Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Ethics of Cryonics: Is it Immoral to be Immortal? 2018 ed. [Hardback]

  • Formāts: Hardback, 135 pages, height x width: 210x148 mm, weight: 454 g, XIII, 135 p., 1 Hardback
  • Izdošanas datums: 11-Jun-2018
  • Izdevniecība: Birkhauser Verlag AG
  • ISBN-10: 3319785982
  • ISBN-13: 9783319785981
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 60,29 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Standarta cena: 70,94 €
  • Ietaupiet 15%
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Hardback, 135 pages, height x width: 210x148 mm, weight: 454 g, XIII, 135 p., 1 Hardback
  • Izdošanas datums: 11-Jun-2018
  • Izdevniecība: Birkhauser Verlag AG
  • ISBN-10: 3319785982
  • ISBN-13: 9783319785981
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
Cryonics—also known as cryopreservation or cryosuspension—is the preservation of legally dead individuals at ultra-low temperatures. Those who undergo this procedure hope that future technology will not only succeed in reviving them, but also cure them of the condition that led to their demise. In this sense, some hope that cryopreservation will allow people to continue living indefinitely. This book discusses the moral concerns of cryonics, both as a medical procedure and as an intermediate step toward life extension. In particular, Minerva analyses the moral issues surrounding cryonics-related techniques (including the hypothetical cryosuspension of fetuses as an alternative to abortion) by focusing on how they might impact the individuals who undergo cryosuspension, as well as society at large. 
Part I Cryonics as an Ethical Problem
1(44)
1 Pausing Death
3(20)
Weird Goals
3(4)
Storting and Ending Life in Liquid Nitrogen
7(2)
The Information-Theoretic Criterion of Death
9(3)
Public Scepticism Towards Biotechnology
12(9)
Against Nature
13(1)
Humans Should Not "Play God"
14(1)
Weirdness and Repugnance
15(1)
Uncertainty
16(2)
Only the Rich Will Be Able to Afford It
18(3)
References
21(2)
2 Resuming Life
23(22)
Objections to Cryonics
24(1)
Waste of Resources
25(9)
Waste of Organs for Transplants
25(2)
Waste of Money That Could Be Used for Donation to an Effective Charity
27(7)
Indifference of the Future
34(5)
No Interest in Spending Resources on Reviving the Cryopreserved
35(1)
No Interest in Developing Cryonics Technology
36(1)
No Interest in "Homo sapiens"
37(2)
Desirability of Being Revived in the Future
39(3)
Trouble Adapting Even to an Objectively Better World
39(3)
References
42(3)
Part II Cryonics as a Step Towards Immortality
45(50)
3 The Death Conundrum
49(18)
Is Death Bad?
49(1)
Death as Transition to Nonexistence
50(5)
A Life Worth Starting and a Life Worth Living
51(2)
Whose Nonexistence?
53(2)
Death as Deprivation
55(6)
The Harm of Deprivation
55(2)
The Plausible Counterfactuals
57(1)
Epistemic Disagreement About Plausible Counterfactuals
58(2)
Death as Deprivation of Negative Counterfactuals
60(1)
Death as Frustration of Desires
61(5)
References
66(1)
4 The Immortality Conundrum
67(28)
Different Types of Immortality
67(3)
What Would an Indefinitely Long Life Look Like?
70(4)
Freedom from Regrets
70(4)
Personal Identity
74(4)
A Recognizably Human Life
78(5)
Would Virtual Immortality Deprive People of Eternity in Heaven?
83(3)
Boredom
86(4)
Tiredness
90(3)
References
93(2)
Part III Alternative Uses of Cryonics
95(38)
5 Cryothanasia
97(14)
Objections to Euthanasia Applied to Cryothanasia
100(1)
Deontological
101(1)
Faith-Based
102(1)
Principles of Medical Ethics
103(2)
Weirdness and Repugnance
105(1)
Unlikelihood and Futility
106(2)
Resource Use
108(1)
References
109(2)
6 Cryosuspension of Pregnancy
111(22)
Giving Pregnant Women Another Option
113(2)
Would Objections to Abortion Apply to Cryosuspension of Pregnancy?
115(5)
What Type of "Future Like Ours"?
116(1)
Potentiality
117(2)
Killing an Innocent Is Always Impermissible
119(1)
Reproductive Technology
120(2)
Therapeutic Aid
122(1)
Adoption
123(1)
Ectogenesis
124(3)
Limits
127(3)
References
130(3)
Index 133
Francesca Minerva is FWO Post-Doctoral Fellow at the University of Ghent, Belgium. She has previously worked at the University of Melbourne, Australia, and she collaborates with various universities. Her main area of research is bioethics.