Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Copyright and Collective Authorship: Locating the Authors of Collaborative Work [Hardback]

4.00/5 (2 ratings by Goodreads)
(University College London)
  • Formāts: Hardback, 326 pages, height x width x depth: 235x157x21 mm, weight: 590 g, Worked examples or Exercises
  • Sērija : Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
  • Izdošanas datums: 02-May-2019
  • Izdevniecība: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1107199956
  • ISBN-13: 9781107199958
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 137,94 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
Copyright and Collective Authorship: Locating the Authors of Collaborative WorkPalielināt
  • Formāts: Hardback, 326 pages, height x width x depth: 235x157x21 mm, weight: 590 g, Worked examples or Exercises
  • Sērija : Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
  • Izdošanas datums: 02-May-2019
  • Izdevniecība: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1107199956
  • ISBN-13: 9781107199958
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
Permanent link: https://www.kriso.lv/db/9781107199958.html
Keywords:
Simone argues that a recalibration of copyright law is necessary and proposes an inclusive and contextual approach to joint authorship that is true to the legal concept of authorship but is also more aligned with creative reality.

As technology makes it easier for people to work together, large-scale collaboration is becoming increasingly prevalent. In this context, the question of how to determine authorship – and hence ownership - of copyright in collaborative works is an important question to which current copyright law fails to provide a coherent or consistent answer. In Copyright and Collective Authorship, Daniela Simone engages with the problem of how to determine the authorship of highly collaborative works. Employing insights from the ways in which collaborators understand and regulate issues of authorship, the book argues that a recalibration of copyright law is necessary, proposing an inclusive and contextual approach to joint authorship that is true to the legal concept of authorship but is also more aligned with creative reality.

Recenzijas

'Cited by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales in Kogan v Martin [ 2019] EWCA 1645.' 'Dr Daniela Simone identifies root causes of the deficiencies in the law's treatment of (joint) authorship, and provides an admirable roadmap and analytical framework to orient the judiciary and all others concerned about ascertaining who should be the authors of collective works A must-read for anyone interested in the interaction between law and the creative process. This book made me think differently about copyright law and what it promotes and values when it comes to (not) recognizing those who contribute to the creation of works.' Pascale Chapdelaine, Intellectual Property Journal 'By and large, the book makes a compelling case for taking collaborative creativity seriously in the long-lasting process of the modernisation of copyright law also a valuable input for further evidence-based research on the effectiveness of co-authorship rules at national, supranational and international level.' Giulia Priora, European Intellectual Property Review

Papildus informācija

Addresses the difficult question of how to determine the authorship, and ownership, of copyright in highly collaborative works.
Acknowledgements viii
Abbreviations x
Table of Cases
xii
Table of Statutes
xx
1 Copyright Law and Collective Authorship
1(14)
1.1 Introduction
1(5)
1.2 Methodological Approach
6(2)
1.3 A Roadmap
8(7)
2 Authorship and Joint Authorship
15(57)
2.1 The Concept of Authorship in the CDPA
17(12)
2.2 The Joint Authorship Test
29(13)
2.2.1 A Contribution That Is Not Distinct
30(1)
2.2.2 Collaboration or Common Design
31(4)
2.2.3 A Significant Contribution of the Right Kind
35(7)
2.3 A Critique of the Application of the Joint Authorship Test
42(11)
2.3.1 Factual Specificity
43(1)
2.3.2 The Pragmatic Instrumental Approach
43(7)
2.3.3 A Preoccupation with Aesthetic Neutrality
50(3)
2.4 The Factual and the Normative Dimensions of the Joint Authorship Test
53(5)
2.5 Copyright Scholarship: Theories of Authorship
58(12)
2.5.1 The Romantic Author
59(3)
2.5.2 Ginsburg's Search for Copyright's Author
62(1)
2.5.3 Nimmer v Goldstein (and Beyond)
63(4)
2.5.4 The Value of Social and Cultural Conceptions of Authorship
67(3)
2.6 Conclusion
70(2)
3 Wikipedia
72(28)
3.1 Authorship Dynamics: Promoting Sharing
73(5)
3.2 Copyright Subsistence on Wikipedia
78(12)
3.2.1 Is Wikipedia (or Parts Thereof) an Original Literary Work?
78(8)
3.2.2 Are Wikipedia Contributors Copyright Authors?
86(4)
3.3 Copyleft Licences and the Ambivalent Role of Copyright Law
90(5)
3.4 Insights for Copyright Law
95(5)
4 Australian Indigenous Art
100(31)
4.1 Indigenous Art
102(7)
4.1.1 Authorship Dynamics: Building and Sustaining Cultural Identity
102(3)
4.1.2 Background to the Issue of Protecting Indigenous Cultural Expressions
105(4)
4.2 Protecting Indigenous Art with Copyright
109(13)
4.2.1 Cases Prior to Bulun Bulun
110(2)
4.2.2 Bulun Bulun
112(3)
4.2.3 Bulun Bulun's Limited Legacy
115(7)
4.3 Other Solutions for the Protection of Indigenous Cultural Expressions
122(5)
4.3.1 Protocols and Codes of Conduct
123(1)
4.3.2 Collective/Certification Trade Marks
124(1)
4.3.3 Contract
125(1)
4.3.4 Sui Generis Legislation
126(1)
4.4 Insights for Copyright Law
127(4)
5 Scientific Collaborations
131(28)
5.1 Authorship Dynamics: Constructing Authority
132(7)
5.2 Regulating Scientific Authorship with Private Ordering
139(9)
5.2.1 Biomedical Science Collaborations: An Authorship Crisis
139(6)
5.2.2 Particle Physics Collaborations: The Bureaucratisation of Authorship
145(3)
5.3 The Application of Copyright Law
148(6)
5.4 Insights for Copyright Law
154(5)
6 Film
159(42)
6.1 Authorship Dynamics: The Pragmatic Value of Authorship
161(8)
6.2 The Subsistence of Copyright
169(23)
6.2.1 A Brief Historical Note
170(1)
6.2.2 Explaining the Complexity of Film Copyright
171(5)
6.2.3 Film as a First Fixation
176(4)
6.2.4 Film as a Dramatic Work
180(7)
6.2.5 The Pitfalls of Pragmatic Reasoning
187(5)
6.3 Private Ordering
192(4)
6.4 Insights for Copyright Law
196(5)
7 Characteristics of Collective Authorship and the Role of Copyright Law
201(30)
7.1 The Nature of Collective Authorship
201(3)
7.2 The Meaning of Authorship for Each Collective Authorship Group
204(6)
7.2.1 Different Meanings of Authorship
205(1)
7.2.2 Authorship Signifies Responsibility for the Work
206(2)
7.2.3 Authorship Signals Status within a Particular Community
208(1)
7.2.4 Power Dynamics Affect me Attribution of Authorship
209(1)
7.3 The Gap between Copyright Law's Assumptions about Authorship and Creative Reality
210(3)
7.4 Bridging the Gap between Copyright Law and Creative Reality with Private Ordering
213(11)
7.4.1 Successful Examples
213(2)
7.4.2 Less Successful Examples
215(1)
7.4.3 The Benefits and Limitations of Relying upon Private Ordering
216(8)
7.5 The Role of Copyright Law and Its Concepts
224(5)
7.6 Summary
229(2)
8 An Inclusive, Contextual Approach to the Joint Authorship Test
231(42)
8.1 The Relevance of Social Norms
233(5)
8.2 The Dangers of Deferring to Social Norms
238(3)
8.3 A Framework for Considering Social Norms
241(5)
8.4 Revisiting the Critique of the Joint Authorship Test
246(4)
8.4.1 Factual Specificity
246(1)
8.4.2 The Preoccupation with Aesthetic Neutrality
246(1)
8.4.3 The Pragmatic Instrumental Approach
247(3)
8.5 An Inclusive and Contextual Approach to the Joint Authorship Test
250(6)
8.6 Alternative Approaches to Joint Ownership
256(13)
8.6.1 The Current Approach to Joint Ownership
257(5)
8.6.2 A View from the United States
262(4)
8.6.3 A Proposal for a Modest Legislative Amendment
266(3)
8.7 Final Note
269(4)
Bibliography 273(21)
Index 294
Daniela Simone is a Lecturer in Law at University College London, where she is also a Co-Director of the Institute of Brand and Innovation Law. Dr Simone holds BC.L., M.Phil. and D.Phil. degrees from the University of Oxford. She was awarded a B.A./LL.B. (Hons I) degree from the University of Sydney, was admitted to the Supreme Court of New South Wales and worked as a lawyer for a global commercial law firm in Sydney.