About the Author |
|
vii | |
|
|
xv | |
Foreword |
|
xxi | |
Preface |
|
xxiii | |
Acknowledgements |
|
xxvii | |
|
Chapter 1 Introduction: The Politics of Taxation |
|
|
1 | (22) |
|
1.1 Background: Competing Concerns and Politics |
|
|
1 | (7) |
|
1.1.1 G20 and OECD Efforts |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
1.1.2 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting |
|
|
2 | (3) |
|
1.1.3 The US Concerns: Financial Transparency Issues |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
1.1.4 The Financial Transparency Endeavours: The FATCA Agreements |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
1.1.5 The European Commission's Response |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
1.1.6 Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI) |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
1.1.7 Cross-Border Transactions and Increasing Stakes |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
1.2 The Indian Experience |
|
|
8 | (9) |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
1.2.3 Ishikawajima and the 2007 Amendments |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
1.2.4 Jindal Thermal and the 2010 Amendments |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
1.2.5 Vodafone and the 2012 Amendments |
|
|
12 | (2) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
1.2.8 The Object of This Study |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
1.3 Emerging Challenges: Need to Revisit the Source Rule |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
1.3.1 Physical Presence Paradigm |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
|
19 | (4) |
|
Chapter 2 Historical Evolution of the Source Rule and Its Theoretical Underpinnings |
|
|
23 | (28) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
2.2 Part 1: The Historical Evolution |
|
|
24 | (11) |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
2.2.2 Source Rule in Its Legislative Form |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
2.2.3 The Twentieth Century Developments and Recent Trends |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
2.2.3.1 The Early Twentieth Century Phase |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
2.2.3.2 The Post-World War I Phase |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
2.2.3.3 The Role of the International Chamber of Commerce |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
2.2.3.4 The League of Nations' Contributions |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
2.2.3.4.1 The Economists' Report: The Economic Allegiance Principle |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
2.2.3.4.2 The Technical Experts' Report |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
2.2.3.4.3 Adoption of 1928 Model Conventions |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
2.2.3.5 The US Contribution |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
2.2.3.6 The OEEC-OECD Efforts |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
2.2.3.8 The US Model Convention |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
2.2.4 The Economic Allegiance and the Shaping of `Nexus' |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
2.3 Part 2: Theoretical Premise |
|
|
35 | (14) |
|
|
35 | (2) |
|
2.3.1.1 Benefit Theory and Physical Nexus |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
2.3.1.2 Critique and Assaying the Counter-Arguments |
|
|
37 | (3) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
2.3.2.1 Capital Export Neutrality (CEN) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
2.3.2.2 Capital Import Neutrality (CIN) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
2.3.2.3 A Look at CEN Versus CIN Debate |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
2.3.2.4 Neutrality Theory: Whether It Supports a Strict Territorial Nexus? |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
2.3.3 Inter-Nation Equity |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
2.3.3.1 The Source-Residence Dialectics in Terms of Inter-Nation Equity |
|
|
45 | (3) |
|
2.3.3.2 Equity Considerations and the Territorial Nexus Debate |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
|
49 | (2) |
|
Chapter 3 The Nexus Debate in Treaty Structures: A Comparative Critique of the OECD and UN Models |
|
|
51 | (92) |
|
|
51 | (2) |
|
3.2 Right to Tax Income from Immovable Property |
|
|
53 | (6) |
|
3.2.1 Indian Domestic Laws and Treaty Practices |
|
|
54 | (5) |
|
3.3 Rights to Tax Business Profits: The Basic Principles |
|
|
59 | (67) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
3.3.1.1 The PE Concept: Fixed Place of Business PE |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
3.3.1.2 Concept of `Fixed' |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
3.3.1.3 PE for Short Period |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
3.3.1.4 Intermittent or Incidental Use of Home Office |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
3.3.1.5 Slackening of Physical Presence Barriers |
|
|
62 | (2) |
|
3.3.1.6 Indian Law and Treaty Practices |
|
|
64 | (2) |
|
3.3.1.6.1 Virtual Projection Test |
|
|
66 | (5) |
|
3.3.1.7 Building Sites: Construction PE |
|
|
71 | (2) |
|
3.3.1.7.1 Gradual Trend: The OECD 2002, 2011 Reports and BEPS Developments |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
3.3.1.7.2 Judicial Approach to Measuring Time Limit |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
3.3.1.7.3 OECD Deliberations and Reports |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
3.3.1.7.4 BEPS Action 7 and Multilateral Instruments |
|
|
75 | (2) |
|
3.3.1.7.5 Indian Domestic Law and Treaty Practices |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
3.3.1.7.6 Implication of `In Connection Therewith' |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
|
79 | (3) |
|
3.3.1.8.1 Indian Domestic Law and Treaty Practices |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
3.3.1.8.2 Services Rendered Through `Other Personnel' |
|
|
83 | (2) |
|
3.3.1.8.3 `Any Twelve-Month Period' Versus Fiscal Year |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
3.3.1.8.5 Indian Domestic Law and Treaty Practices |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
3.3.1.9 Dependent Agent PE: Maintenance of Stocks |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
3.3.1.9.1 Indian Law and Treaty Practices |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
3.3.1.9.2 Refining the Nexus Rule: Some Recent Trends -- BEPS and Multilateral Instruments (MLIs) |
|
|
88 | (3) |
|
3.3.1.9.3 India's Stance on These Developments |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
3.3.1.10 Insurance Services PE |
|
|
92 | (2) |
|
3.3.1.10.1 Indian Law and Treaty Practices |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
3.3.2 The Profit Attribution Principle |
|
|
94 | (2) |
|
3.3.2.1 Indian Law and Treaty Practices |
|
|
96 | (6) |
|
3.3.3 The Independent Enterprise and the Arm's Length Principles: Limits on Source Taxation |
|
|
102 | (3) |
|
3.3.3.1 The AOA: Mounting Criticism |
|
|
105 | (4) |
|
3.3.3.2 BEPS Debates on Profit Attribution |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
3.3.3.3 Indian Domestic Tax Law and Treaty Practices: Reactions to the AOA |
|
|
110 | (5) |
|
3.3.3.4 Restrictions on the Deductibility of PE Expenses |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
3.3.3.5 International Transportation: An Exception to the PE Rule |
|
|
116 | (3) |
|
3.3.3.5.1 Indian Domestic Law and Treaty Practices |
|
|
119 | (7) |
|
3.4 Rights to Tax Investment Income: Dividend, Interest and Royalty |
|
|
126 | (6) |
|
3.4.1 The Basic Principles of Allocating Rights to Tax Investment Income |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
3.4.1.1.1 Recent Trends: BEPS and MLIs |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
3.4.1.1.2 Indian Domestic Law and Treaty Practices |
|
|
128 | (2) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
3.4.1.2.1 Indian Domestic Law and Treaty Practices |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
3.4.1.3.1 Indian Domestic Law and Treaty Practices |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
3.5 Rights to Tax Capital Gains |
|
|
132 | (8) |
|
3.5.1 Indian Domestic Law and Treaty Practices |
|
|
135 | (5) |
|
|
140 | (3) |
|
Chapter 4 Strict Territorial Nexus and the Principles of International Law |
|
|
143 | (44) |
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
4.2 Territorial Nexus: Conceptual Divergence in Public International Law and Tax Law |
|
|
145 | (3) |
|
4.3 Judicial Approaches in Municipal Courts |
|
|
148 | (23) |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
|
150 | (4) |
|
|
154 | (6) |
|
|
160 | (11) |
|
4.4 Finding Evidence of International Custom of Strict Territorial Presence for Tax Jurisdiction |
|
|
171 | (5) |
|
4.5 Does International Law Override Municipal Law? |
|
|
176 | (4) |
|
4.6 Conclusion and Recent Trends |
|
|
180 | (7) |
|
Chapter 5 Territorial Nexus and Constitutionality |
|
|
187 | (34) |
|
|
187 | (3) |
|
5.2 The Extraterritoriality Principle: Its Historical Setting |
|
|
190 | (4) |
|
|
190 | (2) |
|
5.2.2 Huber's Formulations |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
5.2.3 The Lotus Principles |
|
|
192 | (2) |
|
5.3 Extraterritoriality and the Constitutional Questions |
|
|
194 | (18) |
|
5.3.1 The International Scenario |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
5.3.1.1 The United Kingdom |
|
|
194 | (4) |
|
5.3.1.2 The United States |
|
|
198 | (3) |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
|
202 | (3) |
|
5.3.2 The Indian Scenario |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
5.3.2.1 The Government of India Act, 1935 |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
5.3.2.1.1 Raleigh Investment Co |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
5.3.2.1.2 Wallace Brothers |
|
|
207 | (2) |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
5.3.2.2 Position under the Indian Constitution |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
5.3.2.2.1 Rungta Engineering |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
5.4 Recent Trends in India |
|
|
212 | (5) |
|
5.4.1 Electronics Corporation |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
|
213 | (3) |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
|
217 | (4) |
|
Chapter 6 Conclusion: Retrospective Amendments, Fairness and More Politics |
|
|
221 | (12) |
|
6.1 Contrived Debate: Fairness in Tax Allocation |
|
|
221 | (2) |
|
6.2 Vodafone and Cairn Arbitration Cases |
|
|
223 | (1) |
|
6.3 Legislative Changes: Retrospective Operation and Discrimination |
|
|
224 | (9) |
|
6.3.1 Context of Retrospectivity |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
6.3.2 The Carlton Standard |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
6.3.3 The Huitson Principles |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
6.3.4 The Australian Position: Chevron |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
6.3.5 China, Canada and South Africa |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
6.3.6 The Indian Position |
|
|
230 | (3) |
Bibliography |
|
233 | (18) |
Table of Cases |
|
251 | (6) |
Table of Statutes |
|
257 | (4) |
Table of Treaties and Conventions |
|
261 | (6) |
Index |
|
267 | |