Acknowledgements |
|
vii | |
Abbreviations |
|
xiii | |
|
|
xv | |
|
|
xxi | |
Introduction |
|
1 | (18) |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
II The European Patent System |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
|
7 | (5) |
|
IV Perspectives on Fragmentation |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (6) |
|
PART I FRAGMENTATION AND THE EUROPEAN PATENT SYSTEM TODAY |
|
|
|
1 Existing Routes to Patent Protection in Europe |
|
|
19 | (17) |
|
I National Patent Systems |
|
|
19 | (8) |
|
II The European (EPC) Patent System " |
|
|
27 | (4) |
|
III The International Patent Application |
|
|
31 | (3) |
|
IV Existing Fragmentation |
|
|
34 | (2) |
|
2 Forthcoming Route to EU Unitary Patent Protection |
|
|
36 | (37) |
|
I Background to the Unitary Patent Package |
|
|
37 | (5) |
|
II The Unitary Patent Package |
|
|
42 | (3) |
|
III Concerns Related to the Unitary Patent Package |
|
|
45 | (24) |
|
|
45 | (4) |
|
B Territorial Fragmentation |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
i Ratification and Membership of the UPC A |
|
|
50 | (4) |
|
ii Participation in the Unitary Patent |
|
|
54 | (5) |
|
|
59 | (4) |
|
C Institutional Fragmentation |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
i Internal Structure of the UPC |
|
|
64 | (3) |
|
ii Jurisdiction and Competence of the UPC and the Transitional Period |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
|
69 | (4) |
|
PART II ALTERNATIVE PERCEPTIONS OF FRAGMENTATION |
|
|
|
3 Fragmentation in European Law-Making |
|
|
73 | (17) |
|
I Constructing Europe and the European Patent System |
|
|
74 | (8) |
|
A Council of Europe - Longchambon Proposal |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
B European Coal and Steel Community |
|
|
75 | (3) |
|
C Council of Europe - Strasbourg Patent Convention |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
D European Economic Community, the EPC and the CPC |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
E Shifting Perspectives and Objectives |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
II The Impact of Expansion |
|
|
82 | (6) |
|
A Impact on the Patent System |
|
|
85 | (3) |
|
III Fragmentation as a Means of Integration |
|
|
88 | (2) |
|
4 Fragmentation in the International Legal System |
|
|
90 | (19) |
|
I Fragmentation in the International Legal System |
|
|
91 | (11) |
|
A Analysis of Fragmentation |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
B Responses to Fragmentation |
|
|
95 | (4) |
|
C Judicial Dialogue and Cooperation |
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
D From Fear to Acceptance |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
II Application to the European Patent System |
|
|
102 | (3) |
|
III Fragmentation as an Inherent Aspect of a Legal System |
|
|
105 | (4) |
|
PART III FRAGMENTATION AND SUBSTANTIVE PATENT LAW |
|
|
|
5 Responding to Fragmentation as an Inherent Aspect of the European Patent System |
|
|
109 | (35) |
|
|
110 | (7) |
|
A Implementation of the EPC |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
B Approaches to Patentability |
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
ii Patentable Subject Matter |
|
|
114 | (3) |
|
II Towards Convergence - Judicial Dialogue and Cooperation |
|
|
117 | (9) |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
i National Courts Considering Board of Appeal Decisions |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
ii National Courts Considering Other National Court Decisions |
|
|
119 | (4) |
|
iii EPO Interpretation and Consideration of National Court Decisions |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
iv Boards of Appeal Considering CJEU Decisions and the CJEU Considering Board of Appeal Decisions |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
v Referrals by National Courts |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
B Case Study in Cooperation - Claim Construction |
|
|
126 | (16) |
|
|
126 | (2) |
|
|
128 | (4) |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
|
133 | (3) |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
vi Post-Act a vis v Eli Lilly |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
C Judicial Meetings and Appointments |
|
|
137 | (2) |
|
D Impact of the Unitary Patent Package |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
E Limitations of Judicial Dialogue and Cooperation |
|
|
140 | (2) |
|
III Fragmentation as an Inherent Aspect of the European Patent System |
|
|
142 | (2) |
|
6 Accepting Fragmentation as a Necessary Aspect of the European Patent System |
|
|
144 | (25) |
|
I The Impact of the Biotech Directive |
|
|
145 | (4) |
|
A Legislative Harmonisation |
|
|
146 | (2) |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
II Interpretations of the Exceptions to Patentability |
|
|
149 | (16) |
|
A Uses of Human Embryos for Industrial or Commercial Purposes |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
a Convergence Overextended |
|
|
153 | (3) |
|
b Generalist v Specialist Decision-making |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
c Institutional Interactions |
|
|
157 | (2) |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
B Essentially Biological Processes |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
i G2/13 and G2/12 (Broccoli II and Tomatoes II) |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
ii T1063/18 Extreme Dark Green, Blocky Peppers |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
iii G3/19 Pepper (follow-up to `Tomatoes II' and `Broccoli II') |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
a Institutional Interactions and Convergence Overreach |
|
|
162 | (2) |
|
b Specialist Institution Perspective |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
III Impact of the Unitary Patent Package |
|
|
165 | (3) |
|
IV Considering Diversity and Value Pluralism when Responding to Fragmentation |
|
|
168 | (1) |
Conclusion: Fragmentation and the European Patent System |
|
169 | (8) |
Bibliography |
|
177 | (12) |
Index |
|
189 | |