Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Complete Criminal Law: Text, Cases, and Materials 7th Revised edition [Mīkstie vāki]

3.88/5 (8 ratings by Goodreads)
(Former Senior Lecturer in Law, London Metropolitan University), (Lecturer in Law, The Open University), (Associate Lecturer in Law, The Open University)
  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 784 pages, height x width x depth: 243x188x30 mm, weight: 1474 g
  • Sērija : Complete
  • Izdošanas datums: 20-May-2020
  • Izdevniecība: Oxford University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0198848463
  • ISBN-13: 9780198848462
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Mīkstie vāki
  • Cena: 61,03 €*
  • * Šī grāmata vairs netiek publicēta. Jums tiks paziņota lietotas grāmatas cena
  • Šī grāmata vairs netiek publicēta. Jums tiks paziņota lietotas grāmatas cena.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
Complete Criminal Law: Text, Cases, and Materials 7th Revised editionPalielināt
  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 784 pages, height x width x depth: 243x188x30 mm, weight: 1474 g
  • Sērija : Complete
  • Izdošanas datums: 20-May-2020
  • Izdevniecība: Oxford University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0198848463
  • ISBN-13: 9780198848462
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
Permanent link: https://www.kriso.lv/db/9780198848462.html
Keywords:
Complete Criminal Law provides students with choice extracts, supported by clear author commentary and useful learning features. The explanations and examples in this textbook have been crafted to help students hone their understanding of criminal law.

The Complete titles are ambitious in their scope; they have been carefully developed with teachers to offer law students more than just a presentation of the key concepts. Instead they offer a complete package. Only by building on the foundations of the subject, by showing how the law works, demonstrating its application through extracts from cases and judgments, and by giving students the tools and the confidence to think critically about the law will they gain a complete understanding. Digital formats and resources This edition is available for students and institutions to purchase in a variety of formats, and is supported by online resources. - The e-book offers a mobile experience and convenient access along with functionality tools, navigation features, and links that offer extra learning support: www.oxfordtextbooks.co.uk/ebooks - The online resources includes: * Annual updates * Links to relevant websites * Answer guidance on problem questions and 'thinking points' from the text * Extra exam style questions with answers guidance * Test bank of 200 multiple choice questions * Additional information on drugs offences

Recenzijas

A fantastic book...a complete package. The book and combined online support provides...a detailed and highly effective learning pathway. If a learner followed the logical structure and took advantage of the online support they would be guaranteed success on any criminal law module * Louis Martin, Senior Lecturer, Staffordshire University * A comprehensive and accessible criminal law textbook, written in an engaging way to enhance student learning * Dr Noel Cross, Programme Leader, Liverpool John Moores University *

Acknowledgements xxii
Table of cases
xxiii
Table of legislation
xxxv
1 Introduction and general principles
1(28)
1.1 What is Crime?
2(10)
1.1.1 Traditional Theory: Harm to Others
3(3)
1.1.2 Harm to Oneself
6(1)
1.1.3 Politicisation
6(1)
1.1.4 Contemporary Theories of Criminal Law
7(1)
1.1.5 The Need for Minimal Criminalisation--Are There Too Many Crimes?
8(2)
1.1.6 Punishment
10(2)
1.2 Presumption of Innocence and the Burden of Proof
12(4)
1.2.1 The General Principle
12(2)
1.2.2 Exceptions to the Prosecution Bearing the Burden of Proof
14(2)
1.3 Classification of Crimes and Courts
16(2)
1.3.1 Classification of Crimes
16(1)
1.3.2 The Courts
17(1)
1.4 Procedure and Fair Trial Rights
18(2)
1.4.1 Procedure
18(2)
1.4.2 Fair Trial Rights
20(1)
1.5 Police Powers, Miscarriages of Justice and Victims
20(1)
1.5.1 Police Powers
20(1)
1.5.2 Miscarriages of Justice
20(1)
1.5.3 Victims
21(1)
1.6 Sources of the Criminal Law including the ECHR
21(3)
1.6.1 Statute and Common Law
22(1)
1.6.2 The Draft Criminal Code 1989
22(1)
1.6.3 The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR)
22(2)
1.7 Crime in England and Wales Today
24(2)
1.7.1 Women
24(2)
1.7.2 Black and Ethnic Minorities
26(1)
1.8 Conclusion
26(3)
2 Actus reus: acts, omissions and causation
29(58)
2.1 Acts
30(11)
2.1.1 What does Actus Reus Mean?
30(7)
2.1.2 Coincidence/Correspondence of Actus Reus and Mens Rea
37(4)
2.2 Omissions: Liability for Failing to Act in Breach of Duty
41(21)
2.2.1 Introduction: Acts and Omissions
41(1)
2.2.2 Statutory Offences of Failing to Act in Breach of Duty: Conduct Crimes
42(1)
2.2.3 Common Law Offences: Commission by Omission--Result Crimes and the Five Duty Situations
42(15)
2.2.4 Criticisms of Omissions Liability
57(4)
2.2.5 Evaluation
61(1)
2.2.6 Reform
62(1)
2.3 Causation
62(25)
2.3.1 Introduction
63(1)
2.3.2 Factual Causation
63(1)
2.3.3 Legal Causation
64(18)
2.3.4 Conclusion
82(1)
2.3.5 Reform
83(4)
3 Mens rea: intention, recklessness, negligence and gross negligence
87(52)
3.1 Intention
88(24)
3.1.1 Introduction
88(2)
3.1.2 Context: Intention and Murder
90(1)
3.1.3 Intention: Ordinary Meaning
90(1)
3.1.4 Legal Meaning: Type 1---Direct Intent
90(1)
3.1.5 Type 2---Oblique or indirect intent: foresight of a virtual certainty
91(9)
3.1.6 Oblique Intent is a Flexible Concept
100(2)
3.1.7 The Distinction between Motive and Intention
102(2)
3.1.8 Mercy Killings
104(1)
3.1.9 Doctors, Palliative Care and Double Effect
104(1)
3.1.10 Evaluation
105(2)
3.1.11 Reform
107(2)
3.1.12 Transferred Malice
109(3)
3.2 Recklessness
112(16)
3.2.1 Introduction
113(1)
3.2.2 The Ordinary Meaning of Recklessness
114(1)
3.2.3 The Current Legal Definition: Subjective Recklessness
114(4)
3.2.4 Caldwell Recklessness: 1982-2003
118(2)
3.2.5 Subjective Recklessness Restored: 2003 Onwards
120(5)
3.2.6 Was the House of Lords in RvG right to reverse CaldweIR
125(1)
3.2.7 How to Distinguish Recklessness from Intention
126(1)
3.2.8 How to Distinguish Recklessness from Negligence
126(1)
3.2.9 Reform
126(1)
3.2.10 Evaluation and Conclusion
127(1)
3.3 Negligence and Gross Negligence
128(11)
3.3.1 Negligence
129(1)
3.3.2 Negligent Mistake
129(1)
3.3.3 The Distinction between Negligence and Recklessness
130(1)
3.3.4 Should Negligence be a Basis of Fault?
130(1)
3.3.5 Gross Negligence
130(4)
3.3.6 Reform
134(5)
4 Strict, vicarious and corporate liability
139(45)
4.1 Strict Liability
140(26)
4.1.1 Introduction
140(1)
4.1.2 Strict v Absolute Liability
140(2)
4.1.3 The Statutory Context: The Presumption of Mens Rea
142(6)
4.1.4 The Exceptions to Mens Rea
148(14)
4.1.5 Strict Liability and the ECHR
162(2)
4.1.6 Evaluation: Arguments for and against Strict Liability
164(2)
4.2 Corporate Liability
166(18)
4.2.1 Introduction: What is a Corporation?
167(1)
4.2.2 Vicarious Liability
167(2)
4.2.3 Direct Corporate Liability
169(10)
4.2.4 Evaluation of the 2007 Act
179(5)
5 Secondary participation: parties to a crime
184(43)
5.1 Definition of Parties
185(1)
5.2 Accessories: Conditions for Liability
185(17)
5.2.1 Actus Reus
186(9)
5.2.2 Mens Rea
195(7)
5.3 Where P Goes Beyond the Joint Plan to Commit Another Offence
202(14)
5.3.1 Definition
202(2)
5.3.2 `Joint Enterprise' Before Jogee
204(2)
5.3.3 The Law After Jogee
206(7)
5.3.4 Is the Law After Jogee Satisfactory?
213(3)
5.4 Liability of A can be Higher than that of P
216(2)
5.4.1 Liability of A can be Higher
217(1)
5.4.2 Accessories and Justificatory Defences
218(1)
5.5 Defences to Secondary Participation: Withdrawal from a Joint Venture
218(4)
5.5.1 Planned Enterprises: There must be Timely, Unequivocal Communication of Withdrawal where Practical and Reasonable
219(1)
5.5.2 Spontaneous Enterprises: Withdrawal without Communication may be Effective
220(1)
5.5.3 Joint Venture Going beyond the Agreed Plan
221(1)
5.5.4 Reform of Withdrawal
222(1)
5.6 Can Victims be Accessories?
222(1)
5.7 Reform
223(2)
5.8 Evaluation
225(2)
6 Homicide 1: murder
227(21)
6.1 Actus Reus
230(9)
6.1.1 Unlawful Killing
230(1)
6.1.2 Killing and Causation
230(1)
6.1.3 A Human Being
231(7)
6.1.4 Under the Queen's Peace
238(1)
6.1.5 The `Death Within a Year and a Day' Rule No Longer Applies
239(1)
6.2 Mens Rea
239(4)
6.2.1 Background: Malice Aforethought
239(2)
6.2.2 Criticisms of Intention
241(1)
6.2.3 Intention to Commit GBH/Serious Harm
241(2)
6.3 The Sentence for Murder
243(1)
6.4 Criticism
244(1)
6.5 Reform
245(3)
7 Homicide 2: voluntary and involuntary manslaughter
248(76)
7.1 Voluntary Manslaughter
249(36)
7.1.1 Introduction to Voluntary Manslaughter
249(1)
7.1.2 Diminished Responsibility
249(15)
7.1.3 Loss of Control
264(21)
7.1.4 Suicide Pacts
285(1)
7.2 Involuntary Manslaughter: Unintentional Killings
285(33)
7.2.1 Introduction
286(1)
7.2.2 Reckless Manslaughter
286(2)
7.2.3 Manslaughter by Gross Negligence
288(11)
7.2.4 Unlawful and Dangerous Act (Constructive) Manslaughter
299(19)
7.3 Homicide-related Offences
318(6)
7.3.1 Causing Death by Dangerous Driving
318(1)
7.3.2 Causing Death by Careless or Inconsiderate Driving
318(1)
7.3.3 Causing Death by Driving While Unlicensed, Disqualified or Uninsured
319(1)
7.3.4 Infanticide
319(1)
7.3.5 Infant and Child Killing
319(5)
8 Defences of incapacity and mental conditions
324(56)
8.1 Insanity
326(17)
8.1.1 Introduction
326(1)
8.1.2 The Relationship between Insanity, Automatism and Diminished Responsibility
327(1)
8.1.3 TheTest for Insanity: The M'Naghten Rules
328(11)
8.1.4 Burden of Proof
339(1)
8.1.5 The Verdict and Disposal Provisions
339(1)
8.1.6 Criticisms of Insanity
340(1)
8.1.7 Reform
341(2)
8.2 Automatism
343(10)
8.2.1 Introduction
344(1)
8.2.2 Definition
344(1)
8.2.3 Burden of Proof
344(1)
8.2.4 External Causes of Involuntary Action
345(1)
8.2.5 Self-induced Automatism is No Defence
346(5)
8.2.6 Automatism Requires Total Destruction of Voluntary Control/Consciousness in Driving Cases
351(1)
8.2.7 Criticisms of the Defence
351(1)
8.2.8 Reform
352(1)
8.3 Intoxication
353(21)
8.3.1 Introduction
353(1)
8.3.2 Crimes of Basic and Specific Intent
354(2)
8.3.3 Intoxication is not a `Defence' but a Denial of MR
356(1)
8.3.4 Voluntary Intoxication: The Majewski Rule
357(3)
8.3.5 Dutch Courage
360(1)
8.3.6 Involuntary Intoxication
361(3)
8.3.7 Dangerous Drugs
364(2)
8.3.8 Voluntary Intoxication and Defences: Drunken Mistake
366(5)
8.3.9 Criticisms of Majewski
371(2)
8.3.10 Reform
373(1)
8.4 Infancy
374(6)
8.4.1 The Age of Criminal Responsibility: Doli Incapax
374(1)
8.4.2 Criticism: Was it Right to Abolish the Presumption?
375(1)
8.4.3 Innocent Agents
376(4)
9 Defences of compulsion
380(72)
9.1 Duress and Duress of Circumstances
381(29)
9.1.1 Introduction
382(1)
9.1.2 The Test for Duress
383(11)
9.1.3 Limitations on the Defence: Voluntary Association with Criminals: Rv Hasan
394(3)
9.1.4 Limitations on the Defence: Murder, Attempted Murder and Treason
397(7)
9.1.5 Duress of Circumstances
404(4)
9.1.6 Compulsion
408(1)
9.1.7 Reform
409(1)
9.2 Necessity
410(11)
9.2.1 Introduction
410(1)
9.2.2 The Test for Necessity
411(1)
9.2.3 Medical Cases
411(8)
9.2.4 Non-medical Cases: Self-help and Direct Action
419(2)
9.2.5 Reform
421(1)
9.3 Public and Private Defence
421(25)
9.3.1 Introduction
422(2)
9.3.2 The Necessity for Force: A Subjective Test
424(14)
9.3.3 The Degree of Force Must be Reasonable: An Objective Test: s76(7)
438(5)
9.3.4 Lethal Force and the ECHR
443(3)
9.3.5 Reform
446(1)
9.4 Mistake
446(6)
9.4.1 Introduction
447(1)
9.4.2 Relevant Mistakes
448(1)
9.4.3 Mistake and Strict Liability
449(1)
9.4.4 Mistake and Offences of Negligence
449(1)
9.4.5 Irrelevant Mistakes
449(3)
10 Non-fatal offences against the person
452(63)
10.1 Assault
455(9)
10.1.1 Definition
456(1)
10.1.2 Actus Reus
456(8)
10.1.3 Mens Rea
464(1)
10.2 Battery
464(3)
10.2.1 Definition
464(1)
10.2.2 Actus Reus
464(2)
10.2.3 Mens Rea of Assault and Battery
466(1)
10.3 Aggravated Assaults: Actual Bodily Harm, s47 OAPA 1861
467(4)
10.3.1 Definition
467(1)
10.3.2 Actus Reus
468(3)
10.3.3 Mens Rea
471(1)
10.4 Malicious Wounding and Grievous Bodily Harm: s20 OAPA 1861
471(6)
10.4.1 Definition
472(1)
10.4.2 Actus Reus
472(3)
10.4.3 Mens Rea
475(2)
10.5 Causing Grievous Bodily Harm with Intent: si8 OAPA 1861
477(3)
10.5.1 Definition
477(1)
10.5.2 Actus Reus
478(1)
10.5.3 Mens Rea
478(1)
10.5.4 Acid-throwing
479(1)
10.6 Defences to Assault: Consent
480(21)
10.6.1 The Public Interest
480(1)
10.6.2 `Public Interest Exceptions': Consent Provides a Defence
481(12)
10.6.3 Consent Induced by Fraud is No Defence
493(7)
10.6.4 Capacity to Consent
500(1)
10.6.5 D's Mistaken Belief in Consent
500(1)
10.7 Defences to Assault: Lawful Chastisement
501(1)
10.7.1 Parents
501(1)
10.7.2 Teachers
501(1)
10.8 Racially and Religiously Aggravated Assaults
501(4)
10.8.1 Racial and Religious Aggravated Offences
501(1)
10.8.2 Section 28 Crime and Disorder Act 1998
502(1)
10.8.3 Section 28(1)(a): Demonstration of Racial/Religious Hostility
502(1)
10.8.4 Section 28(1)(b): Racial/Religious Motivation
503(1)
10.8.5 Section 28(4):'Racial Group'
503(2)
10.9 The Protection from Harassment Act 1997
505(4)
10.9.1 Introduction
506(1)
10.9.2 Actus Reus: Harassment
507(1)
10.9.3 Mens Rea
508(1)
10.9.4 Stalking
508(1)
10.10 Coercive control
509(2)
10.10.1 Introduction
509(1)
10.10.2 Actus reus
510(1)
10.10.3 Mens rea
510(1)
10.10.4 Evaluation
511(1)
10.11 Reform
511(4)
10.11.1 Offences Against the Person
511(1)
10.11.2 Consent
512(3)
11 Sexual offences
515(41)
11.1 The Sexual Offences Act 2003
517(1)
11.2 Rape
518(31)
11.2.1 Definition of Rape
518(2)
11.2.2 Actus Reus
520(20)
11.2.3 Mens Rea
540(4)
11.2.4 Marital Rape
544(1)
11.2.5 The Rationale of Rape
544(1)
11.2.6 Why is Rape so Controversial? The Justice Gap
545(4)
11.3 Assault by Penetration
549(1)
11.4 Sexual Assault
550(3)
11.4.1 Section 78:'Sexual'
551(2)
11.5 Causing Sexual Activity without Consent
553(3)
12 Property offences 1: theft, robbery and handling
556(69)
12.1 Theft
558(50)
12.1.1 Introduction
558(1)
12.1.2 Actus Reus
559(31)
12.1.3 Mens Rea
590(18)
12.2 Robbery
608(7)
12.2.1 Introduction
609(1)
12.2.2 Actus Reus
610(4)
12.2.3 Mens Rea
614(1)
12.3 Handling
615(10)
12.3.1 Introduction
615(1)
12.3.2 Actus Reus
616(5)
12.3.3 Mens Rea
621(4)
13 Property offences 2: fraud and making off without payment
625(20)
13.1 Fraud
626(15)
13.1.1 The Fraud Act 2006
626(1)
13.1.2 Section 2: Fraud by False Representation
627(8)
13.1.3 Section 3: Fraud by Failing to Disclose Information
635(1)
13.1.4 Section 4: Fraud by Abuse of Position
636(2)
13.1.5 Section 11: Obtaining Services Dishonestly
638(3)
13.2 Making off Without Payment
641(4)
13.2.1 Actus Reus
641(1)
13.2.2 Mens Rea
642(3)
14 Property offences 3: burglary, blackmail and criminal damage
645(36)
14.1 Burglary
646(12)
14.1.1 Introduction
646(2)
14.1.2 Actus Reus of Both Offences
648(7)
14.1.3 Mens Rea
655(1)
14.1.4 Aggravated Burglary
656(2)
14.2 Blackmail
658(6)
14.2.1 Introduction
658(1)
14.2.2 Actus Reus
659(5)
14.2.3 Mens Rea
664(1)
14.3 Criminal Damage
664(17)
14.3.1 Introduction
664(1)
14.3.2 Actus Reus
665(8)
14.3.3 Mens Rea
673(2)
14.3.4 Racially or Religiously Aggravated Criminal Damage
675(1)
14.3.5 Criminal Damage with Intent or Recklessness as to Endangering Life
675(3)
14.3.6 Arson
678(3)
15 Inchoate offences: attempt, conspiracy and assisting and encouraging under the Serious Crime Act 2007
681(38)
15.1 Attempt
682(13)
15.1.1 Definition
682(1)
15.1.2 Actus Reus
683(6)
15.1.3 Mens Rea
689(3)
15.1.4 Impossibility
692(3)
15.1.5 Reform
695(1)
15.2 Conspiracy
695(14)
15.2.1 Introduction
696(1)
15.2.2 Actus Reus
697(7)
15.2.3 Impossibility
704(1)
15.2.4 Conspiracy to Defraud
705(2)
15.2.5 Conspiracy to Corrupt Public Morals and Conspiracy to Outrage Public Decency
707(1)
15.2.6 Reform
708(1)
15.3 The Serious Crime Act 2007: Encouragement and Assistance
709(10)
15.3.1 Introduction
709(1)
15.3.2 Problems with the Old Law of Incitement
710(1)
15.3.3 Section 44: Intending to Assist or Encourage
710(1)
15.3.4 Section 45: Assisting or Encouraging Believing an Offence will be Committed
711(1)
15.3.5 Section 46: Encouraging or Assisting Offences Believing One or More will be Committed
712(3)
15.3.6 Defences
715(1)
15.3.7 Conclusion
716(3)
Index 719
The late Janet Loveless was a Senior Lecturer in Law at London Metropolitan University. During her career she was also a member of the LLM Board of London University Examiners and a partner of a London legal aid firm of solicitors.



Mischa Allen has 20 years' experience of teaching and examining criminal law on undergraduate and GDL courses and was previously Course Leader for the GDL at London Metropolitan University. She is an Associate Lecturer in Law at the Open University and at University of Essex Online.



Caroline Derry is a Lecturer in Law at the Open University. She has practised as a barrister and solicitor, and was previously LLB Law Course Leader at London Metropolitan University.