Preface |
|
xix | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xxi | |
Author |
|
xxiii | |
|
|
1 | (6) |
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
1.2 Main fire safety design issues for tall buildings |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
1.3 Structure of the book |
|
|
3 | (4) |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
2 Regulatory requirements and basic fire safety design principles |
|
|
7 | (36) |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
2.2 Fire incidents and fire tests of tall buildings worldwide |
|
|
7 | (19) |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
2.2.1.1 The new cladding system |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
2.2.1.2 Compartment and evacuation route for Grenfell Tower |
|
|
9 | (5) |
|
2.2.1.3 Collapse potential for Grenfell Tower |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
2.2.1.4 Major findings from Interim Report of British Research Establishment (2017) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
15 | (3) |
|
2.2.3 World Trade Center 7 |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
2.2.4 Other fire incidents of tall buildings |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
2.2.4.1 First Interstate Bank building in Los Angles |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
2.2.4.2 Fiasco shopping center, Iran |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
2.2.4.3 Faculty of Architecture Building, Delft University |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
2.2.4.4 Windsor Tower, Spain |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
2.2.5 Cardington fire test |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
2.2.5.1 Introduction of the test |
|
|
20 | (3) |
|
2.2.5.2 Failure modes for buildings in fire |
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
2.3 Current design guidance and regulations to fire safety in high-rise buildings |
|
|
26 | (10) |
|
2.3.1 British design guidance and regulations |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
2.3.1.1 Building Regulations 2010---Approved Document B |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
2.3.1.2 The FSO and Housing Act 2004 |
|
|
28 | (2) |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
2.3.1.7 Design guidelines from IStructE and Steel Construction Institute |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
2.3.3 Guidelines from International Organization for Standardization |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
2.3.3.1 ISO 24679-1:2019(en) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
2.3.3.2 ISO 16730-1 and ISO 16733-1 |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
2.3.4.1 National Fire Protection Association |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
2.3.4.2 International Code Council---International Fire Code® (IFC®) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
2.3.4.3 American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
2.3.4.4 American Society of Civil Engineers |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
2.3.4.5 Federal Standards and Guidelines |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
2.3.5 Chinese design guidance |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
2.3.6 New Zealand code NZS 3404 Part 1: 1997 |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
2.3.7 Australian code AS 4100:1998 |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
2.4 Basic principles for fire safety of tall buildings |
|
|
36 | (7) |
|
2.4.1 Main design objective |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
2.4.3 Structural fire design |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
2.4.3.1 Key design tasks in structural fire design |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
2.4.3.3 Pros and cons of the two design methods |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
2.4.4 Robustness of the structure in fire |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
2.4.5.1 Modeling the atmosphere temperature induced by fire |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
2.4.5.2 Modeling the thermal response of load-bearing building elements |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (3) |
|
3 Fundamentals of fire and fire safety design |
|
|
43 | (34) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
3.2 Fire development process |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
3.3 Design fire temperature |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
3.1.1 Standard fire temperature-time curve |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
3.1.2 The parametric temperature-time curves |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
3.4 Design fire in a compartment |
|
|
46 | (7) |
|
3.4.1 Characterization of compartment |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
3.4.1.1 Characterization of fire enclosure |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
3.4.1.2 Characterization of openings |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
3.4.1.3 Duration of fire to be adopted in design |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
3.4.2 Fuel-controlled and ventilation-controlled fire |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
3.4.3 Long-cool and short-hot fire |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
3.4.4 Fully developed fire |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
3.4.5.1 Calculation of thermal action of a localized fire from Eurocode |
|
|
51 | (2) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
3.4.7 Fire scenarios for tall buildings |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (2) |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
3.6.1 Fire load calculation from Eurocode 1 |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
3.6.2 Fire load density from Eurocode 1 |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
3.8 Routes of fire spread |
|
|
56 | (3) |
|
3.8.1 Horizontal spread of fire |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
3.8.2 Vertical spread of fire |
|
|
57 | (2) |
|
3.8.2.1 Fire spread through ducts, shafts, and penetrations (internal) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
3.8.2.2 Fire spread through facade |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
3.9 Structural fire design |
|
|
59 | (10) |
|
3.9.1 Determine the compartment temperature (design fire) |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
3.9.2 Determine the thermal response of structural members |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
3.9.3.1 Thermodynamics of heat transfer |
|
|
61 | (2) |
|
3.9.3.2 Eurocode formula to determine member temperature |
|
|
63 | (2) |
|
3.9.4 Material degradation at elevated temperatures |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
3.9.4.1 Degradation of steel material in fire |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
3.9.4.2 Degradation of concrete material in fire |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
3.9.5 Design values of material properties under fire |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
3.9.6 Design of structural members in fire |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
3.9.6.1 Mechanical design approaches of structural members in fire |
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
3.9.6.2 The acceptance criteria in designing structural members for tall buildings |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
|
69 | (3) |
|
3.10.1 Methods to determine fire resistance |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
3.10.2 Fire resistance rating |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
3.10.3 Fire resistance test for load-bearing structural members |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
3.10.4 Fire resistance requirements for elements of a tall building |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
3.11 Fire protection method |
|
|
72 | (5) |
|
3.11.1 Active control system |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
3.11.2 Passive control system |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
3.11.2.1 Intumescent paints |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
3.11.2.2 Spray fire protection |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
3.11.2.3 Board fire protection |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
3.11.3 Fire resistance test for protected members |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
|
74 | (3) |
|
4 Structural fire design principles for tall buildings |
|
|
77 | (36) |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
4.2 Key tasks for structural fire design |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
4.2.1 Building elements to be considered in design for fire |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
4.2.2 Design of structural members in fire |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
4.3 Fire resistance rating for load-bearing structural members |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
4.4 Design of concrete members in fire |
|
|
79 | (9) |
|
4.4.1 Thermal response of concrete in fire |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
4.4.2.1 Types of spalling |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
4.4.2.2 Prevention of spalling |
|
|
83 | (3) |
|
4.4.3 Simplified calculation methods for concrete members from EC2 EN 1992-1-2:2004/A1:2019 (E), 500°C isotherm method |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
4.4.4 Concrete cover and protective layers |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
4.5 Design of steel members in fire |
|
|
88 | (5) |
|
4.5.1 Thermal response of steel in fire |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
4.5.2 The critical temperature method (BS5950, 2003 and EN 1993-1-2 2005) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
4.5.2.2 Load ratio (degree of utilization) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
4.5.2.3 Critical temperature method for constrained members |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
4.5.2.4 Critical temperature method for the compression and unconstrained members |
|
|
90 | (2) |
|
4.5.2.5 Column buckling resistance in fire |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
4.5.3 Lateral torsional buckling of steel beams |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
4.5.4 Beams in line with compartment walls |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
4.6 Moment capacity approach (section method) |
|
|
93 | (5) |
|
4.6.1 Method of calculation |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
4.6.1.1 Temperature profile |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
4.6.1.2 Reduced strength of each element |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
4.6.1.3 Reduced flexural strength calculation |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
4.6.2 Case study for flexural capacity of reinforced concrete beams using moment capacity approach |
|
|
95 | (2) |
|
4.6.3 Flexural capacity of steel beams using moment capacity approach |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
4.7 Design of composite beams under fire |
|
|
98 | (3) |
|
4.7.1 Resistance of shear connection in fire |
|
|
98 | (2) |
|
4.7.2 Effect of degree of shear connection |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
4.7.4 Case study of composite beam design in fire |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
4.8 Design of composite slabs in fire |
|
|
101 | (6) |
|
4.8.1 Membrane actions in fire |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
4.8.2 Strength design composite slabs |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
4.8.2.1 Calculation method based on plastic theory |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
4.8.2.2 Calculation method considering membrane action |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
4.8.3 Insulation criterion of composite slabs |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
4.8.4 Deformation design of composite slabs in fire |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
4.9 Design of post-tension slabs in fire |
|
|
107 | (2) |
|
4.10 Design of connections under fire |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
4.11 Design of beam openings |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
4.12 Summary of structural fire design methods |
|
|
110 | (3) |
|
4.12.1 Comparison of moment capacity method and critical temperature method |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
4.12.2 Comparison of three major methods |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
5 Typical fire safety design strategy for tall buildings |
|
|
113 | (36) |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
5.2 Fire safety design objectives and strategies for tall buildings |
|
|
113 | (2) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
5.3 Design strategy for tall buildings in fire |
|
|
115 | (2) |
|
5.3.1 Prescriptive design |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
5.3.2 Performance-based design |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
5.3.2.1 Step 1: set fire safety goals and objectives |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
5.3.2.1 Step 2: determine performance criteria |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
5.3.2.2 Step 3: analysis of fire scenarios |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
5.3.2.3 Step 4: protection strategy |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
5.3.2.4 Step 5: determine whether the fire safety goals are met |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
5.4 Fire risk analysis for tall buildings |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
5.4.1 Qualitative fire risk assessment |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
5.4.2 Quantitative fire risk assessment |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
5.5 Deterministic and probabilistic assessments to determine the worst-case fire scenario |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
5.5.1 Deterministic approach |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
5.5.2 Probabilistic approach |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
|
119 | (6) |
|
5.6.1 Key components in a compartment |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
5.6.1.1 Fire doors design |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
5.6.1.2 Compartment wall design |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
5.6.1.3 Compartment floor design |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
5.6.5 Integrity of compartmentation in buildings |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
5.6.5.1 Measures to accommodate movements of compartment walls due to fire |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
5.6.5.2 Control movement of slab |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
5.7 Evacuation route design |
|
|
125 | (7) |
|
5.7.1 Number of escapes routes and exits |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
|
126 | (2) |
|
5.7.5 Staircases and elevators |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
5.7.5.1 Protected staircases and elevators |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
|
128 | (2) |
|
5.7.5.3 External escape stairs |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
5.7.6 Phased/progressive evacuation |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
5.7.8 Clear sign for evacuation |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
5.7.9 Computational models for evacuation simulation |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
5.8 Emergency vehicle and firefighter access |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
5.8.1 Equipment for firefighting |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
5.8.2 Firefighting lift, lobby, shaft, and stair |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
5.9 Resisting fire spread through building envelope |
|
|
132 | (2) |
|
5.9.1 Resisting fire spread over external walls |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
5.9.2 Fire-resisting design for glazing |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
5.10 Fire detection, alarm, and communication system |
|
|
134 | (2) |
|
5.10.1 Central fire alarm system |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
5.11 Fire and smoke suppression system |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
5.12 Comparison for fire protection system for tall buildings across the world |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
5.13 Case study of fire safety deign for Burj Khalifa |
|
|
137 | (6) |
|
5.13.1 Evacuation and refuge |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
5.13.3 Staircase and elevator |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
5.13.4 Alarm and warning system |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
5.13.6 Special water supply and pumping system |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
5.14 Case study: structural fire design of the Shard |
|
|
143 | (3) |
|
5.14.1 Introduction of the project |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
5.14.3 Determine the worst-case fire scenarios |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
5.14.4 Design for fire resistance |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
5.15 Structural framing and structural system |
|
|
146 | (3) |
|
|
147 | (2) |
|
6 Fire analysis and modeling |
|
|
149 | (34) |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
6.2 Determining compartment fire |
|
|
149 | (6) |
|
6.2.1 Simplified models from Eurocode |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
6.2.1.1 Compartment fires |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
|
150 | (4) |
|
6.2.2.2 Limitations of zone modeling |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
6.2.2.3 Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) fire modeling |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
6.3 Determining member temperature |
|
|
155 | (2) |
|
6.3.1 Simplified temperature increase models from Eurocode |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
6.3.2 Heat transfer using finite element method |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
6.3.2.1 Theoretical principles |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
6.3.2.2 Analysis software and modeling example |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
6.4 Determining structural response of structural members in fire |
|
|
157 | (10) |
|
6.4.1 Multi-physics fire analysis (thermal mechanical coupled analysis) |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
|
158 | (2) |
|
6.4.2 Sequentially coupled thermal-stress analysis |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
6.4.2.1 Sequentially coupled thermal-stress analysis using Abaqus® |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
6.4.2.2 Sequentially coupled thermal-stress analysis using ANSYS |
|
|
161 | (3) |
|
6.4.2.3 Partial thermal-mechanical analyses in OpenSees |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
6.4.2.4 Codified thermal-mechanical coupled analysis |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
6.5 Probabilistic method for fire safety design |
|
|
167 | (10) |
|
6.5.1 Reliability-based structural fire design and analysis |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
6.5.1.1 The basic reliability design principles |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
6.5.1.2 Reliability-based design and analysis procedure |
|
|
169 | (2) |
|
6.5.1.3 Case study for reliability analysis for individual members |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
6.5.1.4 Case study for reliability analysis for a whole building |
|
|
172 | (2) |
|
6.5.2 Fire fragility functions |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
6.5.2.3 Compartment-level fragility function |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
6.5.2.4 Building-level fragility function |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
6.5.3 Other probabilistic approaches in fire safety design |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
6.6 Major fire analysis software |
|
|
177 | (6) |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
|
178 | (2) |
|
|
180 | (3) |
|
7 Preventing fire-induced collapse of tall buildings |
|
|
183 | (22) |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
7.2 Design objective and functional requirement for structural stability in fire |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
7.3 Importance of collapse prevention of tall buildings in fire |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
7.4 Collapse mechanism of tall buildings in fire |
|
|
184 | (11) |
|
7.4.1 Factors affecting thermal response and failure mechanism of individual members |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
7.4.2 Behavior and failure mechanism of steel beams in fire |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
7.4.2.1 Local buckling of beams in connection area |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
7.4.2.2 Excessive deflection |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
7.4.3 Behavior and failure mechanism of slabs in fire |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
7.4.3.1 Membrane actions of slabs |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
7.4.3.2 Effect of different fire scenarios in composite slabs |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
7.4.3.3 Other research in composite slabs in fire |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
7.4.4 Behavior and failure mechanism of steel column in fire |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
7.4.4.1 Change of column force in fire |
|
|
191 | (2) |
|
7.4.4.2 Out plane bending of columns |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
7.4.4.3 Effect of the slenderness ratios |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
7.4.5 Behavior of connections |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
7.4.6 Behavior and failure mechanism of concrete column in fire |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
7.5 Whole-building behavior of tall buildings in fire |
|
|
195 | (7) |
|
7.5.1 Research of Fu (2016b) |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
7.5.2 Twin Tower collapse (WTC1 and WTC2) |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
7.5.2.1 Structural framing for WTC1 |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
7.5.2.2 Reason for the collapse of WTC1 |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
7.5.3.1 Structural framing for WTC7 |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
7.5.3.2 Reason for the collapse of WTC7 |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
7.5.4.1 Severity of the fire |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
7.5.4.2 Structural framing |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
7.5.5 Other research in whole building behavior |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
7.6 Overall building stability system design for fire |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
7.7 Methods for mitigating collapse of buildings in fire |
|
|
202 | (3) |
|
|
203 | (2) |
|
8 New technologies and machine learning in fire safety design |
|
|
205 | (10) |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
8.2 New technologies in fire safety |
|
|
205 | (2) |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
8.2.2.1 Fire safety sensors and BMS |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
8.3 Machine learning in fire safety design |
|
|
207 | (8) |
|
8.3.1 Machine learning and its application in the construction industry |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
8.3.2 Problems experienced in the conventional structural fire analysis approach |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
8.3.3 Predicting failure patterns of simple steel-framed buildings in fire |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
8.3.3.1 Define failure pattern |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
8.3.3.2 Dataset generation using the Monte Carlo simulation and random sampling |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
8.3.3.3 Training and testing |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
8.3.3.4 Failure pattern prediction |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
8.3.3.5 Fire safety design and progressive collapse potential check based on prediction results |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
8.3.4 Predicting and preventing fires with machine learning |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
8.3.5 Machine learning of fire hazard model simulations for use in probabilistic safety assessments at nuclear power plants |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
8.3.6 Learning algorithms and programming language |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
8.3.6.1 Learning algorithms |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
8.3.6.2 Programming language |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
|
212 | (3) |
|
9 Post-fire damage assessment |
|
|
215 | (8) |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
9.2 Post-fire damage assessment |
|
|
215 | (8) |
|
9.2.1 Post-fire damage assessment of concrete structure |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
9.2.1.1 Visual inspection |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
9.2.1.2 Schmidt rebound hammer |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
9.2.1.3 Petrographic analysis |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
9.2.1.4 Spectrophotometer investigations |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
9.2.1.5 Reinforcement sampling |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
9.2.2 Post-fire damage assessment of structural steel members |
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
9.2.2.1 Methods for post-fire damage assessment |
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
9.2.2.2 Nondestructive post-fire damage assessment of structural steel members using the Leeb harness method |
|
|
218 | (3) |
|
|
221 | (2) |
Index |
|
223 | |