About the author |
|
xi | |
Foreword |
|
xiii | |
Preface |
|
xxv | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xxix | |
A short summary: lead is a long-lasting insidious poison |
|
xxxi | |
|
Part 1 Paralysis and the abject failure to address lead paint before 1985 |
|
|
|
Chapter 1 Banning lead paint: the missed opportunity |
|
|
3 | (32) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
1.2 Finger pointing--food versus gasoline versus paint versus bad landlords versus bad parents |
|
|
4 | (7) |
|
1.3 "It's right in front of you--it's the paint!" |
|
|
11 | (2) |
|
1.4 Inadequate measurement methods obscure the lead paint problem |
|
|
13 | (4) |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
1.6 The first international lead paint ban |
|
|
18 | (3) |
|
1.7 How the US government changed from promoting lead paint to banning it |
|
|
21 | (4) |
|
1.8 Lead-free versus lead-safe |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
1.9 Toxicity research and intervention solution research |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
|
28 | (7) |
|
Chapter 2 Early failures and the seeds of success |
|
|
35 | (26) |
|
2.1 Limitations of the Medical Model: The 1971 Lead Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
2.2 Treatment versus prevention |
|
|
36 | (5) |
|
2.3 Surveillance and population surveys |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
2.4 Reagan's "New Federalism": lead poisoning disappears from the policy agenda |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
2.5 Where was the housing profession? |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
2.5.1 Decent safe and sanitary housing |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
2.6 Early lead paint removal efforts backfire |
|
|
45 | (4) |
|
2.7 Housing codes fail to regulate lead paint |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
2.8 Housing law and public housing |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
2.9 Lawsuits and affordable housing |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
2.10 Seeds of success: new pathway studies reveal the importance of lead dust from paint |
|
|
53 | (2) |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
55 | (6) |
|
Part 2 Breaking the Barriers to Progress (1986-2001) |
|
|
|
Chapter 3 Solutions take shape: the lead paint Title X law |
|
|
61 | (52) |
|
3.1 Science, policy, and practice meet--an unlikely venue |
|
|
62 | (5) |
|
3.2 Bombshell report to Congress: "corrective actions have been a clear failure" |
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
3.3 Congress tries again: the 1987 Housing Act and the 1988 Stewart McKinney Amendments |
|
|
69 | (2) |
|
3.4 Leaders in public housing take action: the birth of lead paint risk assessments |
|
|
71 | (4) |
|
3.5 A scandal prompts Congress to create the HUD lead paint office |
|
|
75 | (4) |
|
3.6 Moving remediation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to the Department of Housing and Urban Development: The 1990 Public Housing Guidelines |
|
|
79 | (5) |
|
3.7 Sticker shock: The Department of Housing and Urban Development's comprehensive and workable plan |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
3.8 A new Alliance to End Childhood Lead Poisoning marshals political will |
|
|
85 | (3) |
|
3.9 The nation's health secretary declares lead poisoning the number one childhood environmental disease over White House objections |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
3.10 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issues public health strategic plan and new medical guidance |
|
|
88 | (3) |
|
3.11 Congress acts: Title X of the 1992 Housing and Community Development Act |
|
|
91 | (11) |
|
3.11.1 Moving from reaction to prevention |
|
|
94 | (2) |
|
3.11.2 Creating the workforce |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
3.11.3 Seven principal purposes |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
3.11.4 Using science to define "lead paint hazard" |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
3.11.5 Show me the money: new Congressional appropriations for private housing |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
3.11.6 Reforming housing regulations |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
3.11.8 Renovation, repair, and painting |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
3.12 Bringing science to bear: a new National Center for Lead-Safe Housing brings health and housing together |
|
|
102 | (3) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
105 | (8) |
|
Chapter 4 Growing pains--new regulations, enforcement, capacity, and proof emerge |
|
|
113 | (74) |
|
4.1 The 1995 rescission and bringing science to the Department of Housing and Urban Development |
|
|
114 | (8) |
|
4.2 The 1995 Department of Housing and Urban Development lead paint guidelines |
|
|
122 | (4) |
|
4.3 The Title X task force fills in the gaps |
|
|
126 | (3) |
|
4.4 The fight over lead dust standards |
|
|
129 | (11) |
|
|
135 | (5) |
|
4.5 Do the new remediation methods work? |
|
|
140 | (7) |
|
4.6 The struggle to reform all federal housing lead paint regulations |
|
|
147 | (15) |
|
|
159 | (3) |
|
4.7 Improved lead paint testing--how government stimulated private innovation |
|
|
162 | (3) |
|
4.8 National lead laboratory accreditation program |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
4.9 First enforcement actions |
|
|
166 | (8) |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
|
175 | (12) |
|
Chapter 5 The Nation Acts: community organizing, a 10-year solution from the President's Cabinet, and political sabotage |
|
|
187 | (56) |
|
5.1 Parents and communities |
|
|
188 | (6) |
|
5.2 The Campaign for a Lead-Safe America |
|
|
194 | (6) |
|
5.3 The Community Environmental Health Resource Center |
|
|
200 | (3) |
|
5.4 Community groups and the press |
|
|
203 | (3) |
|
5.4.1 Advocates and scientists |
|
|
204 | (2) |
|
5.5 The President's Cabinet approves a 10-year strategy, 2000-10 |
|
|
206 | (13) |
|
5.5.1 Lead paint industry interference |
|
|
215 | (3) |
|
5.5.2 Why the 2010 goal was not achieved |
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
|
219 | (12) |
|
5.6.1 Attack and counterattack at HUD, 2004 |
|
|
219 | (8) |
|
5.6.2 Attempted elimination of the CDC lead program, 2012 |
|
|
227 | (4) |
|
|
231 | (12) |
|
Chapter 6 Research ethics and the Grimes court case |
|
|
243 | (48) |
|
6.1 The context: lead poisoning and the courts |
|
|
243 | (5) |
|
6.1.1 The Kennedy Krieger Institute and health research |
|
|
245 | (2) |
|
6.1.2 City Homes and affordable housing |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
6.2 Legal and scientific evidence |
|
|
248 | (4) |
|
6.3 Research ethics and protection of research study participants |
|
|
252 | (2) |
|
6.4 The Baltimore lead paint abatement and repair and maintenance study |
|
|
254 | (6) |
|
|
260 | (10) |
|
6.5.1 Therapeutic and nontherapeutic research |
|
|
261 | (2) |
|
6.5.2 Protecting children or putting them in harm's way? |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
6.5.4 Parents versus the court of appeals |
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
6.5.5 Institutional review boards |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
|
266 | (1) |
|
6.5.8 The facts in the case |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
6.5.9 Confusion on lead dust testing methods |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
|
268 | (1) |
|
6.5.11 The Appeals Court comparison to Nazi and Tuskegee research |
|
|
269 | (1) |
|
6.6 Ethics in housing intervention research |
|
|
270 | (6) |
|
6.7 The best of intentions or the best of community-based science? |
|
|
276 | (4) |
|
6.8 Environmental justice and community participation in research |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
6.9 The legacy of the Maryland Court of Appeals Grimes decision |
|
|
281 | (2) |
|
|
283 | (8) |
|
Part 3 The new consensus (2001--22) |
|
|
|
Chapter 7 If "you make a mess, you have to clean it up"- the Rhode Island and California court decisions |
|
|
291 | (22) |
|
7.1 Local jurisdiction lawsuits against the lead paint industry |
|
|
291 | (4) |
|
7.2 The Rhode Island court decision, 1999-2008 |
|
|
295 | (4) |
|
7.2.1 Public nuisance law |
|
|
297 | (2) |
|
7.3 The California court decision, 2000-2022 |
|
|
299 | (7) |
|
7.4 The industry fights back |
|
|
306 | (2) |
|
|
308 | (1) |
|
|
309 | (4) |
|
Chapter 8 The US and international healthy homes movement |
|
|
313 | (38) |
|
8.1 The detective scientists who solved the Cleveland mold mystery |
|
|
313 | (6) |
|
8.2 The Department of Housing and Urban Development healthy homes report to Congress |
|
|
319 | (6) |
|
8.3 The Surgeon General's Call to Action |
|
|
325 | (1) |
|
8.4 Assembling the evidence |
|
|
326 | (4) |
|
8.4.1 Does it work? A systematic review of housing interventions and health |
|
|
329 | (1) |
|
8.5 The formation of the National Safe and Healthy Housing Coalition |
|
|
330 | (1) |
|
8.6 The World Health Organization Healthy Homes Movement |
|
|
331 | (8) |
|
8.7 "A Kid Who Grew Up in Public Housing" |
|
|
339 | (2) |
|
Appendix: Vilnius Declaration |
|
|
341 | (4) |
|
|
345 | (6) |
|
Chapter 9 Reframing health, environment, and housing |
|
|
351 | (22) |
|
9.1 Health: reframing communicable and noncommunicable disease |
|
|
351 | (3) |
|
9.2 Environment: reframing the shared commons |
|
|
354 | (5) |
|
9.3 Housing: reframing wealth, affordability, and equity |
|
|
359 | (7) |
|
9.4 Toward a healthy housing consensus |
|
|
366 | (2) |
|
|
368 | (5) |
|
Chapter 10 Conclusion: the triumph of science and citizen action over policy paralysis |
|
|
373 | (24) |
|
|
373 | (4) |
|
10.2 Two steps forward, one step back |
|
|
377 | (2) |
|
10.3 The Find It, Fix It, Fund It campaign |
|
|
379 | (4) |
|
10.4 Getting the housing market to work |
|
|
383 | (1) |
|
10.5 Getting government to work |
|
|
384 | (1) |
|
10.6 Getting the procedures right and recruiting the necessary expertise |
|
|
385 | (1) |
|
|
386 | (2) |
|
10.7.1 A new forecast to eliminate lead paint poisoning by 2027 |
|
|
388 | (1) |
|
10.8 The influence of industry |
|
|
388 | (1) |
|
10.9 Nine lessons from lead paint poisoning prevention |
|
|
389 | (2) |
|
10.10 Ending a policy paralysis paradox |
|
|
391 | (1) |
|
|
392 | (5) |
Appendix 1 US government agencies involved in lead paint |
|
397 | (2) |
Appendix 2 Honor role-leaders in lead paint poisoning prevention and healthy housing |
|
399 | (18) |
Glossary |
|
417 | (4) |
Index |
|
421 | |