Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Ethical Dilemmas in Neurology [Hardback]

  • Formāts: Hardback, 224 pages, height x width: 235x159 mm, weight: 550 g, Illustrations
  • Sērija : Major Problems in Neurology Series v. 36
  • Izdošanas datums: 30-Nov-2000
  • Izdevniecība: Bailliere Tindall
  • ISBN-10: 0702022276
  • ISBN-13: 9780702022272
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Formāts: Hardback, 224 pages, height x width: 235x159 mm, weight: 550 g, Illustrations
  • Sērija : Major Problems in Neurology Series v. 36
  • Izdošanas datums: 30-Nov-2000
  • Izdevniecība: Bailliere Tindall
  • ISBN-10: 0702022276
  • ISBN-13: 9780702022272
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
"Ethical Dilemmas in Neurology" aims to assist in the critical thinking that neurologists and other members of the neurological team must undertake as they face the ethical dilemmas which occur in every day practice. Divided into four principal sections, diagnosis and communication, therapy, funding and conflicts of interest, and finally, death and the withdrawal of treatment, the book encompasses a wide range of ethical issues encountered in a variety of clinical settings. The authors confront difficult questions and provide advice and recommendations. If the question of when to seek consent to make a diagnosis, or how to break the diagnosis of dementia to a patient, or when it is appropriate to breach confidentiality has ever taxed you, then, this book will both enlighten and educate. Similarly, what are the ethical grounds for enforcing treatment, or how are conflicts of interest resolved , are further dilemmas that this book tackles. Contributors from around the world have authored chapters which reflect their diverse backgrounds and different perspectives. Adam Zeman and Linda Emanuel have produced a book, which will help neurologists serve their patients better, and which is a welcome addition to the neurologists library.
Preface
Foreword by Ian McDonald

Introduction by Adam Zeman and Linda Emanuel

1. What are ethics? By Anthony Grayling

Diagnosis and communication

2. To tell or not to tell?: the problem of medically unexplained symptoms by Simon Wessely

3. Should the diagnosis of Alzheimers disease always be disclosed? by Robert Howard

4. When, if ever, should confidentiality be set aside? By Jessica Wilen Berg

5. Should consent be required for an HIV test? By Rebecca Dresser

6. Should we offer predictive tests for fatal inherited diseases and, if so, how?
by Susan M Wolf and Thomas C Horejsi

Therapy

7. Why, and how should trials be conducted? By Richard I Lindley and Charles P Warlow

8. How should we test and improve neurosurgical care? By Grant Gillett

9. Embryos and animals: can we justify their use in research and treatment? By Peter Singer

10. Who should receive and who dispense expensive treatments? By David Bates

11. Why and when may treatment be enforced? By Anthony Hope

Funding and conflicts of interest

12. Does private practice threaten public service or enhance it? By Ian R Williams

13. The Gulf War Syndrome and the military medic: whose agent is the physician?
By Edmund G Howe

Last things

14. Is the concept of brain stem death secure? By Calixto Machado

15. When-- if ever-- should treatment be withdrawn? By Christopher D Ward

16. Must we always use advance directives? By Linda Emanuel

17. When-if ever-should we expedite death? By Diane E Meier, Hattie Myers and
Philip R Muskin