Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Crimes Against Humanity: The Limits of Universal Jurisdiction in the Global South [Hardback]

  • Formāts: Hardback, 336 pages, height x width: 216x138 mm, Not illustrated
  • Sērija : International Law
  • Izdošanas datums: 15-Apr-2021
  • Izdevniecība: University of Wales Press
  • ISBN-10: 1786837021
  • ISBN-13: 9781786837028
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 113,24 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
Crimes Against Humanity: The Limits of Universal Jurisdiction in the Global SouthPalielināt
  • Formāts: Hardback, 336 pages, height x width: 216x138 mm, Not illustrated
  • Sērija : International Law
  • Izdošanas datums: 15-Apr-2021
  • Izdevniecība: University of Wales Press
  • ISBN-10: 1786837021
  • ISBN-13: 9781786837028
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
Permanent link: https://www.kriso.lv/db/9781786837028.html
Keywords:
Currently, there is an engorging fascination with and heightened expectations from international legal accountability. Crimes Against Humanity examines whether international criminal law, in particular legislation and institutions pertaining to war crimes and crimes against humanity, is equipped to be a panacea for the ills of the recalcitrant nation-state system. The main thread that runs through the text is to determine the ultimate aim and efficacy of adjudicating some of the most egregious infractions of the internationally sanctioned human rights regime. While international criminal law strives to develop a shared understanding of, and golden standards for, acceptable behavior of states and governments, it also suffers from a degree of institutional idealism pertaining to current accountability regimes in public international law. Focusing on the Global South, it also examines the problem-laden notion of collective responsibility for societal and political mass crimes and questions the merits of disproportionate reliance on international criminal law in the aftermath of civil wars, ethnic cleansing, genocidal violence, and mass exodus.
 

Papildus informācija

This book brings together jurisprudential debates on international criminal law, international law scholarship on the limits of state sovereignty, and applied political philosophy concerning responsibility and accountability in the context of mass political crimes and state criminality.

It offers a compelling view of legal reasoning concerning accountability regimes in the Global South. No other study addresses questions of ethical dimensions of mass crimes and accountability for state criminality.
Acknowledgements xiii
List of Acronyms
xvii
Introduction 1(24)
1 Topographies Of Universal Jurisdiction In International Law, Legal Pluralism And The Curious Case Of The International Criminal Court
25(32)
Introduction
25(3)
I Applications of Legal Pluralism in International Law
28(13)
A The Legacy of the New Haven School
31(4)
B TWAIL Scholarship and the Radical Pluralism Debate
35(3)
C Radical Pluralism and Beyond
38(3)
II Transnational Character of Accountability Regimes in International Law and Multicentricity of Legal Practices
41(10)
A Fragmentation in International Law and the Fragile Balance of Primary and Secondary Rules in Accountability Regimes
43(1)
B The Project of International Law and the Jurisprudential Promise of the ICC: Disciplining the Domestic Realm through International Criminal Law?
44(4)
C International Criminal Court and the Ideal of Complementarity in International Law
48(2)
D Mandate of the International Criminal Court: Jurisprudential versus Political Realities
50(1)
Conclusion
51(6)
2 Universal Jurisdiction And Genealogies Of International Criminal Law
57(24)
Introduction
57(2)
I Nemo Me Impuna Lacessit? The Ethos of Universal Jurisdiction
59(3)
II Divided We Unite? Fragmentation and Legitimacy in International Law
62(3)
III Legitimacy of International Law: Lingering Questions
65(3)
IV The Question of the State in International Law as Seen from the Global South: A Chance to Start Anew?
68(5)
V Jus Gentium and the Outer Limits of International Law
73(3)
VI Jus Cogens or Not - Dilemmas?
76(3)
Conclusion
79(2)
3 Crimes Against Humanity Jurisprudence In International Law And The Conundrum Of Jurisdictional Certainty
81(26)
Introduction
81(4)
I The Normative Architecture of Crimes Against Humanity Jurisprudence
85(9)
II Competing Politico-Normative Visions
94(4)
III Adjudication, Responsibility and the Law: Limits of Universal Jurisdiction
98(5)
Conclusion
103(4)
4 Mea Culpa, Sua Culpa, Tua Maxima Culpa: Collective Responsibility, Societal Wrongdoing And Legal Judgment
107(32)
Introduction
107(5)
I Beyond Eichmann: On the Necessity of Judgment
112(3)
II Towards an Engaged Theory of Judgment and Collective Responsibility
115(7)
A The Threshold Question
116(3)
B The Outcomes Perspective
119(3)
III Collective Responsibility and Legal Judgment in International Law: The Jaspers Alternative?
122(2)
IV Moral Responsibility as an Epicurian Cure for the Conundrums of International Criminal Law?
124(5)
V Collective Responsibility and the Distribution of Blameworthiness
129(3)
Conclusion: The Dilemma of the Sum Total versus Its Constitutive Parts
132(7)
5 Through The Looking Glass: Hybrid Courts And International Criminal Law In The Global South
139(48)
Introduction
139(2)
I Mapping Out Responsibility for Mass Atrocities
141(23)
A More Than Each unto His Own - Hybrid Courts in the Global South
143(2)
II The Clarion Call of Universal Jurisdiction in the Global South
145(6)
A The ICC and Domestic Applications of the Rome Statute
151(9)
B The ICC and the Importance of the Complementarity Principle for the International Legal Accountability
160(4)
III Hybrid Courts: Fractured or Overlapping Legal Regimes of Accountability?
164(4)
Conclusion: Hybrid Courts as New Actors of International Criminal Law in the Global South?
168(9)
In Lieu of Conclusion: Deliverance of Justice in International Criminal Law and the Role of Political Judgment as Purposive Action
177(10)
Notes 187(74)
Bibliography 261(42)
Index 303
Nergis Canefe is Professor of Politics, Public Policy and Law, York University, Canada.