Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Copyright in the Digital Single Market: Article-by-Article Commentary to the Provisions of Directive 2019/790 [Hardback]

(Professor of Intellectual Property Law and Director of the Institute for Intellectual Property and Market Law (IFIM), Stockholm University)
  • Formāts: Hardback, 528 pages, height x width x depth: 253x178x33 mm, weight: 1038 g
  • Izdošanas datums: 26-Aug-2021
  • Izdevniecība: Oxford University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0198858590
  • ISBN-13: 9780198858591
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 233,53 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
Copyright in the Digital Single Market: Article-by-Article Commentary to the Provisions of Directive 2019/790Palielināt
  • Formāts: Hardback, 528 pages, height x width x depth: 253x178x33 mm, weight: 1038 g
  • Izdošanas datums: 26-Aug-2021
  • Izdevniecība: Oxford University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0198858590
  • ISBN-13: 9780198858591
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
Permanent link: https://www.kriso.lv/db/9780198858591.html
Keywords:
In 2019, the EU legislature adopted Directive 2019/790 on copyright in the Digital Single Market. The Directive is supported by a multi-faceted rationale and represents one of the most significant and ambitious EU harmonization efforts in the copyright field so far. This book provides an
article-by-article commentary to all the provisions of the Directive. It is the first complete commentary to Directive 2019/790.

By analyzing the history, objectives, and content of each and every provision, as well as the relationship between some of those provisions and between the Directive and the pre-existing acquis, this book provides a rational, consistent and detailed explanation of the Directive as a whole and of its
individual contents. This Commentary will be a travel companion to all those who wish or need to navigate the legislative provisions that were adopted in 2019 to make EU copyright fit for the "digital single market".

Recenzijas

Professor Eleonora Rosati is renowned as the leading EU copyright expert and from this commentary it is clear why. No one else could have written this book, and certainly not to this standard. It is a detailed and exhaustive vade mecum for those engaging with the provisions of the DSM Directive, and it goes without saying then that it would be of interest to both academics and practitioners, including legislators and courts across the EU with an interested in EU copyright harmonisation, reform and the DSM Directive. * Hayleigh Bosher, The IPKat * [ Rosati] has established herself as one of the leading experts on EU copyright law [ ...] illustrated by the fact that, for the second time, Advocate General Szpunar has contributed a complimentary Foreword. As those familiar with her writings would expect, her commentaries are authoritative and insightful, grounded in her mastery of the existing acquis as well as the history and text of the legislation and academic commentary. The strengths of her exposition are illustrated by the commentary to Article 17, probably the most controversial and difficult to interpret Article in the whole Directive, which is a tour de force running to 59 pages. Rosati not only sheds as much light as is humanly possible on the tortuous provisions of Article 17, but she also set out a persuasive analysis of how it relates to the existing acquis . * Sir Richard Arnold, Lord Justice of Appeal, Court of Appeal of England and Wales, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice * It is hard not to express satisfaction that, thanks to Professor Rosati's efforts, legal practitioners will have at their disposal an excellent tool to assist them in applying the DSM Directive. I also have no doubt that this Commentary will make a significant contribution to scientific research into problems pertaining to copyright protection in the digital era. * First Advocate General Maciej Szpunar *

Papildus informācija

Winner of Voted IPKat Best Copyright Law Book 2021.Voted IPKat Best Copyright Law Book 2021
Table of Case Law (Court of Justice of the European Union) xxv
Abbreviations xxxi
Origin, Objectives, and Content of the Directive 1(15)
1 Process, Rationale, and State of the EU Copyright Harmonization Process: From the Early Days to the Digital Single Market Strategy
1(8)
1.1 A Short History of EU Copyright Harmonization
2(4)
1.2 The Pursuit of Copyright Harmonization Objectives
6(3)
2 The Digital Single Market Strategy, the Commission's Proposal, and the Negotiation Process
9(4)
2.1 The Digital Single Market Strategy
10(1)
2.2 The Proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market
11(1)
2.3 The Negotiation Process and the Adoption of the Directive
12(1)
3 Overview of the Directive: Content and Objectives
13(3)
3.1 Content
13(1)
3.2 Objectives
14(2)
Article 1 Subject Matter and Scope 16(7)
1 History
18(1)
2 Rationale
19(2)
3 Relation to Pre-existing EU Legislation
21(2)
Article 2 Definitions 23(2)
1 History
24(1)
2 Definitions
24(1)
2.1 'Research Organisation'
24(1)
2.2 'Text and Data Mining'
24(1)
2.3 'Cultural Heritage Institution'
24(1)
2.4 'Press Publication'
24(1)
2.5 'Information Society Service'
24(1)
2.6 'Online Content-sharing Service Provider'
24(1)
Article 3 Text and Data Mining for the Purposes of Scientific Research 25(35)
1 History
29(5)
1.1 Earlier National Experiences
30(1)
1.2 The Commission's Proposal
30(1)
1.3 The Parliament Text
31(2)
1.4 The Council Text
33(1)
2 TDM Processes from a Technical Standpoint
34(4)
2.1 Access to Content
34(1)
2.2 Extraction and/or Copying of Content
35(2)
2.3 Mining of Text and/or Data and Knowledge Discovery
37(1)
3 Rationale
38(2)
4 Nature of the Exception in Article 3 and its Relation to Article 4
40(1)
5 Definitions
41(5)
5.1 Text and Data Mining
41(1)
5.2 Research Organizations
42(1)
5.3 Scientific Research
43(1)
5.4 Cultural Heritage Institutions
43(2)
5.5 Lawful Access
45(1)
6 Exclusive Rights to which the Exception Applies
46(10)
6.1 Right of Reproduction in the Database Directive 96/9
46(2)
6.1.1 Notion of Database
47(1)
6.1.2 Copyright Subsistence and Scope of the Right of Reproduction
47(1)
6.2 Right of Reproduction in the InfoSoc Directive 2001/29
48(3)
6.2.1 The Right of Reproduction of Authors in Relation to Works
49(1)
6.2.2 The Right of Reproduction of Other Rightholders in Article 2 of the InfoSoc Directive 2001/29
50(1)
6.3 Right of Reproduction of Press Publishers Pursuant to Article 15
51(1)
6.4 Database (Sui Generis) Right
52(2)
6.5 Interpretation of Exceptions (including Article 3) and Compliance with the Three-step Test
54(2)
7 Storage and Retention of Copies
56(1)
8 Measures Applied by Rightholders
57(1)
9 Continued Application of Other Provisions and Freedom of Member States
58(2)
Article 4 Exception or Limitation for Text and Data Mining 60(33)
1 History
63(5)
1.1 Earlier National Experiences
64(1)
1.2 The Commission's Proposal
64(1)
1.3 The Parliament Text
65(2)
1.4 The Council Text
67(1)
2 TDM Processes from a Copyright Standpoint
68(3)
2.1 Access to Content
68(1)
2.2 Extraction and/or Copying of Content
69(2)
2.3 Mining of Text and/or Data and Knowledge Discovery
71(1)
3 Rationale
71(3)
4 Nature of the Exception or Limitation in Article 4 and its Relation to Article 3
74(2)
5 Definitions
76(1)
5.1 Text and Data Mining
76(1)
5.2 Lawful Access
76(1)
6 Exclusive Rights to which the Exception or Limitation Applies
77(12)
6.1 Right of Reproduction in the Database Directive 96/9
77(2)
6.1.1 Notion of Database
77(1)
6.1.2 Copyright Subsistence and Scope of the Right of Reproduction
78(1)
6.2 Right of Reproduction in the InfoSoc Directive 2001/29
79(3)
6.2.1 The Right of Reproduction of Authors in Relation to Works
80(1)
6.2.2 The Right of Reproduction of Other Rightholders in Article 2 of the InfoSoc Directive 2001/29
81(1)
6.3 Right of Reproduction of Press Publishers Pursuant to Article 15
82(1)
6.4 Database (Sui Generis) Right
83(2)
6.5 Rights in Computer Programs under the Software Directive 2009/24
85(2)
6.6 Interpretation of Exceptions and Limitations (including Article 4) and Compliance with the Three-step Test
87(2)
7 Retention of Copies and Extractions
89(1)
8 Reservation by Rightholders
89(1)
9 Measures Applied by Rightholders
90(1)
10 Continued Application of Other Provisions and Freedom of Member States
91(2)
Article 5 Use of Works and Other Subject Matter in Digital and Cross-border Teaching Activities 93(35)
1 History
96(2)
2 Rationale
98(2)
3 Nature of the Exception or Limitation in Article 5 and its Relation to Pre-existing Exceptions or Limitations
100(1)
4 Definitions
101(4)
4.1 Use and Digital Use
101(2)
4.2 Illustration for Teaching
103(1)
4.3 Non-commercial Purpose
103(1)
4.4 Educational Establishment
104(1)
4.5 Acknowledgment
105(1)
5 Exclusive Rights to which the Exception or Limitation in Article 5 Applies
105(17)
5.1 Rights in Copyright-protected Databases
106(2)
5.1.1 Notion of Database
106(1)
5.1.2 Copyright Subsistence
107(1)
5.1.3 Exclusive Rights
107(1)
5.2 Database (Sui Generis) Right
108(3)
5.3 Right of Reproduction in the InfoSoc Directive 2001/29
111(3)
5.3.1 The Right of Reproduction of Authors in Relation to Works
111(1)
5.3.2 The Right of Reproduction of Other Rightholders in Article 2 of the InfoSoc Directive 2001/29
112(2)
5.4 Right of Communication/Making Available to the Public in the InfoSoc Directive 2001/29
114(3)
5.5 Rights in Computer Programs in the Software Directive 2009/24
117(2)
5.6 Press Publishers' Right
119(1)
5.6.1 Right of Reproduction
120(1)
5.6.2 Right of Making Available to the Public
120(1)
5.7 Interpretation of Exceptions and Limitations (including Article 5) and Compliance with the Three-step Test
120(2)
6 Freedom of Member States
122(3)
6.1 Licensing in Lieu of the Exception or Limitation
123(1)
6.2 Proportion of Work or Other Subject Matter
124(1)
6.3 Possibility of Fair Compensation
124(1)
7 Country of Origin Principle
125(1)
8 Measures Applied by Rightholders
126(1)
9 Continued Application of Other Provisions and Freedom of Member States
127(1)
Article 6 Preservation of Cultural Heritage 128(23)
1 History
130(1)
2 Rationale
131(2)
3 Nature of the Exception in Article 6 and its Relation to Article 5(2)(c) of the InfoSoc Directive 2001/29
133(1)
4 Definitions
134(3)
4.1 Cultural Heritage Institutions, including Third-party Involvement
134(2)
4.2 Permanency in the Collection
136(1)
4.3 Any Format or Medium
136(1)
4.4 Preservation
136(1)
5 Exclusive Rights to which the Exception Applies
137(11)
5.1 Right of Reproduction in the Database Directive 96/9
137(2)
5.1.1 Notion of Database
138(1)
5.1.2 Copyright Subsistence and Scope of the Right of Reproduction
138(1)
5.2 Database (Sui Generis) Right
139(3)
5.3 Right of Reproduction in the InfoSoc Directive 2001/29
142(3)
5.3.1 The Right of Reproduction of Authors in Relation to Works
142(2)
5.3.2 The Right of Reproduction of Other Rightholders in Article 2 of the InfoSoc Directive 2001/29
144(1)
5.4 Right of Reproduction in the Software Directive 2009/24
145(1)
5.5 Right of Reproduction of Press Publishers Pursuant to Article 15
146(1)
5.6 Interpretation of Exceptions and Limitations (including Article 6) and Compliance with the Three-step Test
147(1)
6 Scope of the Exception
148(1)
7 Measures Applied by Rightholders
149(1)
8 Continued Application of Other Provisions and Freedom of Member States
150(1)
Article 7 Common Provisions 151(7)
1 History
153(1)
2 Rationale
154(1)
3 Prohibition of Contractual Override
154(1)
4 Three-step Test in Article 5(5) of the InfoSoc Directive 2001/29
154(3)
5 Technological Measures in Article 6(4) of the InfoSoc Directive 2001/29
157(1)
Article 8 Use of Out-of-commerce Works and Other Subject Matter by Cultural Heritage Institutions 158(45)
1 History
164(4)
2 Rationale
168(1)
3 Definitions
169(7)
3.1 Non-commercial Purposes
169(1)
3.2 Cultural Heritage Institution, including Third-party Involvement
170(2)
3.3 Out-of-commerce
172(2)
3.4 Permanency in the Collection
174(1)
3.5 Sufficiently Representative Collective Management Organization
174(1)
3.6 Acknowledgment
175(1)
4 Licensing Mechanism (Article 8(1))
176(3)
4.1 Requirements for Collective Management Organizations
176(1)
4.2 Character and Scope of the Licence
177(1)
4.3 Freedom and Obligations of Member States
177(2)
5 Exception or Limitation (Article 8(2))
179(20)
5.1 Exclusive Rights to which the Exception or Limitation Applies
179(15)
5.1.1 Rights in Copyright-protected Databases
180(2)
5.1.1.1 Notion of Database
180(1)
5.1.1.2 Copyright Subsistence
181(1)
5.1.1.3 Exclusive Rights
181(1)
5.1.2 Database (Sui Generis) Right
182(3)
5.1.3 Right of Reproduction in the InfoSoc Directive 2001/29
185(3)
5.1.3.1 The Right of Reproduction of Authors in Relation to Works
185(1)
5.1.3.2 The Right of Reproduction of Other Rightholders in Article of the InfoSoc Directive 2001/29
186(2)
5.1.4 Right of Communication/Making Available to the Public in the InfoSoc Directive 2001/29
188(3)
5.1.5 Rights in Computer Programs in the Software Directive 2009/24
191(2)
5.1.6 Press Publishers' Right
193(79)
5.1.6.1 Right of Reproduction
194(1)
5.1.6.2 Right of Making Available to the Public
194(1)
5.2 Interpretation of Exceptions and Limitations (including Article 8(2)) and Compliance with the Three-step Test
194(2)
5.3 Nature and Scope of the Exception or Limitation
196(2)
5.4 Country of Origin Principle
198(1)
5.5 Freedom and Obligations of Member States
198(1)
5.6 Measures Applied by Rightholders
198(1)
6 Opt-out Mechanism
199(1)
7 Exclusion for Third-country Works and Subject Matter
200(1)
8 Continued Application of Other Provisions and Freedom of Member States
201(2)
Article 9 Cross-border Uses 203(5)
1 History
205(1)
2 Rationale
206(1)
3 Licences with Cross-border Effects
206(1)
4 Country of Origin Principle for the Exception or Limitation
207(1)
Article 10 Publicity Measures 208(7)
1 History
210(1)
2 Rationale
210(2)
3 Basic and Additional Information
212(2)
3.1 Basic Information
212(1)
3.2 Additional Information
213(1)
4 The Portal Established and Managed by the EUIPO
214(1)
Article 11 Stakeholder Dialogue 215(4)
1 History
217(1)
2 Rationale
217(1)
3 Member States' Obligations
218(1)
4 Scope
218(1)
Article 12 Collective Licensing with an Extended Effect 219(16)
1 History
223(2)
2 Rationale
225(1)
3 Requirements for and Scope of Collective Licences with an Extended Effect
226(2)
3.1 Collective Management Organizations
227(1)
3.2 Object and Territory of the Licensing Agreement
227(1)
4 Obligations of Member States
228(4)
4.1 Availability of Collecting Licensing Agreements with an Extended Effect
229(1)
4.2 Safeguards for Rightholders, including Opt-out Mechanism
229(2)
4.3 Information to the Commission
231(1)
5 Freedom of Member States
232(1)
6 Continued Application of Other Provisions
233(1)
7 The Commission's Report
233(2)
Article 13 Negotiation Mechanism 235(4)
1 History
236(1)
2 Rationale
236(1)
3 Obligations of Member States
237(2)
3.1 Impartial Body or Mediators
237(1)
3.2 Notification to the Commission
238(1)
Article 14 Works of Visual Art in the Public Domain 239(11)
1 History
240(1)
2 Rationale
241(1)
3 Definitions
241(3)
3.1 Public Domain
241(1)
3.2 Works of Visual Art
242(1)
3.3 Reproduction
243(1)
3.4 Material
243(1)
3.5 Cultural Heritage Institutions
243(1)
4 Requirements for Copyright Protection of Material
244(3)
4.1 A Work
244(1)
4.2 Originality as Author's Own Intellectual Creation
245(1)
4.3 Copyright Protection of 'Material Resulting from an Act of Reproduction'
246(1)
5 Requirements for Protection of 'Material' through Related Rights
247(1)
5.1 Protection of Non-original (Simple) Photographs
248(1)
6 Relation to Other Legal Regimes
248(1)
7 Sale of Reproductions
249(1)
8 Application in Time and Freedom of Member States
249(1)
Article 15 Protection of Press Publications Concerning Online Uses 250(45)
1 History
253(4)
2 Rationale
257(1)
3 Definitions
258(5)
3.1 Press Publisher
258(1)
3.2 Establishment in a Member State
259(1)
3.3 Press Publication
260(2)
3.4 Online Use
262(1)
3.5 Information Society Service Providers
262(1)
4 Scope of the Right: Right of Reproduction (Article 2 of the InfoSoc Directive 2001/29)
263(4)
4.1 The Right of Reproduction of Authors in Relation to Works
264(1)
4.2 The Right of Reproduction of Other Rightholders in Article 2 of the InfoSoc Directive 2001/29
265(1)
4.3 The Right of Reproduction of Press Publishers
266(1)
5 Scope of the Right: Right of Making Available to the Public (Article 3(2) of the InfoSoc Directive 2001/29)
267(5)
5.1 The right of Making Available to the Public in Article 3(2) of the InfoSoc Directive 2001/29
268(1)
5.2 Construction of the Right of Communication/Making Available to the Public
269(2)
5.3 The Right of Making Available to the Public of Press Publishers
271(1)
6 Scope of the Right: Exclusions and Restrictions
272(15)
6.1 Uses of Press Publications by Individual Users
272(2)
6.1.1 Private or Non-commercial Uses
273(1)
6.2 Individual Words and Very Short Extracts (Including Titles and Headlines)
274(2)
6.3 Acts of Hyperlinking
276(9)
6.3.1 Acts of Hyperlinking and the Right of Reproduction
277(1)
6.3.2 Acts of Hyperlinking and the Right of Making Available to the Public
278(6)
6.3.2.1 Linking and Contractual Restrictions
282(2)
6.3.3 Types of Links to which the Exclusion in Article 15 Applies
284(1)
6.4 Mere Facts
285(1)
6.5 Works or Subject Matter for which Protection has Expired
286(1)
7 Waivability and Transferability of the Right; Licensing Aspects
287(1)
8 Exceptions and Limitations
287(5)
8.1 Exceptions and Limitations under the InfoSoc Directive 2001/29
287(2)
8.2 Beneficiaries of Exceptions and Limitations in Connection with Article 15
289(1)
8.3 Quotation under EU Law
290(2)
8.3.1 Acceptable Quotation of a Press Publication
292(1)
9 Third-party Rights in Subject Matter Incorporated in a Press Publication
292(2)
9.1 Revenue-sharing: Meaning of Appropriateness
293(1)
10 Relation to Other EU Directives
294(1)
11 Start and Duration
294(1)
Article 16 Claims to Fair Compensation 295(6)
1 History
296(2)
2 Rationale
298(1)
3 Requirement of Author's Consent
299(1)
4 Freedom of Member States
299(2)
Article 17 Use of Protected Content by Online Content-sharing Service Providers 301(59)
1 History
308(6)
1.1 The Structure of the Commission's Proposal
308(2)
1.2 The Undertaking of Acts of Communication/Making Available to the Public and Safe Harbour Availability under the Pre-existing Acquis
310(1)
1.3 The Council Text
311(1)
1.4 The Parliament Text
312(2)
1.5 Polish CJEU Challenge
314(1)
2 Rationale
314(1)
3 Definitions
315(18)
3.1 Online Content Sharing Service Providers (OCSSPs)
315(9)
3.1.1 Information Society Service
316(1)
3.1.2 Storing and Giving Access to Copyright Works and Other Protected Subject Matter
317(4)
3.1.2.1 Storage
317(1)
3.1.2.2 Giving Access to the Public
318(1)
3.1.2.3 Large Amount
319(1)
3.1.2.4 User Uploads
320(1)
3.1.2.5 Main or One of the Main Purposes
321(1)
3.1.3 Organization and Promotion of Content for Profit-making Purposes
321(2)
3.1.3.1 Organization and Promotion
321(1)
3.1.3.2 Profit-making Purposes
322(1)
3.1.4 Exclusions
323(1)
3.2 Communication/Making Available to the Public
324(5)
3.2.1 Right of Communication to the Public (Article 3 the InfoSoc Directive 2001/29)
324(3)
3.2.2 Nature of Article 17 and of its Right of Communication to the Public
327(2)
3.3 Rightholders
329(1)
3.4 Best Efforts
330(3)
3.4.1 In Relation to Article 17(4)(a)
330(2)
3.4.2 In Relation to Article 17(4)(b) and (c)
332(1)
4 Authorization Obtained by OCSSPs and its Scope
333(2)
4.1 Authorization to OCSSPs in Relation to Their Own Activities
334(1)
4.2 Authorization to OCSSPs in Relation to Users' Activities
334(1)
5 Exclusion of the Hosting Safe Harbour
335(1)
6 Liability of OCSSPs in Certain Cases
336(8)
6.1 Article 17(4) as a Specific Liability Mechanism
336(1)
6.2 Liability Regime in Case of No Authorization Obtained
337(5)
6.2.1 Best Efforts to Ensure the Unavailability of Specific Works and Other Subject Matter
338(1)
6.2.2 Obligations of Rightholders and OCSSPs
339(2)
6.2.3 Preventing Further Uploads of Unlawful Content
341(1)
6.3 Specific Liability Regime for Certain OCSSPs
342(2)
7 Protection of Users and Exceptions and Limitations with Mandatory Character
344(10)
7.1 Quotation, Criticism, Review in the InfoSoc Directive 2001/29
348(2)
7.2 Quotation, Criticism, Review in Article 17(7)(a)
350(1)
7.3 Use for the Purpose of Caricature, Parody, or Pastiche (Article 17(7)(b))
351(2)
7.4 Interpretation of Exceptions and Limitations
353(1)
8 No General Obligation to Monitor and Information to Rightholders
354(1)
9 Ex Ante Blocking and Complaint and Redress Mechanism
355(2)
10 Stakeholder Dialogues and Commission Guidelines
357(1)
11 Freedom of Member States
358(1)
12 Application in Time and Review
359(1)
Article 18 Principle of Appropriate and Proportionate Remuneration 360(8)
1 History
361(1)
2 Rationale
362(1)
3 Notion of Appropriate and Proportionate Remuneration
363(1)
4 Scope of Application and Exclusions
364(3)
4.1 Non-applicability to Authors of Computer Programs
365(1)
4.2 Application in Time
366(1)
4.3 Contractual Override
367(1)
5 Obligations and Freedom of Member States
367(1)
Article 19 Transparency Obligation 368(13)
1 History
371(1)
2 Rationale
372(1)
3 Beneficiaries and Addressees of the Transparency Obligation
373(1)
3.1 Beneficiaries
373(1)
3.1.1 Non-applicability to Authors of Computer Programs
373(1)
3.2 Addressees
374(1)
4 Information Subject to the Transparency Obligation
374(4)
4.1 Core Information (Article 19(1))
375(2)
4.1.1 Content of the Information
375(1)
4.1.2 Type of Information
376(1)
4.1.3 Frequency and Modality of the Information
377(1)
4.2 Additional Information (Article 19(2))
377(1)
5 Scope and Breach of the Transparency Obligation
378(1)
5.1 Limitation of the Obligation
378(1)
5.2 Exclusions
378(1)
6 Collective Bargaining and Collective Rights Management
379(1)
7 Mandatory Nature and Contractual Override
380(1)
8 Application in Time and Transitional Period
380(1)
Article 20 Contract Adjustment Mechanism 381(12)
1 History
383(1)
2 Rationale
383(1)
3 Beneficiaries and Addressees
384(2)
3.1 Non-applicability to Authors of Computer Programs
385(1)
4 Additional, Appropriate, and Fair Remuneration
386(3)
4.1 Disproportionately Low Original Remuneration
386(1)
4.2 Notions of Additional, Appropriate, and Fair Remuneration
387(2)
5 Scope of the Contract Adjustment Mechanism and Exclusions
389(2)
6 Mandatory Nature and Dispute Resolution
391(1)
7 Application in Time
391(2)
Article 21 Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedure 393(7)
1 History
394(1)
2 Rationale
395(1)
3 Eligibility for the ADR Mechanism
396(1)
3.1 Non-applicability to Authors of Computer Programs
396(1)
4 Availability of the ADR Mechanism and Exclusions
397(1)
5 Obligations and Freedom of Member States
398(1)
6 Mandatory Nature
398(1)
7 Relationship between the ADR Procedure and Court Action
399(1)
8 Application in Time
399(1)
Article 22 Right of Revocation 400(8)
1 History
401(1)
2 Rationale
402(1)
3 Beneficiaries and Exclusions
403(1)
3.1 Non-applicability to Authors of Computer Programs
403(1)
4 Scope and Exercise of the Right
404(1)
5 Obligations and Freedom of Member States
405(1)
6 Application in Time
406(2)
Article 23 Common Provisions 408(1)
Article 24 Amendments to Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC 409(2)
Article 25 Relationship with Exceptions and Limitations Provided for in Other Directives 411(1)
Article 26 Application in Time 412(1)
Article 27 Transitional Provision 413(1)
Article 28 Protection of Personal Data 414(1)
Article 29 Transposition 415(1)
Article 30 Review 416(1)
Article 31 Entry into Force 417(1)
Article 32 Addressees 418(1)
Appendix 1 Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on copyright in the Digital Single Market 419(24)
Appendix 2 Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC 443(38)
Index 481
Eleonora Rosati is Professor of Intellectual Property Law and Director of the Institute for Intellectual Property and Market Law (IFIM) at Stockholm University. She is also Of Counsel at Bird & Bird, Editor of the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (OUP), long-standing contributor to The IPKat, and Co-Founder of Fashion Law London. Eleonora has published extensively in the IP field. She has also prepared technical briefings and studies and delivered talks at the request of international organizations and EU institutions and agencies (including WIPO, European Parliament, European Commission, and EUIPO), as well as international professional bodies and organizations (including ALAI, INTA, AIPPI, LIDC, and ECTA).