Preface |
|
xi | |
|
List of Figures, Maps and Tables |
|
|
xiii | |
Abbreviations and Symbols |
|
xv | |
|
|
1 | (31) |
|
1.1 Ergativity, an Enigma in Semitic Linguistics? |
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
1.2 Neo-Aramaic Dialects in the Land of Rivers |
|
|
3 | (8) |
|
1.2.1 Above the Tigris: Northeastern Neo-Aramaic (NENA) Dialect Bundle |
|
|
5 | (3) |
|
1.2.2 Below the Tigris: Dialects of Tur 'Abdin |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
1.2.3 Writing a Spoken Language: Sociolinguistic Factors |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
1.2.4 Converging Neighbors: Areal Factors |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
1.5 Previous Approaches to Alignment in Eastern Neo-Aramaic |
|
|
11 | (11) |
|
1.5.1 Early Scholarship: Passive or Possessive |
|
|
11 | (7) |
|
1.5.2 Recent Typo logical Approaches |
|
|
18 | (4) |
|
1.6 Aims and Scope of This Book |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
1.7 Sources and Transcription Conventions |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
|
26 | (6) |
|
2 Who Did What to Whom in the Context of Neo-Aramaic |
|
|
32 | (68) |
|
2.1 Main Components of Verbal Inflection in Neo-Aramaic |
|
|
33 | (11) |
|
|
34 | (2) |
|
2.1.2 Basic Stems qat∂l-/qot∂l- vs. qtil-and Their Derivations |
|
|
36 | (3) |
|
2.1.3 Sets of Person Markers: E-suffixes and L-suffixes |
|
|
39 | (3) |
|
2.1.4 Preverbal TAM-marking and the -wa-affix |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
2.2 (Pro)nominals and Verbal Constructions Derived from (Pro)nominals |
|
|
44 | (14) |
|
|
45 | (3) |
|
2.2.2 Unmarked vs. Prepositional Pronouns |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
|
49 | (2) |
|
2.2.4 Nouns as Verbs and Verbs as Nouns: Non-verbal Clauses and Nominal Forms of the Verb |
|
|
51 | (4) |
|
2.2.5 Objects on `Nouny' Verbs |
|
|
55 | (3) |
|
2.3 Denning and Identifying the Alignment of Who Did What to Whom |
|
|
58 | (38) |
|
2.3.1 Arguments in the Clause and Their Core Functions |
|
|
59 | (8) |
|
2.3.2 Alignment: Morphological Properties |
|
|
67 | (18) |
|
2.3.3 Syntactic Properties: Role and Reference Inversion in Neo-Aramaic |
|
|
85 | (11) |
|
2.4 Conclusion: A Construction-Specific Approach |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
2.5 Overviews of Inflection |
|
|
97 | (3) |
|
3 Ergativity and Its Typology: The Trans-Zab Jewish Dialects |
|
|
100 | (107) |
|
3.1 Main Morphosyntactic Hallmarks |
|
|
102 | (8) |
|
3.1.1 Verb-Final Word Order |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
3.1.2 Prepositional Marking of Objects |
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
3.1.3 Verbal Inflection and Person Marking |
|
|
105 | (5) |
|
3.2 Ergativity and Alignment Splits in Typological Perspectives |
|
|
110 | (19) |
|
3.2.1 Clause- and Verb-Related Factors for Alignment Splits |
|
|
111 | (8) |
|
3.2.2 Argument-Related Factors for Alignment Splits: Prominence |
|
|
119 | (10) |
|
3.3 Ergativity and Patient-Related Splits in Trans-Zab Jewish NENA |
|
|
129 | (19) |
|
3.3.1 Alignment of qtil- in Southeastern Trans-Zab Jewish Dialects |
|
|
130 | (8) |
|
3.3.2 Comparative Syntax of Trans-Zab Jewish Dialects |
|
|
138 | (10) |
|
3.4 Ergativity and Splits along the Tense-Aspect-Mood Scale |
|
|
148 | (25) |
|
3.4.1 Filling the Gap of the Transitive Perfect |
|
|
149 | (2) |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
3.4.3 Rustaqa: Ergative and Tripartite Resultative |
|
|
152 | (3) |
|
3.4.4 Koy Sanjaq: Competing Resultattves |
|
|
155 | (2) |
|
3.4.5 Urmi: Mixing Resultattves |
|
|
157 | (3) |
|
3.4.6 Sulemaniyya: Gender-Conditioned Ergativity |
|
|
160 | (4) |
|
3.4.7 Jewish NENA in West Iran: Ergative Third Person |
|
|
164 | (9) |
|
3.5 Ergativity and Transitivity: Argument Omission and Valency Alternations |
|
|
173 | (29) |
|
3.5.1 Patient Omission: Lexical Transitivity |
|
|
174 | (7) |
|
3.5.2 Agent Omission: Ergative and Antipassive Typology |
|
|
181 | (12) |
|
3.5.3 Agent Omission in Compound Verbal Forms in West Iranian Jewish Dialects of NENA |
|
|
193 | (6) |
|
3.5.4 Transitivity and Alternations in Northwest Iranian Jewish Dialects of NENA |
|
|
199 | (3) |
|
3.6 Conclusion: Construction-Specific, Not Alignment-Specific Factors |
|
|
202 | (5) |
|
4 Christian and Western Jewish Dialects of NENA |
|
|
207 | (95) |
|
4.1 Preliminary Notes on Morphosyntax |
|
|
211 | (10) |
|
4.1.1 Person Marking in Transitive Perfective Past Constructions |
|
|
211 | (4) |
|
4.1.2 The Copula and Compound Veral Forms |
|
|
215 | (5) |
|
4.1.3 Prepositional Marking of Agents |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
4.2 Ergative or Passive? Agents in and out of Focus |
|
|
221 | (27) |
|
4.2.1 The Importance of Zero |
|
|
222 | (5) |
|
4.2.2 On Agent {De]focusing and Passive Typology |
|
|
227 | (5) |
|
4.2.3 Passive-Like Properties and Anticausattves |
|
|
232 | (6) |
|
4.2.4 Ergative-Like Properties |
|
|
238 | (10) |
|
4.3 Verb-Related Factors: Grammaticalization of Resultatives |
|
|
248 | (12) |
|
4.3.1 Tense-Aspect Associated Person Marking: sand a |
|
|
248 | (2) |
|
4.3.2 Transitivization of Compound Verbal Constructions |
|
|
250 | (10) |
|
4.4 Argument-Related Factors: Harmonizing the Object |
|
|
260 | (35) |
|
4.4.1 Person-Role Constraints |
|
|
261 | (9) |
|
4.4.2 Alternative I: Independent Object Pronouns |
|
|
270 | (5) |
|
4.4.3 Alternative II: Stacking of L-suffixes |
|
|
275 | (6) |
|
4.4.4 Alternative III: Mixing of L- and E-suffixes |
|
|
281 | (5) |
|
4.4.5 Alternative IV: qam-qat∂l-construction |
|
|
286 | (9) |
|
4.5 Conclusion: Cross-System Harmonization |
|
|
295 | (7) |
|
5 Below the Tigris: The Neo-Aramaic Dialects of Tur 'Abdin and Mlahso |
|
|
302 | (47) |
|
5.1 Morphosyntactic Traits of Central Neo-Aramaic |
|
|
303 | (6) |
|
5.1.1 Stems Disengaged: *m∂qtol- vs. *qot∂l- |
|
|
303 | (2) |
|
5.1.2 Stems Entangled: Phonological Reduction |
|
|
305 | (1) |
|
5.1.3 Unmarked and Prepositional Pronouns |
|
|
306 | (1) |
|
5.1.4 Differential Object Marking and Word Order |
|
|
307 | (2) |
|
5.2 The Neo-Aramaic Dialects of Tur 'Abdin |
|
|
309 | (28) |
|
5.2.1 Patient-Related Factors |
|
|
309 | (7) |
|
5.2.2 Agent-Related Factors: Optional Flagging |
|
|
316 | (8) |
|
5.2.3 Voice and Other Verb-Related Factors: *qtil- vs. *qattil- |
|
|
324 | (13) |
|
5.3 The Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Mlahso |
|
|
337 | (7) |
|
5.3.1 Alignment of Person Marking |
|
|
337 | (2) |
|
5.3.2 Neutralizing Subject Coding: Mediopassive with L-suffixes |
|
|
339 | (2) |
|
5.3.3 Special Perfect Forms Based on *qattil- |
|
|
341 | (3) |
|
5.4 The Primacy of Intransitive Coding |
|
|
344 | (1) |
|
5.5 Summary from Stem to Stern |
|
|
345 | (4) |
|
6 Cross-Dialectal Synopsis of the Morphosyntax |
|
|
349 | (42) |
|
6.1 Tense-Aspect-Sensitive Splits |
|
|
350 | (6) |
|
6.1.1 The Tense-Aspect-Mood scale |
|
|
350 | (3) |
|
6.1.2 From Stative-Resultative to Preterit |
|
|
353 | (3) |
|
|
356 | (17) |
|
6.2.1 Prepositional and Verbal Person Marking Entangled |
|
|
357 | (5) |
|
6.2.2 Ergative-Like Markedness |
|
|
362 | (5) |
|
6.2.3 Role Reference Inversion |
|
|
367 | (3) |
|
6.2.4 What about Ditransittves? |
|
|
370 | (3) |
|
6.3 Splits and Transitivity Alternations |
|
|
373 | (9) |
|
6.3.1 Contextualizing the Agent |
|
|
373 | (3) |
|
6.3.2 Recovering the Patient |
|
|
376 | (3) |
|
6.3.3 Split Intransitivity |
|
|
379 | (3) |
|
6.4 Splits Based on Argument Properties |
|
|
382 | (9) |
|
6.4.1 Patient-Related Scales |
|
|
383 | (4) |
|
6.4.2 Agent-Related Scales |
|
|
387 | (4) |
|
|
391 | (14) |
|
7.1 Constructions Leading a Life of Their Own |
|
|
391 | (5) |
|
7.1.1 Identifying Argument Groupings |
|
|
391 | (1) |
|
7.1.2 Ergativity from Typological Perspectives |
|
|
392 | (3) |
|
7.1.3 Recommendations for Future Research |
|
|
395 | (1) |
|
7.2 A Taxonomy of Major Alignment Types |
|
|
396 | (9) |
|
7.2.1 Accusative Alignment (A=S#P) |
|
|
396 | (1) |
|
7.2.2 Ergative Alignment (A#S=P) |
|
|
397 | (4) |
|
7.2.3 Other Basic Alignment Types |
|
|
401 | (4) |
References |
|
405 | (21) |
Index of Languages and Geographical Names |
|
426 | (4) |
Index of Subjects |
|
430 | |