Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Extraterritoriality and Collective Redress

Edited by (Herbert Smith Senior Research Fellow in Private International Law, British Institu), Edited by (Senior Research Fellow in Comparative Law and Director of the Product Liability Forum, British Institute of International and Comparative Law (BIICL))
  • Formāts: PDF+DRM
  • Izdošanas datums: 27-Sep-2012
  • Izdevniecība: Oxford University Press
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780191636615
  • Formāts - PDF+DRM
  • Cena: 219,58 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.
  • Formāts: PDF+DRM
  • Izdošanas datums: 27-Sep-2012
  • Izdevniecība: Oxford University Press
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780191636615

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

An expert analysis of the relevant law and jurisprudence in mass litigation, this edited work examines the diverse and complex transnational considerations and issues of collective redress. With contributions from distinguished and authoritative commentators on this topic, the coverage is broad, thorough, and practically focused.

The book offers new perspectives on the challenges of collective redress as it innovatively combines a comparative and cross border approach. Organized clearly into sections, it provides in-depth comment on these challenges from a national, European, and global perspective.

With detailed analysis of the relevant law and jurisprudence in this area offering a significant practical impact, this book also examines possible solutions to the challenges identified, covering important topics and issues within collective redress mechanisms; the private international law perspective on collective redress; reception of foreign collective redress; and extraterritoriality and US law.

Including contributions from the jurisdictions most relevant to these conflict of laws issues, this book unites global expertise to provide information on a complex topic and offer a solution-based approach to the collective redress landscape.
Editors xiii
Contributors xv
Table of Cases
xxiii
Table of Legislation
xxxiii
I COLLECTIVE REDRESS MECHANISMS IN A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
1 Class Actions and Collective Actions
Diego Corapi
I Introduction
1(8)
II The United States Model and Its Influence on Other Regimes
9(27)
III Developments Within the United States Model
36(4)
IV Conclusion
40
2 Collective Redress Procedures: European Debates
Duncan Fairgrieve
Geraint Howells
I Introduction
1(12)
II Developments at a National Level
13(53)
III The EU Response
66(15)
IV Conclusion
81
3 Collective Action Reform in England and Wales
John Sorabji
I Introduction
1(1)
II 1987-2004: The Long Road to Reform
2(20)
III 2004-10: Flattering to Deceive, Reform's False Dawn
22(23)
IV Conclusion
45
4 Class Actions and Class Settlements Going Global: the Netherlands
Ianika Tzankova
Helene van Lith
I Introduction
1(2)
II The Dutch System of Collective Redress
3(34)
III Cross-border Mass Disputes---The WCAM Going Global
37(11)
IV The Complementary Role of the WCAM
48(5)
V Unanticipated Problems with Going Global
53(16)
VI Recognition and Enforcement of United States Judgments
69(7)
VII Conclusion
76
5 Collective Redress: Policy Objectives and Practical Problems
Alexander Layton
I Introduction
1(1)
II Policy Objectives
2(14)
III Practical Problems
16(31)
IV Conclusions
47
II PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW AND COLLECTIVE REDRESS
6 A Coherent Approach to European Collective Redress
Burkhard Hess
I Introduction
1(8)
II Different Perspectives and Objectives of Law-making
9(21)
III Conclusion
30
7 The Trouble with Cross-Border Collective Redress: Issues and Difficulties
Horatia Muir Watt
I Introduction
1(6)
II Sources of Resistance
7(5)
III New Directions?
12
8 Cross-Border Collective Redress and Jurisdiction under Brussels I: A Mismatch
Eva Lein
I Introduction
1(6)
II One Court for All: Concentration of Jurisdiction under Brussels I
7(9)
III Too Many Courts Spoil the Broth: Dispersed Jurisdiction under Brussels I
16(9)
IV The Magic Trick? Article 6(1) Brussels I Regulation
25(6)
V Can the Parties Decide?
31(2)
VI Conclusions and Perspectives
33
9 Parallel Litigation and Cross-Border Collective Actions under the Brussels I Framework: Lessons from Abroad
Justine N Stefanelli
I Introduction
1(4)
II Lis Pendens and Related Actions under the Brussels I Regulation
5(8)
III Collective Actions and Parallel Proceedings
13(10)
IV Proposed Amendments to the Brussels I Regulation
23(8)
V Suggestions for Reform
31(41)
VI Conclusion
72
10 The Impact of the Brussels I Enforcement and Recognition Rules on Collective Actions
Duncan Fairgrieve
I Introduction
1(3)
II The Scheme of Brussels I
4(14)
III The Notion of Ordre Public under Brussels I, Article 34(1)
18(8)
IV Approach in Individual Member States: Public Policy and Collective Redress
26(29)
V Article 34(2): Procedural Issues
55(3)
VI Article 34(3): Irreconcilability
58(4)
VII Conclusion
62
11 Conflicts of Laws in Multinational Collective Actions---a Judicial Nightmare?
Astrid Stadler
I Introduction
1(10)
II Choice of Law and European Mass Litigation
11(24)
III Possible Solutions
35(22)
IV Conclusion
57
12 Extraterritoriality of Evidence Gathering in US Class Action Proceedings
Andrea Pinna
I Introduction
1(7)
II The Scope of Extraterritoriality of United States Discovery
8(30)
III The Conflict between Extraterritorial United States Discovery Rules and Foreign Laws
38(17)
IV Conclusion
55
13 The ILA Rio Resolution on Transnational Group Actions
Catherine Kessedjian
I Introduction
1(3)
II The Resolution of the 2008 ILA Rio de Janeiro Conference
4(4)
III Factors Determining the Type of Procedure
8(12)
IV Analysis of the Resolution
20(21)
V Conclusion
41
14 In Defence of the Requirement for Foreign Class Members to Opt In to an English Class Action
Rachael Mulheron
I Introduction
1(3)
II The Draft Statutory Framework
4(11)
III Requiring Non-domiciled Class Members to Opt In: Key Canadian Precedent
15(18)
IV Further Support Derived from Some Key United States Decisions
33(22)
V Conclusion
55
III RECEPTION OF FOREIGN COLLECTIVE REDRESS AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES DECISION IN NATIONAL JURISDICTIONS
15 Foreign Punitive Damages Decisions and Class Actions in Italy
Francesco Quarta
I Introduction
1(2)
II Compatibility of US Class Action Procedure with European Jurisprudence
3(37)
III Conclusion
40
16 The Perils of Certifying International Class Actions in Canada
John P Brown
I Introduction
1(9)
II Traditional Judgment Recognition Rules Are Inadequate for Enforcing Multi-jurisdictional Class Action Judgments
10(5)
III Why the `Real and Substantial Connection' Test Should Not Be Applied to Absent Foreign Claimants
15(13)
IV The `Real and Substantial Connection' Test---Applied Rigorously
28(19)
V Canadian Courts Should Not Certify Multi-jurisdictional Opt-out Classes
47(28)
VI Conclusion
75
17 Collective Redress in Spain: Recognition and Enforcement of Class Action Judgments and Class Settlements
Marta Requejo Isidro
Marta Otero Crespo
I Introduction
1(3)
II Collective Redress in Spain
4(18)
III Recognition and Enforcement in Spain
22(43)
IV Conclusion
65
IV EXTRATERRITORIALITY AND US LAW
18 Morrison v National Australia Bank: The US Supreme Court Limits Collective Redress for Securities Fraud
Thomas A Dubbs
I Introduction
1(4)
II The Facts of Morrison
5(43)
III The Court's Opinion and the Presumption Against Extraterritoriality
48(38)
IV Conclusion
86
19 Morrison v National Australia Bank: Implications for Global Securities Class Actions
Linda J Silberman
I Introduction
1(1)
II Background of Morrison
2(1)
III The Morrison Decision
3(4)
IV The Presumption Against Extraterritoriality in Morrison
7(5)
V The Influence of Comity Concerns in Morrison
12(5)
VI Implications for Global Class Actions Post-Morrison
17(22)
VII Conclusion
39
20 Morrison v National Australia Bank: Foreign Securities and the Jurisdiction to Prescribe
Adam Johnson
I Introduction
1(4)
II Choice of Law and Jurisdiction
5(1)
III International Jurisdiction
6(8)
IV Extraterritorial Application of United States Law
14(6)
V International Comity and the Approach in England
20(8)
VI Conclusion
28
21 `Bridging the Gap': Contrasting Effects of US Supreme Court Territorial Restraint on European Collective Claims
Vincent Smith
I Introduction: Morrison and Empagran
1(20)
II How Might this New Situation Affect Collective Claims in Europe?
21(12)
III Conclusion: Increasing Collective Claims in Europe?
33
22 Transnational Issuer Liability after the Financial Crisis: Seeking a Coherent Choice of Law Standard
Wolf-Georg Ringe
Alexander Hellgardt
I Introduction
1(8)
II International Securities Class Actions
9(6)
III Classification of Primary Capital Markets Duties
15(8)
IV Current State of the Conflict of Laws Discussion
23(19)
V Suggested Solution: Synchronism between Duties and Liability
42(27)
VI Implications
69(6)
VII Conclusion
75(356)
Index 431
Dr Duncan Fairgrieve is Senior Research Fellow in Comparative Law and Director of the Product Liability Forum at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law.



Dr Eva Lein is Herbert Smith Senior Research Fellow in Private International Law at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law.