Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Fragmentation and the European Patent System [Hardback]

(Maynooth University, Ireland)
  • Formāts: Hardback, 240 pages, height x width: 234x156 mm
  • Izdošanas datums: 11-Aug-2022
  • Izdevniecība: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1509939318
  • ISBN-13: 9781509939312
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 101,78 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Standarta cena: 119,74 €
  • Ietaupiet 15%
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Hardback, 240 pages, height x width: 234x156 mm
  • Izdošanas datums: 11-Aug-2022
  • Izdevniecība: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1509939318
  • ISBN-13: 9781509939312
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
This book provides an in-depth study on current perceptions of, and responses to, fragmentation in the European patent system (EPS). For decades, attempts have been made to address this fragmentation by introducing a unitary patent system. The most recent attempt, the EU unitary patent system, will be the first of its kind. It is expected to significantly change the EPS. However, rather than reducing existing fragmentation, it will likely add to it.

Based on an analysis of the current and forthcoming system, the book argues that the inherent nature of fragmentation within the EPS needs to be recognised and suggests that a multifaceted approach is required to respond to it. Uniquely, it draws on work regarding fragmentation outside of the patent and intellectual property regimes, gaining insights from both European law-making and the international legal system.

These insights are used to investigate current responses to fragmentation in the EPS. Interpretations of substantive patent law are examined, including claim construction (Actavis v Eli Lily), exceptions to patentability related to uses of human embryos for industrial or commercial purposes (WARF, Brüstle, ISCC), and products resulting from essentially biological processes (Broccoli and Tomatoes II, G3/19). Attempts towards convergence in these areas have had mixed results and in some instances fragmentation may be necessary. However, similar techniques to those applied in the international legal system to respond to fragmentation are being used in the EPS, and, where this is seen, it has been to good effect. It is argued that these methods should be recognised, structured, and promoted to make our response to fragmentation more effective.

Fragmentation and the European Patent System will be of interest to academics, students and practitioners looking for a new perspective on the EPS.

Recenzijas

This courageous book takes us one step forward in this discussion, providing inspiration for policymakers, IP scholars, and the patent community in general, as to the importance of fostering diversity in the European patent system. * Common Market Law Review *

Papildus informācija

This book questions the general perspective that the fragmentation in the current European patent system is entirely negative, and proposes that instead it can be seen as inherent and as a positive feature of the system.
Acknowledgements vii
Abbreviations xiii
Table of Cases
xv
Table of Legislation
xxi
Introduction 1(18)
I Background
3(2)
II The European Patent System
5(2)
III Terminology
7(5)
IV Perspectives on Fragmentation
12(1)
V Outline
13(6)
PART I FRAGMENTATION AND THE EUROPEAN PATENT SYSTEM TODAY
1 Existing Routes to Patent Protection in Europe
19(17)
I National Patent Systems
19(8)
II The European (EPC) Patent System "
27(4)
III The International Patent Application
31(3)
IV Existing Fragmentation
34(2)
2 Forthcoming Route to EU Unitary Patent Protection
36(37)
I Background to the Unitary Patent Package
37(5)
II The Unitary Patent Package
42(3)
III Concerns Related to the Unitary Patent Package
45(24)
A Substantive Issues
45(4)
B Territorial Fragmentation
49(1)
i Ratification and Membership of the UPC A
50(4)
ii Participation in the Unitary Patent
54(5)
iii Users of the UPP
59(4)
C Institutional Fragmentation
63(1)
i Internal Structure of the UPC
64(3)
ii Jurisdiction and Competence of the UPC and the Transitional Period
67(1)
iii Bifurcation
68(1)
IV Further Fragmentation
69(4)
PART II ALTERNATIVE PERCEPTIONS OF FRAGMENTATION
3 Fragmentation in European Law-Making
73(17)
I Constructing Europe and the European Patent System
74(8)
A Council of Europe - Longchambon Proposal
74(1)
B European Coal and Steel Community
75(3)
C Council of Europe - Strasbourg Patent Convention
78(1)
D European Economic Community, the EPC and the CPC
79(2)
E Shifting Perspectives and Objectives
81(1)
II The Impact of Expansion
82(6)
A Impact on the Patent System
85(3)
III Fragmentation as a Means of Integration
88(2)
4 Fragmentation in the International Legal System
90(19)
I Fragmentation in the International Legal System
91(11)
A Analysis of Fragmentation
94(1)
B Responses to Fragmentation
95(4)
C Judicial Dialogue and Cooperation
99(2)
D From Fear to Acceptance
101(1)
II Application to the European Patent System
102(3)
III Fragmentation as an Inherent Aspect of a Legal System
105(4)
PART III FRAGMENTATION AND SUBSTANTIVE PATENT LAW
5 Responding to Fragmentation as an Inherent Aspect of the European Patent System
109(35)
I Areas of Divergence
110(7)
A Implementation of the EPC
111(1)
B Approaches to Patentability
111(2)
i Inventive Step
113(1)
ii Patentable Subject Matter
114(3)
II Towards Convergence - Judicial Dialogue and Cooperation
117(9)
A Decision-making
118(1)
i National Courts Considering Board of Appeal Decisions
118(1)
ii National Courts Considering Other National Court Decisions
119(4)
iii EPO Interpretation and Consideration of National Court Decisions
123(1)
iv Boards of Appeal Considering CJEU Decisions and the CJEU Considering Board of Appeal Decisions
124(1)
v Referrals by National Courts
125(1)
B Case Study in Cooperation - Claim Construction
126(16)
i Background
126(2)
ii Impact of the EPC
128(4)
iii Divergence
132(1)
iv Convergence
133(3)
v Impact
136(1)
vi Post-Act a vis v Eli Lilly
137(1)
C Judicial Meetings and Appointments
137(2)
D Impact of the Unitary Patent Package
139(1)
E Limitations of Judicial Dialogue and Cooperation
140(2)
III Fragmentation as an Inherent Aspect of the European Patent System
142(2)
6 Accepting Fragmentation as a Necessary Aspect of the European Patent System
144(25)
I The Impact of the Biotech Directive
145(4)
A Legislative Harmonisation
146(2)
B Institutional Addition
148(1)
II Interpretations of the Exceptions to Patentability
149(16)
A Uses of Human Embryos for Industrial or Commercial Purposes
149(1)
i WARF
150(1)
ii Brustle
151(1)
iii ISCC r
152(1)
iv Evaluation
152(1)
a Convergence Overextended
153(3)
b Generalist v Specialist Decision-making
156(1)
c Institutional Interactions
157(2)
d Conclusion
159(1)
B Essentially Biological Processes
160(1)
i G2/13 and G2/12 (Broccoli II and Tomatoes II)
160(1)
ii T1063/18 Extreme Dark Green, Blocky Peppers
161(1)
iii G3/19 Pepper (follow-up to `Tomatoes II' and `Broccoli II')
162(1)
iv Evaluation
162(1)
a Institutional Interactions and Convergence Overreach
162(2)
b Specialist Institution Perspective
164(1)
c Conclusion
164(1)
III Impact of the Unitary Patent Package
165(3)
IV Considering Diversity and Value Pluralism when Responding to Fragmentation
168(1)
Conclusion: Fragmentation and the European Patent System 169(8)
Bibliography 177(12)
Index 189
Karen Walsh is Assistant Professor in Law, Maynooth University, Ireland.