Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Debating Relational Psychoanalysis: Jon Mills and his Critics

(Adelphi University)
  • Formāts: 212 pages
  • Izdošanas datums: 10-Jun-2020
  • Izdevniecība: Routledge
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781000068016
  • Formāts - PDF+DRM
  • Cena: 40,06 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.
  • Formāts: 212 pages
  • Izdošanas datums: 10-Jun-2020
  • Izdevniecība: Routledge
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781000068016

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

"In Debating Relational Psychoanalysis, Jon Mills provides an historical record of the debates that had taken place for nearly two decades on his critique of the relational school, including responses from his critics. Since he initiated his critique, relational psychoanalysis has become an international phenomenon with proponents worldwide. This book hopes that further dialogue may not only lead to conciliation, but more optimistically, that relational theory may be inspired to improve upon its theoretical edifice, both conceptually and clinically, as well as develop technical parameters to praxis that help guide and train new clinicians to sharpen their own theoretical orientation and therapeutic efficacy. Because of the public exchanges in writing andat professional symposiums, these debates have historical significance in the development of the psychoanalytic movement as a whole simply due to their contentiousness and proclivity to question cherished assumptions, both old and new. In presenting thiscollection of his work, and those responses of his critics, Mills argues that psychoanalysis may only advance through critique and creative refinement, and this requires a deconstructive praxis within the relational school itself. Debating Relational Psychoanalysis will be of interest to psychoanalysts of all orientations, psychotherapists, mental health workers, psychoanalytic historians, philosophical psychologists, and the broad disciplines of humanistic, phenomenological, existential, and analytical psychology"--

In Debating Relational Psychoanalysis, Jon Mills provides an historical record of the debates that had taken place for nearly two decades on his critique of the relational school, including responses from his critics.

Since he initiated his critique, relational psychoanalysis has become an international phenomenon with proponents worldwide. This book hopes that further dialogue may not only lead to conciliation, but more optimistically, that relational theory may be inspired to improve upon its theoretical edifice, both conceptually and clinically, as well as develop technical parameters to praxis that help guide and train new clinicians to sharpen their own theoretical orientation and therapeutic efficacy. Because of the public exchanges in writing and at professional symposiums, these debates have historical significance in the development of the psychoanalytic movement as a whole simply due to their contentiousness and proclivity to question cherished assumptions, both old and new. In presenting this collection of his work, and those responses of his critics, Mills argues that psychoanalysis may only advance through critique and creative refinement, and this requires a deconstructive praxis within the relational school itself.

Debating Relational Psychoanalysis

will be of interest to psychoanalysts of all orientations, psychotherapists, mental health workers, psychoanalytic historians, philosophical psychologists, and the broad disciplines of humanistic, phenomenological, existential, and analytical psychology.

Recenzijas

"Imagine a book on psychoanalysis that gets your heart racing and your own critical mind aroused into action! Jon Mills and his critics hold nothing back in their critique of the relational model and of each other. The reader has a front seat to a theoretical and practical boxing match that vitalizes the conversation, sharpens our theories and practices, prompting further debate and dialogue. In this provocative, deeply stirring and academically rigorous collection, we are challenged to be as thoughtful and thorough in our own theorizing and practices, as is Jon Mills and his contributors. This is a text that clarifies, informs and ultimately inspires."

Roy Barsness, PhD, Professor, The Seattle School of Theology & Psychology and the Brookhaven Institute of Psychoanalysis; author of Core Competencies in Relational Psychoanalysis.

"This is an exhilarating, refreshing, and brave volume. Why? Because Jon Mills is not afraid to challenge dogma and theoretical hegemony, to ask the reader to think with (or for that matter, against) him. Mills commanding and passionate rhetorical and intellectual skills shine through as he engages both his sophisticated interlocutors and the vexing conundrums and aporias at the heart of contemporary psychoanalytic relational theorizing. The best kind of psychoanalytic journey, Debating Relational Psychoanalysis, offers a vigorous, rigorous, and ultimately compassionate and redemptive conversation between Mills, the critic, and Mills critics, in which familiar thought is tested, and ones truths are turned over, maybe tossed aside, maybe reaffirmed with renewed (and newly philosophically grounded) conviction."

Jill Gentile, PhD, NYU Postdoctoral Program in Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis; author of Feminine Law.

"Jon Mills tells us "There is nothing more exciting than a clash of ideas, except for, perhaps, sex." I think that says it all. His controversial critique of Relational Psychoanalysis is provocative on many grounds. And the often-heated responses by his critics reveal both intellectual differences and personal affronts. In the end, it is the reader who benefits from this unique dialogue between intellectuals nimbly defending their own ideas. It will force you to think harder, and feel more deeply, not only about what you believe, but also how you practice."

Karen J. Maroda, PhD, ABPP, author of Psychodynamic Techniques

Foreword vii
Acknowledgments xi
Author xiii
Introduction: (Re)visioning relational psychoanalysis 1(16)
1 A critique of relational psychoanalysis
17(40)
Jon Mills
2 Contextualizing is not nullifying: Reply to Mills
57(6)
Robert D. Stolorow
George E. Atwood
Donna M. Orange
3 Assertions of therapeutic excess: A reply to Mills
63(4)
Marilyn S. Jacobs
4 "Neither fish nor flesh": Commentary on Jon Mills
67(6)
Stuart A. Pizer
5 A response to my critics
73(14)
Jon Mills
6 Conundrums: A critique of contemporary psychoanalysis: Interview on New Books in Psychoanalysis
87(14)
Jon Mills
Tracy D. Morgan
7 Fine-tuning problems in relational psychoanalysis: New directions in theory and praxis
101(18)
Jon Mills
8 Introduction to the relational approach and its critics: A conference with Dr. Jon Mills
119(4)
Aner Govrin
9 Challenging relational psychoanalysis: A critique of postmodernism and analyst self-disclosure
123(22)
Jon Mills
10 Straw men, stereotypes and constructive dialogue: A response to Mills' criticism of the relational approach
145(4)
Chana Ullman
11 On multiple epistemologies in theory and practice: A response to Jon Mills' critique of the postmodern turn in relational psychoanalysis
149(6)
Shlomit Yadlin-Gadot
12 Relational psychoanalysis and the concepts of truth and meaning: Response to Jon Mills
155(4)
Boaz Shalgi
13 Projective identification and relatedness: A Kleinian perspective
159(6)
Merav Roth
14 Psychoanalysis and postmodernism: A response to Dr. Jon Mills' "Challenging relational psychoanalysis: A critique of postmodernism and analyst self-disclosure"
165(8)
Liran Razinsky
15 Relational psychoanalysis out of context: Response to Jon Mills
173(12)
Steven K. Uchuck
Rachel Sopher
16 Challenging relational psychoanalysis: A reply to my critics
185(8)
Jon Mills
Index 193
Jon Mills, PsyD, PhD, ABPP is a philosopher, psychoanalyst, and clinical psychologist. He is a faculty member in the postgraduate programs in psychoanalysis and psychotherapy, Gordon F. Derner School of Psychology, Adelphi University, emeritus professor of psychology and psychoanalysis, Adler Graduate Professional School, and runs a mental health corporation in Ontario, Canada. Recipient of numerous awards for his scholarship, he is the author and editor of over 20 books in psychoanalysis, philosophy, psychology, and cultural studies.