For the past 50 years, the Census Bureau has conducted experiments and evaluations with every decennial census involving field data collection during which alternatives to current census processes are assessed for a subset of the population. An "evaluation" is usually a post hoc analysis of data collected as part of the decennial census processing to determine whether individual steps in the census operated as expected. The 2010 Program for Evaluations and Experiments, known as CPEX, has enormous potential to reduce costs and increase effectiveness of the 2020 census by reducing the initial list of potential research topics from 52 to 6. The panel identified three priority experiments for inclusion in the 2010 census to assist 2020 census planning: (1) an experiment on the use of the Internet for data collection; (2) an experiment on the use of administrative records for various census purposes; and (3) an experiment (or set of experiments) on features of the census questionnaire. They also came up with 11 recommendations to improve efficiency and quality of data collection including allowing use of the Internet for data submission and including one or more alternate questionnaire experiments to examine things such as the representation of race and ethnicity.
Executive Summary |
|
1 | (5) |
|
|
6 | (10) |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
Background: Experiments and Evaluations in the 2000 Census |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
Post Hoc Assessment of the 2000 Experiments and Evaluations |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
Overview of the 2010 Census |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
The CPEX Planning Document |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
Initial Views on 2010 Census Experiments |
|
|
16 | (20) |
|
A General Approach to the Selection of Census Experiments |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
Priority Topics for Experimentation in 2010 |
|
|
17 | (14) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
Use of Administrative Records to Assist in Component Census Operations |
|
|
20 | (4) |
|
Alternative Questionnaire Experiment |
|
|
24 | (6) |
|
A Possible Additional Experiment: Comparison of Telephone to Personal Interview for Coverage Follow-Up Interview |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
|
31 | (5) |
|
Initial Views on 2010 Census Evaluations |
|
|
36 | (10) |
|
Suggestions for the 2010 Census Evaluations |
|
|
36 | (6) |
|
|
36 | (2) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
Coverage Assessment of Group Quarters |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
Training of Field Enumerators |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
A General Approach to Census Evaluation |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
Initial Considerations Regarding a General Approach to Census Research |
|
|
43 | (3) |
|
Considerations for the 2010 Census |
|
|
46 | (5) |
|
|
46 | (2) |
|
Data Retention by Census Contractors |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
Census Enumeration as Part of Telephone Questionnaire Assistance |
|
|
48 | (3) |
|
|
51 | (42) |
|
|
|
A The Census Bureau's Suggested Topics for Research |
|
|
56 | (19) |
|
B Internet Response Options in Selected Population Censuses |
|
|
75 | (18) |
|
C Biographical Sketches of Panel Members and Staff |
|
|
93 | |
Lawrence D. Brown, Michael L. Cohen, and Daniel L. Cork, Editors, Panel on the Design of the 2010 Census Program of Evaluations and Experiments, National Research Council