Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Google Rules: The History and Future of Copyright Under the Influence of Google [Hardback]

4.83/5 (11 ratings by Goodreads)
(Lecturer in the Creative Industries Faculty, The Queensland University of Technology)
  • Formāts: Hardback, 252 pages, height x width x depth: 155x272x23 mm, weight: 499 g
  • Izdošanas datums: 24-Mar-2020
  • Izdevniecība: Oxford University Press Inc
  • ISBN-10: 0190072075
  • ISBN-13: 9780190072070
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 136,00 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
Google Rules: The History and Future of Copyright Under the Influence of GooglePalielināt
  • Formāts: Hardback, 252 pages, height x width x depth: 155x272x23 mm, weight: 499 g
  • Izdošanas datums: 24-Mar-2020
  • Izdevniecība: Oxford University Press Inc
  • ISBN-10: 0190072075
  • ISBN-13: 9780190072070
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
Permanent link: https://www.kriso.lv/db/9780190072070.html
Keywords:
Blockbuster lawsuits, artificial intelligence, backroom deals, millions in lobbying dollars and grand Silicon Valley idealism - the story of Google and copyright law is action-packed.

By tracing Google's legal, commercial and political negotiations over copyright, Google Rules explains how Google became one of the most influential actors in the history of digital copyright. Today, Google reigns over a technological and economic order that features empowered private companies and rapidly changing technological conditions, and how to protect the public interest in this environment is one of the most pressing policy questions of our time. In Google Rules, Joanne E. Gray provides pragmatic strategies for taking up this challenge.

Google Rules is a book that will appeal to anyone interested in understanding Google's accumulation of power, the recent history of digital copyright, or the future of our digital lives under the influence of an extremely powerful and motivated technology company.
Preface xiii
Acknowledgments xvii
1 A Brief History of Digital Copyright and Google: Politics, Ideologies, and Agendas
1(18)
Copyrights Foundational Tension: In Service of Both Public and Private Interests
3(2)
Copyright's Foundational Objectives in the Digital Age
5(1)
Digital Copyright Politics: The Search for a New Model of Control
6(4)
An Ideological Setting: The Laissez-Faire Evolution of the Digital Environment
10(3)
The Advent of Google
13(6)
2 The Value and Function of Copyright: Why the Copyright Debate Matters to Us All
19(22)
The Conventional Wisdom of Copyright as a Private Property Right
20(1)
Politically Constructed Concepts of Authorship and Creativity
21(1)
Social, Cumulative, and Appropriated Creativity
22(3)
Authors' Rights: The Labor and Personality Theories of Copyright
25(4)
Labor Theory: The Liberating Nature of Private Property
26(2)
Personality Theory: Private Property for Self-Actualization
28(1)
An Economic Theory of Copyright: Private Property for Market Transactions
29(4)
The Economic Model---Copyright as an Economic Incentive
30(3)
A Cultural Theory of Copyright
33(7)
Human Flourishing, the Social Human, and a Cultural Democracy
34(3)
Cultural Theory, Creativity, and Copyright
37(1)
Why the Cultural Theory Approach to Understanding Copyright Is the Right Approach for the Digital Age
38(2)
Conclusion
40(1)
3 "Innovate First, Permission Later": Google's Copyright Policy Agenda
41(24)
Google's Innovation Idealism
42(3)
In a Digital Economy, Copyright Is Economic Policy
45(2)
Copyright and Creativity---Valuing Innovation over Tradition
47(2)
What, Then, Should Policymakers Do? "Balanced" Copyright for the Digital Age
49(1)
A Flexible Fair Use Exception---The Gold Standard for Balanced Copyright
50(4)
Safe Harbors for Online Intermediaries---The Second Pillar of Balanced Copyright
54(6)
Google's Plan for Addressing "Piracy"---Leave It to Innovation!
60(2)
Conclusion
62(3)
4 Google vs. The Copyright Tradition: Litigating "Innovate First, Permission Later"
65(32)
Copying the Entire Internet
66(1)
Testing the Legality of Automated Copying of Websites---Field v. Google
67(2)
A Second Test---Parker v. Google
69(1)
Copying Other Peoples Photos---Perfect 10 v. Google
70(4)
In-Line Linking---What Does It Mean to Serve Content over the Internet?
71(1)
But What About Those Thumbnail Copies?!
72(2)
A Public Interest Deal
74(1)
If We Can Copy Websites and Images, Then Why Not Books?
74(9)
Perhaps Making Full Copies of Books Is Pushing Things Too Far? A Proposed Settlement (2008)
76(1)
Google Books Is a Fair Use of Authors' Works---The District Court Decision (2013)
77(2)
Copying for a Searchable Database Is a Quintessentially Fair Use---The HathiTrust Decision (2014)
79(1)
Displaying Snippets Is Fair Too---The Second Circuit Decision (2015)
79(2)
The Significance of the Google Books Decision
81(2)
Google's Obligation to Monitor for Copyright Infringement---Viacom v. YouTube
83(5)
Was YouTube Entitled to Intermediary Safe Harbor?
83(1)
Viacom: YouTube Knew All About Its Users' Infringement!
84(1)
Google: YouTube Has No Obligation to Monitor for or Investigate Infringement!
85(1)
No Duty to Monitor---The District Court Decision (2010)
86(1)
But Did YouTube Have Actual Knowledge of Infringement? The Second Circuit Decision (2012)
87(1)
The Path to a Settlement
87(1)
Copying Oracle's API---Oracle v. Google
88(7)
The Java Platform and Google's Android
88(1)
So, What Exactly Did Google Copy?
89(1)
No Copyright Protection for the Java API---The District Court Decision (2012)
90(1)
Oracle's API Is Protected by Copyright---The Federal Circuit Decision (2014)
91(2)
Google's Copying Was a Fair Use---A Jury Decision (2016)
93(1)
The Jury Was Wrong---The Federal Circuit Decision (2018)
94(1)
Conclusion
95(2)
5 The Problems of Google News in Europe
97(20)
Aggregating News Articles
98(2)
The Problems of News Media in the Digital Age
100(2)
Agency France Presse---United States
102(1)
Copiepresse---Belgium
103(2)
Federazione Italiana Editori Giornali---Italy
105(1)
Leistungsschutzrecht fur Presseverleger---Germany
106(1)
Digital Publishing Innovation Fund---France
107(1)
Article 32 of the Ley de Propiedad Intelectual---Spain
108(1)
Digital News Initiative---European Union
109(1)
European Commission Copyright Directive---European Union
110(3)
Conclusion
113(4)
6 Google's Private Copyright Rule-Making and Algorithmic Enforcement
117(18)
Large-Scale Algorithmic Notice and Take-Down
118(1)
Beyond Notice and Take-Down: Sanitizing Search
119(2)
Further Beyond: Content ID on YouTube
121(6)
Governed by Google: Private Copyright Rule-Making, Algorithmic Enforcement, and the Public Interest
127(6)
Conclusion
133(2)
7 From Access to Monopoly: The Results and Complexities of Google's Copyright Logic
135(16)
Google's Access Paradox
135(5)
Economic Consequences of Google's Monopoly Power: The Capacity for Anticompetitive Practices
140(4)
The Cultural Consequences of Monopoly Power in an Information Market
144(1)
Political Consequences of Google's Monopoly Power---Private Regulatory Power
145(2)
Democracy and Concentrated Private Power in the Digital Environment
147(3)
Conclusion
150(1)
8 Conclusion: Achieving Public Interest Outcomes in a Digital Environment Dominated by Monopolistic Technology Firms
151(14)
Directly Addressing Google's Monopoly Power
152(4)
Imposing Public Interest Responsibilities upon Google
156(1)
Public Interest Copyright Law Reforms
157(2)
Self-Regulating in the Public Interest
159(5)
Conclusion
164(1)
Notes 165(52)
Index 217
Joanne E. Gray is a Lecturer in the Creative Industries Faculty and a member of the Digital Media Research Centre at the Queensland University of Technology. Her research focuses on issues impacting the governance of technology, innovation, culture and creativity in the digital environment. Dr Gray has also worked in the Australian music industry for over a decade. Since establishing her own company in 2010, she has been working as an artist manager, progressing the careers of Australian recording and performing artists in Australia and internationally. She holds a Ph.D., a Master of International Law and a Bachelor of Commerce with First Class Honours (Political Economy).