Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

File: Case Study in Correction (19771979) 1981 ed. [Mīkstie vāki]

Edited by
  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 712 pages, height x width: 279x210 mm, weight: 1970 g, XI, 712 p., 1 Paperback / softback
  • Izdošanas datums: 21-Aug-1981
  • Izdevniecība: Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
  • ISBN-10: 038790607X
  • ISBN-13: 9780387906072
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Mīkstie vāki
  • Cena: 63,38 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 712 pages, height x width: 279x210 mm, weight: 1970 g, XI, 712 p., 1 Paperback / softback
  • Izdošanas datums: 21-Aug-1981
  • Izdevniecība: Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
  • ISBN-10: 038790607X
  • ISBN-13: 9780387906072
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
The File is a collection of documents from a major dispute involving a number of American college professors, mainly mathematicians, statisticians,and sociologists. The controversy was ignited by the mathematician Serge Lang's reaction to a questionnaire, "The 1977 Survey of the American Professoriate", distributed by E. C. Ladd of the University of Connecticut and S. M. Lipset of Stanford. The ensuing discussion - in part acrimonious and personal - soon involved a large group of active and passive participants, and included issues such as survey techniques, evaluation of academic work, public and political honesty, and McCarthyism at Harvard.

Papildus informācija

Springer Book Archives
Introductory Letter to the Reader.- Why bother? (Your point of view).
Why bother? (My point of view). Editorial responsibility.- The letters.
Introductory and other comments. Objectivity.- The Story: Summary.- A Reply
to Lang.- The LaddLipset SurveysA Brief Review. The Methodology of the 1977
Survey. Survey Research on Public Opinion and Social Values. Sampling.
Nonresponse. Question Design and Questionnaire Development. Envoi..- The
File.- The 1977 Survey of the American Professoriate.- VERITAS AT HARVARD,
by Sigmund Diamond from the New York Review of Books, 28 April 1977.- The
First Year.- One: The Opening Exchange.- Two: From Koblitzs Letter to Langs
Fifteen Pages of Comments.- Three: From Langs Comments to the Science
Article.- Four: From Science to New York Review of Books.- Five: The
Garfinkel Letter (McCarthyism?).- Six: The New York Review of Books
Article.- The Second Year.- Seven: Trying to Settle Loose Ends.- Eight: The
Chronicle Causes a Rebound.- Nine: From Mac Lanes Letter to the Editors
(Notices, AMS) to Langs Letter to the Editor (Bulletin, AAUP).- Ten: The
Stakes Are Raised.- Eleven: The Ratings Get Publicity.- Twelve: The
AAUPChronicle Relation.- Thirteen: End of the Second Year.- Into a Third
Year.- Fourteen: McCarthyism? (Again).- Fifteen: Intemperate and
Libelous?.- Sixteen: LaddLipset, Survey Research, Sociology. Can We
Generalize? How?.- Seventeen: The Story Goes On.- Eighteen: Closing the
File.- Appendices.- Appendix II. Documents on the CarnegieACE 1969 Survey.-
Lang Letter to Clark Kerr on the 1969 Survey.- Appendix III. Representative
Sampling, I: Non-scientific Literature, by William Kruskal and Frederic
Mosteller.- Appendix IV. Veritas at Harvard.- Some Themes and Issues.-
S.Lang.- Correction. The 1977 Survey of the American Professoriate:
quality; use of the questionnaire; academic effect; administrative effect and
public effect. Survey research. Sociology. Social Sciences. VERITAS AT
HARVARD. Scholarship: academic only? active? political? Journalistic power;
the cc list; letters to the editor. Financial power. Subservience to
authority and power: intellectual authority; statutory authority and power.
The competence of the surveyors. The personal aspect of the file. The
methodology of the file. Collegiality. Responsibility: institutional;
journalistic; scientific; personal. Conclusion.- Publication of the File.-
Comments and Letters.- Selective Memory and Scholarly Controversy,.-
Seymour Martin Lipset.