Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Divine Will and Human Choice: Freedom, Contingency, and Necessity in Early Modern Reformed Thought [Hardback]

4.46/5 (48 ratings by Goodreads)
  • Formāts: Hardback, 336 pages, height x width: 235x159 mm, weight: 596 g
  • Izdošanas datums: 02-May-2017
  • Izdevniecība: Baker Academic, Div of Baker Publishing Group
  • ISBN-10: 0801030854
  • ISBN-13: 9780801030857
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Formāts: Hardback, 336 pages, height x width: 235x159 mm, weight: 596 g
  • Izdošanas datums: 02-May-2017
  • Izdevniecība: Baker Academic, Div of Baker Publishing Group
  • ISBN-10: 0801030854
  • ISBN-13: 9780801030857
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
This fresh study from an internationally respected scholar of the Reformation and post-Reformation eras shows how the Reformers and their successors analyzed and reconciled the concepts of divine sovereignty and human freedom. Richard Muller argues that traditional Reformed theology supported a robust theory of an omnipotent divine will and human free choice and drew on a tradition of Western theological and philosophical discussion. The book provides historical perspective on a topic of current interest and debate and offers a corrective to recent discussions.
Preface 11(8)
Part I Freedom and Necessity in Reformed Thought: The Contemporary Debate
1 Introduction: The Present State of the Question
19(27)
1.1 Reformed Thought on Freedom, Contingency, and Necessity: Setting the Stage for Debate
19(12)
1.2 Freedom, Necessity, and Protestant Scholasticism: A Multi-Layered Problem
31(8)
1.3 Synchronic Contingency: Historiographical Issues of Medieval and Early Modern Debate, Conversation, and Reception
39(7)
2 Reformed Thought and Synchronic Contingency
46(37)
2.1 The Argument for Synchronic Contingency
46(8)
2.2 The Logical Issue: Does Synchronic Contingency Resolve the Question of Divine Will and Human Freedom?
54(9)
2.3 Historical and Historiographical Issues
63(20)
A Variant Understandings of the History from Aristotle through the Middle Ages
63(7)
B The Issue of Scotism and Early Modern Reformed Thought
70(13)
Part II Philosophical and Theological Backgrounds: Aristotle, Aquinas, and Duns Scotus
3 Aristotle and Aquinas on Necessity and Contingency
83(56)
3.1 Aristotle, Aquinas, and the Debate over Synchronic Contingency
83(3)
A Introduction: The Historical Issues---Transmission and Reception
83(1)
B Aristotle and Aquinas in Current Discussion
84(2)
3.2 The Question of Contingency and the Implication of Possibility in Aristotle
86(17)
3.3 The Medieval Backgrounds: Aristotle, Augustine, Boethius, and the Problem of Plenitude
103(7)
A Augustine and the Ciceronian Dilemma
103(2)
B Boethius and the Medieval Reception of Aristotle
105(5)
3.4 Aquinas and the Medieval Reading of Aristotle
110(9)
3.5 Thomas Aquinas on Divine Power, Necessity, Possibility, Contingency, and Freedom
119(20)
A Aquinas on the Power of God: Absolute, Ordained, and Utterly Free
119(8)
B Necessity, Possibility, Contingency, and Freedom
127(12)
4 Duns Scotus and Late Medieval Perspectives on Freedom
139(42)
4.1 The Assessment of Duns Scotus in Recent Studies
139(5)
4.2 The Potentia Absoluta-Potentia Ordinata Distinction and the Issue of Contingency
144(3)
4.3 Synchronic Contingency, Simultaneous Potency, and Free Choice
147(15)
4.4 The Scotist Alternative in Its Metaphysical and Ontological Framework
162(8)
4.5 Penultimate Reflections
170(11)
Part III Early Modern Reformed Perspectives: Contingency, Necessity, and Freedom in the Real Order of Being
5 Necessity, Contingency, and Freedom: Reformed Understandings
181(30)
5.1 Freedom, Necessity, and Divine Knowing in the Thought of Calvin and the Early Reformed Tradition
181(22)
A The Present Debate
181(4)
B Calvin on Necessity, Contingency, and Freedom
185(8)
C Freedom and Necessity in the Thought of Vermigli
193(4)
D Zanchi and Ursinus on Contingency and Freedom
197(6)
5.2 Eternal God and the Contingent Temporal Order: Reformed Orthodox Approaches to the Problem
203(8)
A Early Modern Reformed Views: The Basic Formulation
203(4)
B Development of Reformed Conceptions of Eternity
207(4)
6 Scholastic Approaches to Necessity, Contingency, and Freedom: Early Modern Reformed Perspectives
211(47)
6.1 Preliminary Issues
211(3)
6.2 Junius, Gomarus, and Early Orthodox Scholastic Refinement
214(11)
A Junius' disputations on free choice
214(6)
B Gomarus on freedom and necessity
220(5)
6.3 William Twisse: Contingency, Freedom, and the Reception of the Scholastic Tradition
225(10)
6.4 John Owen on Contingency and Freedom
235(6)
6.5 Voetius on Free Will, Choice, and Necessity
241(6)
6.6 Francis Turretin on Necessity, Contingency, and Human Freedom
247(11)
7 Divine Power, Possibility, and Actuality
258(25)
7.1 The Foundation of Possibility: Reformed Understandings
258(16)
A Meanings of "Possible" and "Possibility"
258(5)
B The Foundation of Possibility
263(11)
7.2 Absolute and Ordained Power in Early Modern Reformed Thought
274(9)
A The Historiographical Problem
274(2)
B Calvin and the Potentia Absoluta
276(4)
C Reformed Orthodoxy and the Two Powers of God
280(3)
8 Divine Concurrence and Contingency
283(28)
8.1 Approaches to Concurrence: Early Modem Issues and Modern Scholarly Debate
283(4)
A The Modern Debate
283(1)
B The Early Modern Issues
284(3)
8.2 Divine Concurrence in Early Modern Reformed Thought
287(3)
8.3 Concurrence, Synchronicity, and Free Choice: Non-Temporal and Temporal Considerations
290(9)
8.4 Synchronic Contingency and Providence: The Ontological Issues
299(12)
9 Conclusions
311(14)
9.1 Contingency, Synchronic and Diachronic, and the Issue of Human Freedom
311(6)
9.2 The Historical Narrative---and the Question of Reformed "Scotism"
317(5)
9.3 Reformed Orthodoxy, Determinism, Compatibilism, and Libertarianism
322(3)
Index 325
Richard A. Muller (PhD, Duke University) is P. J. Zondervan Professor of Historical Theology Emeritus and senior fellow of the Junius Institute for Digital Reformation Research at Calvin Theological Seminary in Grand Rapids, Michigan. He is the author of numerous books, including the multivolume Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics.