This book addresses the possibilities of analyzing the modern international through the thought of Michel Foucault. The broad range of authors brought together in this volume question four of the most self-evident characteristics of our contemporary world-'international', 'neoliberal', 'biopolitical' and 'global'- and thus fill significant gaps in both international and Foucault studies. The chapters discuss what a Foucauldian perspective does or does not offer for understanding international phenomena while also questioning many appropriations of Foucault's work. This transdisciplinary volume will serve as a reference for both scholars and students of international relations, international political sociology, international political economy, political theory/philosophy and critical theory more generally.
Recenzijas
Foucault and the Modern International is an intellectually dense and highly analytical text that contributes to the debate on the place of Foucault in the evolution of IR, both as a discipline and a reality to be studied. Its contribution is an important one . (Julien Pomarede, European Review of International Studies ERIS, Vol. 5 (1), 2018)
Papildus informācija
"This volume is a sophisticated endeavour by leading scholars to gauge the importance of Michel Foucault for the study of international relations. It offers an exciting pluralization of both Foucault and IR studies." (Jens Bartelson, Professor of Political Science, Lund University, Sweden) "With remarkable nuance and sophistication, this volume addresses the many interpretations of Foucault and his impact on the study of international relations. A needed contribution diversifying both how Foucault and the international realm should be understood and studied!" (Nisha Shah, Assistant Professor, School of Political Studies, University of Ottawa, Canada) "There will never be the last word on Foucault but by virtue of authorial aptitude, pluralist attitudes and intellectual audacity, Foucault and the Modern International might well be the most comprehensive and subversive account yet. Trans-Atlantic and trans-disciplinary, this collection of essays rejects the domesticated Foucault to relight the fuse of a philosopher who was, above all else, a peerless artificier of the 'international'. The results are nothing short of explosive." (James Der Derian, Michael Hintze Chair of International Security, University of Sydney, Australia)
|
1 Introduction: The International as an Object for Thought |
|
|
1 | (12) |
|
|
|
Part I De-disciplining Knowledge About the International |
|
|
13 | (64) |
|
2 The Figure of Foucault and the Field of International Relations |
|
|
15 | (18) |
|
|
|
3 Michel Foucault and International Relations: Cannibal Relations |
|
|
33 | (24) |
|
|
|
4 The Microphysics of Power Redux |
|
|
57 | (20) |
|
|
|
Part II Between Philosophy and Method |
|
|
77 | (58) |
|
5 Political Spirituality: Parrhesia, Truth and Factical Finitude |
|
|
79 | (18) |
|
|
|
6 Power as Sumbolon: Sovereignty, Governmentality and the International |
|
|
97 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
115 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
|
135 | (54) |
|
8 Silencing Colonialism: Foucault and the International |
|
|
137 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
9 Violence and the Modern International: An Archaeology of Terrorism |
|
|
155 | (20) |
|
|
|
10 Foucault and the Historical Sociology of Globalization |
|
|
175 | (14) |
|
|
|
|
|
189 | (48) |
|
11 On Liberalism: Limits, the Market and the Subject |
|
|
191 | (12) |
|
|
|
12 On Bureaucratic Formalization: The Reality-Like Fiction of Neoliberal Abstractions |
|
|
203 | (16) |
|
|
|
13 Too-Late Liberalism: From Promised Prosperity to Permanent Austerity |
|
|
219 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237 | (38) |
|
14 Biopolitics in the Twenty-First Century: The Malthus-Marx Debate and the Human Capital Issue |
|
|
239 | (22) |
|
|
|
15 Mesopolitics: Foucault, Environmental Governmentality and the History of the Anthropocene |
|
|
261 | (14) |
|
|
|
|
|
275 | (66) |
|
16 The Word and the Things: An Archaeology of an Amnesic Notion |
|
|
277 | (18) |
|
|
|
17 Foucault and Geometries |
|
|
295 | (18) |
|
|
|
18 Conclusion: Which Foucault? Which International? |
|
|
313 | (28) |
|
|
| Bibliography |
|
341 | (26) |
| Index |
|
367 | |
Philippe Bonditti holds a doctorate in Political Science from Sciences Po Paris, France, and is currently Lecturer at the European School of Political and Social Science (ESPOL-UCL), France. Previously, he was Assistant Professor at the Institute of International Relations of the Pontificial Universidade Catholica in Rio de Janeiro (IRI/PUC-Rio), Brazil, and Postdoctoral Fellow at the Watson Institute, Brown University, US. His research interests focus on contemporary discourses on violence, war, and security, the transformations of the modern state and the art of government, (critical) International Relations theory, (critical) security studies, contemporary French philosophy, and political theory.
Didier Bigo is Associate Professor (tenure) at Sciences-Po, France and Professor of International Relations at Kings College London, UK. Bigo is Editor-in-Chief of the French quarterly journal Cultures & Conflits and launched, with R. B. J. Walker, the journal International Political Sociology. His research interests include security and liberty, biometrics identifiers and databases, antiterrorist policies in Europe after 9/11, the merging of internal security and external security, migrants and refugees in Europe, critical security studies, and international political sociology.
Frédéric Gros is Professor of Philosophy at Sciences Po Paris, France. His research focuses on contemporary French philosophyin particular the thought of Michel Foucault, whose writings, such as Subjectivity and Truth, he has editedthe foundations of the right to punish, issues of war and security, and the ethics of the political subject.
