Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Governing Divided Societies: Habsburg Austrias Democratic Legacy and the Czechoslovak First Republic [Hardback]

(Adrian College), (University College London), (University in West Florida in Pensacola)
  • Formāts: Hardback, 440 pages, height x width: 229x152 mm, weight: 835 g, 2 Maps; 7 Figures; 14 Tables, black and white
  • Izdošanas datums: 15-Mar-2025
  • Izdevniecība: Central European University Press
  • ISBN-10: 9633865859
  • ISBN-13: 9789633865859
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 199,07 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Hardback, 440 pages, height x width: 229x152 mm, weight: 835 g, 2 Maps; 7 Figures; 14 Tables, black and white
  • Izdošanas datums: 15-Mar-2025
  • Izdevniecība: Central European University Press
  • ISBN-10: 9633865859
  • ISBN-13: 9789633865859
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
The authors of this volume challenge conventional notions about Habsburg and Czechoslovak politics, arguing that they were more democratic than they often appear. At combining political science and history, the authors guiding principle and means of analysis is the consociational model of democracy. This theory, linked best to Arend Lijphart, asserts that consociationalism guarantees minorities a say in government and helps preserve democracy in societies that experience deep ideological, cultural, or ethnic divisions. It enables the main segments to be isolated organizationally from each other, thus avoiding conflict, and affording the leaders to make compromises for the good of the whole.



Consociationalism has proven its worth as a model for describing contemporary democracies and diagnosing their ills. By exploring the institutions and practices of the Habsburg Monarchy before 1918 and the Czechoslovak First Republic, Howe, Lorman, and Miller prove the value of the consociational theory at analyzing the past. They hold that a multitude of parties, frequent cabinet changes, and reliance on circles of experts do not necessarily signal flawed democracies, when, in fact, they are features of consociationalism. This book is a call to specialists to view current politics not just in terms of majoritarian democracy but rather by the standard of the consociational democracies.

Tables

Illustrations

List of Abbreviations

Preface

Introduction

Chapter 1: Consociationalism and Consensus Democracy in Theory and Practice

Introduction

The Development of the Consociational Model

The Model

Nine Conditions Favorable to Consociationalism

Consociationalism and Its Critics

Majoritarian and Consensus Democracy

Conclusion

Chapter 2: The Development of Consociationalism in Imperial Austrian

Introduction

Historical Background and Terminology

Favorable and Unfavorable Conditions for Consociational Democracy in Imperial Austria

Imperial Austria as a Semi-Democratic, Proto-Consociational Political System

Regional Compromises as Semi-Democratic Consociationalism

Historians' Criticisms, National Flexibility and the Institutionalization of Ethnicity

Conclusion

Chapter 3: Czechoslovakia as a Consociational Democracy

Introduction

The Diplomatic Career of Lewis Einstein

The Favorable Conditions for Consociational Democracy in Czechoslovakia

The Components of Consociational Democracy in Czechoslovakia

Conclusion

Chapter 4: The Consociational Model and Interwar Slovakia

Introduction

The Favorable Conditions for Consociational Democracy in Slovakia

The Benefits of Participation

The Components of Consociational Democracy in Slovakia

Conclusion

Chapter 5: Conclusion

Evidence of Consociationalism in Central Europe

Contributions to Consociational Theory

Historical Approaches to Consociationalism

Biographies of the Authors

Index

Philip J. Howe is a professor of political science at Adrian College in Adrian, MI. Thomas A. Lorman is a teaching fellow in the School of Slavonic and East European Studies at the University College London. Daniel E. Miller is a professor of history at the University of West Florida in Pensacola.