at times inspired the heat of polemics, at others that silence of taboo, Candea brings a voice that is calm - even wise.' Webb Keane, University of Michigan 'Matei Candea's book, Comparison in Anthropology: The Impossible Method, is a fascinating example of how complex, and how intellectually fortifying, the survival-revival genre can be. As a historical primer on how anthropologists compare, and when they decide not to, the book has no rivals. I say this knowing that the publication of books and essays on comparison is endless Candea re-articulates everything the comparative method aspires to but cannot attain. Comparison in Anthropology is an exemplary blend of preaching and practice. Read it. Teach it. Object to it. And enjoy its incomparable eects.' Andrew Shryock, History and Anthropology

Papildus informācija

Presents a systematic rethinking of the power and limits of comparison in anthropology.
List of Figures
x
Preface: What We Know in our Elbows xi
Introduction 1(26)
Our Impossible Method
1(3)
Too General, Too Specific
4(3)
The Pinch of Salt
7(5)
A Roadmap to the Book
12(6)
A Negative-Space Ethnography
18(9)
Part I Impossibilities
27(158)
1 The Impossible Method
29(24)
Introduction: On Seeing One Comparative Method
29(5)
Problems of Mapping
34(6)
Problems of Communication
40(7)
Problems of Purpose
47(5)
Conclusion: From Problems to Impossibility
52(1)
2 The Garden of Forking Paths
53(95)
Introduction: On Seeing Two Comparative Methods
53(3)
Fork 1: The Comparative Method vs Naive Comparisons: The Birth of an Impossible Method
56(16)
Fork 2: The Historical Method vs the Comparative Method: A Boasian Crisis
72(6)
Fork 3: Comparison vs Description: Varieties of Functionalist Hope
78(18)
Fork 4: Topology vs Typology: Structuralist Alternatives
96(23)
Fork 5: The Frontal vs the Lateral: Interpretivism and its Heirs
119(14)
Fork 6: Old Worries, New Hopes: Anthropological Comparatisms Today
133(11)
Conclusion: The Shadow of Two Forms
144(4)
3 Caesurism and Heuristics
148(37)
Introduction: On Seeing Many Comparative Methods
148(1)
Making a Break from Caesurism
149(3)
A Heuristic View
152(3)
The Normativity of Heuristics
155(8)
Caesurism as a Heuristic: Seeing Fractal Patterns in Theoretical Debates
163(11)
The Normativity of Caesurism
174(7)
Conclusion: How Far Have We Got?
181(4)
Part II An Archetype
185(162)
4 Comparatio
187(15)
Why?
187(4)
Building an Archetype
191(6)
Conclusion: A Roadmap to Part II
197(5)
5 Two Ends of Lateral Comparison: Identity and Alterity
202(23)
Introduction: Different Ends
202(4)
The Argument by Analogy
206(3)
The Persistence of Caveated Generalisation
209(2)
Alterity
211(4)
Compare and Contrast
215(5)
Conclusion: Comparatio as Common Ground
220(3)
Coda: A Note on Diagrams
223(2)
6 Another Dimension of Lateral Comparison: Identity and Intensity
225(17)
Introduction: A Genealogy of Intensity
225(4)
Varieties of Intensity in Anthropological Comparison
229(5)
Intensity and Identity: A Second Axis
234(3)
Conclusion: The Plane of Lateral Comparison
237(5)
7 Two Ends of Frontal Comparison: Identity, Alterity, Reflexivity
242(28)
Introduction: `Us and Them' not "This and That'
242(9)
Tylor's Ejections
251(5)
The Persistence of Ejection: Interpretivism and Methodological Equation
256(3)
Ejection and Satire
259(2)
Equivocation and Recursivity: Ejection Inside-Out
261(5)
Conclusion: Identity, Alterity, Reflexivity
266(4)
8 The Oscillations of Frontal Comparison: Identity, Intensity, Reflexivity
270(55)
Introduction: Intense Critiques, Intense Responses
270(4)
An Unstable Compound
274(5)
Frontal Comparison Stabilised: The West, Anthropology and the Rest
279(7)
After Culture: Frontal Comparison Destabilised
286(5)
Not-Quite-Fictions: Frontal Comparison Refounded
291(19)
Oscillation and Rigour
310(3)
The Frontal and the Lateral: A Constitutive Oscillation
313(6)
Conclusion: The Archetype of Comparison
319(6)
9 Rigour
325(22)
Introduction: The Rigour of Comparisons
325(2)
The Rigour of the Anthropologist
327(4)
The Rigour of the Discipline
331(8)
The Rigour of the World
339(5)
Conclusion
344(3)
Conclusion 347(8)
Good Comparisons are Comparisons that Object
347(6)
Coda: Views from the Fence
353(2)
Notes 355(10)
References 365(20)
Index 385
Matei Candea is a lecturer at the University of Cambridge and a former honorary editor of the Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. He is the author of Corsican Fragments (2010), editor of The Social after Gabriel Tarde (2010) and Schools and Styles of Anthropological Theory (2018).