|
|
x | |
Preface: What We Know in our Elbows |
|
xi | |
Introduction |
|
1 | (26) |
|
|
1 | (3) |
|
Too General, Too Specific |
|
|
4 | (3) |
|
|
7 | (5) |
|
|
12 | (6) |
|
A Negative-Space Ethnography |
|
|
18 | (9) |
|
|
27 | (158) |
|
|
29 | (24) |
|
Introduction: On Seeing One Comparative Method |
|
|
29 | (5) |
|
|
34 | (6) |
|
Problems of Communication |
|
|
40 | (7) |
|
|
47 | (5) |
|
Conclusion: From Problems to Impossibility |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
2 The Garden of Forking Paths |
|
|
53 | (95) |
|
Introduction: On Seeing Two Comparative Methods |
|
|
53 | (3) |
|
Fork 1: The Comparative Method vs Naive Comparisons: The Birth of an Impossible Method |
|
|
56 | (16) |
|
Fork 2: The Historical Method vs the Comparative Method: A Boasian Crisis |
|
|
72 | (6) |
|
Fork 3: Comparison vs Description: Varieties of Functionalist Hope |
|
|
78 | (18) |
|
Fork 4: Topology vs Typology: Structuralist Alternatives |
|
|
96 | (23) |
|
Fork 5: The Frontal vs the Lateral: Interpretivism and its Heirs |
|
|
119 | (14) |
|
Fork 6: Old Worries, New Hopes: Anthropological Comparatisms Today |
|
|
133 | (11) |
|
Conclusion: The Shadow of Two Forms |
|
|
144 | (4) |
|
3 Caesurism and Heuristics |
|
|
148 | (37) |
|
Introduction: On Seeing Many Comparative Methods |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
Making a Break from Caesurism |
|
|
149 | (3) |
|
|
152 | (3) |
|
The Normativity of Heuristics |
|
|
155 | (8) |
|
Caesurism as a Heuristic: Seeing Fractal Patterns in Theoretical Debates |
|
|
163 | (11) |
|
The Normativity of Caesurism |
|
|
174 | (7) |
|
Conclusion: How Far Have We Got? |
|
|
181 | (4) |
|
|
185 | (162) |
|
|
187 | (15) |
|
|
187 | (4) |
|
|
191 | (6) |
|
Conclusion: A Roadmap to Part II |
|
|
197 | (5) |
|
5 Two Ends of Lateral Comparison: Identity and Alterity |
|
|
202 | (23) |
|
Introduction: Different Ends |
|
|
202 | (4) |
|
|
206 | (3) |
|
The Persistence of Caveated Generalisation |
|
|
209 | (2) |
|
|
211 | (4) |
|
|
215 | (5) |
|
Conclusion: Comparatio as Common Ground |
|
|
220 | (3) |
|
|
223 | (2) |
|
6 Another Dimension of Lateral Comparison: Identity and Intensity |
|
|
225 | (17) |
|
Introduction: A Genealogy of Intensity |
|
|
225 | (4) |
|
Varieties of Intensity in Anthropological Comparison |
|
|
229 | (5) |
|
Intensity and Identity: A Second Axis |
|
|
234 | (3) |
|
Conclusion: The Plane of Lateral Comparison |
|
|
237 | (5) |
|
7 Two Ends of Frontal Comparison: Identity, Alterity, Reflexivity |
|
|
242 | (28) |
|
Introduction: `Us and Them' not "This and That' |
|
|
242 | (9) |
|
|
251 | (5) |
|
The Persistence of Ejection: Interpretivism and Methodological Equation |
|
|
256 | (3) |
|
|
259 | (2) |
|
Equivocation and Recursivity: Ejection Inside-Out |
|
|
261 | (5) |
|
Conclusion: Identity, Alterity, Reflexivity |
|
|
266 | (4) |
|
8 The Oscillations of Frontal Comparison: Identity, Intensity, Reflexivity |
|
|
270 | (55) |
|
Introduction: Intense Critiques, Intense Responses |
|
|
270 | (4) |
|
|
274 | (5) |
|
Frontal Comparison Stabilised: The West, Anthropology and the Rest |
|
|
279 | (7) |
|
After Culture: Frontal Comparison Destabilised |
|
|
286 | (5) |
|
Not-Quite-Fictions: Frontal Comparison Refounded |
|
|
291 | (19) |
|
|
310 | (3) |
|
The Frontal and the Lateral: A Constitutive Oscillation |
|
|
313 | (6) |
|
Conclusion: The Archetype of Comparison |
|
|
319 | (6) |
|
|
325 | (22) |
|
Introduction: The Rigour of Comparisons |
|
|
325 | (2) |
|
The Rigour of the Anthropologist |
|
|
327 | (4) |
|
The Rigour of the Discipline |
|
|
331 | (8) |
|
|
339 | (5) |
|
|
344 | (3) |
Conclusion |
|
347 | (8) |
|
Good Comparisons are Comparisons that Object |
|
|
347 | (6) |
|
Coda: Views from the Fence |
|
|
353 | (2) |
Notes |
|
355 | (10) |
References |
|
365 | (20) |
Index |
|
385 | |