Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2020 [Mīkstie vāki]

Edited by , Edited by
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Mīkstie vāki
  • Cena: 212,07 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
The investigation of computational models of argument is a rich and fascinating interdisciplinary research field with two ultimate aims: the theoretical goal of understanding argumentation as a cognitive phenomenon by modeling it in computer programs, and the practical goal of supporting the development of computer-based systems able to engage in argumentation-related activities with human users or among themselves. The biennial International Conferences on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA) provide a dedicated forum for the presentation and discussion of the latest advancements in the field, and cover both basic research and innovative applications. This book presents the proceedings of COMMA 2020. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, COMMA 2020 was held as an online event on the originally scheduled dates of 8 -11 September 2020, organised by the University of Perugia, Italy. The book includes 28 full papers and 13 short papers selected from a total of 78 submissions, the abstracts of 3 invited talks and 13 demonstration abstracts. The interdisciplinary nature of the field is reflected, and contributions cover both theory and practice. Theoretical contributions include new formal models, the study of formal or computational properties of models, designs for implemented systems and experimental research. Practical papers include applications to medicine, law and criminal investigation, chatbots and online product reviews. The argument-mining trend from previous COMMAs is continued, while an emerging trend this year is the use of argumentation for explainable AI. The book provided an overview of the latest work on computational models of argument, and will be of interest to all those working in the field.
Preface v
Henry Prakken
Stefano Bistarelli
Francesco Santini
Carlo Taticchi
Programme Committee and Reviewers ix
Invited Talks
Conflict, Adversariality, and Cooperation in Argumentation
3(1)
Catarina Dutilh Novaes
Open Texture and Defeasible Semantic Constraint
4(1)
John Horty
Argument Technology from Philosophy to Phone
5(4)
Chris Reed
Innovative Applications
A Persuasive Chatbot Using a Crowd-Sourced Argument Graph and Concerns
9(12)
Lisa A. Chalaguine
Anthony Hunter
An Explainable Approach to Deducing Outcomes in European Court of Human Rights Cases Using ADFs
21(12)
Joe Collenette
Katie Atkinson
Trevor Bench-Capon
Generating Adversarial Examples for Topic-Dependent Argument Classification
33(12)
Tobias Mayer
Santiago Marro
Elena Cabrio
Serena Villata
Dataset Independent Baselines for Relation Prediction in Argument Mining
45(10)
Oana Cocarascu
Elena Cabrio
Serena Villata
Francesco Toni
Regular Papers
PageRank as an Argumentation Semantics
55(12)
Emanuele Albini
Pietro Baroni
Antonio Rago
Francesco Toni
Computing Skeptical Preferred Acceptance in Dynamic Argumentation Frameworks with Recursive Attack and Support Relations
67(12)
Gianvincenzo Alfano
Sergio Greco
Francesco Parisi
An Adjustment Function for Dealing with Similarities
79(12)
Leila Amgoudand Victor David
On Minimality and Consistency Tolerance in Logical Argumentation Frameworks
91(12)
Ofer Arieli
Christian Strasser
Timed Abstract Dialectical Frameworks: A Simple Translation-Based Approach
103(8)
Ringo Baumann
Maximilian Heinrich
Ranking-Based Semantics from the Perspective of Claims
111(12)
Stefano Bistarelli
Wolfgang Dvorak
Carlo Taticchi
Stefan Woltran
Basic Beliefs and Argument-Based Beliefs in Awareness Epistemic Logic with Structured Arguments
123(12)
Alfredo Burrieza
Antonio Yuste-Ginel
Minimal Strong Admissibility: A Complexity Analysis
135(12)
Martin Caminada
Paul E. Dunne
Deductive Joint Support for Rational Unrestricted Rebuttal
147(12)
Marcos Cramer
Meghna Bhadra
A First Approach to Argumentation Label Functions
159(8)
Marcos Cramer
Jeremie Dauphin
A Principle-Based Analysis of Weakly Admissible Semantics
167(12)
Jeremie Dauphin
Tjitze Rienstra
Leendert Van Der Torre
Computing Strongly Admissible Sets
179(12)
Wolfgang Dvorak
Johannes P. Wallner
Expressiveness of SETAFs and Support-Free ADFs Under 3-Valued Semantics
191(12)
Wolfgang Dvorak
Atefeh Keshavarzi Zafarghandi
Stefan Woltran
Structure or Content? Towards Assessing Argument Relevance
203(12)
Marc Feger
Jan Steimann
Christian Meter
Argumentative Reflections of Approximation Fixpoint Theory
215(12)
Jesse Heyninck
Ofer Arieli
An Epistemic Interpretation of Abstract Dialectical Argumentation
227(12)
Jesse Heyninck
Gabriele Kern-Isberner
Learning Constraints for the Epistemic Graphs Approach to Argumentation
239(12)
Anthony Hunter
Revisiting SAT Techniques for Abstract Argumentation
251(12)
Jonas Klein
Matthias Thimm
Towards an Argument Mining Pipeline Transforming Texts to Argument Graphs
263(8)
Mirko Lenz
Premtim Sahitaj
Sean Kallenberg
Christopher Coors
Lorik Dumani
Ralf Schenkel
Ralph Bergmann
Explanation Semantics for Abstract Argumentation
271(12)
Beishui Liao
Leendert Van Der Torre
Possible Controllability of Control Argumentation Frameworks
283(12)
Jean-Guy Mailly
Analysing Product Reviews Using Probabilistic Argumentation
295(12)
Kawsar Noor
Anthony Hunter
Estimating Stability for Efficient Argument-Based Inquiry
307(12)
Daphne Odekerken
Anne Marie Borg
Floris Bex
Argumentative Relation Classification with Background Knowledge
319(12)
Debjit Paul
Juri Opitz
Maria Becker
Jonathan Kobbe
Graeme Hirst
Anette Frank
Increasing the Naturalness of an Argumentative Dialogue System Through Argument Chains
331(8)
Niklas Rach
Wolfgang Minker
Stefan Ultes
Semantics Hierarchy in Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks
339(8)
Rafael Silva
Samy Sd
Joao Alcantara
Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with Fallible Evidence
347(8)
Kenneth Skiba
Matthias Thimm
Andrea Cohen
Sebastian Gottifredi
Alejandro J. Garcia
An Argument-Based Framework for Selecting Dialogue Move Types and Content
355(8)
Mark Snaith
On Computing the Set of Acceptable Arguments in Abstract Argumentation
363(8)
Matthias Thimm
Federico Cerutti
Mauro Vallati
Consistency in Assumption-Based Argumentation
371(12)
Toshiko Wakaki
Deductive and Abductive Reasoning with Causal and Evidential Information
383(12)
Remi Wieten
Floris Bex
Henry Prakken
Silja Renooij
Enthymemes in Dialogues
395(8)
Andreas Xydis
Christopher Hampson
Sanjay Modgil
Elizabeth Black
Continuum Argumentation Frameworks from Cooperative Game Theory
403(8)
Anthony P. Young
David Kohan Marzagao
Josh Murphy
Efficient Construction of Structured Argumentation Systems
411(8)
Bruno Yun
Nir Oren
Madalina Croitoru
Sets of Attacking Arguments for Inconsistent Datalog Knowledge Bases
419(12)
Bruno Yun
Srdjan Vesic
Madalina Croitoru
A Discussion Game for the Grounded Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks
431(12)
Atefeh Keshavarzi Zafarghandi
Rineke Verbrugge
Bart Verheij
Case-Based Reasoning with Precedent Models: Preliminary Report
443(10)
Heng Zheng
Davide Grossi
Bart Verheij
Demonstrations deliberate - Online Argumentation with Collaborative Filtering
453(2)
Markus Brenneis
Martin Mauve
An Implementation of Argument-Based Discussion Using ASPIC-
455(2)
Martin Caminada
Soren Uebis
AGNN: A Deep Learning Architecture for Abstract Argumentation Semantics
457(2)
Dennis Craandijk
Floris Bex
Navigating Arguments and Hypotheses at Scale
459(2)
Rory Duthie
John Lawrence
Chris Reed
Jacky Visser
Dimitra Zogrqfistou
The ASPARTIX System Suite
461(2)
Wolfgang Dvorak, Sarah A. Gaggl, Anna Rapberger, Johannes P. Wallner and Stefan Woltran decide: Supporting Participatory Budgeting with Online Argumentation
463(2)
Bjorn Ebbinghaus
Martin Mauve
Dialogical Fingerprinting of Debaters
465(2)
Matt Foulis
Jacky Visser
Chris Reed
PEOPLES: From Private Responses to Messages to Depolarisation Nudges in Two-Party Adversarial Online Talk
467(2)
Iwan Ittermann
Brian Pliiss
ArgAgent: A Simulator of Goal Processing for Argumentative Agents
469(2)
Henrique M.R. Jasinski
Mariela Morveli-Espinoza
Cesar A. Tacla
Implementing Argument and Explanation Schemes in Dialogue
471(2)
Isabel Sassoon
Nadin Kokciyan
Martin Chapman
Elizabeth Sklar
Vasa Curcin
Sanjay Modgil
Simon Parsons
A Modular Platform for Argument and Dialogue
473(2)
Mark Snaith
John Lawrence
Alison Pease
Chris Reed
The Open Argumentation PLatform (OAPL)
475(2)
Simon Wells
Neva - Extension Visualization for Argumentation Frameworks
477(2)
Mei Yang
Sarah Alice Gaggl
Sebastian Rudolph
Subject Index 479(2)
Author Index 481