Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Explaining Religious Party Strength: State Capacity, Social Services, and Religious Civil Society [Taylor & Francis e-book]

(Macrobond, UK)
  • Formāts: 252 pages, 9 Tables, black and white; 1 Line drawings, black and white; 43 Halftones, black and white; 44 Illustrations, black and white
  • Sērija : Routledge Studies in Religion and Politics
  • Izdošanas datums: 30-Dec-2022
  • Izdevniecība: Routledge
  • ISBN-13: 9781003316916
  • Taylor & Francis e-book
  • Cena: 142,30 €*
  • * this price gives unlimited concurrent access for unlimited time
  • Standarta cena: 203,28 €
  • Ietaupiet 30%
  • Formāts: 252 pages, 9 Tables, black and white; 1 Line drawings, black and white; 43 Halftones, black and white; 44 Illustrations, black and white
  • Sērija : Routledge Studies in Religion and Politics
  • Izdošanas datums: 30-Dec-2022
  • Izdevniecība: Routledge
  • ISBN-13: 9781003316916
Explaining Religious Party Strength explores why religious political parties are electorally successful in some countries but not in others.

Drawing on insights from political science and sociology, this book argues that religious parties are typically formed for defensive reasons, reacting against state-builders attempts to secularize public services such as education, welfare, and healthcare. Building on these findings, the author argues that the strength of religious parties is determined by the infrastructural power of the state. Weak states that fail to provide adequate public services open up space for religious communities to build a dense network of private schools, hospitals, and charities, which translates into votes for religious political parties. By contrast, strong states that provide efficient public services squeeze out private welfare providers, undermining the electoral strength of religious political parties. The author tests this theory through statistical analysis, using a new dataset on all religious parties which have participated in national parliamentary elections between 1800 and 2015. He includes comparative historical analyses of Roman Catholic political parties in France and Italy and Sunni Islamic political parties in Egypt, Turkey, and Albania.

This book will interest students and scholars of religion and politics, specifically those interested in party formation, voting, and political activism, as well as policymakers.
List of Figures
x
List of Tables
xii
Acknowledgements xiii
1 Introduction
1(14)
1.1 Solving the Puzzle: Existing Theories of Religion and Politics
2(2)
1.2 Empirical Patterns
4(1)
1.3 The Argument in Brief
5(4)
1.3.1 What Is a Religious Party?
5(2)
1.3.2 Explaining Religious Party Strength
7(1)
1.3.3 The Theory in Context
8(1)
1.4 Contributions to the Literature
9(1)
1.5 Testing the Theory
10(2)
1.5.1 Case Selection for Comparative Historical Analysis
11(1)
1.6 Plan for the Book
12(3)
Notes
14(1)
2 Religion and State, Formation
15(13)
2.1 Building Blocks
16(5)
2.1.1 Definitions
16(1)
2.1.2 Theoretical Priors
17(1)
2.1.3 Institutional Differentiation, Political Alliance
18(1)
2.1.4 Religious Provision of Social Services
19(2)
2.2 State-Building and Infrastructural Power
21(4)
2.2.1 State-Building and the Transformation of the Religion-State Relationship
21(2)
2.2.2 Variation in State Infrastructural Power
23(2)
2.3 Social Service Provision and State Capacity: Causal Connections
25(1)
2.4 Conclusion
26(2)
Notes
27(1)
3 Theorizing Religious Party Development
28(25)
3.1 The Proclerical Path to State-Building
30(3)
3.2 Religious Provision of Social Services under Anticlericalism
33(9)
3.2.1 Anticlerical Strong States and the Marginalization of Religious Service Provision
33(2)
3.2.2 The "Crowding Out" Effect in Anticlerical Strong States
35(1)
3.2.3 Anticlerical Weak States and the Survival of Religious Social Service Provision
36(2)
3.2.4 Infrastructural Decline and the Re-emergence of Religious Service Providers
38(2)
3.2.5 Variation in Religious Institutional Autonomy
40(2)
3.3 Anticlericalism and Religious Party Formation
42(3)
3.4 Explaining Religious Party Strength
45(7)
3.4.1 Direct Mobilization
45(3)
3.4.2 Reputational Effect
48(3)
3.4.3 Governing Religious Parties and State Capacity
51(1)
3.5 Conclusion
52(1)
Notes
52(1)
4 Quantitative Analysis of Religious Party Strength
53(26)
4.1 Operationalization of the Dependent Variable
54(3)
4.1.1 From Concept to Variable: Coding Religious Parties
54(1)
4.1.2 Operationalizing Religious Party Strength
54(1)
4.1.3 Unit of Observation and Sources
55(1)
4.1.4 Descriptive Statistics
56(1)
4.2 Independent Variables: State Capacity and Anticlericalism
57(7)
4.2.1 Anticlericalism and State Capacity
57(1)
4.2.2 Defining and Measuring Anticlericalism
58(2)
4.2.3 Defining and Measuring Infrastructural Power
60(4)
4.3 Alternative Explanations
64(3)
4.3.1 Modernization Theory
64(2)
4.3.2 Religious Market Theory
66(1)
4.3.3 Ideational Theory
67(1)
4.4 Statistical Analysis of Religious Party Strength
67(10)
4.4.1 Main Findings
70(2)
4.4.2 Additional Party Strength Models
72(5)
4.5 Conclusion
77(2)
Notes
77(2)
5 Anticlerical State-Building in France and Italy
79(31)
5.1 French and Italian State Capacity
80(4)
5.2 The Foundations of Modern Welfare States: Social Insurance, Healthcare, Education, and Social Assistance
84(19)
5.2.1 Education
84(8)
5.2.2 Social Insurance
92(4)
5.2.3 HealthCare
96(3)
5.2.4 Social Assistance
99(4)
5.3 Anticlericalism and Party Formation in Italy and France
103(6)
5.3.1 Catholic Civil Society and the Formation of the Italian People's Party, 1887--1919
103(2)
5.3.2 Catholic Civil Society and the Formation of the Popular Liberal Action, 1889--1901
105(4)
5.4 Conclusion
109(1)
Notes
109(1)
6 The Rise (and Fall) of Political Catholicism in Italy and France
110(39)
6.1 French and Italian Catholic Parties: From Formation until the Second World War
111(8)
6.1.1 Fascism and Catholicism: Italy, 1919--1942
111(3)
6.1.2 French Catholicism from the ALP to Vichy, 1902--1945
114(5)
6.2 French and Italian Catholic Parties in the Postwar Period
119(8)
6.2.1 Establishing Political Hegemony in Postwar Italy, 1942--1994
119(4)
6.2.2 A Brief Moment of Glory: Political Catholicism in France, 1944--1966
123(4)
6.3 French and Italian Catholic Associational Density
127(10)
6.3.1 Catholic Action
127(2)
6.3.2 Trade Unions
129(2)
6.3.3 Rural Syndicates
131(3)
6.3.4 Political Committees
134(3)
6.4 Analysis of Catholic Party Vote
137(9)
6.4.1 Alternative Explanations
138(3)
6.4.2 Analysis of Religious Party Vote in Italy
141(3)
6.4.3 Analysis of Religious Party Vote in France
144(2)
6.5 Conclusion
146(3)
Notes
147(2)
7 Islam and Anticlerical State-Building in Twentieth-Century Egypt, Turkey, and Albania
149(29)
7.1 Religious Politics and State Capacity in Egypt, Albania, and Turkey
152(9)
7.1.1 Infrastructural Power in Albania, Egypt, and Turkey
155(6)
7.2 Religious Civil Society and Authoritarian State-Building in Early Twentieth-Century Egypt, Turkey, and Albania
161(7)
7.2.1 Egypt, 1928--1954
162(3)
7.2.2 Turkey, 1923--1938
165(2)
7.2.3 Albania, 1912--1945
167(1)
7.3 Anticlericalism and Social Policy in Postwar Egypt, Turkey, and Albania
168(9)
7.3.1 Egypt, 1954--1970
169(2)
7.3.2 Turkey, 1938--1970
171(3)
7.3.3 Albania, 1945--1978
174(3)
7.4 Conclusion
177(1)
Notes
177(1)
8 Islam and Political Competition in Egypt, Turkey, and Albania
178(27)
8.1 State Retrenchment and the Re-emergence of Religious Civil Society
179(10)
8.1.1 Egypt, 1970--1990
179(4)
8.1.2 Turkey, 1970--1990
183(3)
8.1.3 Albania, 1978--1997
186(3)
8.2 Political Islam in Contemporary Egypt, Turkey, and Albania
189(9)
8.2.1 Egypt, 1990--2013
190(3)
8.2.2 Turkey, 1990--2002
193(4)
8.2.3 Albania, 1997--
197(1)
8.3 Analysis of Religious Party Vote
198(5)
8.3.1 Egypt
198(4)
8.3.2 Turkey
202(1)
8.4 Conclusion
203(2)
Notes
204(1)
9 Conclusion
205(8)
9.1 Rethinking Theories of Religion and Politics
207(5)
9.1.1 Modernization Theory
207(2)
9.1.2 Religious Market Theory
209(1)
9.1.3 Ideational Theory
210(2)
9.2 Conclusion
212(1)
Note
212(1)
Bibliography 213(37)
Index 250
Mįrio Rebelo holds a DPhil in Politics from the University of Oxford, UK. He is a data specialist at Macrobond. Previously, he taught courses on Comparative Politics and European Politics at the University of Oxford, as well as a Social Policy course on Stanford Universitys UK campus.