Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Day Fines in Europe: Assessing Income-Based Sanctions in Criminal Justice Systems [Hardback]

Edited by (Universiteit Maastricht, Netherlands), Edited by (Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)
  • Formāts: Hardback, 400 pages, height x width x depth: 235x152x25 mm, weight: 750 g, Worked examples or Exercises
  • Izdošanas datums: 01-Jul-2021
  • Izdevniecība: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1108490832
  • ISBN-13: 9781108490832
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 173,06 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Hardback, 400 pages, height x width x depth: 235x152x25 mm, weight: 750 g, Worked examples or Exercises
  • Izdošanas datums: 01-Jul-2021
  • Izdevniecība: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1108490832
  • ISBN-13: 9781108490832
How can criminal sentencing be made more equal and yet more deterrent? This book provides the first comprehensive comparative analysis of the unique system of income-dependent fines - day fines - in Europe, which accounts not only for the severity of the offence but also for the income of the offender.

Day fines, as a pecuniary sanction, have a great potential to reduce inequality in the criminal sentencing system, as they impose the same relative punishment on all offenders irrespective of their income. Furthermore, with correct implementation, they can constitute an alternative sanction to the more repressive and not always efficient short-term prison sentences. Finally, by independently expressing in the sentence the severity and the income of the offender, day fines can increase uniformity and transparency of sentencing. Having this in mind, almost half of the European Union countries have adopted day fines in their criminal justice system. For the first time, this book makes their findings accessible to a wider international audience. Aimed at scholars, policy makers and criminal law practitioners, it provides an opportunity to learn about the theoretical advantages, the practical challenges, the successes and failures, and ways to improve.

Papildus informācija

The first comprehensive analysis of income-dependent fines (day fines), which can improve criminal sentencing by reducing inequality and short-term imprisonment.
List of Figures
xi
List of Tables
xiii
List of Contributors
xv
Acknowledgements xvii
List of Abbreviations
xviii
1 Introduction
1(7)
Elena Kantorowicz-Reznichenko
Michael Faure
1.1 Introduction
1(2)
1.2 Day Fines Around the World
3(2)
1.3 Synopsis and structure
5(2)
References
7(1)
2 Theoretical Perspectives on Day Fines
8(16)
Elena Kantorowicz-Reznichenko
2.1 Introduction
8(1)
2.2 Justifications of Punishment and Day Fines
9(9)
2.3 Theoretically Optimal Day Fine Model
18(3)
2.4 Conclusion
21(1)
References
22(2)
3 Day Fines in Finland
24(20)
Raimo Lahti
3.1 Historical Development of Day Fines in Finland and Their Legislative Reasons
24(3)
3.2 Contents of the Provisions on Day Fines, Conversion Sentences and the Enforcement of Imposed Fines
27(5)
3.3 Practical Implementation of the Day Fine System
32(7)
3.4 Public Perception of Day Fines
39(1)
3.5 Actual Challenges of the Fining System
39(2)
3.6 Conclusion
41(1)
References
42(2)
4 Day Fines in Sweden
44(12)
Jacob Oberg
4.1 Introduction
44(1)
4.2 Historical Development of Day Fines in the Swedish Legal System
45(3)
4.3 The Legal Framework of Day Fines
48(8)
44 Practical Implementation of the Day Fine System
56(14)
4.5 Public Perception and Criticism of the Day Fine System
61(2)
4.6 Special Challenges: Switching to Day Fines from Short Imprisonment Sentences
63(2)
4.7 Conclusions: Day Fines As an Alternative Criminal Sanction
65(2)
References
67(3)
5 Day Fines in Denmark
70(15)
Thomas Elholm
5.1 Historical Development of Day Fines in the Country
70(2)
5.2 The Legal Framework and the Structure of Day Fines
72(4)
5.3 The Practical Implementation of Day Fines
76(6)
5.4 Public Perception of Day Fines
82(1)
5.5 Special Challenges
83(1)
References
84(1)
6 Day Fines in Germany
85(37)
Hans-Joerg Albrecht
6.1 Historical Development of Day Fines in Germany
85(3)
6.2 The Comprehensive Criminal Law Reform, Day Fines and the System of Criminal Penalties
88(6)
6.3 The Structure of Day Fines and Fining
94(7)
6.4 Implementing the Day Fine System
101(11)
6.5 Public Opinion and Day Fines
112(3)
6.6 Challenges
115(2)
References
117(5)
7 Day Fines in Austria
122(24)
Christopher Kahl
Verena Weinberger
7.1 Historical Development of Day Fines in Austria
122(1)
7.2 The Structure of the Fine
123(13)
7.3 The Practical Implementation of Day Fines
136(6)
7.4 Public Perception of Day Fines
142(2)
7.5 Conclusion
144(1)
References
144(2)
8 Day Fines in Hungary
146(21)
Csaba Gyory
8.1 Historical Development of Day Fines in Hungary
146(2)
8.2 The Legal Framework for Day Fines
148(11)
8.3 Practical Implementation
159(3)
8.4 Conclusion
162(3)
References
165(2)
9 Day Fines in France
167(8)
Bruno Deffains
Jean-Baptiste Thierry
9.1 Historical Development of Day Fines in France
167(2)
9.2 Legal Framework for Day Fines
169(5)
9.3 Practical Implementation of Day Fines
174(1)
94 Statistical Elements
175(6)
9.5 Evaluation
177(2)
References
179(2)
10 Day Fines in Portugal
181(11)
Maria Fernanda Palma
Helena Morao
10.1 Historical Development of the Day Fine Model in Portugal
181(5)
10.2 The Legal Framework of Day Fines
186(4)
10.3 The Practical Implementation of Day Fines
190(2)
104 Public Perception of Day Fines
192(3)
10.5 Constitutionality Challenges
193(1)
References
193(2)
11 Day (Unit) Fines in England and Wales
195(21)
Valsamis Mitsilegas
Foivi Sofia Mouzakiti
11.1 Historical Development of Day Fines in England and Wales
196(4)
11.2 The Legal Framework of Unit Fines
200(4)
11.3 Practical Implementation of Unit Fines
204(4)
11.4 Public Perception of Unit Fines
208(2)
11.5 Special Challenges
210(2)
11.6 Conclusion
212(1)
References
213(3)
12 Day Fines in Slovenia
216(22)
Mitja Kovac
12.1 Introduction
216(1)
12.2 Historical Development of Day Fines in the Country
217(6)
12.3 The Structure of the Fine
223(3)
12.4 Practical Implementation
226(6)
12.5 Public Perception of Day Fines
232(2)
12.6 Special Challenges
234(1)
12.7 Conclusions
235(1)
References
236(2)
13 Day Fines in Spain
238(25)
Jesus Barquin Sanz
13.1 Introduction: Fines in Spanish Criminal Law
238(2)
13.2 Historical Development of Day Fines in Spain
240(1)
13.3 Legal Framework
241(5)
13.4 Practical Implementation
246(11)
13.5 Public Perception
257(3)
13.6 Other Challenges
260(1)
References
261(2)
14 Day Fines in Poland
263(21)
Dawid Marko
Slawomir Steinborn
14.1 Historical Development of Day Fines in Poland
263(3)
14.2 The Legal Framework of Day Fines
266(6)
14.3 The Practical Implementation of Day Fines
272(9)
14.4 The Public Perception of Day Fines
281(1)
References
282(2)
15 Day Fines in Croatia
284(22)
Maja Munivrana Vajda
15.1 Historical Development of Day Fines in Croatia
284(5)
15.2 The Structure of the Fine
289(8)
15.3 Practical Implementation of Day Fines
297(4)
15.4 Public Perception of Day Fines
301(1)
15.5 Special Challenges
302(1)
References
303(3)
16 Day Fines in Switzerland
306(18)
Martin Killias
Lorenz Biberstein
16.1 Introduction
306(1)
16.2 Monetary Penalties As an Alternative to Custodial Sanctions
306(5)
16.3 Effects of Day Fines on Sentencing
311(5)
16.4 A Major Problem Denied: Monetary Penalties Converted into Custody
316(5)
16.5 Policy Implications
321(2)
References
323(1)
17 Day Fines in Czech Republic
324(22)
Jiri Kindl
Jan Kupcik
17.1 Historical Development of Day Fines in the Country
324(3)
17.2 The Legal Framework of Day Fines
327(7)
17.3 The Practical Implementation of Day Fines
334(7)
17.4 Public Perception of Day Fines
341(2)
17.5 Special challenges
343(1)
References
344(2)
18 Day Fines in Romania
346(20)
Mihail Udroiu
18.1 Historical Development of Day Fines in Romania
346(3)
18.2 The Legal Framework for Day Fines
349(6)
18.3 The Practical Implementation of Day Fines
355(7)
18.4 Public Perception of Day Fines
362(1)
18.5 Special Challenges
363(2)
References
365(1)
19 Comparative Law and Economics Perspective on Day Fines
366(23)
Elena Kantorowicz-Reznichenko
Michael Faure
19.1 Introduction
366(1)
19.2 A Comparative View
367(6)
19.3 Theory versus Practice
373(2)
19.4 Best Practices and Limitations
375(6)
19.5 Policy Implications
381(5)
19.6 Concluding Remarks
386(2)
References
388(1)
Index 389
Elena Kantorowicz-Reznichenko is a Professor of Quantitative Empirical Legal Studies at the Rotterdam Institute of Law and Economics, Erasmus School of Law, Erasmus University Rotterdam. As an expert on day fines, she has published widely on the topic in international journals and served as an expert advisor to Ministries in different countries that considered the implementation of day fines. Michael Faure is a Professor of Comparative and International Environmental Law at Maastricht University and Professor of Comparative Private Law and Economics at Erasmus School of Law. He is member of the board of the European Centre of Tort and Insurance Law (Vienna) and a member of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.