Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: The Duty of Care in Negligence

(Victorian Bar, Melbourne)
  • Formāts: 304 pages
  • Sērija : Hart Studies in Private Law
  • Izdošanas datums: 08-Feb-2018
  • Izdevniecība: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-13: 9781509914869
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Formāts - EPUB+DRM
  • Cena: 32,68 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.
The Duty of Care in NegligencePalielināt
  • Formāts: 304 pages
  • Sērija : Hart Studies in Private Law
  • Izdošanas datums: 08-Feb-2018
  • Izdevniecība: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-13: 9781509914869
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

This book aims to provide a detailed analysis and overview of the duty of care enquiry, drawing on both academic analyses and judicial experience in leading common law systems. A new structure through which duty problems can be analysed is also proposed. It is hoped that the book provides some fresh insights and clarity of the concept to the reader.

Recenzijas

Plunketts book will prove a valuable guide to everyone involved in this area of law as to how we should approach duty of care issues in future. -- Nick McBride, Pembroke College, University of Cambridge * The Journal of Professional Negligence * Given that the law on duty of care is highly contested and performs a normative function, it is a testament to Plunketts writing that I found myself agreeing with most of his arguments... I cannot recommend this thoroughly researched and elegantly written monograph highly enough. -- Craig Purshouse, School of Law, University of Leeds * Modern Law Review * This book would be of interest to practitioners, academics and the judiciary alike. Clearly written and cogently argued, this book succeeds in increasing its readers understanding of this almost mystical concept. -- Val Corbett * Tort Law and Litigation Review * The Duty of Care in Negligence provides a useful consolidation of the historical and modern evolution of duty and a thoughtful critique of some current scholarly debates. -- Erika Chamberlain, University of Western Ontario * Cambridge Law Journal *

Papildus informācija

An important reexamination of duty of care in negligence, offering the first book-length treatment of the subject in more than 25 years.
Acknowledgements v
List of Abbreviations
xi
List of Diagrams and Tables
xiii
Table of Cases
xv
Table of Statutes
xxiii
1 Introduction
1(6)
I What is the Duty of Care?
1(1)
II Making Sense of the Duty of Care
2(1)
III The Aim of this Book
3(1)
IV The Structure of this Book
4(1)
V Scope and Terminology
5(2)
2 The Historical Foundations of the Duty of Care
7(28)
I Introduction
7(1)
II The Beginnings of the Duty of Care
8(11)
A Duty Enters Relationship Negligence: From Contract to Tort and the Elevation of Duty
9(4)
B Duty Enters Non-Relationship Negligence
13(3)
C Duty as an Element of the Action for Negligence
16(3)
III Towards a General Conception
19(14)
A Heaven v Pender
22(3)
B The Twentieth Century and the Ever-Changing Role of Foreseeability
25(5)
C Donoghue v Stevenson
30(3)
IV Conclusion
33(2)
3 Methods for Determining the Existence of a Duty of Care
35(44)
I Introduction
35(1)
II The Aftermath of Donoghue v Stevenson
36(3)
III The Staggering March of Negligence
39(5)
IV The Rise and Fall of Anns v Merton
44(3)
V Caparo
47(9)
A Foreseeability
48(1)
B Proximity
48(6)
C Policy Considerations and What is Fair, Just, and Reasonable
54(2)
VI Canada and the `Two Stage' Test
56(2)
VII Assumption of Responsibility and the `Extended' Hedley Byrne Principle
58(7)
VIII Australia and the `Salient Features' Test
65(5)
IX Pockets
70(3)
X Incrementalism
73(3)
XI Conclusion
76(3)
4 Factual Duty
79(32)
I Introduction
79(1)
II The Dual Function of Duty
79(5)
A The Attack on Duty
79(3)
B Factual and Notional Duty
82(2)
III Factual Duty, Fault, and Remoteness
84(5)
A Factual Duty and Fault
85(2)
B Factual Duty and Remoteness
87(2)
IV Factual Duty and the Problem of the Unforeseeable Plaintiff
89(15)
A Palsgraf, Bourhill and Re Polemis
90(3)
B Is the Duty of Care a `Real' Duty?
93(3)
C Is the Problem of the Unforeseeable Plaintiff Relevant to the Wrong or the Remedy?
96(1)
i The Distinction is Arbitrary
97(1)
ii Foreseeability of Harm to the Plaintiff and Foreseeability of the Kind of Harm cannot be Considered in Isolation from One Another
98(6)
iii We Must Simultaneously Accept Contradictory Rationales
104(1)
V Why Factual Duty Entered the Duty Enquiry and Why it Remains
104(3)
VI Why Does it Matter?
107(1)
VII Conclusion
108(3)
5 Notional Duty I: General Principles
111(40)
I Introduction
111(1)
II The `Categorical' Nature of Notional Duty
112(19)
A Notional Duty Situations are both Inclusionary and Exclusionary
114(3)
B The `Relationship' and `Interest' Views of Notional Duty
117(4)
C The Level of Generality of the Notional Duty Situation
121(2)
D Notional Duty Situations and Questions of Fault
123(5)
E The `Scope' of the Duty
128(3)
III Assumptions of Responsibility
131(8)
A A Distinctive Type of Justification?
132(1)
B Criticism
133(5)
C The Role of Reliance
138(1)
IV Putting it all Together: The Structure of the Notional Duty Enquiry
139(5)
V A Suggested Approach to Resolving Notional Duty Problems
144(4)
VI Conclusion
148(3)
6 Notional Duty II: Theoretical Issues
151(24)
I Introduction
151(1)
II The Use of Policy Considerations
151(13)
A Judges are not Qualified to Rely on Policy Considerations
153(4)
B The Use of Policy Requires the Balancing of Incommensurables
157(1)
C The Use of Policy Considerations Violates the Rule of Law
158(4)
D The Use of Policy-Based Arguments Makes the Law Less Coherent
162(2)
E Is the Use of Policy Permissible?
164(1)
III The Need for Notional Duty
164(8)
A Attacks on Notional Duty
165(3)
B Why is the Notional Duty Enquiry So Broad?
168(1)
C Comparison to Other Legal Systems
168(3)
D Is Notional Duty Necessary?
171(1)
IV Conclusion
172(3)
7 Comparing the Duty Methodologies of Australia, Canada and the UK
175(38)
I Introduction
175(1)
II The Study
176(2)
III The Competing Methodologies
178(32)
A A Brief Overview of the Data
178(1)
i Kinds of Damage
179(1)
ii Nature of the Decision being Appealed
179(1)
iii The Number of Independent Opinions per Case
180(1)
iv Success Rates of Claimants and Defendants
181(2)
B The Use of General Duty Tests
183(1)
i Methodology
183(1)
ii The Results
184(1)
iii Analysis
184(5)
C Determining the Existence of a Duty without General Tests
189(1)
i Methodology
189(1)
ii The Results
190(1)
iii Analysis
190(4)
iv Some Additional Commentary
194(1)
D Do the Courts Approach the Duty Enquiry in a Categorical or Fact Specific Manner?
195(1)
i Methodology
196(1)
ii The Results
196(1)
iii Analysis
196(3)
E To What Extent Do Courts Rely on Policy Considerations?
199(1)
i Methodology
200(2)
ii The Results
202(2)
iii Analysis
204(3)
F To What Extent Do Courts Rely on Academic Literature?
207(1)
i Methodology
207(2)
ii The Results
209(1)
iii Analysis
209(1)
IV Conclusion
210(3)
8 Conclusion
213(4)
I Introduction
213(1)
II Moving Forward
214(2)
III Conclusion
216(1)
Appendix 217(4)
Index 221
James Plunkett is a barrister at the Victorian Bar in Melbourne. He has previously taught law at the University of Oxford and practised at the Bar of England and Wales.
Biežāk uzdotie jautājumi par e-grāmatām Biežāk uzdotie jautājumi par e-grāmatām
Permanent link: https://www.kriso.lv/db/97815099148696e.html
Keywords: