Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Concept of Sin in Judaism, Christianity and Islam: Key Concepts in Interreligious Discourses [Mīkstie vāki]

  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 182 pages, height x width: 230x155 mm, weight: 283 g
  • Sērija : Key Concepts in Interreligious Discourses
  • Izdošanas datums: 04-Nov-2024
  • Izdevniecība: De Gruyter
  • ISBN-10: 3111303942
  • ISBN-13: 9783111303949
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Mīkstie vāki
  • Cena: 34,15 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 182 pages, height x width: 230x155 mm, weight: 283 g
  • Sērija : Key Concepts in Interreligious Discourses
  • Izdošanas datums: 04-Nov-2024
  • Izdevniecība: De Gruyter
  • ISBN-10: 3111303942
  • ISBN-13: 9783111303949
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:

It is asserted by Judaism, Christianity and Islam alike that sin is a central part of human life. Where sin comes from, however, is answered differently in the respective religions. While both the Bible and the Qur’an agree that there was a kind of "fall" of Adam at the beginning of human history, this fall is interpreted solely in classical Christian theology in terms of an "original" or "ancestral sin." Moreover, the classical doctrine of original sin is becoming increasingly called into question in today's Christian theology. This example already shows that the concept of sin is anything but clear. What does sin mean? Is sin primarily a violation of God's commandments? Or does the term "sin" refer to a radical corruption of man’s nature? How does sin relate to man’s redemption, toward which all three religions aim? The book "The Concept of Sin in Judaism, Christianity and Islam" addresses these and related questions. It analyzes how "sin" has been understood in the three religions in the past and the present and points out similarities and differences.

Christoph Böttigheimer and Konstantin Kamp, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Germany.