Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Enhancing Scientific Reproducibility in Biomedical Research Through Transparent Reporting: Proceedings of a Workshop

  • Formāts: 142 pages
  • Izdošanas datums: 28-Apr-2020
  • Izdevniecība: National Academies Press
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780309664066
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Formāts - EPUB+DRM
  • Cena: 58,85 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.
  • Formāts: 142 pages
  • Izdošanas datums: 28-Apr-2020
  • Izdevniecība: National Academies Press
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780309664066
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

Sharing knowledge is what drives scientific progress - each new advance or innovation in biomedical research builds on previous observations. However, for experimental findings to be broadly accepted as credible by the scientific community, they must be verified by other researchers. An essential step is for researchers to report their findings in a manner that is understandable to others in the scientific community and provide sufficient information for others to validate the original results and build on them. In recent years, concern has been growing over a number of studies that have failed to replicate previous results and evidence from larger meta-analyses, which have pointed to the lack of reproducibility in biomedical research.



On September 25 and 26, 2019, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine hosted a public workshop in Washington, DC, to discuss the current state of transparency in the reporting of preclinical biomedical research and to explore opportunities for harmonizing reporting guidelines across journals and funding agencies. Convened jointly by the Forum on Drug Discovery, Development, and Translation; the Forum on Neuroscience and Nervous System Disorders; the National Cancer Policy Forum; and the Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health, the workshop primarily focused on transparent reporting in preclinical research, but also considered lessons learned and best practices from clinical research reporting. This publication summarizes the presentation and discussion of the workshop.

Table of Contents



Front Matter 1 Introduction 2 Transparency and Trust 3 Approaches to Cultivate Transparent Reporting in Biomedical Research 4 Lessons Learned and Best Practices 5 Checklists and Guidelines 6 Toward Minimal Reporting Standards for Preclinical Biomedical Research 7 Stakeholder Opportunities for Promoting Transparent Reporting Appendix A: References Appendix B: Background Discussion Document: Selected Guidelines for Transparent Reporting Appendix C: Workshop Agenda
Acronyms And Abbreviations xxi
1 Introduction
1(4)
Organization of the Proceedings
3(2)
2 Transparency And Trust
5(12)
Overview of Reproducibility and Replicability in Science
5(6)
Sustaining Public Trust in Science
11(6)
3 Approaches To Cultivate Transparent Reporting In Biomedical Research
17(18)
Early Career Investigator Perspective
19(3)
Culture Change Organization Perspective
22(3)
Scientific Society Journal Editor Perspective
25(3)
National Institutes of Health Perspective
28(2)
Discussion
30(5)
4 Lessons Learned And Best Practices
35(18)
Lessons from the SPIRIT Initiative
37(3)
The Institution's Role in Improving Reproducibility
40(3)
Funder/Foundation Role in Influencing and Enabling Reproducibility
43(4)
Discussion
47(6)
5 Checklists And Guidelines
53(20)
Checklist Implementation by Life Science lournals: Toward Minimum Reporting Standards for Research
56(6)
Approaches to Improve Adherence to Checklists and Guidelines
62(3)
Discussion
65(8)
6 Toward Minimal Reporting Standards For Preclinical Biomedical Research
73(18)
What Transparent Reporting Means for Reviewers
75(1)
Improving Assessment of Reproducibility
76(2)
Culture Change for journal Publishers
78(1)
Engaging Research Support Staff
78(2)
Librarians Driving Institutional Change
80(2)
Applying a Systematic Framework to Developing Mimimal Reporting Standards
82(2)
The Impact of Minimal Standards on Improving Methodology
84(3)
Discussion
87(4)
7 Stakeholder Opportunities For Promoting Transparent Reporting
91(10)
Small Group Discussion Reports
92(8)
Closing Statement
100(1)
APPENDIXES
A References
101(4)
B Background Discussion Document: Selected Guidelines For Transparent Reporting
105(6)
C Workshop Agenda
111