Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Diverging Parties: Social Change, Realignment, and Party Polarization

, , (Syracuse University, USA)
  • Formāts: 208 pages
  • Izdošanas datums: 08-Mar-2018
  • Izdevniecība: Westview Press Inc
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780429969515
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Formāts - PDF+DRM
  • Cena: 47,58 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.
  • Formāts: 208 pages
  • Izdošanas datums: 08-Mar-2018
  • Izdevniecība: Westview Press Inc
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780429969515
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

Stonecash (political science, Syracuse U.), Brewer (government, Colby College), and Mariani (PhD candidate, Syracuse U.) argue that polarization between the Democratic and Republican parties in the U.S. Congress has significantly increased over recent decades and seek to explain why. They contend that long-term secular realignment and social change has resulted in a situation where the diversity within the electoral base of the two parties has decreased while the differences between the bases have grown. After presenting the explanatory framework for their analysis, they review the realignment changes of the parties before the 1970s. The heart of the work focuses on the enfranchisement of the black population since the 1970s, the rise of inequality, and the increase in the Hispanic population, identifying these factors as the drivers of party realignment in the past few decades. Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)

Explores how redistricting, demographic shifts, and political polarization are impacting legislation and voting behavior in the US Congress.


Party polarization in the House of Representatives has increased in recent decades. Explaining this development has been difficult, given current interpretations of American elections. The dominant framework for interpreting elections has been to see them as candidate-centered, or individualistic. This framework may have seemed appropriate as a way to see elections during the 1970s and 1980s, when identification with parties declined and split-ticket voting increased. With increasing party differences, however, the presumptions that campaigns focus on candidates separate from parties, and that voters are less partisan in their voting, do not provide a satisfactory framework for understanding our current situation. This proposed book explains the emergence of party polarization by focusing on how the constituencies of House districts affect partisan outcomes and the subsequent voting behavior of House members. This proposed analysis is premised on the simple argument that members are elected from districts, and an explanation of polarization must begin with districts. The origins of polarization lie in the realignment of the electoral bases of the parties, and the shifting demographic composition of America. Liberal voting is more likely among members from urban, lower-income, largely non-white districts. Conservative voting is more likely among members from higher-income, largely white districts. Realignment has resulted in Democrats representing urban, lower-income, heavily non-white districts, while Republicans are more likely to come from suburban-rural, more affluent, white districts. Perhaps most important, the percentage of districts with a substantial proportion of non-whites is steadily increasing in the United States. The analysis will focus primarily on changes since the 1960s.
Tables and Illustrations
ix
Preface xii
The Reemergence of Party Polarization
1(16)
Explaining Increasing Conflict
17(10)
The Origins of Increased Party Polarization
27(24)
Social Change and Political Implications
51(30)
Social Change, Realignment, and Party Polarization
81(28)
Constituencies and Party Conflict
109(22)
Interpreting Congressional Elections: The Limits of the Candidate-Centered Framework
131(24)
Appendix: Congressional District Data 155(6)
Figure, May, and Table Credits 161(4)
Bibliography 165(18)
Index 183


Jeffrey M. Stonecash, Mack Mariani