|
|
x | |
Acknowledgements |
|
xi | |
Introduction |
|
xiii | |
|
1 Adjective position: Why having a `iguapo novio' does not raise any eyebrows, but having a `novio guapo' might |
|
|
1 | (41) |
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
1.2 A nonrestrictive adjective expresses totality; a restrictive one expresses partitivity |
|
|
2 | (4) |
|
1.3 Why is la hermosa Pen61ope Cruz nonrestrictive and los novelistas mexicanos restrictive? |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
1.4 With nonrestrictiveness and restrictiveness, there is no needfor word twisting, for explanations that do not make sense (6 below), or for invoking emphasis, subjectivity, affectedness, value judgments |
|
|
7 | (4) |
|
1.5 Two adjectives modifying a noun |
|
|
11 | (6) |
|
1.6 Is Italian red wine different from red Italian wine? |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
1.7 Bolinger (1952: 1118) principle of linear modification modified |
|
|
18 | (3) |
|
1.8 Allie Neals prediction regarding determiners and quantifiers before a noun |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
1.9 Missed predictions 150 years ago. And now |
|
|
22 | (6) |
|
1.10 Many nonrestrictive adjectives go after their noun as the result of the omission of que + ser or que + estar (copula deletion) |
|
|
28 | (3) |
|
1.11 Bueno/a, malo/a, serio/a, verdadero/a, ultimo/a, final `good, bad, serious, true, last, final' |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
1.12 Do a few adjectives have one meaning when used before a noun and a different one after it? In part. But it is more totality vs. part |
|
|
32 | (4) |
|
1.13 Some implications for teaching |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (3) |
|
2 Whole/part matters: Nonrestrictive and restrictive adjectival (relative) clauses |
|
|
42 | (28) |
|
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
2.2 Nonrestrictive and restrictive adjectival clauses |
|
|
43 | (5) |
|
2.3 Choosing the best (most informative) relative pronoun |
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
2.4 A few additional observations on the choice of relative pronoun |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
2.5 Relative pronouns: why settle for the generic que `that' when you can choose a relative pronoun that helps your listener/reader? |
|
|
52 | (13) |
|
2.6 Some implications for teaching |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
3 Estar expresses change of state; most learners already have ser in their native language |
|
|
70 | (17) |
|
|
|
|
70 | (2) |
|
3.2 A change in location is a change of state |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
3.3 Why an explicit understanding of passive voice (and resultant state) is an efficient use of classroom time |
|
|
73 | (3) |
|
3.4 If the progressive is always with estar, and if estar expresses change, then the progressive expresses an explicit (or implied) change |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
3.5 Change of state also accounts for putative "idioms" with estar |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
3.6 Giving some teeth to the proposal in VanPatten (2010) about privileging estar |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
3.7 Change of state explains apparently challenging (or nuanced) uses |
|
|
79 | (4) |
|
3.8 Some implications for teaching |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
4 The preterite is like entering or leaving a room; the imperfect is like staying in it |
|
|
87 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
|
89 | (2) |
|
|
91 | (2) |
|
4.4 Testing this proposal with the famous example ayer tuve una carta `yesterday, I had a letter' and similar examples |
|
|
93 | (5) |
|
4.5 Testing this proposal with examples from five different textbooks for beginning to advanced levels |
|
|
98 | (2) |
|
4.6 Verbs do not change meaning when used in the preterite |
|
|
100 | (2) |
|
4.7 Some implications for teaching |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
105 | (2) |
Index |
|
107 | |