Preface |
|
11 | |
1. Introduction |
|
13 | |
|
1.1. Rationale for the study |
|
|
13 | |
|
1.2. Overview of the volume |
|
|
14 | |
2. Literature Review |
|
15 | |
|
2.1. Historical overview of research on individual differences |
|
|
15 | |
|
2.2. Extroversion/introversion and language learning |
|
|
17 | |
|
2.2.1. Definition of extroversion/introversion |
|
|
17 | |
|
2.2.2. Extroversion/introversion and language learning |
|
|
21 | |
|
|
25 | |
|
|
25 | |
|
2.3.2. Relevant work on learner strategies |
|
|
27 | |
|
2.3.2.1. The Good Language Learner study |
|
|
27 | |
|
2.3.2.2. O'Malley and Chamot's contribution |
|
|
29 | |
|
2.3.2.3. Oxford's contribution |
|
|
31 | |
|
2.3.3. Summary and evaluation of research on learner strategies: two paradigms |
|
|
32 | |
|
2.3.4. The issue of strategy training |
|
|
34 | |
|
2.4. Environmental factors and English proficiency: EFL learning conditions in Japan |
|
|
38 | |
|
|
38 | |
|
2.4.2. Factors specific to Japan |
|
|
40 | |
|
2.4.3. Rationale for use of listening as an evaluative tool |
|
|
41 | |
|
|
44 | |
|
2.6. Significance of the study |
|
|
44 | |
3. Methods |
|
45 | |
|
|
45 | |
|
|
48 | |
|
3.2.1. Context and participants |
|
|
48 | |
|
|
48 | |
|
3.2.2.1. Personality questionnaire |
|
|
48 | |
|
3.2.2.2. Instructor's holistic evaluation of learners' E/I |
|
|
50 | |
|
3.2.2.3. Strategy questionnaire for reported strategies |
|
|
51 | |
|
3.2.2.4. Background questionnaire |
|
|
55 | |
|
3.2.2.5. Listening proficiency tests |
|
|
55 | |
|
|
56 | |
|
|
58 | |
|
|
58 | |
|
|
59 | |
|
|
59 | |
|
|
60 | |
|
3.3.3. Contexts and participants |
|
|
62 | |
|
|
63 | |
|
3.4.1 Contexts and participants |
|
|
63 | |
|
|
63 | |
|
3.4.3. Stimulated recall interviews |
|
|
64 | |
|
|
65 | |
|
3.5. Summary of methodologies |
|
|
66 | |
4. Results |
|
67 | |
|
|
67 | |
|
4.2. Phase I: Quantitative study |
|
|
67 | |
|
4.2.1. Distributions of E/I |
|
|
67 | |
|
4.2.2. Distributions of listening proficiency |
|
|
69 | |
|
4.2.3. Distributions of LS |
|
|
70 | |
|
4.2.3.1. Distributions of LS by modes |
|
|
70 | |
|
4.2.3.2. Distributions of individual LS |
|
|
72 | |
|
|
74 | |
|
4.2.4.1. Reliabilities of the strategy questionnaire |
|
|
74 | |
|
4.2.4.2. The relationship between the MBTI results and the instructor's holistic evaluation |
|
|
74 | |
|
4.2.5. Impacts of E/I on LS |
|
|
76 | |
|
4.2.5.1. Impacts of E/I on cognitive strategies |
|
|
76 | |
|
4.2.5.2. Impacts of E/I on communication strategies |
|
|
76 | |
|
4.2.5.3. Impacts of E/I on metacognitive strategies |
|
|
77 | |
|
4.2.5.4. Impacts of E/I on socio-affective strategies |
|
|
77 | |
|
4.2.5.5. Impacts of E/I on individual strategies |
|
|
78 | |
|
4.2.6. Impacts of E/I on listening proficiency |
|
|
79 | |
|
4.2.6.1. Impacts of E/I on the TOEIC test scores |
|
|
79 | |
|
4.2.6.2. Impacts of E/I on the CELT test scores |
|
|
80 | |
|
4.2.7. Summary of Phase I |
|
|
81 | |
|
4.3. Phase II: LS use in the classroom |
|
|
82 | |
|
4.3.1. Observations and stimulated recall interview |
|
|
82 | |
|
4.3.1.1. Strategy use in teacher-fronted (TF) portions of the class |
|
|
82 | |
|
4.3.1.2. Strategy use in student-centered (SC) portions of the class |
|
|
85 | |
|
4.3.1.3. Stimulated recall interview with Miki and Yuri |
|
|
87 | |
|
4.3.2. Supplemental interviews |
|
|
88 | |
|
|
91 | |
|
4.4. Phase III: LSs in an individual learning situation |
|
|
91 | |
|
4.4.1. Strategies used in Task A |
|
|
91 | |
|
4.4.2. Stimulated recall on Task A |
|
|
93 | |
|
4.4.3. Strategies used in Task B |
|
|
95 | |
|
4.4.4. Stimulated recall for Task B |
|
|
98 | |
|
4.4.5. Summary of Phase III |
|
|
101 | |
5. Discussion |
|
103 | |
|
|
103 | |
|
5.2. Responding to Research Question 1 |
|
|
103 | |
|
5.2.1. Discussion of the difference between present strategy use and previous use |
|
|
103 | |
|
5.2.2. Discussion of the gap between use, preferences, helpfulness, and previous use |
|
|
106 | |
|
5.3. Responding to Research Question 2 |
|
|
110 | |
|
5.3.1. General tendencies from quantitative data |
|
|
110 | |
|
5.3.2. Learning in the classroom |
|
|
112 | |
|
5.3.2.1. Teacher-fronted (TF) situations |
|
|
112 | |
|
5.3.2.2. Student-centered (SC) situations: small group work |
|
|
114 | |
|
5.3.3. Learning in an individual learning situation |
|
|
116 | |
|
5.4. Responding to Research Question 3 |
|
|
118 | |
|
|
120 | |
6. Conclusion |
|
121 | |
|
6.1. Possible developments of this study |
|
|
122 | |
|
6.2. Pedagogical implications |
|
|
123 | |
References |
|
127 | |
Appendices |
|
141 | |
Index |
|
155 | |