this remarkable study combines extraordinary command and interpretation of the literature on 191945 across many countries with very promising approaches for inquiry. These include viewing Fascism as an alternative modernity fashioned by experiences and interactions with others, domestic and international, including liberal regimes, conservatives, and the Soviets. Roberts also understands Fascism as a new mode of collective action lacking any central core, but composed of a series of unstable, vulnerable, interlocking pieces. The author concludes with a powerful plea that historians take Fascism seriouslyEssential. Choice
With the current wave of right-wing politics spreading across the world, David D. Roberts has written a timely book Written with erudition, Fascist Interactions is the most up-to-date work in what is sometimes called fascist studies, a loose eld where historians, political scientists, and cultural critics have debated the origins, scope, and meaning of fascism [ The book] will be of interest to a wider audience of specialists and graduate students interested in the interwar Right. American Historical Review
In the course of the last four decades, the previously hopelessly contentious and dysfunctional (non-)discipline of fascist studies has been given enhanced cohesion, momentum and direction by the occasional game-changing book. Robertss Fascist Interactions may well prove to be one of them With a respectful and constructively critical tone he convincingly suggests what the next developmental phase might be which would allow us all to move on with a degree of productive synergy. European History Quarterly
The literature on fascism has become so elaborate and dense during the past couple of decades that we badly need surefooted critical guidance of the kind that Roberts provides. This consistently interesting volume is the culminating statement of a long and distinguished career. Geoff Eley, University of Michigan
This is a highly sophisticated synthesis of key debates and potential new directions in scholarship on fascism. It rests on a phenomenal grasp of the literature and represents a magisterial stock-taking that is essential reading for specialists. Christopher Dillon, Kings College London
