Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Experimentalist Constitutions: Subnational Policy Innovations in China, India, and the United States [Hardback]

  • Formāts: Hardback, 278 pages, height x width x depth: 229x152x19 mm, weight: 522 g
  • Sērija : Harvard East Asian Monographs
  • Izdošanas datums: 02-Jan-2024
  • Izdevniecība: Harvard University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0674295897
  • ISBN-13: 9780674295896
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 52,05 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Hardback, 278 pages, height x width x depth: 229x152x19 mm, weight: 522 g
  • Sērija : Harvard East Asian Monographs
  • Izdošanas datums: 02-Jan-2024
  • Izdevniecība: Harvard University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0674295897
  • ISBN-13: 9780674295896
"One of the most commonly cited virtues of American federalism is its "laboratories of democracy"-the notion that decentralization and political competition encourage states to become testing grounds for novel social policies and ideas. In Experimentalist Constitutions, the first book that systematically compares subnational experimentalism in different countries, Yueduan Wang argues that the idea of federal laboratories is not exclusive to the American system; instead, similar concepts can be applied toconstitutions with different center-local structures and levels of political competition. Using case studies from China, India, and the United States, the book illustrates that these vastly different polities have instituted their own mechanisms of subnational experimentalism based on the interactions between each country's constitutional system and partisan/factional dynamics. The study compares and contrasts these three versions of policy laboratories and comments on their pros and cons, thus making contributions to the discussion of these great powers' competing models of development"--

In Experimentalist Constitutions, the first book that systematically compares subnational experimentalism in different countries, Wang argues that “laboratories of democracy” are not exclusive to the American system; instead, similar concepts apply in China and India, with different center–local structures and levels of political competition.

One of the most commonly cited virtues of American federalism is its “laboratories of democracy”—the notion that decentralization and political competition encourage states to become testing grounds for novel social policies and ideas. In Experimentalist Constitutions, the first book that systematically compares subnational experimentalism in different countries, Yueduan Wang argues that the idea of federal laboratories is not exclusive to the American system; instead, similar concepts can be applied to constitutions with different center-local structures and levels of political competition. Using case studies from China, India, and the United States, the book illustrates that these vastly different polities have instituted their own mechanisms of subnational experimentalism based on the interactions between each country’s constitutional system and partisan/factional dynamics. In this study, Wang compares and contrasts these three versions of policy laboratories and comments on their pros and cons, thus contributing to the discussion of these great powers’ competing models of development.

Recenzijas

[ This book] is ultimately trying to say something new about China[ it is] a well-researched book of taxonomy, with comparisons across countries, and across instances of experimentation within countries, that are intended to demonstrate patterns of activities in China that in part bear resemblances to India and to the United State, and that are in combination novel.a valuable contribution to the field of comparative federalism. -- Ken Kollman * Publius * Stands as a sensible and all-too-rare rebuttal of the widespread assumption among constitutional law scholars that the deep dissimilarities between their usual (Western, liberal and democratic) case studies and China preclude meaningful comparison or learning. On the contrary, it is precisely the magnitude of these differences that enables us to identify fundamental, recurring mechanisms and dynamics that depend little, if at all, on basic constitutional structure and might even be universal. What insights could be more profound? -- David Law * China Quarterly *

Yueduan Wang is Assistant Professor at the School of Government at Peking University.