Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Defining the Boundaries of Disability: Critical Perspectives [Taylor & Francis e-book]

Edited by , Edited by
  • Formāts: 144 pages, 1 Line drawings, black and white; 1 Illustrations, black and white
  • Sērija : Routledge Advances in Disability Studies
  • Izdošanas datums: 08-Mar-2021
  • Izdevniecība: Routledge
  • ISBN-13: 9780367855086
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Taylor & Francis e-book
  • Cena: 155,64 €*
  • * this price gives unlimited concurrent access for unlimited time
  • Standarta cena: 222,34 €
  • Ietaupiet 30%
  • Formāts: 144 pages, 1 Line drawings, black and white; 1 Illustrations, black and white
  • Sērija : Routledge Advances in Disability Studies
  • Izdošanas datums: 08-Mar-2021
  • Izdevniecība: Routledge
  • ISBN-13: 9780367855086
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
"This ground-breaking volume considers what it means to make claims of disability membership in view of the robust Disability Rights movement, the rich areas of academic inquiry into disability, increased philosophical attention to the nature and significance of disability, a vibrant disability culture and disability arts movement, and advances in biomedical science and technology. By focusing on the statement, "We are all disabled", the book explores the following questions: What are the philosophical, political and practical implications of making this claim? What conceptions of disability underlie it? When, if ever, is this claim justified, and when or why might it be problematic or harmful? What are the implications of claiming "we are all disabled" amidst this global COVID-19 pandemic? These critical reflections on the boundaries of disability include perspectives from the humanities, social sciences, law, and the arts. In exploring the boundaries of disability, and the ways in which these lines aredrawn theoretically, legally, medically, socially and culturally, the authors in this volume challenge particular conceptions of disability, expand the meaning and significance of the term, and consider the implications of claiming disability as an identity. It will be of interest to a broad audience, including disability scholars, advocates and activists, philosophers and historians of disability, moral theorists, clinicians, legal scholars, and artists"--

This ground-breaking volume considers what it means to make claims of disability membership in view of the robust Disability Rights movement, the rich areas of academic inquiry into disability, increased philosophical attention to the nature and significance of disability, a vibrant disability culture and disability arts movement, and advances in biomedical science and technology.

By focusing on the statement, "We are all disabled", the book explores the following questions: What are the philosophical, political, and practical implications of making this claim? What conceptions of disability underlie it? When, if ever, is this claim justified, and when or why might it be problematic or harmful? What are the implications of claiming "we are all disabled" amidst this global COVID-19 pandemic? These critical reflections on the boundaries of disability include perspectives from the humanities, social sciences, law, and the arts. In exploring the boundaries of disability, and the ways in which these lines are drawn theoretically, legally, medically, socially, and culturally, the authors in this volume challenge particular conceptions of disability, expand the meaning and significance of the term, and consider the implications of claiming disability as an identity.

It will be of interest to a broad audience, including disability scholars, advocates and activists, philosophers and historians of disability, moral theorists, clinicians, legal scholars, and artists.

List of contributors
ix
Introduction: What does it mean to claim "we are all disabled"? 1(10)
Licia Carlson
Matthew C. Murray
PART 1 Theoretical considerations
11(64)
1 Power, disability, and the academic production of knowledge
13(13)
Matthew C. Murray
2 Depending on the undependable: Disability, fragility, and instability
26(11)
Adam Cureton
3 The universal view of disability and its danger to the civil rights model
37(7)
Doron Dorfman
4 On (not) deserving disadvantage: What kind of difference does "disability" make?
44(13)
Leslie Francis
5 Being and deafness: Examining ontology and ethics within the dialectic of hearing4oss and deaf-gain and deafness-and-disability
57(18)
Michael E. Skyer
PART 2 Spaces, representations, and lived boundaries
75(66)
6 Poems
77(3)
Jim Ferris
7 "We are all disabled": Feathers, continuities, and a neglected musical argument?
80(10)
Stefan Sunandan Honisch
8 Robinson Crusoe and Peter the Wild Boy: What Daniel Defoe inadvertently tells us about disability
90(11)
D. Christopher Gabbard
9 "We are all disabled": The conundrum of problems and solutions
101(9)
Madeleine Dewelles
10 Borderlands and neurodiversity: Aren't we all humans?
110(9)
Sara Newman
11 We are all disabled, until we are not
119(5)
Teresa Blankmeyer Burke
12 Thoughts on precarity, disablement, and risk during COVID-19
124(14)
Sandy Sufian
Licia Carlson
13 Toward disability justice in a pandemic world
138(3)
Matthew C. Murray
Licia Carlson
Index 141
Licia Carlson is Professor of Philosophy at Providence College, USA. She is the author of a book on philosophy and intellectual disability and has co-edited volumes on disability and moral philosophy, and phenomenology and the arts. She has published numerous articles and chapters in the philosophy of disability, bioethics, philosophy of music, and feminist philosophy. Her current research interests include the ethics of genetic testing, and the intersection of philosophy, music, and disability.

Matthew C. Murray is the Senior Project Adviser for the Growthpolicy.org project at the Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government and serves as Visiting Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Providence College, USA. Matthew is actively researching and publishing in the areas of critical theories of justice and their effects on the ideas of and applications of distributive and social justice.