|
|
xxi | |
|
|
xxxiii | |
|
|
xlv | |
|
|
li | |
|
PART I EQUITY FINANCING AND CAPITAL MARKETS FINANCE |
|
|
|
1 The Prohibition Against Financial Assistance: Constructing a Rational Response |
|
|
3 | (24) |
|
|
3 | (3) |
|
1.2 The Origins, Development, and Policy Objectives of the Prohibition |
|
|
6 | (7) |
|
|
13 | (9) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
1.3.2 The meaning of financial assistance |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
1.3.3 The exceptions to the prohibition |
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
1.3.4 The consequences of breaching the prohibition |
|
|
18 | (3) |
|
1.3.5 Towards relaxing the prohibition: EU developments |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
1.4 Constructing a Measured Response to Financial Assistance |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
|
24 | (3) |
|
2 The Decline of Legal Capital: An Exploration of the Consequences of Board Solvency-Based Capital Reductions |
|
|
27 | (32) |
|
|
27 | (8) |
|
2.2 Legal Strategies for Regulating Capital |
|
|
35 | (6) |
|
2.3 The Winners and Losers from the Board-Solvency-Statement Option |
|
|
41 | (6) |
|
2.4 The Irrelevance of Capital-Reduction Regulation |
|
|
47 | (5) |
|
2.5 The Evolutionary Implications of Legal Capital Reform |
|
|
52 | (4) |
|
|
56 | (3) |
|
|
59 | (28) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
3.1.2 Strengths of schemes as a method of restructuring |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
3.1.3 Objection to the fundamental principle underlying schemes of arrangement |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
|
60 | (2) |
|
3.2.1 Elements of a scheme |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
3.2.2 A scheme must be effected by a company |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
3.3 Standing to Make an Application for an Order Sanctioning a Scheme |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
3.4 Creditors Who Can Enter into a Scheme with the Company |
|
|
63 | (5) |
|
3.4.1 Factors determining who is a creditor |
|
|
63 | (2) |
|
3.4.2 Contribution claimants |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
3.4.3 Dependants with claims under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
3.4.4 The need for a definition of `creditor' |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
3.5 Beneficial and Legal Ownership |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
3.5.1 Beneficial owners are not creditors |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
3.5.2 The persons who are the members that can enter into a scheme with the company |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
3.6 Practical Implications Arising From It Being the Legal Rather than the Beneficial Owner That is the Member or Creditor Who is Party to the Scheme |
|
|
69 | (2) |
|
3.6.1 Depositary interests |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
3.7 Challenges to the Headcount Test |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
3.7.1 Discretion to ignore the outcome of the headcount test |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
3.7.2 A reaction to share splitting in Hong Kong |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
3.8 Schemes Involving Third Parties |
|
|
72 | (5) |
|
3.8.1 Re T & N Ltd (No 3) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
3.8.2 Releases of third parties |
|
|
73 | (3) |
|
3.8.3 Enforcing schemes of arrangement with provisions affecting third parties |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
3.9 Constitution of Classes for Meetings to Approve the Scheme |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
3.9.1 The test for deciding who can vote at the meeting to approve the scheme |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
3.9.2 The role of the court |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
3.9.3 The relevance of the comparator |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
3.10 The Explanatory Statement |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
3.10.1 Scope of obligation |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
3.10.2 The role of the court |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
3.11 Schemes Contrasted with Court Applications in Other Comparable Contexts |
|
|
80 | (3) |
|
3.11.1 The role of the FSA |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
3.11.2 The role of the independent expert |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
3.11.3 The role of the Policyholder Advocate |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
3.11.4 The role of the Takeover Panel |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
|
83 | (4) |
|
3.12.1 Electronic communications and use of websites |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
3.12.2 Conduct of the meetings |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
3.12.3 Factors to be taken into account when the court exercises discretion to sanction a scheme |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
3.12.4 Collateral motives for voting |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
4 Insider Dealing After the Market Abuse Directive |
|
|
87 | (30) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
4.2 Criticism and Justification of the Ban |
|
|
88 | (3) |
|
|
91 | (6) |
|
4.4 Abuse of Inside Information |
|
|
97 | (3) |
|
4.5 The Necessary Mens Rea and Other Requirements of Due Process in Insider Dealing Cases |
|
|
100 | (4) |
|
|
104 | (8) |
|
4.6.1 No use of the inside information |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
|
107 | (3) |
|
4.6.4 The presumption of use and its rebuttal |
|
|
110 | (2) |
|
4.7 Passing on Inside Information |
|
|
112 | (4) |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
5 Short-Sales Regulation in Seasoned Equity Offerings: What Are the Issues? |
|
|
117 | (22) |
|
|
117 | (4) |
|
5.2 Short-Sales in Contemporary Financial Markets |
|
|
121 | (4) |
|
5.3 Should Short-Sales in the Context of SEOs be Banned? A Cost-Benefit Analysis |
|
|
125 | (8) |
|
5.3.1 The efficiency benefits of short-selling |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
5.3.2 Destabilization of orderly markets and settlement risk |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
5.3.3 The impact of short-sales on SEOs |
|
|
128 | (3) |
|
5.3.4 Does short-selling before SEOs amount to market abuse? |
|
|
131 | (2) |
|
5.4 How Short-Sales in the Context of SEOs Should be Regulated |
|
|
133 | (5) |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
5.4.3 A model for the regulation of short-selling around SEOs |
|
|
135 | (3) |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
6 Initial Public Offers---the Supply and Demand Side Perspectives in the Legal Framework |
|
|
139 | (30) |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
6.2 The Supply Side Perspective |
|
|
140 | (14) |
|
6.2.1 The prospectus passport in the EU |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
6.2.2 Cognizance for industry needs in the regulation of offer documents |
|
|
143 | (4) |
|
6.2.3 Little regulation of the bookbuilding process |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
6.2.4 The exception of price stabilization |
|
|
148 | (2) |
|
6.2.5 The exceptions to the prospectus regime |
|
|
150 | (4) |
|
6.3 The Demand Side Perspective |
|
|
154 | (14) |
|
6.3.1 The disclosure regime and investor protection |
|
|
155 | (3) |
|
6.3.2 Market trends, practices, and biases surrounding an IPO |
|
|
158 | (5) |
|
|
163 | (5) |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
7 The Future Role of Credit Rating Agencies in Contemporary Financial Markets---A Theoretical Perspective |
|
|
169 | (44) |
|
|
169 | (2) |
|
7.2 The Role of CRAs, their Potential Liability, and the Various Flaws in their Operation |
|
|
171 | (14) |
|
7.2.1 Defining credit ratings |
|
|
171 | (2) |
|
7.2.2 Credit ratings: just an opinion? |
|
|
173 | (5) |
|
7.2.3 Distinguishing CRAs from other rating agencies |
|
|
178 | (2) |
|
7.2.4 The use of ratings made by market participants |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
7.2.5 The criticisms advanced against CRAs |
|
|
181 | (4) |
|
7.3 The Relationship between CRAs and the Structured Finance Market |
|
|
185 | (6) |
|
7.3.1 Asset securitization |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
7.3.2 Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
187 | (4) |
|
7.4 Regulating CRAs and Assessment of Current Proposals for Reform |
|
|
191 | (15) |
|
7.4.1 Is more regulation needed? |
|
|
193 | (2) |
|
7.4.2 Financial Stability Forum |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
7.4.4 The EU Regulation on CRA |
|
|
196 | (8) |
|
7.4.5 The Turner Review in the UK |
|
|
204 | (2) |
|
|
206 | (7) |
|
PART II DEBT FINANCING AND TAXATION |
|
|
|
8 Contractual Aspects of Debt Financing |
|
|
213 | (20) |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
8.2 Contract and Conveyance |
|
|
213 | (5) |
|
8.3 Characterization as a Charge |
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
8.4 The Mystery of the Floating Charge |
|
|
219 | (4) |
|
8.5 Failure to Insist Upon Contractual Rights |
|
|
223 | (3) |
|
8.6 Automatic Crystallization |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
|
227 | (2) |
|
8.8 The `Two Funds' Fallacy |
|
|
229 | (2) |
|
|
231 | (2) |
|
|
233 | (36) |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
|
234 | (11) |
|
|
235 | (4) |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
|
240 | (3) |
|
|
243 | (2) |
|
9.3 Classification and Characterization |
|
|
245 | (7) |
|
9.3.1 The English law approach to classification |
|
|
245 | (3) |
|
9.3.2 Difficult questions in the classification of securities |
|
|
248 | (4) |
|
9.4 Security over Intangibles and Future Assets |
|
|
252 | (3) |
|
9.4.1 The manner in which securities are held and dealt with |
|
|
252 | (3) |
|
9.5 Security and the Need to Deal with Assets |
|
|
255 | (2) |
|
9.6 The Problem of Charge Backs |
|
|
257 | (1) |
|
9.7 Presenting a `True and Fair View': Registration |
|
|
258 | (4) |
|
9.7.1 The importance of registration |
|
|
258 | (1) |
|
9.7.2 The English registration regime |
|
|
258 | (2) |
|
9.7.3 Foreign corporations |
|
|
260 | (1) |
|
9.7.4 Registration under the Companies Act and the specialist registers |
|
|
261 | (1) |
|
|
262 | (7) |
|
9.8.1 The different priority rules |
|
|
262 | (7) |
|
10 Set-off, Netting, and Alternatives to Security |
|
|
269 | (26) |
|
|
269 | (2) |
|
|
271 | (6) |
|
|
277 | (4) |
|
10.4 Alternatives to Security |
|
|
281 | (9) |
|
|
290 | (5) |
|
11 Policy Issues and Reform in Debt Finance: The Reform of the English Law of Secured Transactions in Personal Property |
|
|
295 | (28) |
|
|
295 | (1) |
|
11.2 Examining the Case for Reform |
|
|
296 | (18) |
|
11.2.1 The multiplicity of interests and forms of transaction under English law |
|
|
297 | (2) |
|
11.2.2 Fixed vs floating charges |
|
|
299 | (1) |
|
11.2.3 Security vs other transactions: the risk of re-characterization and the difficulties with rights and remedies |
|
|
300 | (5) |
|
11.2.4 Registration of security |
|
|
305 | (3) |
|
|
308 | (6) |
|
11.3 Previous Suggestions for Reform |
|
|
314 | (1) |
|
11.4 The Current Consultation |
|
|
315 | (1) |
|
11.5 Suggestions for Reform |
|
|
316 | (4) |
|
11.6 Further Questions for Consideration |
|
|
320 | (3) |
|
12 Practitioner's Perspective: The Financial Collateral Directive in England |
|
|
323 | (38) |
|
|
323 | (1) |
|
12.2 The Material, Personal, and Temporal Scope of the FCAR |
|
|
324 | (4) |
|
12.3 Financial Collateral |
|
|
328 | (6) |
|
|
328 | (3) |
|
12.3.2 Financial instruments |
|
|
331 | (3) |
|
12.4 Security Financial Collateral Arrangement |
|
|
334 | (11) |
|
12.4.1 Relevant financial obligations |
|
|
334 | (2) |
|
12.4.2 Possession and control |
|
|
336 | (9) |
|
12.5 Title Transfer Financial Collateral Arrangement |
|
|
345 | (1) |
|
12.6 Disapplication of Formalities |
|
|
346 | (1) |
|
12.7 Disapplication of Insolvency Provisions |
|
|
347 | (2) |
|
|
349 | (6) |
|
12.9 Right of Use Under Security Financial Collateral Arrangement |
|
|
355 | (1) |
|
12.10 Enforcement by Way of Appropriation |
|
|
356 | (2) |
|
12.11 Conflict of Laws Regarding Book Entry Securities Collateral |
|
|
358 | (2) |
|
|
360 | (1) |
|
13 The Assymetrical Treatment of Debt and Equity Finance under UK Tax Law |
|
|
361 | (32) |
|
|
361 | (2) |
|
13.2 Debt and Equity Finance under UK Tax Law |
|
|
363 | (2) |
|
13.3 Is the Different Tax Treatment of Debt and Equity Justified? |
|
|
365 | (3) |
|
13.4 Does the Difference in Treatment Affect the Capital Structure of Companies? |
|
|
368 | (1) |
|
13.5 Behavioural Responses and Legislative Rejoinder |
|
|
369 | (7) |
|
13.5.1 Equity disguised as debt |
|
|
370 | (4) |
|
13.5.2 Debt disguised as equity |
|
|
374 | (2) |
|
13.6 International Tax Issues |
|
|
376 | (13) |
|
13.6.1 Thin capitalization rules |
|
|
377 | (4) |
|
13.6.2 Taxation of foreign profits, debt cap, and controlled foreign companies |
|
|
381 | (5) |
|
13.6.3 International tax arbitrage |
|
|
386 | (3) |
|
|
389 | (4) |
|
PART III EUROPEAN LAW AND POLICY |
|
|
|
14 The EU Financial Services Action Plan and its Impact on Corporate Finance |
|
|
393 | (36) |
|
|
393 | (4) |
|
|
397 | (4) |
|
14.2.1 The single market programme |
|
|
397 | (1) |
|
|
398 | (1) |
|
14.2.3 The Lamfalussy lawmaking process |
|
|
399 | (2) |
|
14.3 Assessing the Impact of the FSAP on EU Corporate Finance |
|
|
401 | (24) |
|
14.3.1 Regulatory impacts: establishing the contours of the new regulatory landscape |
|
|
403 | (7) |
|
|
410 | (7) |
|
14.3.3 Elements of regulatory competition |
|
|
417 | (2) |
|
14.3.4 Costs and inefficiencies |
|
|
419 | (6) |
|
|
425 | (4) |
|
15 How does Corporate Mobility Affect Lawmaking? A Comparative Analysis |
|
|
429 | (32) |
|
|
429 | (4) |
|
15.2 Challenging the `Non-Competition' Strategy?: The Societas Europaea |
|
|
433 | (9) |
|
15.2.1 The SE: an incomplete lawmaking product |
|
|
434 | (2) |
|
15.2.2 The SE: a vehicle for company law arbitrage? |
|
|
436 | (6) |
|
15.3 ECJ Case Law: Challenging the `Non-Competition' Strategy? |
|
|
442 | (16) |
|
15.3.1 The incorporation mobility cases |
|
|
442 | (3) |
|
15.3.2 The reincorporation mobility cases |
|
|
445 | (3) |
|
15.3.3 The practical impact of the ECJ case law |
|
|
448 | (6) |
|
15.3.4 Responsive (but not competitive) lawmaking in Germany and the Netherlands |
|
|
454 | (4) |
|
|
458 | (3) |
|
16 Is Volkswagen The New Centros? Free Movement of Capital's Impact on Company Law |
|
|
461 | (32) |
|
|
461 | (3) |
|
16.2 Freedom of Establishment and Free Movement of Capital |
|
|
464 | (5) |
|
|
469 | (5) |
|
|
469 | (1) |
|
|
470 | (1) |
|
16.3.3 The Thyssen Krupp case |
|
|
471 | (1) |
|
16.3.4 Consequences and emerging questions |
|
|
472 | (2) |
|
16.4 Systematic Analysis of the Free Movement of Capital |
|
|
474 | (17) |
|
|
474 | (5) |
|
|
479 | (8) |
|
|
487 | (3) |
|
16.4.4 Volkswagen: the aftermath |
|
|
490 | (1) |
|
|
491 | (2) |
|
17 Equivalence-Based Regulation and EU Prospectus Law---The Shadow Regime |
|
|
493 | (26) |
|
|
493 | (3) |
|
17.2 Equivalence-Based Regulation and Article 20 PD |
|
|
496 | (12) |
|
17.2.1 Prior approval as a means to recognize equivalence |
|
|
497 | (2) |
|
17.2.2 Limits to prior approval |
|
|
499 | (3) |
|
17.2.3 Equivalence-based regulation among Member States |
|
|
502 | (6) |
|
17.3 Article 20 PD: A Shadow Regime in Need of Reform? |
|
|
508 | (9) |
|
|
508 | (3) |
|
|
511 | (1) |
|
|
511 | (1) |
|
|
512 | (5) |
|
|
517 | (2) |
|
18 Legal Capital and the EU Treaties |
|
|
519 | (22) |
|
|
519 | (1) |
|
18.2 Summary of the (Former) Debate on Legal Capital |
|
|
520 | (7) |
|
18.3 The Test of Legal Capital under EU Law |
|
|
527 | (12) |
|
18.3.1 National provisions on legal capital and basic freedoms |
|
|
527 | (7) |
|
18.3.2 Directive provisions on minimum capital and basic freedoms |
|
|
534 | (3) |
|
18.3.3 The legal capital system of the Directive: legitimate harmonization? |
|
|
537 | (2) |
|
|
539 | (2) |
Index |
|
541 | |