Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Facing Hydrometeorological Extreme Events: A Governance Issue [Hardback]

Edited by , Edited by
  • Formāts: Hardback, 536 pages, height x width x depth: 246x178x28 mm, weight: 1066 g
  • Sērija : Hydrometeorological Extreme Events
  • Izdošanas datums: 15-Nov-2019
  • Izdevniecība: John Wiley & Sons Inc
  • ISBN-10: 1119383544
  • ISBN-13: 9781119383543
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 159,99 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Bibliotēkām
Facing Hydrometeorological Extreme Events: A Governance IssuePalielināt
  • Formāts: Hardback, 536 pages, height x width x depth: 246x178x28 mm, weight: 1066 g
  • Sērija : Hydrometeorological Extreme Events
  • Izdošanas datums: 15-Nov-2019
  • Izdevniecība: John Wiley & Sons Inc
  • ISBN-10: 1119383544
  • ISBN-13: 9781119383543
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
Permanent link: https://www.kriso.lv/db/9781119383543.html
Keywords:

Provides an understanding of the relationship between social-ecological systems and multilevel governance so that readers can properly deal with hydrometeorological extreme events and hazards

Based on field investigations from EU research projects, this book is the first to devote itself to scientific and policy-related knowledge concerning climate change-induced extreme events. It depicts national and international strategies, as well as tools used to improve multilevel governance for the management of hydrometeorological risks. It also demonstrates how these strategies play out over different scales of the decision-making processes.

Facing Hydrometeorological Extreme Events: A Governance Issue offers comprehensive coverage of such events as floods, droughts, coastal storms, and wind storms. It showcases real-life success stories of multilevel governance and highlights the individuals involved and the resources mobilized in the decision-making processes. The book starts by presenting a synthesis of hydrometeorological extreme events and their impacts on society. It then demonstrates how societies are organizing themselves to face these extreme events, focusing on the strategies of integration of risk management in governance and public policy. In addition, it includes the results of several EU-funded projects such as CLIMB, STARFLOOD, and INTERREG IVB project DROP.

  • The first book dedicated to hydrometeorological extreme events governance based on field investigations from EU research projects
  •  Offers a “multi-hazards” approach—mixing policy, governance, and field investigations’ main outputs
  • Features the results of EU-funded projects addressing hydrometeorological extreme events
  • Part of the Hydrometeorological Extreme Events series

Facing Hydrometeorological Extreme Events is an ideal book for upper-graduate students, postgraduates, researchers, scientists, and policy-makers working in the field.

List of Contributors xvii
Editors xxi
The Series Editor xxiii
Series Preface xxv
Part I: Introduction 1(26)
1 Governance Challenges Facing Hydrometeorological Extreme Events
3(20)
Isabelle La Jeunesse
Corinne Larrue
1.1 Introduction
3(1)
1.2 Facing hydrometeorological extreme events
3(2)
1.3 Floods
5(3)
1.3.1 Definition and characteristics
5(2)
1.3.2 Impacts and adaptation
7(1)
1.4 Drought
8(3)
1.4.1 Definition and characteristics
8(1)
1.4.2 Impacts and adaptation
8(3)
1.5 Coastal storms
11(4)
1.5.1 Coastal zone delimitation
12(1)
1.5.2 Definition and characteristics
13(1)
1.5.3 Impacts and adaptation
13(2)
1.6 Governance issues related to hydrometeorological extreme events
15(4)
1.6.1 Addressing governance issues
15(2)
1.6.2 Analytical framework based on adaptive governance
17(1)
1.6.3 Analytical framework based on risk governance
17(2)
Notes
19(1)
References
20(3)
2 Overview of the Content of the Book
23(4)
Isabelle La Jeunesse
Corinne Larrue
2.1 Floods
24(1)
2.2 Droughts
24(1)
2.3 Coastal storms
24(3)
Part II: Floods 27(130)
II.1: Actors Involved in Flood Risk Management
29(26)
3 European Actors Facing Floods Risks
31(10)
Thomas Schellenberger
3.1 European actors in the field of civil security: A competence which develops within a strict framework of cooperation between the Member States
32(2)
3.2 European actors in the field of the environment: Powers that are paradoxically limited
34(1)
3.2.1 The competence of EU actors
34(1)
3.2.2 The missions of EU actors
36(1)
3.3 European actors in the field of agriculture: Could there be specific powers to deal with floods?
37(2)
3.4 Conclusion
39(1)
Notes
39(1)
References
40(1)
4 Multi-actor, Multilevel Assessment of Social Capacity for Community Engagement in Flood Risk Preparedness: Results of Implementation in Five European Cases
41(14)
Lila Oriard Colin
4.1 Introduction
41(1)
4.1.1 Towards a multi-stakeholder flood risk management approach
41(1)
4.1.2 Social capacity building towards resilience
42(2)
4.2 Social capacity building framework for community engagement
44(1)
4.2.1 Social capacity definition
44(1)
4.2.2 Using civic capacity in flood-risk preparedness
45(1)
4.3 The capacity assessment tool
46(1)
4.4 Indicators and case findings
47(5)
4.5 Conclusions
52(1)
References
53(2)
II.2: Strategies, Instruments, and Resources Used to Face Floods
55(44)
5 Flood Risks Perceptions and Goals/Ambitions
57(14)
Ann Crabbe
5.1 Introduction
57(1)
5.2 The problem stream: Perceptions on increased flood risks
58(2)
5.3 The policy stream: Perceptions on the solutions needed to deal with increased flood risks
60(2)
5.4 The political stream: Willingness to take action
62(1)
5.5 International policies
63(1)
5.6 European directives and policy documents
64(1)
5.7 Experiences with flood risk management in other countries
65(1)
5.8 Research on impacts and adaptation
65(1)
5.9 Economic costs (of inaction)
65(1)
5.10 Facilitating factors
66(1)
5.11 Factors contributing to agenda-setting
66(1)
5.12 Conclusions
66(2)
Note
68(1)
References
68(3)
6 Instruments for Strategies to Face Floods through Prevention, Mitigation, and Preparation in Europe: The Age of Alignment
71(28)
Mathilde Gralepois
6.1 Introduction
71(1)
6.1.1 Recurring floods in Europe and risk management: A mounting dilemma
71(1)
6.1.2 From instruments to strategies: Definitions
72(1)
6.1.3 Five flood-management strategies
72(1)
6.1.4 The hard problem. Understanding the different combinations of flood-management instruments behind flood strategies in Europe
74(1)
6.2 Conceptual framework
75(2)
6.3 Comparison. Similarities and differences in flood instruments' implementation in Europe
77(1)
6.3.1 Prevention, a spatial planning oriented strategy
77(1)
6.3.2 Mitigation, a trend lacking strong instruments
80(1)
6.3.3 Preparation, a highly instrumentalized strategy
81(1)
6.3.4 Defence: A strategy relying on government-based instruments
83(1)
6.3.5 Recovery instruments based on political will
85(1)
6.4 Discussion. Political effects, power relations, and governance choices in flood management: What do flood instruments teach?
86(1)
6.4.1 Emerging trends in flood instruments and strategies
87(1)
6.4.2 A lack of alignment in flood instruments: What results in terms of flood public policies outcomes?
89(1)
6.4.3 Flood governance patterns Analysed Through the lens of instruments
90(4)
6.5 Conclusion
94(1)
Notes
94(1)
References
95(4)
II.3: Lessons from Cases of Flood Governance
99(58)
7 A House of Cards: The Challenge of Establishing Societal Resilience to Flooding Through Multi-Layered Governance in England
101(14)
Meghan Alexander
Sally Priest
7.1 Introduction
101(1)
7.2 Deciphering multi-layered governance
102(1)
7.2.1 Theoretical background
102(1)
7.2.2 Overview of flood risk governance in England
102(1)
7.3 Methodology
103(2)
7.4 Flood-risk governance and implications for societal resilience
105(1)
7.4.1 Spatial planning
105(1)
7.4.2 Flood defence and mitigation
106(1)
7.4.3 Flood emergency management
108(1)
7.4.4 Flood insurance
109(1)
7.5 Reflections on the 'house of cards' of flood risk governance
110(1)
Notes
111(1)
References
111(4)
8 Understanding Dutch Flood-Risk Management: Principles and Pitfalls
115(10)
Mark Wiering
8.1 Introduction
115(1)
8.2 Historical background
116(1)
8.3 The concept of public interest
117(1)
8.4 Solidarity and subsidiarity
117(3)
8.5 Resilience
120(1)
8.6 Challenges and pitfalls
120(1)
8.7 Conclusion and recommendations
121(2)
References
123(2)
9 Flood Governance in France: From Hegemony to Diversity in the French Flood-Risk Management Actors' Network
125(16)
Marie Fournier
9.1 Flood-risk management governance: A stakeholders' network still dominated by central government and municipalities
126(1)
9.1.1 The French central government, a major stakeholder for flood-risk management
126(1)
9.1.2 Municipalities are gaining competences for flood-risk management
128(3)
9.2 Inter-municipalities as new players within the French FRM governance
131(1)
9.2.1 Inter-municipalities, a long tradition in France
131(1)
9.2.2 Integrated inter-municipalities: New leading actors within FRM
132(1)
9.2.3 Defining flexible forms of inter-municipalities to support local FRM strategies
133(1)
9.3 Where are citizens in FRM?
134(1)
9.3.1 Citizens' involvement in FRM via prevention (vulnerability reduction), information, and crisis management policy instruments
135(1)
9.3.2 Urban planning in flood-prone areas: From conflict to cooperation
136(2)
9.4 Conclusion
138(1)
Notes
138(1)
References
139(2)
10 Flood-Risk Governance in Belgium: Towards a Resilient, Efficient, and Legitimate Arrangement?
141(18)
Hannelore Mees
10.1 Introduction
141(1)
10.2 Evaluation framework
142(2)
10.3 Methods
144(1)
10.4 Flood risk governance in Belgium
144(1)
10.4.1 The regional water system arrangements
144(1)
10.4.2 The flood preparation and recovery arrangement
145(1)
10.5 Comparing intrastate developments
145(1)
10.5.1 Spatial planning initiatives
146(1)
10.5.2 Coordination mechanisms
147(1)
10.5.3 Citizen engagement
148(1)
10.6 Evaluating resilience, efficiency, and legitimacy
149(1)
10.6.1 Impact on resilience
149(1)
10.6.2 Impact on efficiency
151(1)
10.6.3 Impact on legitimacy
152(1)
10.7 Conclusion
152(1)
Notes
153(1)
References
153(4)
Part III: Droughts 157(156)
III.1: Actors Involved in Drought Risk Management
159(30)
11 European Actors and Institutions Involved in Water Scarcity and Drought Policy
161(10)
Ulf Stein
Ruta Landgrebe
11.1 Introduction
161(1)
11.2 Actors in the European Union related to WS&D policy
162(1)
11.3 Roles and powers of European actors and institutions involved in WS&D policy
163(2)
11.4 Mapping European actors and institutions involved in WS&D policy
165(2)
11.5 Discussion
167(2)
11.6 Conclusion
169(1)
References
169(2)
12 National and Local Actors of Drought Governance in Europe: A Comparative Review of Six Cases from North-West Europe
171(18)
Gill Ozerol
12.1 Introduction
171(1)
12.2 Methodology
172(2)
12.3 Assessment of the national and local actors of drought governance
174(1)
12.3.1 The case of Eifel-Rur, Germany
174(1)
12.3.2 The case of Somerset, the United Kingdom
175(1)
12.3.3 The case of Vilaine, France
177(1)
12.3.4 The case of Flanders, Belgium
178(1)
12.3.5 The case of Twente, the Netherlands
180(1)
12.3.6 The case of Salland, The Netherlands
181(1)
12.4 Conclusions and recommendations
182(1)
12.4.1 Conclusions: What do we learn from the experiences in north-west Europe?
182(1)
12.4.2 Recommendations: How to improve the involvement of local and national actors in drought governance?
183(3)
References
186(3)
III.2: Strategies, Instruments, and Resources Used to Face Droughts
189(30)
13 Awareness of Drought Impacts in Europe: The Cause or the Consequence of the Level of Goal Ambitions?
191(12)
Isabelle La Jeunesse
13.1 Introduction
191(1)
13.2 Drought governance analysis based on two methodological approaches
192(1)
13.2.1 The Governance Assessment Tool
192(1)
13.2.2 The study of water rivalries
194(1)
13.3 Case studies in NWE
194(2)
13.4 Case studies in the Mediterranean region
196(1)
13.5 Drought perceptions and goal ambitions in NWE
197(1)
13.6 Drought perceptions and goal ambitions in the Mediterranean region
198(1)
13.7 Conclusions
199(2)
Acknowledgements
201(1)
References
201(2)
14 Strategies and Instruments to Face Drought and Water Scarcity
203(16)
Hans Bressers
Nanny Bressers
Stefan Kuks
14.1 Introduction
203(2)
14.2 Reactive measures
205(3)
14.3 Preventive measures
208(2)
14.4 Adaptive measures
210(2)
14.5 Supportive measures
212(3)
14.6 Discussion and overview
215(2)
References
217(2)
III.3: Lessons from Cases of Droughts Governance
219(94)
15 Multilevel Governance for Drought Management in Flanders: Using a Centralized and Data Driven Approach
221(12)
Jenny Troltzsch
15.1 Introduction
221(1)
15.2 Water management in Flanders
222(2)
15.3 Past and future drought events
224(1)
15.4 Governance dimensions for Flemish drought management
225(1)
15.4.1 Administrative scales
225(1)
15.4.2 Inclusion of different actors and stakeholder groups
226(1)
15.4.3 Drought risk perceptions and goal ambitions
227(1)
15.4.4 Strategies and instruments for drought resilience
228(1)
15.4.5 Drought management responsibilities and available resources
229(1)
15.5 Summary and recommendations
229(2)
Notes
231(1)
References
231(2)
16 Drought Governance in the Eifel-Rur Region: The Interplay of Fixed Frameworks and Strong Working Relationships
233(12)
Rodrigo Vidaurre
16.1 Introduction
233(1)
16.2 The water resources system in the Eifel-Rur region
234(2)
16.3 Beyond the water board: The role of other governance levels in Eifel-Rur's water management
236(1)
16.3.1 Water management in North-Rhine Westphalia
236(1)
16.3.2 The role of municipalities and lower water authorities in water management
236(1)
16.4 The drought perspective on Eifel-Rur's water governance
237(1)
16.4.1 Extent
237(1)
16.4.2 Coherence
238(1)
16.4.3 Flexibility
239(1)
16.4.4 Intensity
240(1)
16.5 Conclusions: Factors for current and future success
241(2)
Notes
243(1)
References
244(1)
17 Adaptation of Water Management to Face Drought and Water Scarcity: Lessons Learned from Two Italian Case Studies
245(16)
Claudia Cirelli
Isabelle La Jeunesse
17.1 Introduction
245(1)
17.2 Water management in Italy and the autonomous regime
246(1)
17.2.1 Changes in water legislation and hydraulic management since 2006
246(1)
17.2.2 The specificities of the autonomous regime
247(1)
17.3 The Rio Mannu catchment
248(1)
17.3.1 Projections of the impacts of climate change
249(1)
17.4 The Noce catchment
249(1)
17.4.1 Projections of the impacts of climate change
251(1)
17.5 Comparative analysis and discussion
251(1)
17.5.1 Changes in water uses
251(1)
17.5.2 Saving water versus developing uses
252(1)
17.5.3 Adapting water management
253(1)
17.5.4 The divergence in the risk assessment by users and managers
254(1)
17.5.5 Low awareness of climate change
255(1)
17.6 Conclusions
256(1)
Acknowledgements
257(1)
Notes
258(1)
References
258(3)
18 Power Asymmetries, Migrant Agricultural Labour, and Adaptation Governance in Turkey: A Political Ecology of Double Exposures
261(22)
Ethemcan Turhan
Giorgos Kallis
Christos Zografos
18.1 Introduction
261(2)
18.2 Double Exposures and political ecology of vulnerability
263(2)
18.3 Case study and methods
265(3)
18.4 A political ecology of Double Exposure in Kapi village
268(1)
18.4.1 Outcome Double Exposure in watermelon production
268(1)
18.4.2 Contextual Double Exposure and agricultural insurance
270(1)
18.4.3 Feedback Double Exposures and cost-shifting successes
271(2)
18.5 Discussion
273(2)
18.6 Conclusion
275(1)
Acknowledgements
276(1)
Notes
276(1)
References
277(6)
19 Drought Governance in Catalonia: Lessons Learnt?
283(18)
Alba Ballester
Abel La Calle
19.1 Introduction
283(1)
19.2 Drought management in Spain
284(1)
19.2.1 Legal framework
285(1)
19.2.2 Administrative organization
286(1)
19.3 Drought management in Catalonia
287(2)
19.4 Drought crisis in Catalonia 2007-2008
289(1)
19.4.1 Chronological milestones
289(1)
19.4.2 Public debates, adoption of measures, and actors involved
290(1)
19.4.3 Reflections on governance
292(4)
19.5 Drought planning in Catalonia after the crisis
296(2)
19.6 Deliberative public participation in drought management: Need, obligation, and opportunity
298(1)
19.7 Conclusions
299(1)
Notes
299(1)
References
299(2)
20 What Could Change Drought Governance in Europe?: A Comparative Analysis between Two Case Studies in France and the UK
301(14)
Isabelle La Jeunesse
Hans Bressers
Alison Browne
20.1 Introduction
301(1)
20.2 Vilaine catchment and Arzal dam
302(1)
20.3 Somerset Levels and moors
303(1)
20.4 Methodology
303(1)
20.4.1 Governance Assessment Tool
303(1)
20.4.2 Contextual Interaction Theory
304(1)
20.4.3 Conducting the governance analysis
306(1)
20.5 Results and discussion
306(4)
20.6 Conclusions
310(1)
Acknowledgements
311(1)
References
311(2)
Part IV: Coastal And Wind Storms 313(170)
IV.1: Actors Involved in Coastal Risks Prevention and Management
315(24)
21 Sustainable Communities and Multilevel Governance in the Age of Coastal Storms
317(22)
Yves Henocque
21.1 Introduction: Addressing a social-ecological system
317(1)
21.2 Harmonizing coastal management, disaster risk reduction, and climate change adaptation goals through meaningful public participation
318(1)
21.2.1 Paradigm shifting
318(1)
21.2.2 International framework
319(3)
21.3 As a response, are national climate change strategies efficient enough?
322(5)
21.4 Key principles and responses for building sustainable, hazard-resilient communities
327(1)
21.4.1 Community's sense of ownership, at the core of planning and efficient implementation
328(1)
21.4.2 Governance trajectory
330(1)
21.4.3 Communities and partnerships
330(1)
21.4.4 Measuring recovery from disasters
332(3)
21.5 Conclusion: 'Hazard-resilient' communities vs. 'waves of adversity'
335(1)
Notes
336(1)
References
337(2)
IV.2: Strategies, Instruments, and Resources Used to Face Coastal Risks Prevention
339(52)
22 European Challenges to Coastal Management from Storm Surges: Problem-Structuring Framework and Actors Implicated in Responses
341(22)
Suzanne Boyes
Michael Elliott
22.1 Storm surge threats in European coasts
341(1)
22.1.1 European regions most impacted
341(1)
22.1.2 Management responses over the last century
343(3)
22.2 European governance
346(1)
22.2.1 An adapted problem-structuring framework to European coastal storms
346(1)
22.2.2 European legislative measures of response to climate change threats and coastal surges
348(1)
22.2.3 Actors involved in both pressures and responses
350(1)
22.2.4 Management measures
351(3)
22.3 Discussion and conclusions
354(1)
22.3.1 Challenges to coastal management from storm surges in Europe
354(1)
22.3.2 Management and governance aspects
355(1)
22.3.3 Economic and political aspects
356(1)
22.3.4 Societal aspects of flood protection
356(1)
22.4 Conclusions
357(1)
References
358(5)
23 Perceptions of Extreme Coastal Events: The Case of the French Atlantic and Mediterranean Coasts
363(28)
Lydie Goeldner-Gianella
Esmeralda Longepee
23.1 Contemporary society is increasingly unaware of risks related to the sea
365(1)
23.1.1 Residents and visiting populations relatively unaware of risks related to the sea
365(1)
23.1.2 Stakeholders from the political, professional, and associative spheres slightly more aware of coastal risks
371(1)
23.1.3 Past perceptions and representations were a closer match to the reality of marine risks
372(2)
23.2 Multiple factors behind the gradual dwindling of the 'culture of coastal risks'
374(1)
23.2.1 Practices and social representations of the sea increasingly detached from the notion of danger
374(1)
23.2.2 The gradual disempowerment of coastal societies
376(1)
23.2.3 The focus on coastal risks is proportional to the events experienced: The case of the French and North Sea coasts
377(1)
23.2.4 Inadequate information on coastal hazards and only recent scientific understanding of these phenomena
380(2)
23.3 What recommendations for public policy emerge from this research into the perceptions and representations of risks?
382(1)
23.3.1 Are preferences with regard to sea defence systems linked to the low risk culture?
382(1)
23.3.2 Sound knowledge of perceptions is vital in establishing relevant local policies
383(4)
23.4 Conclusion
387(1)
Acknowledgements
387(1)
Notes
387(1)
References
388(3)
IV.3: Lessons from Cases of Coastal Risks Governance
391(92)
24 After Xynthia on the Atlantic Coast of France: Preventive Adaptation Methods
393(20)
Denis Mercier
Axel Creach
Elie Chevillot-Miot
Sophie Pardo
24.1 Introduction
393(1)
24.2 A normal storm in terms of natural hazard but a major coastal flood due to the concomitance of the meteorological and marine agents
394(1)
24.2.1 Xynthia was a normal storm in terms of natural elements
394(1)
24.2.2 The site effect
394(2)
24.3 A tragic human and expensive material toll due to the addition of natural factors and management issues
396(1)
24.3.1 The problem of architecture
396(1)
24.3.2 The problem of dykes
396(1)
24.3.3 The age of the population
397(1)
24.3.4 The problem of urbanization and local policy
397(1)
24.4 Post-Xynthia policy: A new strategy for coastal management in France
397(3)
24.5 Life-saving maps: New geographical tools for a better coastal management
400(1)
24.5.1 Water depth assessment
400(1)
24.5.2 Link between water depth and architectural typology
401(1)
24.5.3 Assessment of potentially lethal houses for inhabitants: The VIE index
402(3)
24.6 Discussion about these different methods
405(2)
24.7 Conclusion
407(1)
Acknowledgements
408(1)
References
408(5)
25 Coastal Flooding and Storm Surges: How to Improve the Operational Response of the Risk Management Authorities: An Example of the CRISSIS Research Program on the French Coast of Languedoc
413(20)
Brice Anselme
Paul Durand
Alexandre Nicolae-Lerma
25.1 Introduction
413(4)
25.2 The coastal flood hazard and its likely evolution
417(1)
25.2.1 Materials and methods
418(1)
25.2.2 Results and discussion
420(1)
25.3 Vulnerability of the stakes
420(1)
25.3.1 Materials and methods
421(1)
25.3.2 Results and discussion
421(2)
25.4 Social representations and perceptions of the coastal flooding risk
423(1)
25.4.1 Materials and methods
423(1)
25.4.2 Results and discussion
424(1)
25.5 Crisis management
425(1)
25.5.1 Materials and methods
425(1)
25.5.2 Results and discussion
427(1)
25.6 Conclusion
428(2)
References
430(3)
26 Lessons Learnt from Coastal Risks Governance on Reunion Island, Indian Ocean, France
433(28)
Virginie K.E. Duvat
Alexandre K. Magnan
26.1 Introduction
433(2)
26.2 Context of the study
435(1)
26.2.1 Geographical setting
435(1)
26.2.2 Characteristics of TC Bejisa
438(1)
26.2.3 Material and methods
440(2)
26.3 Impacts of TC Bejisa and post-cyclone stakeholders' responses
442(1)
26.3.1 Impacts
442(1)
26.3.2 Responses by local authorities and coastal residents
449(3)
26.4 Key findings and challenges for adaptation to climate change
452(1)
26.4.1 Efficiency of the cyclone alert system
452(1)
26.4.2 Urgent need for practical engagement and action by local authorities
453(1)
26.4.3 Design diversified, context-specific risk reduction strategies
454(1)
26.4.4 Promote adaptation
455(1)
26.5 Conclusion
455(2)
Acknowledgements
457(1)
References
457(4)
27 Lessons from Cases of Coastal Risks Governance in the United Kingdom
461(24)
Brian Golding
Thomas Waite
Virginia Murray
27.1 Introduction: Windstorms and their impacts in the UK
461(1)
27.1.1 Windstorms
461(1)
27.1.2 Storm surges
462(1)
27.1.3 Tracks of windstorms
462(1)
27.1.4 Impacts of windstorms
462(1)
27.1.5 Secondary impacts of windstorms
463(1)
27.2 Events that have shaped governance of natural disasters in the UK
464(1)
27.2.1 Background to the governance of coastal windstorm protection: The 1953 flood
464(1)
27.2.2 Background to the governance of storm warnings: The 1987 storm
468(3)
27.3 New developments in the warning environment
471(1)
27.3.1 Changing exposure and vulnerability
471(1)
27.3.2 Changing forecasting capability
471(1)
27.3.3 Changing governance
471(1)
27.3.4 Introduction of impact-based warnings
471(1)
27.3.5 Changing roles and crisis planning
472(1)
27.3.6 Changes in flood forecasting and warning
473(1)
27.4 How the warning systems work now
473(1)
27.4.1 UK Coastal Monitoring and Forecasting (UKCMF)
473(1)
27.4.2 National Severe Weather Warning Service
474(1)
27.4.3 Civil contingency advisors
475(1)
27.4.4 Naming of windstorms
475(1)
27.4.5 Responsibility for health warnings
475(1)
27.4.6 Operation of warning systems in the stormy winter of 2013-2014
476(1)
27.5 Current and future issues
477(1)
27.5.1 Mental health impacts of storms
477(1)
27.5.2 Renewable power generation
477(1)
27.5.3 Making space for water
477(1)
27.5.4 Climate change
478(1)
27.5.5 Improving the skill of forecasts and the response to warnings
478(1)
References
479(4)
Part V: Conclusions, Perspectives 483(22)
28 Hydrometeorological Extreme Events' Effects on Populations: A Cognitive Insight on Post-Traumatic Growth, Resilience Processes and Mental Well-Being
485(14)
Mauro Galluccio
28.1 Introduction
485(2)
28.2 Resilient ecological systems for a psychological concept
487(1)
28.3 Psychosocial factors and post-traumatic growth
487(1)
28.4 Building resilience to mitigate social vulnerability
488(2)
28.5 Post-traumatic growth: Training for preventive psychological strategies
490(1)
28.6 Modern initiatives to coordinate a global governance
491(3)
28.7 The EU coordination to build up integrated resilient governance to decrease impacts on health and wellbeing due to hydrometeorological extreme events
494(1)
28.8 Elements of conclusion
495(1)
References
496(3)
29 Overview of Multilevel Governance Strategies for Hydrometeorological Extreme Events
499(6)
Corinne Larrue
Isabelle La Jeunesse
29.1 Governance specificities depending on hydrometeorological extreme events
500(2)
29.1.1 Floods
500(1)
29.1.2 Droughts
501(1)
29.1.3 Coastal storms
502(1)
29.2 Actor systems facing hydrometeorological extreme events
502(2)
29.3 Perception and strategies
504(1)
Note
504(1)
Index 505
Isabelle La Jeunesse, PhD HDR, is Lecturer in Environmental Geography at the University of Tours and the laboratory CNRS Citeres, Tours, France. Her research focuses on the impacts of human activities on geochemical cycles and on local adaptation to global changes.

Corinne Larrue, PR, is full Professor of Urban and Environmental Planning at the Université Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France, and was co-director of the Paris School of Planning, one of the most important institutes for urban planning in France. She was also Chairwoman of the scientific committee of Seine Normandie Waterboard.